| Course | MSW 554 Advanced Techniques for Anti-Racist Practice |
|---|---|
| Week | 5 |
| Paper type | Facilitation plan |
| Length | About 530 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | Master of Social Work (MSW) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MSW 554 Week 5
Facilitation Plan for a Family Team Meeting With a Black Family, Their Child's School and the Agency: Speaking Order as the Intervention, Three Roles for Three People, Talk Time on the Page and the Lines the Chair Will Need
Student Name
Chamberlain University
MSW 554: Advanced Techniques for Anti-Racist Practice
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Facilitation Plan for a Family Team Meeting With a Black Family, Their Child's School and the Agency: Speaking Order as the Intervention, Three Roles for Three People, Talk Time on the Page and the Lines the Chair Will Need
Purpose
A family team meeting about the 12-year-old son's school suspensions this term, on November 4 at 4:30 p.m. at the family's choice of location, the public library's meeting room. Present: the parents, the son if the son chooses, the assistant principal, the school counselor, the agency worker and the agency supervisor as chair.
Three Roles, Three People
Chair: the agency supervisor, who keeps the agenda and order. Timekeeper: the school counselor, who signals at time limits. Note-taker: the agency worker, who writes decisions on a board everyone can see.
None of the three roles goes to the school, whose staff hold the most institutional power in the room. Giving the chair to the agency, and the board to the note-taker, keeps the family's words visible on the board and in the record.
Timed Agenda
4:30 to 4:35: arrival and introductions; the family introduces themselves first.
4:35 to 4:50: the family's account: what has been happening and what they want. No interruptions.
4:50 to 5:00: the son's account if present, or a written note from the son read by a parent.
5:00 to 5:10: the school's account.
5:10 to 5:30: options, with the family proposing first.
5:30 to 5:40: decisions, owners and dates written on the board.
5:40 to 5:45: what happens next, and who calls whom.
Speaking Order Is the Intervention
The family speaks first and longest. School meetings often begin with the institution's account, which frames everything the family says as a response. Families called in about discipline often arrive expecting to be judged, and this family has been to three such meetings this term; starting with the family's account changes who sets the frame.
Talk Time on the Page
Family: 25 minutes. School: 10. Agency: 5 at most. If the agency talks more, the plan has failed.
The timekeeper will note actual minutes for each party on the back of the agenda. Comparing those minutes with the plan after the meeting is how we will know whether the family really had the floor.
Lines the Chair Will Need
If a professional interrupts the family: "Let's hold that until the family has finished." If the conversation turns to blame: "What would help from here?" If the assistant principal says a rule cannot change: "Which part of it can?" If a parent becomes upset: "Take the time you need. We have it."
Grounding
Respecting the family's voice and choice in decisions follows the Code's commitment to self-determination (National Association of Social Workers, 2021) and the cultural competence standards' emphasis on family and community as partners (National Association of Social Workers, 2015).
References
National Association of Social Workers. (2015). Standards and indicators for cultural competence in social work practice. National Association of Social Workers.
National Association of Social Workers. (2021). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
Reading the MSW 554 Week 5 instructions
The facilitation plan prepares a meeting in which a family meets institutions that hold more power. Name the purpose, date, place and who will attend, letting the family choose the place where possible. Assign roles such as chair, timekeeper and note-taker, and say why each person holds each role. Write a timed agenda. Explain the speaking order as a choice: who speaks first sets the frame for everything after. Put talk time for each party on the page and say how it will be checked. Write the lines the chair will need for interruptions, blame, rigid rules and distress. Ground the plan in a professional standard on self-determination or cultural competence.
Inside the MSW 554 Week 5 example
The purpose section sets a November 4 meeting at the library room the family chose, with parents, the son if he chooses, the assistant principal, counselor, worker and supervisor. The roles section gives the chair to the agency supervisor, the timekeeper role to the counselor and the board to the worker, and notes no role goes to the school. A timed agenda runs from 4:30 to 5:45 with the family's account first. A section explains why the family speaks first. Talk time sets 25 minutes for the family, 10 for the school and 5 for the agency, with actual minutes recorded. The chair's lines are written out. The grounding cites the NASW Code (2021) and standards (2015).
Reading the MSW 554 Week 5 grading rubric
Markers look for a plan in which order and time do the work. A plan that lists agenda items without saying who speaks when loses the most. Credit goes to roles assigned with reasons, a timed agenda, the family first and longest, talk time on the page with a way to check it and lines the chair can use. Attention to power in the room, such as who holds which role, earns marks. Professional standards should be cited in APA. The plan should be realistic for a 75-minute meeting and should show what happens after it ends. Explaining why no role goes to the most powerful party in the room shows the plan accounts for power rather than ignoring it.
MSW 554 Week 5 help from the desk
Plans most often lose points by giving the school the opening, which turns the family's account into a reply. Another common gap is talk time stated as a value without minutes. Some plans never write the chair's lines, so the chair improvises under pressure. Others forget the young person, who should be offered a way to speak or send words. If the family cannot attend in person, plan a phone or video option and keep the same order. A plan whose actual minutes could be compared with its targets afterward lets the team learn whether the family really had the floor. Share the agenda with the family a few days ahead and change the order if they ask; their agreement is part of the plan.
Get a MSW-554 Week 5 example written to your instructions
Send the assignment, the rubric and whatever your classroom supplies about the case, and a custom MSW-554 Week 5 facilitation plan is written to it inside 24 to 48 hours, agenda timings and chair lines included. The first one is free and revisions come with it, matched to whatever your classroom shows.
More MSW 554 papers and MSW samples
- MSW 554 Week 1: One Finished Move Post
- MSW 554 Week 2: Annotated Session Transcript
- MSW 554 Week 3: Intake Form Redesign
- MSW 554 Week 4: Microaggression Response Script
- MSW 554 Week 6: Agency Practice Audit
- MSW 554 Week 7: Outreach Language Rewrite
- MSW 554 Week 8: Practice Technique Portfolio
- MSW 555 Week 5: Policy and Practice Brief
- MSW 553 Week 5: Explanatory Power Write-Up
- MSW 504 Week 5: Biopsychosocial Assessment
- MSW 505 Week 5: Goal Negotiation Role-Play Analysis
MSW 554 Week 5 questions, answered
Does the plan need a real case behind it?
Most sections supply one or accept a constructed one, and the example works from a case described by type: the ages, the services involved, the disagreement between two of them. Identifying material comes out either way, and where a placement supplies the meeting, only its structure is written up.
How detailed should the timings be?
Detailed enough that they can fail. Durations rounded to five minutes with a running total, an explicit slot for late arrival, and a stated point at which an overrunning item gets carried to the following meeting. A plan fitting perfectly inside the hour has usually not been counted at all.
What makes a go-round different from just calling on people?
A go-round carries a stated rule: who is included, in what order, and whether anybody may pass. Calling on people leaves a chair choosing in the moment, and choosing in the moment reproduces whatever the room already does, which is the thing the plan was written to change.
Where can I find a free MSW 554 Week 5 sample paper?
Read the MSW 554 Week 5 facilitation plan in full below: roles, a timed agenda with the family speaking first and the chair's lines written out.
How is talk time divided in the MSW 554 Week 5 sample?
The family has 25 minutes, the school 10 and the agency at most 5, with the timekeeper recording actual minutes for comparison afterward.