| Course | MSW 520 International Social Work |
|---|---|
| Week | 7 |
| Paper type | Cross-border case consultation record |
| Length | About 470 words, 4 pages |
| Format | Memo with APA 7 citations |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | Master of Social Work (MSW) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MSW 520 Week 7
Memorandum
To: Case file and both participating agencies
From: Resettlement case manager, Chicago
Date: October 20, 2026
Re: Record of cross-border case consultation on the mother of a Chicago client living in a Cox's Bazar camp
Header
Date: October 20, 2026. Time: 8:00 a.m. Chicago, 7:00 p.m. Cox's Bazar. Attended: the resettlement case manager (Chicago resettlement agency); a protection case worker and a Rohingya community volunteer (an NGO working in the camp under agreement with UNHCR); an interpreter on the Chicago side. Authority for sharing: written consent from A., the Chicago client, signed October 14, and verbal consent from A.'s mother, recorded by the camp volunteer on October 16 under the NGO's consent procedure.
Agreed Account of the Case
A.'s mother, 58, a widow, lives alone in a camp shelter. The mother's leg has been swollen for two months, and the camp health post has given painkillers twice. A. sends money monthly. A. fears the mother is not eating. Both sides agreed this account; the camp worker added that the mother's shelter is a 20-minute walk uphill from the health post, which may explain missed appointments.
Same Word, Different Powers
"Case management" in Chicago means a resettlement agency's services to an enrolled family. In the camp it means protection case management for people at risk, with referrals that require the camp official's approval for some services. "Referral" in Chicago is a phone call; in the camp it may require a written form and an escort. A "guardian" for an older adult has no formal meaning in the camp. The record notes these so neither side assumes the other can do what its own title would allow at home.
Actions
Table 1
Agreed Actions
| Action | Owner | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Home visit to the mother; check food and the leg | Camp protection case worker with volunteer | October 23 |
| Escort to the health post and ask for referral to the field hospital if needed | Camp volunteer | By October 27 |
| Tell A. the outcome of the visit in Rohingya | Chicago case manager with interpreter | Within two days of the visit |
| Advise A. on safer ways to send money | Chicago case manager | November 3 |
Note. Note. Each action has one owner on one side of the border.
What Was Not Settled
Whether the camp agency can accept money from A. to pay for a private clinic outside the camp; the camp worker will ask. Whether A.'s mother wants to be on a list for any future resettlement; there is no process that A. can start from Chicago, since a parent is not eligible to follow to join a refugee in the United States. Daily stressors in the camps, including movement restrictions, shape what can be done for her (Riley et al., 2017; Milton et al., 2017).
Next Consultation
November 10, same times, same participants.
References
Milton, A. H., Rahman, M., Hussain, S., Jindal, C., Choudhury, S., Akter, S., Ferdousi, S., Mouly, T. A., Hall, J., & Efird, J. T. (2017). Trapped in statelessness: Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(8), Article 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080942
Riley, A., Varner, A., Ventevogel, P., Taimur Hasan, M. M., & Welton-Mitchell, C. (2017). Daily stressors, trauma exposure, and mental health among stateless Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh. Transcultural Psychiatry, 54(3), 304-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461517705571
What the MSW 520 Week 7 assignment asks for
The consultation note is a record rather than an argument, readable by someone who was not on the call. Open with the administrative facts: date, time in both places, who attended with organization and role, and the authority under which the family's information was shared. Give a one-paragraph account of the case that both sides agreed. Then note any words that sound the same but carry different powers in each system, such as guardian, referral or mandated report. Record actions, each with one owner and a date. List what was not settled, so it is not lost. Avoid minutes that report who said what in order. Keep the family's information to what the consultation needed.
How this MSW 520 Week 7 example is built
The header gives the date, 8:00 a.m. in Chicago and 7:00 p.m. in Cox's Bazar, the attendees and the consent: written from the Chicago client and verbal from the mother, recorded under the NGO's procedure. The agreed account describes the mother's swollen leg, repeated painkillers, monthly money from A. and the uphill walk to the health post. The words section explains that case management, referral and guardian mean different things in Chicago and the camp. Table 1 assigns four actions with owners and dates, from a home visit to advice on sending money. The unsettled section covers paying for a private clinic and the fact that a parent cannot follow to join a refugee in the United States, citing Riley et al. (2017) and Milton et al. (2017).
Where the points sit in the MSW 520 Week 7 rubric
The heaviest deduction is for a note that reads as minutes, with no decision anyone could act on. The next is false equivalence: treating a role in one country as the same job in another because the words translate. Credit goes to a header with both jurisdictions and the authority for sharing, a single agreed account and actions with one owner and one date each. Listing unsettled questions shows care. Faculty also check that the family's information is limited to what was needed. The record should be readable by a stranger to the case. Any claims about law or conditions should be accurate and cited in APA style.
MSW 520 Week 7 help: mistakes that cost points
The note most often loses points by recording the conversation in order without a decision. Another common gap is assuming a guardian or a child protection order means the same thing across borders. Some records leave out the consent behind sharing information, which is a professional problem before it is a grading one. Others assign actions to both sides at once, so no one owns them. If your consultation is different, perhaps a call between a Texas child welfare worker and a DIF office in Mexico, the record still needs both jurisdictions, an agreed account, terms explained, owned actions and open questions. A note drafted for your case would be readable by someone joining the case next month.
Get a MSW-520 Week 7 example written to your instructions
Send the two-country scenario your classroom issued, along with the rubric and any template the section requires, and a consultation note is written to it, filled field by field. It returns inside 24 to 48 hours and the first one is free. If your section issues a form, send that too and the example arrives on it.
More MSW 520 papers and MSW samples
- MSW 520 Week 1: What Makes Practice International
- MSW 520 Week 2: UNHCR Bangladesh Agency Profile
- MSW 520 Week 3: Rohingya Household Case Study
- MSW 520 Week 4: Chicago Resettlement Service Plan
- MSW 520 Week 5: PM+ Adaptation for Camp Women
- MSW 520 Week 6: Rohingya Chicago Diaspora Assessment
- MSW 520 Week 8: International Practice Paper
- MSW 521 Week 7: Long Term Recovery Plan
- MSW 517 Week 7: Young Caregivers Macro Write-Up
- MSW 524 Week 7: Intake Environment Review
- MSW 516 Week 7: Self-Efficacy Level Mismatch Memo
MSW 520 Week 7 questions, answered
Which country's rules apply when the two disagree?
Each applies at home, which is the whole difficulty and the reason the note exists. A worker can only act under the authority they hold where they stand, so the document records both positions and then states what each side will do within its own limits. A paper that picks one system and applies it across the border has missed the week.
How much of the family's information can the note contain?
Only what the other side needs to act, and only what the basis recorded in the header permits. Names, dates of birth and identifiers usually stay out of a classroom version entirely. Describe people by relationship and age band, keep the location general, and state in the note itself which details were withheld and why.
Does the note need a conclusion?
It needs a distribution line more than it needs a conclusion. Saying who receives the record, who does not, and where each agency will file it settles more than a closing paragraph ever does. Where a section asks for reflection as well, most classrooms want it kept separate from the record itself rather than mixed into it.
Where can I find a free MSW 520 Week 7 sample paper?
A full MSW 520 Week 7 cross-border consultation record between Chicago and Cox's Bazar is available on this page, with its action table and margin notes.
What authority for sharing does the MSW 520 Week 7 sample record?
Written consent from the Chicago client and verbal consent from the mother, recorded by the camp volunteer under the NGO's consent procedure.