| Course | NR 341 Complex Adult Health |
|---|---|
| Week | 8 |
| Paper type | Complex care plan |
| Length | About 1,140 words, 3 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | BSN (pre-licensure) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 341 Week 8
Complex Care Plan: Pain Against Breathing in a 79-Year-Old Man With Severe COPD, Two Days After Hip Fracture Repair
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 341: Complex Adult Health
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Complex Care Plan: Pain Against Breathing in a 79-Year-Old Man With Severe COPD, Two Days After Hip Fracture Repair
Mr. L., and the Tension in His Care
Mr. L. is 79, a retired machinist with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who uses 2 liters of oxygen at home and has a baseline arterial carbon dioxide of 52 mmHg recorded at his last clinic visit. He fell at home and had a hemiarthroplasty for a left hip fracture two days ago. Details are composite. Today at 0800: pain 7 of 10 on moving, 3 at rest; breathing 22; saturation 90% on 2 L; heart rate 96; temperature 37.4 C. He has taken only a few steps with physical therapy and has been awake much of the night. His wife says he was "not himself" yesterday evening.
The tension that runs through this plan is simple to state. He needs enough pain relief to breathe deeply, cough and walk, because shallow breathing and lying still after a hip fracture lead to pneumonia, clots and delirium. But the opioids that relieve his pain can slow his breathing, and in a man whose carbon dioxide is already high, that can tip him into respiratory failure. Every intervention below is judged against both sides of that tension.
Ranking, Justified Once
Five nursing problems are identified. They are ranked by how quickly each could harm him and by how much each affects the others. Pain on movement is first, because it drives the breathing, mobility and delirium problems below it; treating it well improves three others. Risk of respiratory failure is second, because it is the most dangerous single outcome and the one most directly worsened by the treatment for the first. Risk of delirium is third, since his wife's comment suggests it may already be starting. Constipation is fourth, because opioids and immobility make it likely and it worsens pain and delirium. Pressure injury is fifth, and it is the problem held at maintenance.
Problem 1: Acute Pain on Movement
Assessment: pain 7 on moving, 3 at rest; takes a few steps only; breathes shallowly when turning.
Goal: pain at or below 4 during physical therapy at 1000 and 1500 today, measured on the 0 to 10 scale, with at least 20 meters walked by the evening.
Interventions and rationale: ask the anesthesia team whether a fascia iliaca block can be placed or repeated, because a Cochrane review of 49 trials found that peripheral nerve blocks for hip fracture reduced pain on movement, reduced acute confusion and probably reduced chest infections (Guay & Kopp, 2020), all of which are problems on this plan. Give scheduled acetaminophen every 6 hours rather than as needed. Give the smallest effective opioid dose 30 to 45 minutes before therapy rather than on a fixed schedule, so the opioid is concentrated where it does the most good.
What it takes: the opioid timed before therapy costs the most on the breathing side, so Problem 2 checks are set around it.
Problem 2: Risk of Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
Assessment: breathing 22, saturation 90% on 2 L; baseline carbon dioxide 52.
Goal: breathing rate 12 to 24 and saturation 88 to 92%, awake and rousable, throughout the shift.
Interventions and rationale: keep oxygen titrated to a saturation of 88 to 92%, the range the British Thoracic Society sets for people who retain carbon dioxide (O'Driscoll et al., 2017); higher targets can raise his carbon dioxide further. Check sedation level and breathing rate 30 and 60 minutes after each opioid dose. Sit him upright in a chair for meals. Encourage incentive spirometry 10 times an hour while awake.
What it takes: tighter checks take time from other patients; the checks are timed to the doses so they are not spread evenly across the day.
Problem 3: Risk of Delirium
Assessment: "not himself" last evening per his wife; awake most of the night.
Goal: negative screen on the confusion assessment at 0800, 1600 and 0000.
Interventions: glasses and hearing aids on during the day; clock and calendar visible; lights on and blinds open by day, dark and quiet at night; his wife encouraged to visit in the afternoon; no sleeping medicines. Pain control from Problem 1 also serves this goal.
Problem 4: Constipation
Assessment: no bowel movement since admission three days ago.
Goal: a bowel movement by tomorrow morning.
Interventions: scheduled stool softener and stimulant laxative as ordered, fluids to at least 1.5 liters a day unless restricted, and walking as in Problem 1.
Why it is on this plan at all: constipation is easy to dismiss beside breathing and pain, but in this man it feeds both. Straining and a full bowel raise his pain and can splint his diaphragm, and constipation is a known contributor to delirium in older adults. It ranks fourth because it can wait a day without harm, not because it does not matter.
One Problem Held at Maintenance
Pressure injury risk is real in an immobile 79-year-old, but his skin is intact today and the unit's routine measures are enough: a pressure-redistributing mattress, turning every 2 hours while in bed, heel protectors, and a skin check each shift. Nothing extra is added. Holding this problem at maintenance is a decision, not an oversight: the time that a more active skin plan would take is better spent on the walking in Problem 1, which will do more for his skin than any extra turning.
Evaluation as Conditions
The plan is working if, by this evening, he walks 20 meters with pain at 4 or below, his breathing stays between 12 and 24, his saturation between 88 and 92%, and his confusion screens are negative. It is failing if his pain stays above 6 during therapy, in which case the anesthesia team is asked again about a block, or if he becomes hard to wake or his breathing falls below 10, in which case opioids are held, the provider is called and an arterial gas is requested. It is failing in the other direction if he is comfortable but will not move, which would mean the opioid dose is too high for what it achieves.
Transition, Tested Against the Tension
He is expected to move to a rehabilitation unit in three to four days. The handover will name the tension first: his pain regimen, the time of his last opioid and what it did to his breathing, his oxygen target of 88 to 92%, and the sign that would mean he has had too much. A transition plan that lists only his medications would hand on the treatment and leave out the balance it depends on.
References
Guay, J., & Kopp, S. (2020). Peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (11), Article CD001159. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001159.pub3
O'Driscoll, B. R., Howard, L. S., Earis, J., & Mak, V. (2017). BTS guideline for oxygen use in adults in healthcare and emergency settings. Thorax, 72(Suppl. 1), ii1-ii90. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209729
The Chamberlain NR 341 Week 8 instructions
The final NR 341 assignment asks you to develop a comprehensive care plan for a patient with several interacting conditions. The brief normally asks for assessment data, prioritized nursing problems, measurable goals, evidence-based interventions with rationales, evaluation criteria, transition planning and APA references. State the central tension in the patient's care at the start. Rank the problems once, by how quickly each could harm him and how it affects the others. Give each problem its own data, goal and interventions, and say what each intervention costs another problem. Hold one lower problem at routine care and explain why. Write evaluation as conditions that show the plan is working or failing.
Inside the NR 341 Week 8 example
The first section introduces Mr. L., a retired machinist on 2 liters of home oxygen, and states that he needs enough pain relief to breathe and walk without depressing his breathing. The ranking places pain on movement first, then the risk of hypercapnic failure, then delirium and constipation. Problem 1 sets a pain goal of 4 or below during therapy and asks about a fascia iliaca block, citing Guay and Kopp. Problem 2 keeps saturation at 88 to 92% under O'Driscoll and colleagues and times checks around opioid doses. Problems 3 and 4 cover sleep, glasses and hearing aids, and bowels. Pressure injury is held at routine measures. Evaluation lists working and failing conditions, and the rehab handover names the tension first.
Reading the NR 341 Week 8 grading rubric
Complex care plan rubrics usually score assessment, prioritization with rationale, measurable goals, evidence-based interventions, evaluation, transition of care and APA. Ranking is the row worth most; this plan justifies it once by speed of harm and effect on other problems, as this plan does. Goals are credited when they are measurable, such as pain at 4 or below during therapy at 1000 and 1500. Interventions score when each has a rationale and evidence, such as the nerve block and the oxygen target. Naming the cost of each intervention to another problem shows the integrated reasoning graders want. Evaluation earns credit through stated working and failing conditions. The handover row is met by putting the tension first for the rehab team.
NR 341 Week 8 help: mistakes that cost points
The costliest error on this plan is treating every problem as fully treatable and scheduling interventions for all of them equally, which avoids deciding anything. Another is ranking by a framework without tying the order to this patient. Students also give high oxygen to a patient who retains carbon dioxide, or hold pain medicine out of fear of breathing problems, when the plan needs both. Leaving constipation off because it seems minor misses how it affects pain and breathing. Evaluation that repeats the goals does not say when the plan has failed. Keep each problem in a consistent format. If your final patient has a different tension, such as anticoagulation and bleeding, describe it and an NR 341 care plan can be built around it.
Get a NR 341 Week 8 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 8 instructions, the care plan template your classroom uses and the case you have been assigned, and a custom example is written into that template and returned inside 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. It arrives complete, including the maintenance decision and the evaluation conditions, which are the two parts drafts tend to leave thin.
More NR 341 papers and pre-licensure samples
- NR 341 Week 1: Competing Priorities Discussion Post
- NR 341 Week 2: Priority-Setting Case Analysis
- NR 341 Week 3: Rhabdomyolysis Concept Map Example
- NR 341 Week 4: Septic Shock Case Response
- NR 341 Week 5: Ventilated Patient Write-Up
- NR 341 Week 6: Night Shift Delegation Scenario
- NR 341 Week 7: In-Hospital Stroke Rapid Response
- NR 452 Week 8: Capstone Paper
- NR 328 Week 8: Pediatric Appendicitis Case Analysis
- NR 103 Week 8: Cardiac Step-Down Career Plan
- NR 327 Week 8: Postpartum Family Care Plan
NR 341 Week 8 questions, answered
Does every problem need the same depth?
No, and forcing that is one reason these plans run long. Give the problems carrying the tension full treatment and let the stable ones run short, with a line saying why they are short. Most templates allow it, and a marker reading a plan where the fourth problem is as elaborate as the first tends to read the ranking as decorative.
How do I write the part where something is not pursued?
Plainly, and with a reason drawn from this patient rather than from resources. Say which problem is being held, what it is being held at, why pursuing it now would take from something more pressing, and what would make you take it up again. Written that way it reads as a clinical position. Written vaguely it reads as an oversight.
What if the template has no field for consequences?
Put the sentence inside the rationale, which is where it belongs anyway. Most templates leave that field open enough to hold it, and a marker seeing an intervention justified by what it will achieve and what it will make harder rarely minds that the box was not labeled for it. Do not redesign the template unless your section invites it.
Where can I find a free NR 341 Week 8 sample paper?
The complete Week 8 care plan for Mr. L., with the stated tension, the ranked problems, the nerve block and oxygen target, delirium and bowel care, evaluation conditions, the rehab handover and references, is on this page.
What oxygen target does the NR 341 Week 8 plan set, and why?
A saturation of 88 to 92%, the range the British Thoracic Society sets for people who retain carbon dioxide, because higher targets can raise his carbon dioxide and make him drowsy.