| Course | MSW 513 Policy II: Soc Pol & Soc Just |
|---|---|
| Week | 7 |
| Paper type | Advocacy plan |
| Length | About 570 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | Master of Social Work (MSW) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MSW 513 Week 7
Advocacy Plan for a Separate Kin Licensing Standard in Brennan County and the State: Turning a Navigator's Caseload Into Counted Evidence, Raising It Inside the Agency First, Handing the Argument to Caregivers and Naming the Risk to the Worker
Student Name
Chamberlain University
MSW 513: Policy II: Soc Pol & Soc Just
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Advocacy Plan for a Separate Kin Licensing Standard in Brennan County and the State: Turning a Navigator's Caseload Into Counted Evidence, Raising It Inside the Agency First, Handing the Argument to Caregivers and Naming the Risk to the Worker
Evidence Already Held
The navigator program sees every kin household in the county that asks for help. The plan turns that into a tally, kept from September through December, of each household that begins licensing and the step where it stops: application, background checks, home study visit, bedroom measurement, pre-service training or final approval. Each entry records only the step, the month and the number of children. A composite tally for this plan reads: 31 households began; 9 were licensed; 11 stopped at the bedroom measurement; 8 at training; 3 for other reasons; none at a background check. The national yardstick is the federal estimate for 2019, when barely more than a quarter (27.6 percent) of children placed with kin drew federal foster care funding (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2023).
De-Identified Before It Travels
The tally holds no names, ages or addresses. Counts under five in any cell are reported as "fewer than five," because in a county this size a small count can identify a family. Any account used in testimony is given with written permission and with details changed.
Inside Before Outside
Stage 1, October: present the tally to my supervisor in supervision and ask what the agency can stand behind. Stage 2, November: with the supervisor, take it to the agency director, including the effect on home study revenue. Stage 3, December: ask the director to bring it to the county's kinship workgroup, which includes the state licensing office's regional manager. Stage 4, January: if the agency agrees, submit the tally as written testimony on House Bill 1182. Media contact is not in the plan.
What Each Stage Should Produce
Stage 1 produces a corrected tally and the supervisor's view. Stage 2 produces the director's position in writing. Stage 3 produces a request from the workgroup to the licensing office. Stage 4 produces testimony on record.
Handing the Argument Over
The navigator program runs a monthly grandparents' support group. In November, the plan asks the group whether its members want to be involved and how. Some have said they prefer to stay unlicensed, which research suggests is not harmful to reunification (Ryan et al., 2016), so the plan offers a choice: written statements, a member testifying with the program's help or no involvement. The goal is that by spring, caregivers speak and the intern does not.
Risk to the Worker
I am a student. The agency could narrow my placement duties if it sees the plan as a threat to its contract. My field instructor and faculty liaison will see this plan before Stage 2, and I will not testify again without the agency knowing.
Measuring Success
Success this year is the workgroup's written request to the licensing office and at least one caregiver choosing to speak. Changing the standard is a longer goal.
References
Ryan, J. P., Perron, B. E., Moore, A., Victor, B., & Evangelist, M. (2016). Foster home placements and the probability of family reunification: Does licensing matter? Child Abuse & Neglect, 59, 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.07.006
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2023). Separate licensing or approval standards for relative or kinship foster family homes (Final rule, 88 FR 66700). Federal Register.
Reading the MSW 513 Week 7 instructions
The week 7 advocacy plan starts from what a practitioner already has: repeated observation of how a rule works. Show how that becomes evidence others can rely on, counted rather than remembered, aggregated and checked against a published figure. De-identify everything before it leaves the agency, including small counts in small places. Sequence the channels starting inside: supervision, agency leadership, then a funder, contracting body or coalition, and only later any public channel. Say what each stage should produce so the plan can be checked. Plan for affected people to take part as participants rather than appearing only as examples. Include a section on risk to the worker. Close with a success measure that could actually be met this year, and assign roles where others are involved.
How the MSW 513 Week 7 example is put together
The evidence section describes a term long tally of kin households by the step where they stopped licensing and gives a composite count: 31 began, 9 were licensed, 11 stopped at the bedroom measurement, 8 at training and none at a background check, set beside the federal participation figure. De-identification rules follow, including reporting counts under five as fewer than five. Four dated stages run from supervision in October through the director and a county kinship workgroup to written testimony in January, with no media contact. A short section names the product of each stage. The handover section asks the grandparents' support group whether and how members want to take part, citing Ryan et al. (2016) to explain why staying unlicensed remains an option. Risk to a student worker and a success measure close the plan.
MSW 513 Week 7 rubric: what full points look like
The plan's evidence carries the most weight. Faculty look for observation turned into a count that someone outside the agency could trust, with de-identification handled before anything travels. Sequencing comes next: a plan that begins with the press or a legislator before the problem is raised internally loses substantial credit. Each stage should have a stated product, and roles should be assigned. Affected people are expected to take part in the plan, not just to supply case examples. A frank risk section earns credit because it shows the plan was written by someone who could lose something. The success measure must be realistic. Writing, APA format and adherence to length are assessed throughout, and every figure needs its source.
MSW 513 Week 7 help: mistakes that cost points
The plan that loses most opens with a media strategy for a problem no supervisor has heard about. Close behind is evidence left as anecdote, a caseload impression that is never counted or compared to anything published. Plans also slip by including details that could identify a family, by treating affected people only as stories and by leaving out any risk to the worker. A success measure such as changing state law in one semester tells the instructor the plan is not serious. If your issue is different, perhaps a utility shutoff policy or a hospital discharge practice, the same sequence holds from evidence to inside channels to handover. A plan written for your setting would date each stage, assign it to someone and set a success measure you could report on by the end of term.
Get a MSW-513 Week 7 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 7 instructions with the rule and the setting your assignment names, and a custom example is built to those requirements and comes back inside 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free. Whether you would actually escalate past your own supervisor stays a decision only you can make.
More MSW 513 papers and MSW samples
- MSW 513 Week 1: Hardship Versus Injustice Post
- MSW 513 Week 2: Kin Licensing Policy Analysis
- MSW 513 Week 3: Kin Licensing Policy Brief
- MSW 513 Week 4: Kin Licensing Stakeholder Map
- MSW 513 Week 5: Kin Licensing Testimony Draft
- MSW 513 Week 6: Advocacy Conflict Post
- MSW 513 Week 8: Policy Change Presentation
- MSW 514 Week 7: Community Systems Analysis
- MSW 512 Week 7: Mandated Client Treatment Plan
- MSW 511 Week 7: Culturally Responsive Practice Plan
- MSW 509 Week 7: Child Treatment Planning Paper
MSW 513 Week 7 questions, answered
Can I build the plan on my field placement?
The observation, yes; the paperwork, no. What you have seen a rule do is exactly the material this assignment wants, provided it is de-identified and the agency is not named in a way that identifies it. Placement hours, supervision records and any evaluation your field instructor signs are your own account of your own work and are never written for you.
How far does internal escalation have to go?
Far enough to be genuine, and not so far that it becomes an excuse for never acting. The plan should name what it expects each stage to produce and how long it will wait. Where a stage produces nothing by that point, the plan moves on. Written that way, escalation is a documented sequence rather than a reason the campaign never left the building.
Does the plan need affected people involved?
Points generally follow from showing it, and the reasoning is not decorative. People living under a rule can say things about it that no worker can say on their behalf, and a plan keeping them as case material has reproduced the arrangement it objects to. The plan should also say what support makes participation possible rather than assuming availability.
Where can I find a free MSW 513 Week 7 sample paper?
The complete MSW 513 Week 7 advocacy plan for a separate kin licensing standard is posted on this page, with margin notes on evidence, sequence and handover.
Why does the MSW 513 Week 7 sample start inside the agency?
Because raising the matter in supervision and with leadership first protects the evidence and the worker, and gives the agency a chance to carry the argument before any outside channel.