This page holds a finished COMM-277N Week 5 self-concept write-up example: one role the writer occupies, argued from sentences they used themselves rather than from general self-description. Searches like "comm 277n week 5 assignment example", "comm277n week 5 sample" and "comm-277n week 5 example" land here.
What a finished COMM-277N Week 5 self-concept write-up looks like
A strong version reads as an argument about a person who happens to be the author. It opens on a claim narrow enough to be wrong: in this family the writer is the one who keeps things pleasant, and it costs them the first sentence of every disagreement. Evidence follows from talk, two or three utterances of the writer's own, quoted and placed, with the retreat visible inside them. Course vocabulary arrives next, self-concept and the looking-glass idea and face work among them, each explaining a specific retreat rather than sitting in a definition block. A closing section names what the writer would have to say differently for the claim to stop being true. Headings are optional here, and most finished versions run as continuous prose.
How a COMM-277N Week 5 example is structured
Claim, sources, evidence, concepts, consequence. The claim leads, and the four movements behind it are all ways of testing it. Sources come second, and sections differ most here: some want the people whose reactions built the self-image, some want a formal inventory completed and reported, some want both, and a sentence saying which applies keeps the document honest. Evidence is the writer's own speech, quoted, with enough of the other person's turn around it to show what it was answering. Concepts then do explanatory work one at a time, each carrying its citation. The last section gives the consequence for the relationship and, in many classrooms, a specific change of wording rather than a resolution. Sections differ on length here, so the claim and its evidence take the space and the definitions stay brief.
A claim you could lose
One sentence about the writer that evidence could contradict. Broad self-description passes every test and therefore earns nothing, which is the failure this week produces most often.
Who built the picture
The particular people whose reactions shaped the self-image, named by relationship. Vague reference to family and friends leaves the source row with nothing specific to credit.
Your own wording as evidence
Quoted sentences the writer said, not summaries of how they behave. A retreat visible in eleven words outperforms a paragraph describing a tendency to retreat.
Concepts doing work
Each term applied to one quoted moment with its citation attached. Self-concept, self-esteem and face work usually appear, and each has to explain something the quotation shows.
The sentence you would change
A closing commitment written as speech rather than as intention, placed at the exact moment it replaces. Vague resolutions to communicate better lose the final row.
Where marks go in COMM-277N Week 5
Graders take the most off for a claim nobody could argue with. I am a good listener who sometimes gets distracted survives no evidence and refuses none, and the whole write-up then rests on it. A second loss comes from evidence that is not speech: feelings recalled from memory, or an account of how the writer usually behaves, where this week wants sentences that were spoken. Sections asking for an inventory weight it, so a write-up arguing from recollection alone forfeits that row entire. Claims that drift cost as well, since a document opening on family role and ending on speaking anxiety has answered two assignments badly. A write-up quoting nobody but the writer also misses what the role was answering, because a role is held with somebody and not alone.
Get a COMM-277N Week 5 example written to your instructions
Send the instructions and rubric your classroom posted, plus a few lines about the relationship and anything you remember saying, and a write-up written to them returns inside 24-48h, the first one free. Your evidence comes from talk with somebody outside this course, so the example names them by relationship only and keeps their words to what bears on your claim.
COMM-277N Week 5 questions, answered
What if I cannot decide which role to write about?
Pick the relationship where your own talk surprises you, not the one you understand best. The role that produces usable evidence is usually the one where you sound different from your normal self, at work, with a parent, or with an old friend. A write-up covering three roles shallowly marks below one that takes a single relationship and stays with it for the whole document.
My section assigns a self-assessment instrument. Does it need citing?
Yes, and it needs reporting properly as well. Give the instrument by name with its source, say what your result was, and then treat the result as one piece of evidence rather than as a verdict on you. The marks sit in the comparison: where the instrument agrees with what your quoted talk shows, and where it does not, and what you make of the gap.
Can I write about a role at work?
Yes, and workplace roles often give the clearest evidence because the expectations attached to them are explicit. Keep the analysis on ordinary interaction between colleagues rather than on anything belonging to your employer or to people your employer serves. Change identifying details, describe positions rather than persons, and the write-up stays inside what the course is actually marking.