This page holds a finished MSW-532 Week 4 surrogate decision-maker memo, listing the pending decisions one at a time with the person authorized for each and the paper that authorized them. Searches like "msw 532 week 4 assignment example", "msw532 week 4 sample" and "msw-532 week 4 example" land here.
What a finished MSW-532 Week 4 surrogate decision-maker memo looks like
The memo is short and built around a list of decisions rather than a list of relatives. Selling the house, choosing where he lives, consenting to a procedure, ending the rental on a storage unit, telling the brother anything at all: each sits on its own line. Beside it goes the person who may make it and the instrument saying so, with health care and money kept apart, since one grant of authority is silent about the other. Two further columns do the work separating a passing memo from a good one: what condition the authority depends on, and whether that condition has been met. A short block names the alternate. A closing note records who is deciding today with none of this behind them.
How a MSW-532 Week 4 example is structured
Formats vary between sections, and a table with a covering paragraph is the usual shape. The covering paragraph states which decisions are live, because a memo surveying every power a family might one day need is answering nothing in particular. Documents in hand are inventoried next, each with its date, its type, and whether anybody has read past its first page. The rows follow, ordered by which decision arrives soonest rather than by which is easiest to settle. Conditions attached to a grant sit inside the row they belong to, since a power beginning only on a written finding is not a power anybody holds this afternoon. Alternates come after that, with whether they have been told. The memo closes on the uncovered rows and on the lightest route to covering them.
Decisions, not relatives
The list runs down the things that have to be settled this month and attaches a person to each, which is the inversion the whole assignment is built on.
Health and money are separate grants
One document naming a daughter for medical decisions says nothing about the house, and a memo treating a single appointment as general authority has misread its own evidence.
What the authority waits on
Some of it is live at signature and some begins only on a written finding, so every row records the condition and whether anybody has satisfied it yet.
The alternate nobody called
Most instruments name a second person, most families have not spoken to that person in years, and the memo says who they are and whether they know.
The lightest route that works
Where nothing covers a decision, the memo sets out the least restrictive way to cover it before reaching for a court, with the delay each route costs.
Who is acting right now
A closing note on the son already writing checks from a joint account, recorded as a fact about the situation rather than argued into a conclusion.
Where marks go in MSW-532 Week 4
A memo answering the whole list with one name sits at the top of the deductions here, because a daughter appointed for medical decisions has not thereby been handed the house. Running close is authority claimed from relationship alone, next of kin offered as though it settled the matter, when statutes differ on whether relatives rank at all and in what order. Third is an instrument described without the two things a reader needs from it, what it covers and when it begins. Below those: an alternate named in the paperwork and never contacted, a court route reached for before any lighter arrangement is examined, an uncovered decision dropped from the list instead of entered blank, and no line anywhere about who is signing things now.
Get a MSW-532 Week 4 example written to your instructions
Paste in the memo instructions with the rubric and whatever your section's case says about the paperwork in hand, and a custom example is written against those requirements and returned inside 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free, laid out in the table your instructor issued rather than in a general one built here.
MSW-532 Week 4 questions, answered
The family cannot find any paperwork. Is there still a memo?
Yes, and the search becomes part of it: who was asked, which offices were called, what turned up and on what date. The rows then say which decisions can still be made and by whom under general arrangements, hedged, since what a state provides for a person with nobody appointed differs and the memo should say so rather than assert one version.
One document names a daughter for health and a son for money. Which governs?
Neither, and that is the answer this memo is built to give. The list splits instead: consent to a procedure sits with her, closing an account sits with him, and choosing where he lives may sit with neither, depending on what each document actually says. Writing a winner into the memo is the commonest way it forfeits its ethics points.
Does the memo recommend who ought to decide?
It says who may. Recommending is a different document, and a memo arguing that the son would handle things better has stepped outside what the paperwork supports. Where the authorized person is unreachable, or is acting past what the instrument permits, the memo says that plainly and names what would have to happen next without choosing a replacement.