NR 300A · RN-to-BSN

NR 300A Directed Independent Study sample papers, week by week

Reviewed by Nell Harrington, MSN, RN Directed Independent Study Chamberlain University Free custom samples in 24–48h

NR 300A has no fixed assignment list, because the work is agreed between you and a faculty member. These samples model the documents that negotiated study tends to produce, not a syllabus we would be guessing at.

How this shelf works

Send the exact assignment or rubric from your classroom and a custom sample written to it lands in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. NR 300A is Chamberlain’s Directed Independent Study course. It centers on a piece of work you propose and a faculty member approves, so the deliverable comes from that agreement rather than a course outline. Some program versions carry this course as NR 300B and NR 300C; the same drawers apply. Searches like "nr 300a week 4 assignment example", "NR300A sample paper", and "NR 300A week samples" land on this page.

What NR 300A is really about

Almost every other shelf on this site can tell you roughly what a course wants, because the deliverables repeat from session to session. This one cannot, and pretending otherwise would be dishonest. A directed independent study exists so that a defined piece of work can be arranged around a gap: credit that has to be made up, a subject the catalog does not carry, a project a faculty member is willing to supervise. What it contains depends on what you and that faculty member write down at the start. Two people enrolled in the same course number in the same session may be producing entirely different things, and both would be correct.

What can be said with any confidence is the shape such work usually takes rather than its content. Independent study is normally held together by an agreement made early, some form of scheduled contact so that progress is visible, and a final product large enough to justify the credit. Around those sit the ordinary supports: reading gathered and summarized, an outline shown to a supervisor before the writing starts, short progress notes that keep a distant faculty member informed. The risk everybody meets is the same one. Nothing is due for long stretches, nobody chases you, and a term that felt spacious in week two becomes very short in week six.

What NR 300A’s assessments ask for

Because the deliverable is negotiated, the honest description of the asks is conditional. If your study is a paper, expect the usual scholarly requirements applied without a weekly rubric to lean on: a defined question, sources you found yourself, and a structure you had to choose. If it is a project, expect a proposal, evidence that the work happened, and a written account of what came of it. If it is credit recovery for an equivalent course, expect the deliverables of that course rather than anything unusual. In every version the agreement itself does the work a syllabus would normally do, which is why reading it closely at the start pays for the whole term.

Where students lose points in NR 300A

The characteristic failure of an independent study is not a bad paper; it is a late one. With no weekly deadlines pulling work out of you, the term compresses into its final fortnight and the product shows it. Second is drift, where what gets submitted quietly stops matching what was agreed, and a supervisor who approved one thing is asked to mark another. Third is silence: a faculty member who hears nothing for weeks has no way to correct a direction early, so the correction arrives when it is expensive. Beyond those, work sized for a shorter course, sources gathered without a question to organize them, and a final piece with no statement of what was actually produced all cost marks.

NR 300A grading scale at Chamberlain: how the work is graded, from Chamberlain Assignments
How Chamberlain grades NR 300A, visualized by Chamberlain Assignments.

The NR 300A drawers

Week 1

NR 300A Week 1 project outline example

Week 1 has no published deliverable; most agreements start by fixing the scope. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 2

NR 300A Week 2 annotated bibliography example

Week 2 is unpublished too; early reading is usually gathered and summarized here. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 3

NR 300A Week 3 literature summary example

Week 3 varies entirely; many studies pull the reading into one argued account. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 4

NR 300A Week 4 progress memo example

Week 4 depends on your agreement; a short update to your supervisor is common. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 5

NR 300A Week 5 draft section example

Week 5 is unfixed; a first substantial piece of the product often exists by now. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 6

NR 300A Week 6 methods note example

Week 6 has no set task; studies with a project component describe what was done. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 7

NR 300A Week 7 revision plan example

Week 7 differs by agreement; supervisor comments usually turn into a plan for changes. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Week 8

NR 300A Week 8 final reflection example

Week 8 is unpublished; most studies close with the product and an account of it. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Different?

Your classroom shows something else?

Chamberlain University revises courses; week counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.

Send it over →

Using a NR 300A sample the right way

A sample is less useful here than anywhere else on this site until you send the agreement, because there is nothing to model until the work has been defined. Once it is defined the position reverses and becomes unusually easy: send what you and your faculty member settled on, along with any rubric attached to it, and a sample is written to exactly that. What we will not produce is the agreement itself, or any form your faculty member has to sign, because an approval carries your name and nobody else's.

How these samples are written

Every sample on this chart is written the way the custom ones are: the rubric decoded row by row, discussion samples sized for posts that cannot be edited after they land, templates filled field by field. Chamberlain revises classrooms; a custom request is always written to the rubric in YOUR course, never from a stale template.

NR 300A questions, answered

What actually gets submitted in this course?

Whatever your agreement says, which is why this shelf will not pretend to know. In practice the submissions cluster around a small set: a substantial paper, a supervised project with a written account, or the deliverables of a course this study is standing in for. Read your agreement as if it were the rubric, because for grading purposes that is what it is.

Can you write my learning agreement?

No. The agreement is a commitment between you and a faculty member and it carries approvals that belong to the two of you, so it is never something we draft. What we can do starts immediately afterwards. Once the scope is fixed, send it with any rubric and we will build a sample of the document it points at, free the first time and usually back in 24-48h.

How do I keep an unstructured term from collapsing?

Invent the deadlines the classroom did not give you and tell your supervisor about them, because a date somebody else knows is a different kind of date. Split the product into pieces you can finish in a week, and send something at every scheduled contact even when it is rough. Faculty correct direction cheaply in week three and expensively in week seven.