MSW 528 Week 3 Stroke Unit Rounds Write-Up Example

Medical Social Work I Chamberlain University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This MSW 528 Week 3 sample paper records a social work intern's contribution to stroke unit rounds, mostly in quotation marks. Chamberlain MSW 528 (MSW-528), Medical Social Work I, has Master of Social Work (MSW) students reproduce their own words rather than describe them. The write-up fixes the setting and the four minutes the patient's turn took, quotes the resident's plan for home on Friday, quotes the intern's sentence about fourteen steps, a weak-side rail and an unreported fall, explains what only social work knew, notes when it was said, quotes the attending's answer and reports the stairs test that turned the plan toward rehabilitation.

CourseMSW 528 Medical Social Work I
Week3
Paper typeRounds participation write-up
LengthAbout 520 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolChamberlain University
ProgramMaster of Social Work (MSW)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MSW 528 Week 3

1

Rounds Participation Write-Up From the Stroke Unit on October 5: The Plan as Stated, My Sentence in Quotation Marks, What I Knew That No One Else at the Table Did, the Answer and What Happened Next

Student Name

Chamberlain University

MSW 528: Medical Social Work I

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title promises the writer's own words in quotation marks, which is what separates a contribution from an account of a meeting.
2

Rounds Participation Write-Up From the Stroke Unit on October 5: The Plan as Stated, My Sentence in Quotation Marks, What I Knew That No One Else at the Table Did, the Answer and What Happened Next

The Setting

Interdisciplinary rounds on the stroke unit, October 5, 9:05 to 9:35 a.m., at the nurses' station. Present: attending neurologist, resident, charge nurse, physical therapist, occupational therapist, pharmacist and me. Eleven patients were discussed; H. was eighth and took about four minutes, a typical share for a patient without a medical complication.

What this page is doingFixing the setting and how long the patient's turn took shows how little time the contribution had.
3

The Plan as Stated

Resident: "Seventy-two, right MCA stroke, day three. Neuro stable. PT has the patient standing with a quad cane and min assist. Plan is home with home health PT and OT, probably Friday."

My Contribution

"Before we settle on home, H. lives up fourteen outside steps, and the only rail is on the right going up, which is the left side coming down, the weak side. H.'s daughter told me last night H. fell on those steps last winter and didn't mention it. Nobody's home on weekday mornings. Could PT try stairs with a rail on the left before we decide?"

What I Knew That Nobody Else Did

The physical therapist knew H. could stand but had not tried stairs. The physician knew the stroke. I knew the number of steps, the side of the rail, the unreported fall and the hours when no one would be home. That information came from the bedside interview and the call with H.'s daughter. Health care social work standards describe contributing psychosocial and environmental information to the team's plan (National Association of Social Workers, 2016); this was that information, stated as facts the team could use.

What this page is doingNaming exactly what the social worker knew that no one else did explains why the sentence changed the plan.
4

When It Was Said

After the resident's summary and before the attending responded, which was the only point when the plan was still open. Waiting until the end of the patient's turn would have meant asking the team to reverse a decision.

The Answer

Attending: "Good point. PT, can you do stairs with H. tomorrow, rail on the left? And let's hold off on Friday until we see." The physical therapist agreed. The resident changed the plan in the chart to "pending stairs assessment" before rounds moved on.

What this page is doingQuoting the attending's answer exactly shows how the contribution changed the plan in the room.
5

What Happened Afterward

On October 6, H. managed four steps with the rail on the left and one person's help before tiring and needing to sit. The therapist recommended inpatient rehabilitation. The plan changed to an inpatient rehabilitation referral that afternoon, which led to the authorization request covered in the next weeks.

The stairs test also changed how the team used social work on this patient: the next morning, the physical therapist asked me for the step count on two other patients' homes before planning their sessions.

References

National Association of Social Workers. (2016). NASW standards for social work practice in health care settings. National Association of Social Workers.

Reading the MSW 528 Week 3 instructions

The rounds write-up should sit mostly inside quotation marks. Fix the setting in a few lines: which team, how many people, where and for how long. Give the plan as it was stated, not as you understood it. Then reproduce your contribution word for word, because a sentence on the page can be judged and a description of advocacy cannot. Explain what you knew that nobody else at the table did. Say when in the discussion you spoke and why that moment. Report the answer, including a no if that is what you got. Close with what happened afterward. Name other team members by role rather than by name.

How this MSW 528 Week 3 example is built

The setting section gives the stroke unit, seven disciplines at the nurses' station and four of thirty minutes on H. The plan section quotes the resident: home with home health on Friday. The contribution section quotes the intern asking about fourteen steps, the rail on the weak side coming down, an unreported fall and empty weekday mornings, and requesting a stairs trial. A section explains that only social work held the step count, the rail side, the fall and the hours, citing the NASW health care standards from National Association of Social Workers (2016). The timing section explains speaking before the attending replied. The answer is quoted, and the outcome reports four steps on October 6 and a referral to inpatient rehabilitation.

Where the points sit in the MSW 528 Week 3 rubric

Marks disappear fastest into a write-up that reports the medical discussion in detail and never quotes its own author. Almost as expensive is a contribution described rather than reproduced, so the page says the writer advocated and no reader can judge how. Credit goes to the plan as stated, the writer's sentence verbatim, a clear account of the information only social work held, the timing and the answer. What happened afterward closes the loop. Team members should be named by role. Faculty also check that the contribution was short enough to fit the time available. A source on interdisciplinary practice, in APA form, can frame the account. Brevity in the quoted sentence itself is part of what is judged.

Common MSW 528 Week 3 mistakes, and how to avoid them

The write-up most often fails by recording the meeting rather than the contribution, a page of medical detail with no quoted sentence from the writer. Another common problem is paraphrase, I raised concerns about safety, which hides whether the point was clear. Some write-ups skip the answer, especially when it was no. Others never say what happened next. If you were told to observe without speaking, quote the sentence you would have said and when, and explain why. A write-up that works for your rounds will let a reader hear exactly what you said and decide whether it was useful.

Get a MSW-528 Week 3 example written to your instructions

Send the Week 3 instructions with any observation form or reflection questions your section attached, and a custom write-up built to them comes back inside 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. Tell us whether the assignment wants a real observation or a supplied scenario, because the two produce quite differently shaped documents.

More MSW 528 papers and MSW samples

MSW 528 Week 3 questions, answered

What if my section has us observe without speaking?

Then the write-up records the moment you would have spoken and the sentence you would have used, which most graders accept and several ask for outright. Fix the point in the discussion where the opening existed, write the sentence out in full, and say what you expected it to change. What does not work is a general observation about teamwork with no moment attached to it.

Do the other people get named?

No. Roles carry everything the document needs, so a resident, a bedside nurse and a therapist do the job that names would do and nothing identifying goes onto the page. That applies to the patient as well: an age, a reason for admission and a living situation are enough for the reader to follow why the contribution mattered at all.

What if the team ignored what I said?

That is often the better paper, and sections mark it that way when the analysis is honest. An unsuccessful contribution gives you something to examine: whether the fact was one the group could act on, whether the moment had passed, whether it was addressed to anybody in particular. Write what happened, then the revised sentence, and resist the urge to end on the team being at fault.

Where can I find a free MSW 528 Week 3 sample paper?

A full MSW 528 Week 3 rounds participation write-up from a stroke unit sits below, with the intern's sentence quoted and margin notes on timing.

What did the intern know that nobody else did in the MSW 528 Week 3 sample?

The number of steps, the side of the only rail, the daughter's report of an unreported fall and the hours when no one would be home.