| Course | NR 576 Differential Diagnosis in Adult-Gerontology Primary Care |
|---|---|
| Week | 6 |
| Paper type | Case presentation |
| Length | About 1,000 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | MSN, Adult-Gerontology Primary Care NP (AGPCNP) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 576 Week 6
Case Presentation Script: The Record Called It Diabetic Neuropathy for Six Years, and Here Is Where That Account Changes, Told One Line of Evidence at a Time
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 576: Differential Diagnosis in Adult-Gerontology Primary Care
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Case Presentation Script: The Record Called It Diabetic Neuropathy for Six Years, and Here Is Where That Account Changes, Told One Line of Evidence at a Time
Opening, About 30 Seconds
This patient is 78, diabetic since 2007, and came to clinic after two falls at night. For six years, the record has explained the patient's numb feet as diabetic neuropathy, and for four years it has carried "dizziness" as a diagnosis. I am going to tell you where that account stops being enough. By the end you will hear three explanations for this patient's problem instead of one, and one of them is a drug the patient restarted three months ago.
What the Record Said, About 45 Seconds
The record's story was simple. Diabetes since 2007. A monofilament test in 2019 found reduced sensation at the toes, and "diabetic peripheral neuropathy" went on the list. Dizziness was added in 2021 after an urgent care visit. Anemia was added in 2022 from a hospital discharge summary as "likely anemia of chronic disease." Nobody revisited any of them. When the falls began, the obvious reading was that the neuropathy had worsened.
Where the Account Diverges, About 20 Seconds
The divergence is one finding: the patient lost position sense at the toes, and fell with eyes closed within three seconds, while touch was reduced only to mid-shin. Diabetic neuropathy of this degree does not usually take position sense first. That is where the record's account stopped being enough.
First Line of Evidence: The Spinal Cord, About One Minute
Let me finish this one before starting the next. Position and vibration travel in the posterior columns of the spinal cord. When those columns are affected, people rely on their eyes to know where their legs are, which is why this patient falls in the dark and why the Romberg test was positive. The knee reflexes were brisk, while the ankle reflexes were absent. Brisk knees suggest the spinal cord; absent ankles suggest the peripheral nerves. Both can be present at once. The fingertips became numb within six months. Together these point to something affecting the spinal cord as well as the nerves, over months rather than years.
Second Line of Evidence: The Blood, About 45 Seconds
Now the second line. The hemoglobin was 11.2, and the red cells were large, with a mean volume of 102. The record had called this anemia of chronic disease, but that label was written during an infection and never tested. Anemia of chronic disease usually produces normal-sized or small cells, not large ones. Large red cells and posterior column signs together suggest a common cause.
Third Line of Evidence: The Medicines, About One Minute
The third line. The patient has taken metformin for 15 years and omeprazole for nine. Both are associated with low vitamin B12. In the Diabetes Prevention Program follow-up, the odds of deficiency climbed with each year on metformin (Aroda et al., 2016), and years of acid suppression have also been linked to it (Lam et al., 2013). Vitamin B12 deficiency affects the spinal cord, the nerves, the blood and sometimes memory (Stabler, 2013). The results came back last week: B12 was 168 pg/mL, low, and methylmalonic acid was raised at 0.62 micromoles per liter, with normal kidney function.
Fourth Line of Evidence: Standing Up, About 45 Seconds
The last line is separate. The patient's blood pressure fell by 22 points on standing and stayed down at three minutes. That meets the definition of orthostatic hypotension. The patient restarted tamsulosin three months ago after running out, and severe low blood pressure on tamsulosin clusters in the first weeks after it is started or resumed (Bird et al., 2013). After two weeks off it, the standing drop was 6 points, and the patient had no falls.
The Revised Account, About 45 Seconds
So the account has three parts. The long-standing diabetic neuropathy is real and explains the stocking numbness and the absent ankle reflexes. Vitamin B12 deficiency, linked to two of the patient's medicines, explains the lost position sense, the positive Romberg, the brisk knees, the fingertips and the large red cells. And tamsulosin, restarted three months ago, explains the falls on standing. The record's single label covered one of the three.
What Happens Next, About 30 Seconds
B12 replacement has started. Metformin continues. The omeprazole decision is next visit. Tamsulosin stays off while the patient and urology discuss an alternative. We will repeat the position sense and Romberg at three months to see how much of the imbalance improves.
Expected Questions
"Why not stop metformin?" Because its benefit for the diabetes stands, and the deficiency is treated by replacement. "Could the neuropathy be all B12?" Possibly not; the stocking loss and absent ankle reflexes predate the change, and some may be diabetic. "Will the patient recover?" Some improvement is likely, but long-standing damage may recover only partly.
Slide Plan
Slide 1: the patient in one line and the record's three labels. Slide 2: the one finding where the account diverges, position sense lost with touch largely kept. Slide 3: the blood, two numbers. Slide 4: the medicines, two of them, with years of use. Slide 5: the standing pressures before and after stopping tamsulosin. Slide 6: the three-part account. Each slide carries a few words and numbers only; the reasoning is spoken. There is no slide for the history of the record, because the opening states it in a sentence and the room does not need it again.
Note on Delivery
This is written to be spoken in about seven minutes, timed twice in rehearsal. Slides show only the four findings that diverge from the record's account and the three-part summary, not the text spoken here.
References
Aroda, V. R., Edelstein, S. L., Goldberg, R. B., Knowler, W. C., Marcovina, S. M., Orchard, T. J., Bray, G. A., Schade, D. S., Temprosa, M. G., White, N. H., & Crandall, J. P. (2016). Long-term metformin use and vitamin B12 deficiency in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 101(4), 1754-1761. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-3754
Bird, S. T., Delaney, J. A. C., Brophy, J. M., Etminan, M., Skeldon, S. C., & Hartzema, A. G. (2013). Tamsulosin treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia and risk of severe hypotension in men aged 40-85 years in the United States: Risk window analyses using between and within patient methodology. BMJ, 347, Article f6320. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6320
Lam, J. R., Schneider, J. L., Zhao, W., & Corley, D. A. (2013). Proton pump inhibitor and histamine 2 receptor antagonist use and vitamin B12 deficiency. JAMA, 310(22), 2435-2442. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.280490
Stabler, S. P. (2013). Vitamin B12 deficiency. New England Journal of Medicine, 368(2), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1113996
NR 576 Week 6 instructions, in plain terms
The Week 6 assignment asks for a case presentation written to be heard rather than read. The opening should state who the patient is, what the record had been saying and that the account is about to change, all in the first moments, so listeners do not build a picture that has to come apart at the end. The body carries one line of evidence at a time, finishing each before the next begins, because a listener cannot turn back a page. The correction should be delivered as a divergence point that the room can locate. Most prompts reward slides that support rather than repeat the spoken text, and a presentation timed to the slot.
How the NR 576 Week 6 example is put together
The script opens in 30 seconds with the patient, the record's labels and the promise of three explanations. The record's account follows briefly. A 20-second section names the divergence: position sense lost with touch largely kept. Four lines of evidence follow, each with a timing: the spinal cord signs, the blood, the medicines with the B12 and methylmalonic acid results, and the standing pressures before and after tamsulosin. The revised account summarizes the three parts, and next steps follow. Expected questions have short answers. A slide plan lists six slides of numbers, and a delivery note gives the length and rehearsal. The script is written for speaking, in short sentences.
Reading the NR 576 Week 6 grading rubric
The presentation that loses most saves the correction for the end, so the room learns a version it must discard; this script announces the change in its first sentences. A presentation with no divergence point, where the account simply shifts, costs the next share, and this one names a single finding. Interleaving several strands of evidence loses the listener; each line here is finished before the next starts. Slides that reproduce the spoken words cost points, so the slides carry numbers only. An opening that walks the chart in order is penalized as written for a reader. Prepared answers and timing support delivery marks. A clear three-part summary at the end earns the synthesis row.
Common NR 576 Week 6 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Many NR 576 Week 6 presentations walk through the chart in date order and reach the new diagnosis in the last minute. Others change the account without saying where it changed. Evidence is often interleaved, leaving several threads half finished. Slides frequently repeat the script. Some presentations run long because the record's history is told in full. If your case differs, send the record's account and the evidence that changed it; a script can be built that announces the change, names the divergence and carries each line to the end. Rehearse with a timer, cut the record's history to a sentence and put only numbers on the slides.
Get a NR 576 Week 6 example written to your instructions
Send the case your section published, the rubric, and any slide or outline format your classroom requires. A custom NR 576 Week 6 case presentation is written to them and returned inside 24-48h, free the first time. Where the patient is one of your own, the encounter, the hours it counted toward and anything your preceptor puts a name to stay yours alone to produce.
More NR 576 papers and AGPCNP samples
- NR 576 Week 1: Old Label Versus New Complaint Post
- NR 576 Week 2: Problem List Review
- NR 576 Week 3: Episodic Visit Note
- NR 576 Week 4: Clinical Reasoning Write-Up
- NR 576 Week 5: Diagnostic Work-Up Plan
- NR 576 Week 7: Atypical Presentation Write-up
- NR 576 Week 8: Diagnostic Synthesis Paper
- NR 568 Week 6: Hyponatremia Adverse Effect Write-Up
NR 576 Week 6 questions, answered
Does a case presentation need the same depth of reasoning as a written paper?
The same reasoning, delivered differently. The example holds every argument the written version would carry but reorders them for a listener and compresses the ones a handout can carry instead. In many sections the graded artifact is a written outline together with the delivered version, and the outline is where the citations and the full reasoning are expected to live.
How much of the record's original account should be presented?
Enough that the correction has something to correct, and no more. The example gives the record's version its own short passage, complete and fairly stated, then moves on. Reproducing the chart at length before disagreeing with it is the commonest way these presentations run over, and the material cut to make room is usually the reasoning.
What if the record turns out to have been right?
Then present that, with the checking shown. The value here is in the method rather than in the reversal, and a presentation that tested an account carefully and found it sound demonstrates the same skill. Cases in this week are commonly built so that something does not fit, but manufacturing a correction the material will not support is visible immediately.
Where can I find a free NR 576 Week 6 sample paper?
The full presentation script, with its opening, divergence point and four lines of evidence for the 78-year-old, is on this page.
Where does the account diverge in the NR 576 Week 6 presentation?
At one finding: position sense lost at the toes and a positive Romberg while touch was reduced only to mid-shin, which diabetic neuropathy of that degree does not usually produce.