NR 446 Week 7 Daily Weights Change Project Proposal Example

Collaborative Healthcare Chamberlain University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Weighing heart failure patients before breakfast to reduce missed daily weights on a 30-bed cardiac telemetry unit is the change proposed in this NR 446 Week 7 sample paper. Chamberlain NR 446 (NR-446), Collaborative Healthcare, asks RN-to-BSN students to propose a change they could lead using a change model. The proposal sizes the problem with the unit's own quality board data and explains why missed weights matter for diuretic decisions. It writes the change in operational terms, weight between 0500 and 0600 after voiding on the recorded scale, then follows Lewin's unfreezing, moving and refreezing stages in the order of its steps, with Shirey's application to nursing. Stakeholders each have a helping and a resisting interest. One measure has a baseline of 64 per 100 weights on time and a target of 90, with a balancing measure. Barriers are named, and the plan separates what the writer can start alone.

CourseNR 446 Collaborative Healthcare
Week7
Paper typeChange project proposal
LengthAbout 1,160 words, 8 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolChamberlain University
ProgramRN-to-BSN
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NR 446 Week 7

1

Weighing Before Breakfast: A Change Project Proposal to Reduce Missed Daily Weights on a Cardiac Telemetry Unit

Student Name

College of Nursing, Chamberlain University

NR 446: Collaborative Healthcare

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the routine being changed, the gap it closes and the unit. It is deliberately modest, which is what a staff nurse proposal should look like. Student APA 7 format, no running head.
2

Weighing Before Breakfast: A Change Project Proposal to Reduce Missed Daily Weights on a Cardiac Telemetry Unit

The Problem, Sized Locally

On a composite 30-bed cardiac telemetry unit, most patients admitted with heart failure, and many receiving intravenous diuretics for other reasons, have an order for a daily weight. The weight is the number the cardiology team uses each morning to decide whether to continue, increase or stop a diuretic. The unit already tracks daily weight completion on its quality board: over the last eight weeks, 64 of every 100 ordered daily weights were documented before 0800 rounds, 19 were documented later in the day, and 17 were not documented at all. Of the weights that were documented, a spot check of 30 found that 11 were taken on a bed scale and 19 on the standing scale, with the method recorded in only 9. A weight taken on a different scale from yesterday's, at a different time and after breakfast, can differ by a kilogram or more for reasons unrelated to fluid, which makes it useless for the decision it exists to support.

What this page is doingThe problem is sized with a number the unit already collects, from its own quality board, and then the paper shows why the number matters to a clinical decision. That gives the plan something concrete to move rather than a problem stated only from the literature.
3

The Change, in Operational Terms

The change is to one routine. Every patient with a daily weight order will be weighed between 0500 and 0600, after voiding and before breakfast, on the standing scale if they can stand safely for 30 seconds and on the same bed scale each day if they cannot, in a hospital gown with no shoes. The nursing assistant assigned to the patient takes the weight during the 0500 vital signs round and records it in the flowsheet with the scale used, which will become a required field. If the weight differs from the previous day by more than 1 kilogram, the nursing assistant tells the registered nurse, who rechecks it before 0630 and notes the recheck. A laminated card on each scale will list the steps. Nothing else about the patient's care changes.

What this page is doingThe change is written so a colleague could perform it on a Tuesday without asking what was meant: a time window, a sequence, a scale rule, a threshold and who does each part. Vagueness here is what makes the rest of a proposal unmarkable.
4

The Change Model Behind the Plan

The plan follows Lewin's three stages of planned change, unfreezing, moving and refreezing (Lewin, 1951), and the stages appear in the order of the steps rather than as a label. Unfreezing comes first: at two staff meetings, the unit will see its own completion data and a single example of a patient whose diuretic was held because a bed-scale weight taken after lunch looked like a two-kilogram loss. Moving comes next: a two-week pilot on one hallway of ten rooms, with the laminated cards and the required scale field, and a daily five-minute check at the 0700 huddle. Refreezing follows: the routine becomes the unit standard, the scale field stays required, and completion before 0800 becomes a line on the monthly quality board reviewed by the nurse manager. Shirey (2013) notes that the refreezing stage is where most unit changes fail, because the new behavior is never anchored in a system, and the required field and the quality board line are the anchors here.

What this page is doingThe change model shapes the sequence of the plan rather than being pasted on at the end. Deleting the word Lewin would still leave the three stages visible in the order of the steps, which is the test a grader applies.
5

Stakeholders and Their Real Reasons

Nursing assistants carry most of the change, and their interest cuts both ways: they want fewer end-of-shift arguments about missing weights, but 0500 is already their busiest hour, and adding a walk to the standing scale for eight patients takes time. Their concern is legitimate, and the pilot will measure how long the 0500 round takes before and after. Night registered nurses gain reliable data at morning report but will have to recheck outliers at the busiest point of their shift. The cardiology team gains a trustworthy number for diuretic decisions and has supported the change; the cardiology nurse practitioner has agreed to speak at the first staff meeting. Physical therapy has a real concern that some patients are unsafe to stand at 0500 when orthostatic; the plan answers it by allowing the same bed scale daily for anyone who cannot stand safely, rather than pushing every patient onto the standing scale. Patients themselves may resist being woken at 0500, and the plan does not pretend otherwise; the weight is paired with vital signs that already wake them, so it adds a step but not a new interruption.

What this page is doingEach group gets an interest that helps and one that resists, and resistance is treated as legitimate, with physical therapy's safety concern answered in the plan itself. A stakeholder list that treats objections as ignorance loses marks here.
6

One Measure and Its Baseline

The measure is the percentage of ordered daily weights documented between 0500 and 0800 with the scale type recorded. The baseline, from the eight weeks before the pilot, is 64 of every 100 for timing and fewer than a third for scale type. The measure will be read weekly during the two-week pilot on the pilot hallway, then monthly for three months on the whole unit. The target is 90 of every 100 weights documented on time with the scale recorded by the end of the third month. A balancing measure, the average time the nursing assistant 0500 round takes, will be timed on three mornings before and three mornings after the pilot begins, so that the unit can see what the change costs. Weekly and monthly values will be plotted on a run chart rather than compared as two averages, because a run chart shows whether a change holds over time or only appeared during the weeks when everyone was paying attention (Provost & Murray, 2011).

What this page is doingThe measure has a definition, a baseline and a schedule for rereading it, plus a balancing measure for the cost to the assistants. Without the baseline, the evaluation would have nothing to say, which is the most common gap in Week 7 proposals.
7

Barriers Named, Not Solved on Paper

Three barriers are likely, and the proposal does not pretend to solve them in advance. The unit has one standing scale for 30 beds, so on mornings with many patients who can stand, the nursing assistants will queue at the scale; the pilot will show whether a second scale is needed, which would be a purchase request for the manager. Patients on fluid restrictions sometimes drink water from their bedside cup before 0500, and nothing in this plan prevents that. And the required scale field depends on an informatics request that may take weeks. Each barrier will be recorded during the pilot, and the unit practice council will decide what to do about each one with pilot data in hand rather than with guesses.

What I Can Start Alone and What Needs Approval

Some of this I can start next week without anyone's permission. I can weigh my own patients at 0500 on the same scale, record the scale, and bring the unit's completion data to the next staff meeting. I can also make the laminated cards. The rest needs approval. The two-week pilot needs the nurse manager's agreement and the night charge nurse's support. The required scale field needs the nursing informatics team, and adding the measure to the quality board needs the manager. I will ask for the pilot at the next staff meeting, with the baseline data and the cardiology nurse practitioner present, and I will not claim that the change is unit practice until the manager has approved it.

What this page is doingThe proposal ends by separating what the writer can start today from what needs somebody else's approval, and names who that somebody is. That honest division is both a graded requirement and what makes the plan believable from a staff nurse.
8

References

Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (D. Cartwright, Ed.). Harper & Row.

Provost, L. P., & Murray, S. K. (2011). The health care data guide: Learning from data for improvement. Jossey-Bass.

Shirey, M. R. (2013). Lewin's theory of planned change as a strategic resource. Journal of Nursing Administration, 43(2), 69-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e31827f20a9

The Chamberlain NR 446 Week 7 instructions

For Week 7 you propose a unit change project built on a change theory. Plan on covering the problem with local data, the change described operationally, the change model, stakeholders, a measure with a baseline, barriers, what you can start yourself and APA. Size the problem with a number your unit already collects and show why it matters to a clinical decision. Write the change so a colleague could do it without asking what you meant. Let the change model shape the order of your steps instead of naming it at the end. Give each stakeholder a reason to help and a reason to resist. Define one measure with a baseline and target, and add a balancing measure. Say what needs approval and from whom.

How the NR 446 Week 7 example is put together

The problem section reports how often ordered weights were missing or late on the quality board and explains how a weight taken after breakfast on a different scale misleads diuretic decisions. The change section sets the 0500 to 0600 window, the voiding and scale rules and who does each part. The model section shows unfreezing with the unit's own data at two staff meetings, moving with a two-week pilot on one hallway of ten rooms and refreezing with a required scale field and a line on the monthly quality board, citing Lewin and Shirey. The stakeholders section covers nursing assistants, nurses, physical therapy and providers. The measure section gives the baseline of 64 per 100 and a target of 90, plus timing of the assistants' round. Barriers include one standing scale for 30 beds.

Where the points sit in the NR 446 Week 7 rubric

Change project rubrics in NR 446 usually score a locally sized problem, an operational description of the change, integration of a change model, stakeholder analysis, a measurable outcome with a baseline, barriers and feasibility, and APA. Integration of the model is the row most proposals miss, and this one earns it by letting Lewin's stages set the order of the steps. The problem is credited because it uses the unit's own data. The change scores for being specific enough to perform on a Tuesday. Stakeholders earn points because resistance is treated as legitimate and answered. The measure is credited for a baseline, a target, a schedule and a balancing measure, with Provost and Murray's methods. Feasibility is met by separating what the writer can start from what needs approval.

NR 446 Week 7 help from the desk

Change proposals lose most by being too big, such as changing staffing ratios or buying a system, which no staff nurse could begin. Another loss is a change model named in one paragraph and never used. Students also describe the change vaguely, list supportive stakeholders only or set a target with no baseline. Barriers that are "solved" on paper read as wishful. Lewin's model is common, but Kotter or PDSA cycles also work if they shape the plan. Small projects score better than ambitious ones. Unit data are ideal, but realistic estimates labeled as such are acceptable. Send your change idea and an NR 446 proposal can be written in operational terms with a model behind it.

Get a NR 446 Week 7 example written to your instructions

Send the proposal prompt, the change model your classroom requires, and the rubric or template. A custom example comes back written to those instructions inside 24 to 48 hours, and the first one is free. Name your unit type and the project is scoped to something that setting could realistically begin.

More NR 446 papers and RN-to-BSN samples

NR 446 Week 7 questions, answered

Which change model should the proposal use?

Use the one your classroom names. Lewin, Kotter and a plan do study act cycle are the usual choices here, and each shapes the plan differently. Where no model is specified, the example adopts one and lets its stages set the running order, since a framework named but not obeyed is a common and highly visible loss.

How small should the project be?

Small enough that you could begin it next week. Changing a handoff routine, adding a second check to one medication, or moving where information is posted are all projects a bedside nurse can run. Plans to change ratios, buy equipment or rewrite policy read as wishes, and the evaluation section usually collapses under them.

Do you need data from my hospital?

No, and we would rather you did not send it. The example uses a stated baseline that reads as ordinary for the unit type and marks it clearly, so you can replace it with your own figure. Internal audit results and quality reports belong to your employer, and the paper is safer when those numbers come from you.

Where can I find a free NR 446 Week 7 sample paper?

The complete Week 7 proposal to weigh patients before breakfast, with the sized problem, the operational change, Lewin's stages, stakeholders, the measure and baseline, barriers and three references, appears on this page.

What baseline and target does the NR 446 Week 7 proposal set?

A baseline of 64 of every 100 daily weights documented on time and a target of 90 of every 100 with the scale type recorded by the end of the third month, with the assistants' round time as a balancing measure.