| Course | PA 526 Comprehensive Clinical Module Gastroenterology |
|---|---|
| Week | 8 |
| Paper type | Hepatobiliary case paper |
| Length | About 1,010 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | Master of Physician Assistant Studies (MPAS) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PA 526 Week 8
Hepatobiliary Case Paper: One Shared Drainage System Behind N.R.'s Jaundice, Fever and Back Pain, Each Lab Value Assigned to Liver, Bile Duct or Pancreas, and the Diagnoses That Lost to a Stone in the Common Duct
Student Name
Chamberlain University
PA 526: Comprehensive Clinical Module Gastroenterology
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Hepatobiliary Case Paper: One Shared Drainage System Behind N.R.'s Jaundice, Fever and Back Pain, Each Lab Value Assigned to Liver, Bile Duct or Pancreas, and the Diagnoses That Lost to a Stone in the Common Duct
Introduction
Seven weeks after the bleeding ulcer was treated, and two weeks before the scheduled gallbladder operation, N.R. arrived at the emergency department with a day of right upper quadrant pain, shaking chills, a temperature of 38.9 C and yellow eyes, plus a band of pain through to the back. This paper reasons through the case around the anatomy the three organs share: the liver's bile ducts, the gallbladder's cystic duct and the pancreatic duct all drain through the common channel at the ampulla into the duodenum.
One Exit, Three Organs
Bile from the liver flows through the hepatic ducts into the common bile duct, which the cystic duct joins from the gallbladder. Near its end, the common bile duct runs through the head of the pancreas and usually joins the pancreatic duct before both empty at the ampulla. A stone can sit in the cystic duct and inflame the gallbladder, in the common bile duct and block bile from the liver, or at the ampulla and block both bile and pancreatic juice. The location of one stone therefore decides which organ shows the injury, and the paper is organized around that single exit rather than three separate organs.
Chemistry Assigned to an Organ
For the liver and its ducts: total bilirubin 5.8 mg/dL, mostly direct; alkaline phosphatase 410 U/L and GGT 610 U/L, a cholestatic pattern showing bile backing up into the liver. ALT 180 U/L reflects liver cell irritation from the back pressure. Albumin 3.8 g/dL and INR 1.1 show that liver function is preserved.
For the pancreas: lipase 1,240 U/L, more than three times the upper limit, with back pain, which meets two of the three criteria for acute pancreatitis.
For the blood and infection: white cells 16.8 × 10^9/L, C-reactive protein raised, two sets of blood cultures drawn before antibiotics.
For the gallbladder itself: no specific laboratory marker; its state comes from imaging.
What Imaging Is Asked to Show
Ultrasound was asked one question: is the common bile duct dilated, and are there stones in it or in the gallbladder? It showed multiple gallbladder stones without wall thickening, a common bile duct of 9 mm (dilated for age) and a possible echogenic focus near its lower end, partly hidden by bowel gas. CT was not ordered first, because ultrasound answers the duct question with no radiation, and contrast would add little within the first 72 hours of pancreatitis.
Acute Cholangitis
Under the Tokyo Guidelines, a definite diagnosis of acute cholangitis needs three things together: an inflammatory response in the body, laboratory signs that bile is backing up, and a scan showing the duct widened or the thing widening it (Kiriyama et al., 2018). N.R. has fever with raised inflammatory markers, jaundice with abnormal liver tests and a dilated duct: a definite diagnosis. The guidelines grade severity by organ dysfunction; N.R.'s blood pressure, kidney function, platelets and mental status are normal, but the white count above 12 places N.R. in the moderate grade, which calls for early drainage.
The Plan
Intravenous fluids and broad antibiotics after blood cultures. The ASGE guideline places a patient with cholangitis in the high-probability group for a common duct stone and recommends proceeding to ERCP rather than further imaging (Buxbaum et al., 2019). ERCP was done the next morning: a 7 mm stone was removed from the lower common duct after a sphincterotomy, and pus drained from the duct. Gallbladder removal is planned during the same admission once the pancreatitis settles, because leaving the gallbladder in place after gallstone pancreatitis carries a high risk of recurrence.
The Versions That Lost
Acute cholecystitis alone: would cause right upper quadrant pain, fever and a positive Murphy sign, but rarely a bilirubin this high and not a dilated duct; the ultrasound showed no wall thickening. It lost.
Hepatitis from drugs or viruses: would raise ALT far more than alkaline phosphatase, with no duct dilation. The R ratio here is below 2, the cholestatic range in the liver chemistry guideline (Kwo et al., 2017), and the duct is dilated. It lost.
Pancreatic head tumor: can block the duct and cause jaundice, but usually without fever or such sudden pain, and a stone was found. It lost for now, although the ERCP findings and later imaging will confirm the pancreas head is normal once the inflammation has passed.
A complication of the healed ulcer: a posterior duodenal ulcer can penetrate the pancreas, but would not dilate the bile duct or explain the jaundice. It lost.
Connecting the Year
Looking back, N.R.'s first visit described biliary colic, the liver panel after the fourth attack suggested a stone that passed, and this admission is the stone that did not. The bleeding ulcer, treated endoscopically and followed by a confirmed healing exam as the bleeding guideline supports (Laine et al., 2021), and the dysphagia, found to be a peptic stricture on endoscopy and dilated after healing, were separate problems in the same patient. Each was handled at its own point along the gut, which is the lesson of the course.
Conclusion
A stone at the lower end of the common bile duct, the shared exit, explains every finding: obstructed bile flow, infection behind the blockage and pancreatic inflammation from the shared channel. Assigning each value to the organ it reports for, and reading imaging as an answer to a specific question, led directly to ERCP. The case also shows the cost of delay: a gallbladder with known stones awaiting surgery can produce a duct stone at any time.
References
Buxbaum, J. L., Abbas Fehmi, S. M., Sultan, S., Fishman, D. S., Qumseya, B. J., Cortessis, V. K., Schilperoort, H., Kysh, L., Matsuoka, L., Yachimski, P., Agrawal, D., Gurudu, S. R., Jamil, L. H., Jue, T. L., Khashab, M. A., Law, J. K., Lee, J. K., Naveed, M., Sawhney, M. S., . . . Wani, S. B. (2019). ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 89(6), 1075-1105.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001
Kiriyama, S., Kozaka, K., Takada, T., Strasberg, S. M., Pitt, H. A., Gabata, T., Hata, J., Liau, K.-H., Miura, F., Horiguchi, A., Liu, K.-H., Su, C.-H., Wada, K., Jagannath, P., Itoi, T., Gouma, D. J., Mori, Y., Mukai, S., Gimenez, M. E., . . . Yamamoto, M. (2018). Tokyo Guidelines 2018: Diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos). Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, 25(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.512
Kwo, P. Y., Cohen, S. M., & Lim, J. K. (2017). ACG clinical guideline: Evaluation of abnormal liver chemistries. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 112(1), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.517
Laine, L., Barkun, A. N., Saltzman, J. R., Martel, M., & Leontiadis, G. I. (2021). ACG clinical guideline: Upper gastrointestinal and ulcer bleeding. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 116(5), 899-917. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001245
What the PA 526 Week 8 assignment asks for
The final week asks for a case paper on a hepatobiliary presentation. Organize it around the shared drainage system of liver, gallbladder and pancreas rather than around three separate organ headings, explaining how one blockage can show up in different organs depending on its location. Assign each laboratory value to the organ it reports for. Describe imaging as an answer to a specific question you asked of it, and explain why you chose that test. Apply published diagnostic criteria and severity grading where they exist. Set out the plan with guideline support. Include a section on the diagnoses that lost, each with the finding that defeated it. Close with a conclusion linking the findings to the anatomy. This is the longest paper in the module and carries a full reference list.
Inside the PA 526 Week 8 example
The introduction presents N.R. with fever, chills, jaundice and back pain two weeks before a planned gallbladder operation, and frames the paper around the ampulla. A section traces bile and pancreatic flow and shows how a stone's position decides which organ is injured. Chemistry is sorted into liver and ducts, pancreas, infection and gallbladder. Ultrasound is asked whether the duct is dilated and stone-filled, showing a 9 mm duct. The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 criteria give a definite moderate cholangitis. The plan follows the ASGE guideline to ERCP, removal of a 7 mm stone and same-admission cholecystectomy. Four losing diagnoses are each defeated by a named finding, citing the liver chemistry guideline. A section links the year's visits, citing the bleeding guideline, and the conclusion ties every finding to the shared exit.
PA 526 Week 8 rubric: what full points look like
Faculty grade this final paper on organization first. A paper with three organ headings and no account of the shared ducts loses the largest share, because the week tests anatomical reasoning across organs. Next comes the assignment of chemistry: values listed together without saying which organ each reports for are marked down. Credit goes to imaging framed as an answer to a question, and to diagnostic criteria and severity grading applied from a published source. The section on diagnoses that lost is weighted heavily; each must name the finding that defeated it. The plan must follow guideline recommendations. A conclusion tied to the anatomy and a complete, correctly formatted reference list complete the expected structure.
Common PA 526 Week 8 mistakes, and how to avoid them
The usual weakness in hepatobiliary papers is a set of organ sections that never explain how one blockage affects several organs. Share your case, laboratory values and imaging, and the paper prepared for you would be organized around the shared drainage system, assign each value to its organ and present imaging as the answer to a stated question. Published criteria and grading are applied where they exist, and the plan follows the guideline your course uses. A section on losing diagnoses names the finding that defeated each one. The conclusion ties the findings back to the anatomy. If your case is pancreatitis or cholecystitis rather than cholangitis, the same structure applies. Check every value and criterion against your own case and sources before using the paper.
Get a PA-526 Week 8 example written to your instructions
Send the case, the rubric and any reference count your section sets, and a custom PA-526 Week 8 paper is written to it and returned inside 24-48h, the first one free. If your term closes on something other than a hepatobiliary case, tell the desk what your term actually closes on and that deliverable is written instead.
More PA 526 papers and MPAS samples
- PA 526 Week 1: Abdominal Region Discussion Post
- PA 526 Week 2: Abdominal Quadrant Brief
- PA 526 Week 3: GI Alarm Feature Checklist
- PA 526 Week 4: Dysphagia and Reflux Case
- PA 526 Week 5: Liver Panel Interpretation
- PA 526 Week 6: GI Bleeding Source Triage
- PA 526 Week 7: Endoscopy Indication Write-Up
- PA 524 Week 8: Renal Dosing Adjustment Table
- PA 522 Week 8: Monitoring Interval Rationale
- PA 520 Week 8: Symptom to Number Mismatch Case
- PA 518 Week 8: Reperfusion Timing Brief
PA 526 Week 8 questions, answered
My case involves the pancreas only.
Then the paper is written on the pancreas, and the shared outlet becomes the reason certain findings have to be explained away rather than the subject itself. That framing still earns the comparison marks, because ruling the other two out is part of what a rubric on this week rewards. Give the desk your case exactly as the classroom posted it and the weighting follows.
How many references does the final paper carry?
Sections publish different counts and some specify recency as well. The sample matches whatever yours states, and where nothing is specified it carries enough to support each clinical claim without padding the list. Send the rubric row and any library guidance your classroom posted, since some sections restrict the types of source accepted.
The assignment includes a patient education section.
That is common on a closing paper and the example includes one written at the reading level the rubric names, tied to the specific case rather than general. It is kept descriptive, covering what the document would explain and why, which is what the marking rewards. Send the rubric row and the section is sized to the points it carries.
Where can I find a free PA 526 Week 8 sample paper?
The full PA 526 Week 8 hepatobiliary case paper is on this page, organized around the shared bile and pancreatic drainage system with each lab value assigned to an organ.
Which diagnoses lose in the PA 526 Week 8 sample?
Acute cholecystitis alone, viral or drug hepatitis, a pancreatic head tumor and a penetrating duodenal ulcer, each defeated by a specific finding.