This page holds a finished PA-516 Week 2 tympanic membrane documentation, landmark by landmark, with position, translucency, mobility and the parts no light reached. Searches like "pa 516 week 2 assignment example", "pa516 week 2 sample" and "pa-516 week 2 example" land here.
What a finished PA-516 Week 2 tympanic membrane documentation looks like
Short, dense and organized by anatomy rather than by paragraph. Each ear gets its own block and neither borrows from the other. Inside a block the canal comes first, since a canal full of cerumen is the reason half of these records end early, then the membrane itself in named parts: the cone of light and where it pointed, the handle and short process of the malleus, the pars flaccida, the color and translucency of the rest. Position is stated as neutral, retracted or bulging rather than as normal. Mobility appears where the section includes insufflation, with what moved and what did not. The record closes by saying which landmarks were never visible, and the finished version does not write that as an apology.
How a PA-516 Week 2 example is structured
The heading order follows the instrument going in. Identification, then which ear is being described. Canal condition, because everything after it depends on what the light got past. Then the membrane in landmarks, each one named and given a state rather than a verdict. Then the whole surface: color, translucency, anything showing through. Then position and, where the classroom includes it, mobility with the method that produced it. Then the second ear, written out in full instead of as a comparison to the first, which is the compression most records reach for and most rubrics penalize. A closing line lists the unvisualized parts with the reason attached. An impression, where a section asks for one, sits last and stays a single sentence. Where the section supplies numbered rows, the record follows their order and leaves none empty.
Canal before membrane
What the light had to pass gets recorded first. Cerumen, debris or a narrow canal changes what every later sentence is entitled to claim, so it opens the record.
Landmarks, one at a time
Cone of light, malleus handle, short process, pars flaccida, and the translucency of the rest. Each gets a state of its own rather than a share in one adjective.
Position is not a verdict
Neutral, retracted or bulging describes where the membrane sits. Normal describes how the writer felt about it, and only the first of those has a rubric row.
Two ears, two blocks
Paired structures are marked separately, so the finished record writes the left out in full instead of saying it matched the right. That compression costs points every time.
The parts no light reached
A closing list of landmarks not visible, each with the reason. Faculty read this as observation rather than as excuse, and it usually carries a row of its own.
Where marks go in PA-516 Week 2
The heaviest single loss is a record written as a verdict, where the whole membrane gets one adjective and the landmark rows have nothing to mark. Running close behind it is a block that mixes the two ears, using phrases like the same on the left, since paired structures are scored separately and a comparison scores once. A third loss is silence about cerumen: a canal obstructed and unreported turns every statement after it into a claim with no basis. Then the smaller ones, which add up quickly: mobility asserted when no insufflation was performed, translucency and color collapsed into a single word, and an impression naming a condition the described findings do not carry. Sections also deduct where the canal is described and the membrane never is.
Get a PA-516 Week 2 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 2 instructions and any documentation template your classroom posted, and a custom tympanic membrane record is written to those headings and returned inside 24 to 48 hours, first one free. If the week has you examine a live patient, that examination and any image of it stay outside this; the sample covers the written form around them.
PA-516 Week 2 questions, answered
What if the canal was completely blocked?
Then the record says so and stops there, which is a complete answer rather than a failed one. Finished examples state the obstruction, name what it prevented, and say what would have to change before the membrane could be described at all. What loses points is a set of landmark statements written as though the drum had been seen straight through the blockage.
Does mobility have to be included?
Only where your section's template carries a row for it, since not every classroom includes pneumatic insufflation. Where it is included, the finished record pairs the finding with the method, because mobility is a claim about something that was done rather than about something that was looked at. Send the template and the example follows whichever version applies.
Should the record end with a diagnosis?
Many templates ask for a brief impression and mark it lightly. In the finished examples it stays one sentence and stays consistent with the described findings, naming what the appearance is compatible with rather than declaring a condition outright. An impression reaching past the landmarks recorded above it is the mismatch faculty look for first.