| Course | MPH 508 Leadership and Administration in Public Health Systems |
|---|---|
| Week | 5 |
| Paper type | Budget justification |
| Length | About 1,120 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | Master of Public Health (MPH) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MPH 508 Week 5
Budget Justification: A One-Year, $166,727 Request to Rebuild the Merritt County Closed Dispensing Network From 9 Sites to 30, Line by Line
Student Name
Chamberlain University
MPH 508: Leadership and Administration in Public Health Systems
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Budget Justification: A One-Year, $166,727 Request to Rebuild the Merritt County Closed Dispensing Network From 9 Sites to 30, Line by Line
Purpose and Period
This justification supports a request to the state's preparedness program for a one-year subaward, July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2027, to rebuild the closed point of dispensing network of Merritt County's health department, which serves about 214,000 people. The goal is to raise the number of closed sites from 9, covering about 11,000 people, to 30, covering at least 45,000, and to have every site complete training and one exercise within the year. Each line below is tied to one of three activities: recruiting and re-engaging sites, training and exercising them, and supplying them. The total request is $166,727, of which $144,980 is direct cost and $21,747 is indirect cost.
Personnel
Personnel is the largest cost, because recruiting and keeping closed sites is relationship work done in person. Disaster planners interviewed about closed dispensing networks reported that recruitment required repeated contact and that sites drifted away without frequent communication and visits (Rebmann et al., 2021; Rebmann et al., 2022). Salaries are from the county's 2026 pay plan for each position's grade and step.
Preparedness coordinator, 0.40 full-time equivalent, $28,600. The coordinator's annual salary is $71,500. Forty percent of effort is charged because the coordinator will lead recruitment meetings with executives and boards, approve each site's plan and direct the year-end exercise. The remaining 60% stays on the existing cooperative agreement and is not charged here.
Closed dispensing planner, 1.00 full-time equivalent, $54,080. This is a new, one-year position at $26.00 an hour for 2,080 hours. The planner will carry out site visits, help each site write its plan, maintain the partner database and schedule training. Full effort is charged because the position exists only for this project.
Community health nurse, 0.10 full-time equivalent, $7,800. The nurse's annual salary is $78,000. Ten percent of effort covers delivering the two-hour dispensing and screening training to site staff at 30 sites, with preparation and follow-up.
Fringe benefits, $34,382. The county's fringe rate for full-time staff is 38% of salary, covering retirement, health insurance, Social Security and workers' compensation, applied to total salaries of $90,480.
Travel
Travel, $3,568, is built from trips rather than estimated. Local site visits: 30 sites, four visits each over the year (recruitment or re-engagement, plan review, training and exercise), at an average round trip of 32 miles, gives 3,840 miles at the county's 2026 reimbursement rate of $0.70 a mile, for $2,688. State training: two trips for the planner to the state's required preparedness trainings, each with 360 miles of travel at $0.70 a mile, one night of lodging at $120 and meals at $68, for $880.
Supplies
Supplies total $6,450. Closed site kits, $2,850: 30 kits at $95 each, containing a rolling tote, site signage, identification vests, clipboards and a printed job aid set, priced from the county's 2026 purchasing contract. Screening and dispensing forms, $3,000: 50,000 forms at $0.06 each from the county print shop, enough for one form for each person the network is meant to cover plus a reserve. Training materials, $600: printed participant guides for about 150 site staff at the county print shop's rate.
Contractual
Contractual costs total $8,900. Translation, $2,400: translation of the screening form, the medication information sheet and the site job aids into Spanish and Vietnamese, the two most common languages other than English among county residents with limited English, at a quoted rate from the county's language services vendor. Exercise evaluator, $6,500: an independent evaluator to design, observe and write the after-action report for a multi-site closed dispensing exercise in May 2027, at a fixed price from a quote obtained in March 2026. An outside evaluator is requested because past after-action reports written by the department repeated the same findings for three years without corrective action.
Other
Partner database subscription, $1,200: one year of a contact management service for tracking site contacts, agreement dates, training and exercise status, at the vendor's listed government price. The database addresses the main reason sites lapsed in 2024 and 2025: when a partner's contact left, no record showed who else at the site knew the agreement.
Indirect Costs
Indirect costs are $21,747, calculated at 15% of modified total direct costs of $144,980. The county does not have a negotiated indirect cost rate, so it elects the de minimis rate, which federal guidance raised to 15% for awards made on or after October 1, 2024 (Office of Management and Budget, 2024). No equipment, rent or participant support is included in the base.
Table 1
Budget Summary by Category
| Category | Amount | Activity served |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel salaries | $90,480 | Recruitment, plans, training |
| Fringe benefits (38%) | $34,382 | Same as salaries |
| Travel | $3,568 | Site visits; state training |
| Supplies | $6,450 | Site kits; forms; training materials |
| Contractual | $8,900 | Translation; exercise evaluation |
| Other | $1,200 | Partner database |
| Total direct | $144,980 | |
| Indirect (15% of direct) | $21,747 | |
| Total request | $166,727 |
Note. Note. All figures are composite values for this course; salaries from the county's 2026 pay plan.
What the Budget Will Not Cover
The budget does not include the medication itself, which would come from federal and state stockpiles in an event. It does not pay partner organizations for their staff time, which they contribute voluntarily under their agreements. It does not cover staffing for the county's public dispensing sites, which remains on the existing cooperative agreement. And it does not include equipment such as computers, since the planner will use an existing county laptop. These exclusions are stated so that reviewers can see the request covers only the network's rebuilding, and so that the department does not promise partners support it cannot fund.
Sustainability
After the year, the coordinator will absorb maintenance of the 30 sites within existing cooperative agreement effort, with the partner database and annual visits as the main tools. The planner position is not expected to continue. The national capability standard treats the closed network as part of routine dispensing readiness (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018), so the department will request maintenance costs in future cooperative agreement budgets rather than further one-time funds.
Cost per Person Covered
If the network reaches 30 sites covering 45,000 people, the request adds about 34,000 people to closed dispensing at a one-year cost of about $4.90 for each person added. Each of those people would otherwise need a place in a public dispensing line in the first 48 hours.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Public health emergency preparedness and response capabilities: National standards for state, local, tribal, and territorial public health. https://www.cdc.gov/readiness/media/pdfs/CDC_PreparednesResponseCapabilities_October2018_Final_508.pdf
Office of Management and Budget. (2024). Guidance for federal financial assistance (Final rule, 89 FR 30046). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-2/subtitle-A/chapter-II/part-200
Rebmann, T., Foerst, K., Charney, R. L., Mazzara, R. L., & Sandcork, J. (2022). Challenges in managing, sustaining, and assessing closed point of dispensing sites: Findings from a qualitative study. PLOS ONE, 17(7), e0271037. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271037
Rebmann, T., Foerst, K., Charney, R. L., Sandcork, J., & Mazzara, R. L. (2021). Approaches, successes, and challenges in recruiting closed points of dispensing sites: A qualitative study. Health Security, 19(3), 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2020.0219
What the MPH 508 Week 5 assignment asks for
Week five asks you to justify a program budget so a reviewer could trace every figure. For personnel, give each position's role, the share of effort charged and the basis for the salary. For travel, build the figure from trips, distances and rates. For supplies and contracts, cite where prices came from, such as quotes, contracts or published rates. Tie every line to a program activity. Apply indirect costs at a rate the organization is permitted to use, and say which base it is applied to. State what the budget does not cover. Keep arithmetic consistent across the narrative and the summary table, since reviewers check totals before reading anything else.
How the MPH 508 Week 5 example is put together
The request runs July 2026 to June 2027 and ties every line to recruiting sites, training and exercising them, or supplying them. Personnel covers 40% of a coordinator, a new full-time planner and 10% of a nurse, with salaries from the county pay plan and fringe at 38%. Travel is built from 30 sites, four visits each and 32 miles a trip, plus two state trainings. Supplies are priced per kit and per form. Contracts cover translation into two languages and an outside exercise evaluator, justified by three years of repeated findings. Indirect costs use the 15% de minimis rate. Exclusions, sustainability and a cost of about $4.90 per person added close the paper.
Reading the MPH 508 Week 5 grading rubric
The heaviest loss on a budget justification is the untraceable figure: a round number for travel or equipment with nothing showing how it was reached. Reviewers test exactly those lines, and a few of them undermine the whole budget. Personnel given as a total, with no effort fractions or salary basis, is the second common weakness. Lines that serve no stated activity, indirect costs at a rate the organization cannot claim and arithmetic that does not match between narrative and table also cost points. Strong justifications trace every figure, show effort and salary basis, build travel from trips, tie each line to an activity, apply a permitted indirect rate and state what is excluded.
Common MPH 508 Week 5 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Budget justifications are mostly arithmetic and sourcing, but small inconsistencies cost credibility quickly. If you share your program and draft budget, we can help you set effort fractions, find salary and price sources you can cite, build travel from trips and check that every line ties to an activity. We can also check your totals between the narrative and the table. Your program, figures and choices remain yours. If your organization has a negotiated indirect rate, give us the rate and its base, and the custom sample will apply it in place of the de minimis rate. If a funder sets its own budget categories, we can map your lines onto them.
Get a MPH-508 Week 5 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 5 instructions with the template and any rates your section supplies, and a custom example is built into that format with its narrative and returned inside 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free. The program you are costing stays yours to design.
More MPH 508 papers and MPH samples
- MPH 508 Week 1: Leadership Self-Assessment
- MPH 508 Week 2: Leading Without Authority Post
- MPH 508 Week 3: Leadership Theory Analysis
- MPH 508 Week 4: Organizational Assessment
- MPH 508 Week 6: Workforce Development Plan
- MPH 508 Week 7: Strategic Plan
- MPH 508 Week 8: Leadership Reflection
- MPH 507 Week 5: Intervention Plan
- MPH 506 Week 5: Case Study Analysis
- MPH 505 Week 5: Theory Application Paper
- MPH 500 Week 5: Policy Brief Memo
MPH 508 Week 5 questions, answered
How precise do the figures need to be?
Traceable rather than exact. A salary basis from a published range, equipment from a supplier listing and travel from a mileage rate are all defensible even if the final cost differs. What fails review is the number nobody can reconstruct, since a reviewer who cannot check one line begins to doubt the others.
What is effort and why does it matter?
The fraction of a person's time charged to this program, usually as a percentage or as months. It matters because it is how reviewers judge whether the work is staffed. A budget listing three roles with no effort could be describing three full-time posts or three people giving an afternoon a week, and those are entirely different programs.
Should the justification mention what is not funded?
Yes, and it usually strengthens the request. Naming what the budget cannot cover shows the program has been thought through to its edges and pre-empts the question a reviewer would otherwise ask. Budgets presented as covering everything invite scrutiny about what was left out silently.
Where can I find a free MPH 508 Week 5 sample paper?
This page holds the full MPH 508 Week 5 budget justification for rebuilding a county's closed dispensing network, with a summary table.
What indirect rate does the MPH 508 Week 5 sample use?
The 15% de minimis rate on modified total direct costs, because the county has no negotiated rate and federal guidance raised the rate to 15% in 2024.