MPH 504 Week 7 Global Health Intervention Plan Example

Cultural Competency and Global Public Health Chamberlain University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Household contact screening and preventive treatment for tuberculosis in a Philippine city, led by its own city health office, is the subject of this MPH 504 Week 7 sample paper. Chamberlain MPH 504 (MPH-504), Cultural Competency and Global Public Health in the Master of Public Health (MPH) program, asks students to plan an intervention for a population outside their own country. The sample sets an eighteen-month objective agreed with the city, judges whether trial evidence from Vietnam transfers, lists four activities, gives decisions and authorship to local partners, builds a budget around travel allowances for families, chooses five quarterly indicators and plans for the outside partner's exit.

CourseMPH 504 Cultural Competency and Global Public Health
Week7
Paper typeGlobal health intervention plan
LengthAbout 1,140 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolChamberlain University
ProgramMaster of Public Health (MPH)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MPH 504 Week 7

1

Global Health Intervention Plan: Household Contact Screening and Preventive Treatment for Tuberculosis in a Philippine City, Led by Its City Health Office

Student Name

Chamberlain University

MPH 504: Cultural Competency and Global Public Health

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names who leads the plan, which sets out the partnership before any activity is described.
2

Global Health Intervention Plan: Household Contact Screening and Preventive Treatment for Tuberculosis in a Philippine City, Led by Its City Health Office

The Problem and the Setting

The Philippines had an estimated TB incidence of 625 per 100,000 in 2024, and a national survey found that most people with confirmed TB did not report the symptoms that would lead to testing, while fewer than one in five people with symptoms had seen a health worker (Lansang et al., 2021). This plan concerns a composite city of about 350,000 people in the Visayas, referred to here as the partner city. At the national notification rate of about 470 per 100,000, the city would register roughly 1,650 TB cases a year. Its city health office runs TB services through health centers and relies on barangay health workers, community volunteers in each neighborhood, for home visits. Household members of people with TB are screened only if they come to a health center with symptoms.

Objective

Over 18 months, the plan aims to reach at least 80% of the household contacts of people with bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary TB using symptom questions and chest radiography, to detect TB disease earlier among them and to start TB preventive treatment in at least 70% of eligible contacts who do not have disease. The objective was agreed with the city health office, which identified household contacts as the group it most wanted to reach.

What this page is doingRecording that the objective came from the city health office shows partnership in the plan's substance, not only in its wording.
3

The Evidence and Whether It Transfers

The strongest evidence comes from Vietnam. In a cluster-randomized trial in 70 districts, household-contact investigation with clinical review and chest radiography at baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 months found 2.5 times as many TB cases among contacts as passive case finding alone, and 6.4 times as many smear-positive cases (Fox et al., 2018). A second trial in Ca Mau Province found that three annual rounds of community-wide screening with a molecular sputum test lowered TB prevalence in the fourth year by 44% (Marks et al., 2019).

Whether these results apply to the partner city depends on both applicability, whether the intervention can be delivered there, and transferability, whether its effect is likely to be similar (Wang et al., 2006).

Table 1

Transferability of the Vietnam Evidence to the Partner City

FactorVietnam trial settingsPartner cityJudgment
TB burdenHigh, about 180 to 200 per 100,000Higher, about 625 per 100,000Yield likely as high or higher
Organization of TB servicesCentralized district TB unitsDevolved to city health officeNeeds city leadership and budget
Community workersCommune health workersBarangay health workersSimilar role, available
Chest radiography accessDistrict hospitalsOne city hospital and a mobile unitNeeds scheduling and transport
Cost to familiesNot the focus of the trial42% of TB households face catastrophic costsAllowances needed

Note. Note. Vietnam burden from World Health Organization estimates; costs from Florentino et al. (2022).

The judgment is that the intervention is likely to work as well or better, given higher burden, but only if the plan addresses two differences: devolved governance, which means the city must own and fund the program, and the high costs families face, which would otherwise keep contacts from attending radiography appointments (Florentino et al., 2022).

What this page is doingThe table separates factors that support transfer from those that require adaptation, which is how a judgment of transferability should be reached.
4

Activities

The plan has four activities. First, within two weeks of each new confirmed case, a barangay health worker visits the household, lists contacts and asks the screening questions. Second, all contacts aged 5 and over receive a chest radiograph at the city hospital or the mobile unit, with sputum tests for anyone with symptoms or an abnormal film; younger children are assessed by a physician. Third, contacts without TB disease are offered preventive treatment through the national program, with a short regimen where available. Fourth, contacts are re-screened at 12 months.

Partnership and Roles

The city health officer leads the program and decides on its scope and budget; the national TB program provides drugs, test cartridges and reporting forms. Barangay health workers carry out visits and are paid an honorarium for each household screened. My role, as a public health nurse from the United States working with the city health office through a partnership between our county and the city's medical school, is limited to helping design the data system and analyze results with the city's TB coordinator, who will be first author on any report. Abimbola and Pai (2020) argue that global health partnerships too often keep decisions and credit with partners from wealthy countries; this plan puts both with the city.

Budget

The plan uses the national program's drugs and test supplies. The additional cost falls in three lines, estimated with the city health office and to be confirmed in its budget: barangay health worker honoraria for about 900 household visits a year; transport and meal allowances of PHP 500 per contact for each radiography visit, so that families do not bear travel costs; and mobile radiography sessions twice a month in the two districts farthest from the hospital. The city has asked that the allowances be funded from its own health budget, so that the program continues after the partnership ends.

Indicators

Five indicators will be reported every quarter to the city health board: the share of index cases whose households were visited within two weeks; the share of listed contacts screened with radiography; the number of TB cases found among contacts; the share of eligible contacts starting and completing preventive treatment; and, through a short survey, the share of households reporting costs above 20% of monthly income during screening.

Risks and How the Plan Responds

Three risks could undo the plan. The first is stigma at the household visit: a barangay health worker arriving at a home is visible to neighbors, and families may decline to list all contacts. The plan responds by scheduling visits at times the family chooses, by having the worker introduce the visit as a family health check, and by counting refusals so the city can see where the approach is not working. The second is a shortage of preventive treatment drugs, which has interrupted national supply in past years; the city health office will hold a three-month buffer and report stock levels with each quarterly indicator. The third is the end of the partnership itself. Programs that depend on an outside partner for analysis often stall when the partner leaves, so the data system will be built in the spreadsheet software the city already uses, and the city's TB coordinator will run every quarterly analysis from the second quarter onward, with my role shrinking to review on request.

What this page is doingNaming the partnership's own exit as a risk shows the plan was designed to last without the outside partner, which is the test of a sustainable intervention.
5

References

Abimbola, S., & Pai, M. (2020). Will global health survive its decolonisation? The Lancet, 396(10263), 1627-1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32417-X

Florentino, J. L., Arao, R. M. L., Garfin, A. M. C., Gaviola, D. M. G., Tan, C. R., Yadav, R. P., Hiatt, T., Morishita, F., Siroka, A., Yamanaka, T., & Nishikiori, N. (2022). Expansion of social protection is necessary towards zero catastrophic costs due to TB: The first national TB patient cost survey in the Philippines. PLOS ONE, 17(2), e0264689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264689

Fox, G. J., Nhung, N. V., Sy, D. N., Hoa, N. L. P., Anh, L. T. N., Anh, N. T., Hoa, N. B., Dung, N. H., Buu, T. N., Loi, N. T., Nhung, L. T., Hung, N. V., Lieu, P. T., Cuong, N. K., Cuong, P. D., Bestrashniy, J., Britton, W. J., & Marks, G. B. (2018). Household-contact investigation for detection of tuberculosis in Vietnam. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(3), 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1700209

Lansang, M. A. D., Alejandria, M. M., Law, I., Juban, N. R., Amarillo, M. L. E., Sison, O. T., Cruz, J. R. B., Ang, C. F., Buensalido, J. A. L., CaƱal, J. P. A., Castillo-Carandang, N. T., Cordero, C. P., Gaviola, D. M. G., Ladia, M. A. J., Mantaring, J. B. V., Mendoza, M. T., Salamat, M. S. S., Lam, H. Y., Tadolini, M., . . . Philippine NTPS 2016 Group. (2021). High TB burden and low notification rates in the Philippines: The 2016 national TB prevalence survey. PLOS ONE, 16(6), e0252240. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252240

Marks, G. B., Nguyen, N. V., Nguyen, P. T. B., Nguyen, T.-A., Nguyen, H. B., Tran, K. H., Nguyen, S. V., Luu, K. B., Tran, D. T. T., Vo, Q. T. N., Le, O. T. T., Nguyen, Y. H., Do, V. Q., Mason, P. H., Nguyen, V.-A. T., Ho, J., Sintchenko, V., Nguyen, L. N., Britton, W. J., & Fox, G. J. (2019). Community-wide screening for tuberculosis in a high-prevalence setting. New England Journal of Medicine, 381(14), 1347-1357. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1902129

Wang, S., Moss, J. R., & Hiller, J. E. (2006). Applicability and transferability of interventions in evidence-based public health. Health Promotion International, 21(1), 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dai025

The Chamberlain MPH 504 Week 7 instructions

The seventh week asks you to plan a public health intervention for a specific global setting. Describe the problem and the setting with data. State a measurable objective and the time frame. Choose an evidence-based intervention and explain whether the evidence applies to your setting, since a result from one country may not hold in another. Describe the activities, who will carry them out and how local partners share decisions. Include a budget outline and indicators for monitoring and evaluation. Address risks and sustainability, especially what happens when outside support ends. The plan should show cultural competence in its design, through partnership, local leadership and attention to the costs and conditions people face, not through a section added at the end.

How this MPH 504 Week 7 example is built

The plan sits in a composite Visayas city of about 350,000, where household members of TB patients are screened only if they come to a health center with symptoms. Its objective, agreed with the city health office, is to reach at least 80% of household contacts within eighteen months. Two Vietnam trials supply the evidence, and a transferability table compares burden, governance, community workers, radiography access and family costs. Activities run from a home visit within two weeks to re-screening at twelve months. The city health officer leads, the TB coordinator is first author and the budget funds honoraria, travel allowances and mobile radiography. A risk section covers stigma, drug supply and the partner's departure.

MPH 504 Week 7 rubric: what full points look like

Points in this plan are lost most often on transferability: a proven intervention is chosen and simply assumed to work in the new setting. A second weak spot is partnership described in words while every decision stays with the outside partner. Plans that list activities with no objective, budget or indicators also lose credit, as do plans that ignore what participation costs families. The rubric rewards a specific setting with data, a measurable dated objective, evidence judged for applicability and transferability, clear activities, real local leadership, a budget, indicators reported on a schedule and a response to risks including sustainability. Cultural competence is assessed through these design choices rather than through a separate paragraph about respect.

MPH 504 Week 7 help from the desk

Global plans can drift into either a grant proposal or a list of good intentions. If you tell us the setting and problem you are working on, we can help you find evidence that fits, judge whether it transfers using a recognized framework, and set out partnership roles, a budget and indicators that hang together. We can also help you write a risk section that takes sustainability seriously. Your choice of setting, intervention and partners stays yours. If your instructor uses a particular planning template or logic model, share it and a custom sample will follow its sections in order, with your setting's data in place of ours.

Get a MPH-504 Week 7 example written to your instructions

Send the Week 7 instructions with the element list and the setting your section assigned, and a custom example is written to those requirements and returned inside 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free. Which intervention to argue for remains your judgment to make.

More MPH 504 papers and MPH samples

MPH 504 Week 7 questions, answered

How do I judge whether evidence transfers?

Ask what the intervention depends on and whether the new setting has it. A program resting on a cadre of trained nurses, reliable cold chain or regular follow-up visits transfers only where those exist. Saying explicitly which dependencies are met and which are not is the analytical core of this assignment and the part most plans skip.

What does real partnership look like in a plan?

Named types of organization, stated decision rights and something the partner controls rather than advises on. Who sets priorities, who holds the budget, who can stop the project. Plans that promise engagement without answering those questions are describing consultation, which is a different and weaker thing that faculty in this field recognize instantly.

Do I need a real budget?

Indicative rather than costed, in most sections. Naming the major cost categories and a rough order of magnitude shows the plan has been tested against reality. Plans with no figures anywhere read as untested, and sustainability sections that follow them are usually unconvincing because nothing has established what would need to be sustained.

Where can I find a free MPH 504 Week 7 sample paper?

You can read a complete MPH 504 Week 7 plan for household contact screening for TB in a Philippine city on this page.

How does the MPH 504 Week 7 sample show partnership?

The objective came from the city health office, the city health officer leads, and the city's TB coordinator decides on analysis and is first author.