| Course | MSW 512 Direct Practice II |
|---|---|
| Week | 7 |
| Paper type | Treatment plan |
| Length | About 540 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | Master of Social Work (MSW) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MSW 512 Week 7
Treatment Plan for M. Holding a Court Mandate, Drinking, Depressive Symptoms and Grief: What Comes First and Why, Goals in M.'s Language Separated From the Mandate, Observable Objectives, Adapted Interventions and a Real Evaluation Design
Student Name
Chamberlain University
MSW 512: Direct Practice II
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Treatment Plan for M. Holding a Court Mandate, Drinking, Depressive Symptoms and Grief: What Comes First and Why, Goals in M.'s Language Separated From the Mandate, Observable Objectives, Adapted Interventions and a Real Evaluation Design
The Mandate, Named as a Mandate
The court requires 16 weeks of outpatient treatment with attendance reports to the pretrial program, and the licensing authority requires proof of treatment before a hearing on the commercial license. These are requirements M. did not choose. The plan reports attendance as required and nothing more without M.'s signed consent.
What Comes First
Safety first, through the plan agreed on November 6. Then drinking, because it worsens sleep and mood and threatens the license. Then mood and grief, which will be easier to work on once sleep improves.
Goals in M.'s Language
Goal 1: "Get the license back and keep it." Goal 2: "Sleep without beer." Goal 3: "Stop being short with the kids." Goal 4, added at session 6: "Deal with Dad."
Objectives Someone Could See
1a. No alcohol on weeknights for 8 consecutive weeks, by M.'s daily log and spouse's report, by January 15.
1b. AUDIT score below 8 at the 16-week review.
2a. Sleep at least 6 hours on 5 of 7 nights for 4 weeks, by sleep log.
3a. PHQ-9 below 10 by the 16-week review.
3b. One planned activity with the children each weekend, by spouse's report.
4a. Visit the father's grave with the brother, as M. proposed, by the 12-week mark.
Each objective names its source of evidence, so a supervisor or the court's reviewer could check it without relying on the worker's impression.
Interventions and Their Sources
Motivational interviewing continues for ambivalence about weekends, where M. still wants to drink (Miller & Rollnick, 2013). Cognitive behavioral relapse prevention for weeknights: identifying high-risk situations, such as the driveway after dark, and rehearsing alternatives, following the model in which lapses are treated as learning rather than failure (Witkiewitz & Marlatt, 2004). Adapted: sessions use M.'s trucking language, "pre-trip checks" for evenings, and phone sessions once M. returns to the road. Sleep hygiene. Grief work in individual sessions. The relapse prevention group continues.
Medication
M. will see the agency's prescriber about sleep and mood; any medication decision rests with the prescriber and M.
Evaluation Design
Measures: AUDIT and PHQ-9 at intake, week 8 and week 16; weekly logs for drinking and sleep; spouse's report monthly, with consent. Design: a simple repeated-measures comparison against intake scores. What would count as progress: AUDIT under 8 and PHQ-9 under 10. What would change the plan: drinking on weeknights in two consecutive weeks, or any return of thoughts of death.
Agreement
M. agreed to goals 1 to 4 and to the weekend plan being "still open." The spouse agreed to monthly reports.
The court receives only attendance reports, as the release M. signed allows; the goals and logs stay in the agency record.
References
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
Witkiewitz, K., & Marlatt, G. A. (2004). Relapse prevention for alcohol and drug problems: That was Zen, this is Tao. American Psychologist, 59(4), 224-235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.4.224
The Chamberlain MSW 512 Week 7 instructions
In week 7, the task is a treatment plan for a case that pulls in more than one direction. Say what happens first and why. Write goals in the person's language, separate from anything a referral or court requires, and name any mandate as a mandate. Make objectives observable, so someone could see whether they happened. Attach interventions to objectives, name the model components they come from and say which were adapted. Include a real evaluation section: measures, timing, design, what would count as progress and what would change the plan. Published instruments can be used. A mandated client can still have goals of their own. Cite the models and measures. Agreement, including any part the person declined, belongs in the plan.
How the MSW 512 Week 7 example is put together
The mandate section names 16 weeks of court-required treatment and a licensing requirement, with attendance reported and nothing else without consent. The order section puts safety first, then drinking, then mood and grief. Four goals appear in M.'s words, from keeping the license to dealing with the father's death. Objectives include eight dry weeknight weeks, an AUDIT under 8, six hours of sleep, a PHQ-9 under 10, weekend time with the children and a grave visit. Interventions combine Miller and Rollnick (2013) for weekends and Witkiewitz and Marlatt (2004) for weeknights, adapted as "pre-trip checks." Evaluation uses repeated measures and states what would change the plan.
Where the points sit in the MSW 512 Week 7 rubric
Treatment plans at this level are graded first on order and separation. A plan that writes goals in the court's language, or treats every problem at once, loses marks. Saying what comes first, and why, carries a defined share. Goals in the person's own words are expected. Objectives must be observable. Faculty weigh the link between interventions and objectives, with model components and adaptations named. The evaluation section is graded as a real design: measures, timing, comparison and decision rules. Agreement should be recorded.An APA reference list closes the paper. A mandated client can still own goals, and the plan should show which goals are whose.
MSW 512 Week 7 help: mistakes that cost points
Treatment plans for mandated clients commonly copy the court order into the goals section. Another frequent gap is an evaluation section that says only "progress will be monitored." Some plans also list interventions with no link to any objective. Is your mandated client someone else? Pass along the vignette with the court terms; we would order the problems, keep the person's goals separate from requirements, write observable objectives, attach and adapt interventions and build an evaluation design with clear decision rules. A published instrument, such as a screening scale, can anchor the evaluation if it fits the goal it measures, and the plan would say when it is given.
Get a MSW-512 Week 7 example written to your instructions
Forward the case, the rubric and whatever planning template your section publishes. A custom MSW-512 Week 7 treatment plan is written against them and comes back inside 24-48h. Nothing is charged for a first example. The evaluation design is the half most drafts thin out, so a finished one repays close reading.
More MSW 512 papers and MSW samples
- MSW 512 Week 1: Practice Approach Choice Post
- MSW 512 Week 2: Intervention Model Write-Up
- MSW 512 Week 3: Process Recording of an MI Session
- MSW 512 Week 4: Complex Case Assessment
- MSW 512 Week 5: Group Session Write-Up
- MSW 512 Week 6: Safety Plan Example
- MSW 512 Week 8: Practice Reflection
- MSW 511 Week 7: Culturally Responsive Practice Plan
- MSW 509 Week 7: Child Treatment Planning Paper
- MSW 507 Week 7: Qualitative Study Critique
- MSW 506 Week 7: Cosponsorship Advocacy Plan
MSW 512 Week 7 questions, answered
What counts as an evaluation design here?
Usually something modest and single case: a baseline measure taken before the work starts, the same measure repeated at set intervals, and a stated rule for reading the result. Sections differ on whether they want a named design. What they agree on is that the measure has to exist before the intervention does, otherwise the plan cannot be shown to have failed.
Can a published instrument be used?
Often yes, and naming one is stronger than inventing a scale, provided the plan says who administers it, how often, and what a change in the score would mean for the work. A counted behavior the person tracks themselves is equally acceptable in most sections. What loses marks is a measure named and then never referred to again.
What if the case is mandated?
Then the goal question becomes the assignment. A mandated client system arrives with somebody else's objective attached, and a plan that writes the court's requirement into the person's own goals is marked down for exactly that. The stronger document holds both: what the mandate requires, what the person wants, and where the two overlap enough for work to happen.
Where can I find a free MSW 512 Week 7 sample paper?
This page carries a complete MSW 512 Week 7 treatment plan for a mandated client with drinking, low mood and grief.
What would change the plan in the MSW 512 Week 7 sample?
Drinking on weeknights in two consecutive weeks, or any return of thoughts of death, would trigger a review of the plan.