| Course | MSW 513 Policy II: Soc Pol & Soc Just |
|---|---|
| Week | 6 |
| Paper type | Discussion post |
| Length | About 400 words |
| Format | Discussion post with APA 7 citations |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | Master of Social Work (MSW) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MSW 513 Week 6
Week 6 Discussion: Initial Post
Advocating for Kin Caregivers Who Did Not Ask Me To, Inside an Agency Paid for Full Home Studies: Which Conflict I Am Deciding, the Position I Take and What It Costs Me at My Placement
Two Conflicts, One Decision
This week asks about authorization and about employers. Both apply to my kin licensing work. No group of grandparents asked me to testify on House Bill 1182, and my placement agency earns part of its budget from full foster home studies that a separate kin standard would shorten. I am deciding the second conflict here, because I cannot settle the first alone.
The Employer's Interest, Named
Brennan County Family Services holds a state contract paid per completed home study. A separate kin standard, as the 2023 federal rule permits (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2023), would replace some full studies with shorter kin assessments at a lower rate. My supervisor has not opposed the bill. The director has not mentioned it. Silence is not consent.
My Position and Its Price
I will keep advocating for the bill, and I will tell my supervisor in writing before I testify again, including that the change could lower the agency's study revenue. The Code asks social workers to advocate for policies that improve social conditions and to act for people who are vulnerable or oppressed (National Association of Social Workers, 2021). It also asks us to honor commitments to employers. I read those together as a duty to be open with the agency, not as a reason to wait for its permission. The price is real. My supervisor may limit my hours on the kin caseload or decline to sign my next learning contract with this project on it.
The Part Left Unsettled
Authorization is harder. Some caregivers I serve want the payment. Others told me they prefer not to be licensed at all, because licensing means more visits. Ryan et al. (2016) found children with unlicensed relatives reunified more often than those in licensed homes, so their preference is not a mistake. I have not asked the families as a group what they want. Until I do, my testimony speaks to what I observed, not for them.
A Question for You
If your agency's contract would lose money from the policy you support, would you tell the agency first or testify first?
References
National Association of Social Workers. (2021). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
Ryan, J. P., Perron, B. E., Moore, A., Victor, B., & Evangelist, M. (2016). Foster home placements and the probability of family reunification: Does licensing matter? Child Abuse & Neglect, 59, 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.07.006
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2023). Separate licensing or approval standards for relative or kinship foster family homes (Final rule, 88 FR 66700). Federal Register.
The Chamberlain MSW 513 Week 6 instructions
In week 6, the discussion turns to conflicts inside advocacy. Two run through this course. One is authorization: whether you may argue on behalf of a group that has not asked you to. The other is employment: whether your organization benefits from the arrangement you want to change. Pick the conflict you are deciding and say so. Take a position, and attach its price, because a position that costs the writer nothing is not the situation anyone meets in practice. Apply one ethical standard rather than quoting the Code at length. Say how you know what affected people want, or admit you do not yet know. Keep any real organization unidentifiable. End with a question that a classmate who disagrees could answer. Replies should press on the price.
Inside the MSW 513 Week 6 example
The post opens by naming both conflicts and choosing the employer conflict to decide, explaining that authorization cannot be settled by the writer alone. The next section states the agency's interest plainly: a per study contract that a separate kin standard would shorten, and a director who has said nothing. The position section commits to continued advocacy plus a written note to the supervisor before further testimony, reads the NASW Code's duties to advocate and to employers together, and names the price, a possible narrowing of the student's caseload. The unsettled section returns to authorization, noting that some caregivers prefer to remain unlicensed and that Ryan et al. (2016) found unlicensed relative care reunified more often, so the writer speaks only to observation. The closing question asks classmates whether they would tell the agency first or testify first.
Where the points sit in the MSW 513 Week 6 rubric
This post earns most of its points by deciding something. Instructors read many posts that lay out both sides and conclude the matter is complex, and those earn little. Credit follows a stated position, the cost it carries for the writer and an honest account of the employer's interest. One ethical standard applied to the case earns more than a long quotation from the Code. Faculty also look at authorization: whether the writer knows what affected people want, and how. Anything that would identify a real agency or client loses points. A source should support a specific claim, cited in APA. Replies are graded on whether they test the price of a classmate's position rather than praising it, and on meeting the reply count and deadline.
MSW 513 Week 6 help from the desk
The post that loses most resolves nothing and closes by saying the situation is complicated. Next is the answer with no cost in it, where the writer would simply advocate and the employer never appears again. Quoting the Code at length in place of an argument is common and earns little. Some posts speak for a group without saying how its wishes were learned. If your conflict is different, maybe a hospital worker pressing for a charity care change or a school social worker opposing a discipline rule the district favors, the shape is the same: name the conflict, take a side, state its price and say what is still open. A model post written for your situation would keep to the word limit and close with a question that invites a classmate who disagrees.
Get a MSW-513 Week 6 example written to your instructions
Send us the Week 6 prompt as your classroom words it, plus the conflict you want to write into, and a custom example is written for that prompt and comes back inside 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free. What you would actually do in your own agency is nobody else's answer to give.
More MSW 513 papers and MSW samples
- MSW 513 Week 1: Hardship Versus Injustice Post
- MSW 513 Week 2: Kin Licensing Policy Analysis
- MSW 513 Week 3: Kin Licensing Policy Brief
- MSW 513 Week 4: Kin Licensing Stakeholder Map
- MSW 513 Week 5: Kin Licensing Testimony Draft
- MSW 513 Week 7: Advocacy Plan
- MSW 513 Week 8: Policy Change Presentation
- MSW 514 Week 6: Organizational Analysis
- MSW 512 Week 6: Safety Plan Example
- MSW 511 Week 6: Structural Oppression Analysis
- MSW 509 Week 6: Case Formulation Example
MSW 513 Week 6 questions, answered
What if my organization would not let me advocate on this?
That is worth posting about rather than working around. Many agencies restrict what staff may say publicly, particularly where a contract or a license is involved, and the restriction is part of the situation the course is asking you to think about. A post that names the constraint and says what remains possible inside it beats one imagining a free hand.
How do I know what a group actually wants?
By asking, and the post can say how. Advisory groups, existing member organizations, and people already speaking publicly on the issue are all routes. Where none was used, say that too, since a position argued on somebody's behalf without contact is a weaker position and pretending otherwise is what instructors are watching for in this discussion.
Is it acceptable to disagree with a classmate here?
It is what the week is for. Threads on this material tend to collapse into agreement because the values are shared, and a reply that accepts the position but questions what it would cost inside a real agency is the reply that earns its points. Disagree with the reasoning and keep it about the argument rather than the person.
Where can I find a free MSW 513 Week 6 sample paper?
A full MSW 513 Week 6 discussion post on advocating for kin caregivers inside an agency paid for full home studies is on this page, with margin notes.
Which conflict does the MSW 513 Week 6 sample decide?
The employer conflict, by committing to continued advocacy with written notice to the supervisor, while leaving authorization from caregivers open until they are asked as a group.