| Course | NR 529 Leadership and Management within the Clinical Healthcare Environment |
|---|---|
| Week | 2 |
| Paper type | Delegation analysis |
| Length | About 1,220 words, 3 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | MSN, Nurse Executive |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 529 Week 2
Delegation Analysis: The Weekly Supply Order I Handed to a Charge Nurse in March, the Empty Dressing Bin in June, and the Parts of the Job That Never Left My Desk
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 529: Leadership and Management within the Clinical Healthcare Environment
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Delegation Analysis: The Weekly Supply Order I Handed to a Charge Nurse in March, the Empty Dressing Bin in June, and the Parts of the Job That Never Left My Desk
The Job and Why It Moved
For my first four months as manager of our thirty-bed renal and urology floor, I placed the weekly supply order myself. Every Tuesday I walked the clean utility room with the par sheet, counted what was below par and submitted the order to materials management by 1400. It took about ninety minutes a week, often at the end of a day spent on staffing. In March I delegated the job to Tomás, a day charge nurse with nine years on the unit who had asked for work that would prepare him for a leadership role. I showed him the par sheet, walked the room with him twice and gave him the ordering login. For eleven weeks nothing went wrong.
On a Sunday in June, a night nurse needed a dressing kit for a tunneled hemodialysis catheter and found the bin empty. She borrowed two kits from the intensive care unit, and the patient's dressing was changed on time. On Monday morning the director of nursing called me, not Tomás, to ask why my unit was borrowing supplies every weekend. That call is the start of this analysis. It was the right call to make to me, and working out why it came to me explains most of what went wrong.
What I Actually Handed Over
I handed over a task: count the bins, compare them with the par sheet and order the difference. That task was done correctly every week. Tomás's orders matched the sheet exactly. The problem was that the sheet was wrong for June, and the sheet was not part of what I delegated.
The five rights set out in the national delegation guidelines cover five points: which task, under what conditions, handed to whom, with what instructions and with what follow-up (National Council of State Boards of Nursing [NCSBN], 2016). Those guidelines were written for clinical tasks handed to other care providers, but the same questions apply to a management task, and asking them in order shows where my handover was thin. The task was appropriate. The person was well chosen. The directions covered counting and ordering but said nothing about when the par levels themselves should change. The supervision was absent: after the second week I stopped looking at the orders.
What Never Left My Desk
Three pieces of the job stayed with me without either of us noticing. The first was the knowledge that par levels follow census and case mix. In spring the unit typically has four or five patients on hemodialysis. In June we had nine for most of the month because a nearby unit closed beds for renovation and sent us its renal overflow. I knew about the overflow from a directors' meeting; Tomás did not. A par level set for five dialysis patients runs out for nine, and it runs out on the weekend, when no order goes in.
The second was authority. Even if Tomás had noticed the bin emptying, he did not know he was allowed to change a par level, which requires a form to materials management signed by the manager. I had never told him he could raise the par temporarily and tell me afterward, so the safe course for him was to keep ordering to the sheet.
The third was the relationship with the materials coordinator, who used to phone me when an order looked unusual. She kept phoning me. I passed the messages on when I remembered, which was not always. In short, I delegated the counting and kept the judgment, the authority and the information that the judgment needed.
Why the Director Called Me
The director's call reflects where accountability sits. When a manager delegates, the person who accepts the task is responsible for doing it well, but the manager still answers for how things turn out and for having chosen to hand the work over (NCSBN, 2016; Weydt, 2010). Tomás did the task well. The outcome was a unit borrowing supplies, and the decision that made that likely, handing over a task stripped of its judgment, was mine. I told the director so, and I did not name Tomás in that conversation. He learned about the call from me the same day, together with what I intended to change.
The Cost of the Gap
No patient was harmed, because the night nurse found kits elsewhere. The cost was quieter. Searching for supplies is time taken from patients, and studies of how nurses spend their time find that a meaningful share goes to hunting, fetching and waiting for things rather than to care (Storfjell et al., 2008). Over the weekend of the stockout, night staff estimated they spent close to an hour between them locating kits and gauze. The unit's standing with the intensive care unit, which lent the kits twice that month, also took a small hit. A task that saved me ninety minutes a week had started costing other people more than that.
What I Changed
I did not take the job back. Taking it back would have taught Tomás that delegation ends at the first failure and would have returned ninety minutes a week to my desk. Instead I handed over the missing pieces, in writing.
Judgment. Tomás now receives the weekly census forecast I get from the bed management office, including the count of dialysis patients expected. A one-page guide lists which supplies follow dialysis census, which follow urology procedures and which barely move.
Authority. He may raise any par level by up to 50% for up to two weeks on his own signature and must tell me by email the same day. Larger or longer changes still come to me.
Information. The materials coordinator now calls Tomás directly, with me copied on a monthly summary.
Supervision. For the next quarter we review the order together for ten minutes each Tuesday before it goes in, then monthly. Weydt (2010) describes supervision as the part of delegation most often dropped once a task appears to be running smoothly, which is exactly where mine went.
What This Taught Me About Delegating
The task I delegated was the visible part of a job whose real content was invisible to the person I handed it to. The next time I delegate a standing job, I will list three things before I hand it over: the decisions the job contains, the authority those decisions need and the information they depend on. If I am keeping any of the three, I will say so, so that the person doing the task knows where its edges are. I will also set a date for the first review before I hand anything over, not after the first problem. A delegated job should fail loudly to the person doing it, not quietly to the manager three months later.
References
National Council of State Boards of Nursing. (2016). National guidelines for nursing delegation. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 7(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(16)31035-3
Storfjell, J. L., Omoike, O., & Ohlson, S. (2008). The balancing act: Patient care time versus cost. Journal of Nursing Administration, 38(5), 244-249. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNA.0000312771.96610.df
Weydt, A. (2010). Developing delegation skills. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol15No02Man01
Reading the NR 529 Week 2 instructions
For Week 2 you usually analyze a delegation decision, either one you made or one you observed, and evaluate it against delegation principles and leadership concepts. Prompts ask what was delegated, to whom and why, how the handover was done, what went well or badly, where accountability sat and what you would do differently. A standing management job, such as ordering, scheduling or audits, often produces a richer analysis than a single bedside task, because it lasts long enough for gaps to show. Ask what decisions the job contained and whether the person received the authority and information to make them. Delegation guidelines and leadership texts make good sources; format them in APA 7, and check the page range your instructor posts.
How the NR 529 Week 2 example is put together
The sample begins with the job before delegation, ninety minutes each Tuesday, and why it moved to an experienced charge nurse. It describes the Sunday stockout and the director's call to the manager. A section applies the five points of the national delegation guidelines by analogy and finds thin directions and absent supervision. The core section identifies three things that never left the manager's desk: knowledge that par levels follow dialysis census, authority to change them and the calls from the materials coordinator. Sections on accountability and cost follow, with evidence on time nurses spend hunting supplies. The corrective steps hand over each missing piece in writing rather than taking the job back, and a closing section states what will be listed before the next handover.
Reading the NR 529 Week 2 grading rubric
Delegation analyses are usually graded on a clear description of the delegated work, accurate application of delegation principles, analysis of accountability and outcomes, and specific improvements. Graders reward papers that find the cause of a failure in the handover rather than in the person who accepted the task. Explaining why accountability stayed with the delegating manager, with a source, earns points in the analysis criterion. Showing the cost of the failure, even without patient harm, strengthens the case. Improvements score best when each one matches a gap the analysis found. Honest self-assessment is often credited under professional growth. The last few marks usually go to headings, mechanics and reference format.
Common NR 529 Week 2 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Students most often lose points by analyzing the colleague instead of the delegation. If the person did the task correctly, the gap is in what you handed over. Another problem is reciting delegation rules without applying them to the case. Take each principle and say what happened. Some papers end by taking the job back, which solves nothing and teaches the delegate that one failure ends the arrangement. Others propose closer monitoring with no detail. Say what information, authority or review the person needs. Keep the colleague's identity out of the paper and avoid blame. Finally, remember accountability. A manager who delegates still answers for the outcome, and a paper that forgets this misses the point of the week.
Get a NR 529 Week 2 example written to your instructions
Send the prompt, the template or required element list if your section publishes one, and the rubric, and we will write a custom NR 529 delegation analysis built to those headings and to your own unit's roles. It is written from your materials rather than adapted from somebody else's paper, the first one is free, and it comes back inside 24-48h.
More NR 529 papers and MSN samples
- NR 529 Week 1: Discussion on Refusing a Request
- NR 529 Week 3: Staffing Assignment Rationale
- NR 529 Week 4: Coaching Conversation Plan
- NR 529 Week 5: Unit Budget Review
- NR 529 Week 6: Incident Follow-up Memo
- NR 529 Week 7: Retention Plan
- NR 529 Week 8: Management Philosophy Statement
NR 529 Week 2 questions, answered
Is this the same as the five rights of delegation?
Related but larger. The five rights are written for a task inside a shift, and this week is usually about a job that lives across months, so the reasoning has to cover selection, a limit on signing, and what happens when the person goes on leave. If your prompt names the rights, make each one a heading and file an actual job beneath it rather than a definition.
Can I write about a job I took back?
That often produces the better analysis, provided it does more than express regret. Say what the check found, what you said to the nurse when you took it back, and whether the real problem was her performance or an instruction you never made concrete. Keep her unidentifiable. A job reclaimed and examined honestly shows more judgment than one that ran smoothly all year.
How long should the analysis be?
Your section sets the length and the rubric normally states it. What matters more is that the whole thing tracks one job rather than surveying three, because the second and third only ever get a paragraph each and the interesting part of this week is the detail underneath. Where a page count feels hard to fill, the missing content is normally the check and the month it failed.
Where can I find a free NR 529 Week 2 sample paper?
This page holds the supply-order delegation analysis in APA 7 form, which is the complete NR 529 Week 2 sample and free to read in full. For an analysis of a job you delegated, describe the handover in our form and a paper tracing its gaps can be prepared.
Can the NR 529 delegation analysis use a nonclinical task?
Yes, if your prompt allows it, and management tasks often show delegation problems more clearly. The sample uses a weekly supply order because the job ran for months before its missing pieces caused a stockout.