NR 304 Week 4 Pain Assessment Write-Up Example

Health Assessment II Chamberlain University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NR 304 Week 4 sample paper is a pain assessment write-up on a 74-year-old retired florist with two broken ribs, measured at rest, on a deep breath and on a cough. Chamberlain NR 304 (NR-304), Health Assessment II, asks pre-licensure BSN students to assess pain as a finding nobody else can check directly. The paper fixes the 0 to 10 scale and the exact question at the top, keeps her words stabbing and dull, heavy ache, records three readings of 3, 7 and 8 minutes apart with the time since her last oxycodone, separates what the student saw from what she reported, notes an incentive spirometer volume of 750 against a target of 1,500 and explains why the resting score misleads, citing Bulger and Hjermstad.

CourseNR 304 Health Assessment II
Week4
Paper typePain assessment write-up
LengthAbout 1,180 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolChamberlain University
ProgramBSN (pre-licensure)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NR 304 Week 4

1

Pain Assessment Write-Up: A 74-Year-Old Retired Florist With Two Broken Ribs, at Rest, on a Deep Breath and on a Cough

Student Name

College of Nursing, Chamberlain University

NR 304: Health Assessment II

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the three conditions under which the pain was measured, because with no opposite limb to compare against, those repeated readings are the comparison. The patient is a composite. Student APA 7 format, no running head.
2

Pain Assessment Write-Up: A 74-Year-Old Retired Florist With Two Broken Ribs, at Rest, on a Deep Breath and on a Cough

Setting

Mrs. F. is a 74-year-old retired florist admitted yesterday evening to a medical-surgical unit after slipping on a wet kitchen floor and falling against the edge of a counter. The chest X-ray report in her chart lists fractures of the right 6th and 7th ribs. Her home is a ground-floor apartment where she lives by herself, and she has high blood pressure treated with losartan. This assessment took place at 1015 on hospital day 2. Her last dose of pain medication, oxycodone 5 milligrams by mouth, was given at 0630 according to the medication record, and acetaminophen 1,000 milligrams at 0600.

Pain was measured on the 0 to 10 numeric rating scale throughout, with 0 meaning no pain and 10 meaning the worst pain she can imagine. The same scale was used for every reading, and the question was asked in the same words each time: "On a scale from zero to ten, where zero is no pain and ten is the worst pain you can imagine, what number is the pain in your side right now?" A review of studies comparing pain scales in adults found the numeric rating scale performed well and was generally easier to use than a visual analog scale, while noting that scores from different scales cannot simply be swapped for one another (Hjermstad et al., 2011).

What this page is doingThe scale and the exact wording of the question are fixed once, at the top, so every number below can be compared with every other.
3

Her Account

Quality, in her words: "It's a stabbing, like somebody's poking me with the end of a broom handle," when she breathes in deeply or coughs; "a dull, heavy ache, like a bruise," when she lies still.

Site: right side of the chest, about a hand's width below the armpit; she pointed with one finger to a spot along the side of the ribs.

Spread: "It goes around toward my back a little"; she traced about 10 centimeters toward her spine along the same level. It does not go into her arm, neck, belly or shoulder.

What makes it worse: "breathing in all the way," coughing, turning to the right in bed, and getting from lying to sitting.

What helps: "holding a pillow against it when I cough" and the pain tablets, which she says "take the edge off for a few hours."

Effect on her: "I'm scared to cough, so I don't," and "I only slept a couple of hours."

Her goal: "To be able to take a proper breath."

What this page is doingStabbing and dull, heavy ache are kept exactly as she said them. Converting them to a clinical adjective would lose the difference between the two conditions she described.
4

Three Readings Under Three Conditions

Reading 1, 1015, lying at 30 degrees, breathing normally, still for 5 minutes beforehand: 3.

Reading 2, 1018, same position, immediately after one deep breath in, asked to take "the deepest breath you can": 7.

Reading 3, 1022, same position, after one cough, holding a pillow against the right side as she chose: 8.

Same question, same words, same scale each time. Between readings, she was allowed to rest for two to three minutes until breathing had returned to the rate at rest.

Reading after a position change, 1030, after moving from lying to sitting on the edge of the bed with help: 6.

Time since last oral pain medicine at reading 1: 3 hours 45 minutes (oxycodone at 0630).

What this page is doingThe readings are paired by condition and minutes apart, which is the only comparison available for a finding no one else can check independently. The time since the last dose is recorded because it changes what each number means.
5

What the Student Saw

Breathing at rest, before reading 1: 22 breaths per minute, counted for one full minute; shallow, with the right side of the chest moving less than the left on inspection.

During the deep breath (reading 2): stopped the breath partway in, winced, closed her eyes, pressed her right hand to her side.

During the cough (reading 3): a short, weak cough; she held the pillow tightly, let out a sound, and her face tightened for about 5 seconds.

Position chosen at rest: leaning slightly to the right side, with her right arm held against her chest.

Moving to sitting: used her left arm on the bed rail, kept her right arm tight to her side, and paused twice.

Oxygen saturation: 94 percent on room air at rest, 1015; 93 percent after sitting, 1030.

Incentive spirometer, used by her at 1035 with coaching: 750 milliliters on her best of three tries; her target on the chart is 1,500 milliliters.

What this page is doingObserved behavior is kept in its own block, apart from what she reported. A reader can see which entries came from her and which came from the student's eyes.
6

What Changes the Meaning of the Numbers

A resting score of 3 would be easy to read as acceptable pain control, but the resting number is not the one that matters for a person with broken ribs. The deep-breath and cough scores of 7 and 8, together with the shallow breathing, a weak cough, and an incentive spirometer volume half of her target, show that the pain is limiting the two things she most needs to do. Bulger et al. (2000) studied older adults admitted with rib fractures and found higher rates of pneumonia and death than in younger patients with the same injuries, with each additional broken rib adding risk. That is the reason the write-up treats the cough reading as the key figure. The student does not claim that pneumonia is present or likely in Mrs. F.; the point is that the readings under movement tell the team whether she can clear her lungs.

The timing of her last dose matters too. The readings were taken nearly four hours after oxycodone, and a set repeated about an hour after the next dose would show whether the medication changes the deep-breath and cough scores, not only the resting one.

Report and Plan for Reassessment

At 1040 the student reported to the primary nurse, giving all three readings together with their conditions, the spirometer volume, and her statement that she is afraid to cough. The primary nurse contacted the provider about the pain plan. The student will repeat the same three readings, with the same question and scale, 60 minutes after the next dose of pain medication, and will record them beside this set so the two can be compared directly. Mrs. F. was shown again how to hug the pillow while coughing and was encouraged to try the spirometer ten times an hour while awake, as ordered.

Reflection

The first draft of this write-up said that the patient reports severe pain with breathing. Severe was not her word, and it removed the difference between her stabbing pain on breathing and her dull ache at rest. Jarvis and Eckhardt (2024) list the character of pain as one of the core elements to record, and keeping her words turned out to carry information that no number did. The other change was taking the readings minutes apart with the same words. The first time the student asked, the second question was how bad is it when you breathe in, and she answered really bad rather than a number. Asking the identical question each time gave three numbers that can be compared, and the comparison is the finding.

References

Bulger, E. M., Arneson, M. A., Mock, C. N., & Jurkovich, G. J. (2000). Rib fractures in the elderly. Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 48(6), 1040-1047. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200006000-00007

Hjermstad, M. J., Fayers, P. M., Haugen, D. F., Caraceni, A., Hanks, G. W., Loge, J. H., Fainsinger, R., Aass, N., & Kaasa, S. (2011). Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: A systematic literature review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 41(6), 1073-1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016

Jarvis, C., & Eckhardt, A. (2024). Physical examination and health assessment (9th ed.). Elsevier.

What the NR 304 Week 4 assignment asks for

For Week 4 you assess and document pain in a patient, often from a case or simulation. Expect to cover location, quality, intensity, timing, aggravating and relieving factors, effects on function and the person's goal, plus your observations and a reflection. Use one pain scale throughout and ask the question in the same words each time. Keep the person's own descriptions in quotation marks rather than converting them to clinical adjectives. When there is no opposite side to compare, repeated readings under different conditions become the comparison. Record the time since the last pain medicine. Keep observed behavior separate from what the person reports, and do not name a cause.

How the NR 304 Week 4 example is put together

The write-up sets Mrs. F.'s scene, her fall and the rib fractures in the chart. The scale and exact question are fixed once. Her account follows in her words: stabbing like a broom handle when breathing deeply, a dull heavy ache at rest, spread toward her back and her goal of a proper breath. Three readings follow, at rest, after a deep breath and after a cough, minutes apart, plus one after sitting up. A separate block records what was seen: a rate of 22, splinting and a spirometer volume of 750. A section explains why 7 and 8 matter more than 3, citing Bulger et al. (2000). Report, plan and reflection close it.

Reading the NR 304 Week 4 grading rubric

Pain assessment rubrics commonly grade completeness of the pain characteristics, use of a valid scale, preservation of the patient's words, observation of behavior, functional impact, reassessment planning and reflection. Consistency of measurement carries particular weight, so the scale and question are fixed and repeated. Completeness scores when location, spread, quality and modifying factors are all present. Keeping her words earns credit because it preserves the difference between two kinds of pain. Separating observed behavior from her report is graded on its own. Functional impact is shown through the spirometer volume and fear of coughing. Planning reassessment after the next dose meets the evaluation criterion, supported by research on pain scales.

NR 304 Week 4 help from the desk

Marks go first when the account is converted upward: the person says gnawing and the record says severe. A number floating free, with no scale and no note of whether the person was still or moving, loses next. A site with no spread, readings taken hours apart with different wording, observations mixed into the account, dose times missing and a write-up that names a cause all cost points. If the person will not give a number, record their words and your observations. Use your section's scale unless it does not suit the person, and say why. Leave a few minutes between readings. Send your case notes, and a pain write-up can be built around repeated readings.

Get a NR 304 Week 4 example written to your instructions

Send the Week 4 instructions with the pain scale your section uses, and a custom example is written into it and returned inside 24 to 48 hours, with the wording of the repeat question built in. The first one is free. Tell us whether your prompt supplies the person's own description or expects you to gather it, because the two produce quite different documents.

More NR 304 papers and pre-licensure samples

NR 304 Week 4 questions, answered

My person will not give a number. What goes in that row?

Write what they did give, in their words, and record the row as declined with the reason if the form allows it. Then lean harder on what you can see, and make those observations the thing the repeat reading is checked against. A refusal honestly recorded is a finding. A number you supplied on somebody's behalf is invented data and it is usually visible, because it sits oddly against everything else on the page.

Should I use the scale my section teaches or the one that suits the person?

Use the one that fits the person, name it in the record, and then keep it for every reading in that document. Sections normally allow more than one, and choosing well is part of the assessment. What cannot happen is switching between them partway through, because the two readings then have nothing in common and the whole point of taking a second one disappears.

How long should I leave between the two readings?

Long enough that something could have changed and short enough that the situation is still the same one. Your classroom text will name an interval for a reassessment and the safest move is to follow it and write the interval down. What matters for the mark is that the gap appears on the page, since a reader who cannot see the interval cannot judge whether the second figure means anything at all.

Where can I find a free NR 304 Week 4 sample paper?

The complete Week 4 pain assessment on Mrs. F., with three readings under three conditions, her own words and the observed behavior, is shown in full on this page.

Why isn't the resting score enough in the NR 304 Week 4 example?

With broken ribs, pain on a deep breath and a cough decides whether she can breathe deeply and clear her lungs; her 7 and 8 on those, with shallow breathing, matter more than a resting 3.