NR 103 Week 4 APA Formatting Exercise Example

Transition to the Nursing Profession Chamberlain University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NR 103 Week 4 sample paper is an APA formatting exercise written as a two-page paper on missed nursing care and checked in both directions. Chamberlain NR 103 (NR-103), Transition to the Nursing Profession, uses an early pre-licensure BSN assignment to teach the seventh edition of APA style, and the points sit in details that are easy to check. The paper treats the student title page as a checklist, builds the reference list before the body, places each citation beside the idea it supports, sets a direct quotation from Kalisch and colleagues next to its paraphrase, applies two heading levels and finishes with a body-to-list and list-to-body check that catches an orphan reference on nurse staffing.

CourseNR 103 Transition to the Nursing Profession
Week4
Paper typeAPA formatting exercise
LengthAbout 1,140 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolChamberlain University
ProgramBSN (pre-licensure)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NR 103 Week 4

1

APA Formatting Exercise: A Two-Page Paper on Missed Nursing Care, Built From the Reference List Outward and Checked Both Ways

Student Name

College of Nursing, Chamberlain University

NR 103: Transition to the Nursing Profession

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title page carries the five student fields the seventh edition asks for and no running head, which is the first thing this exercise is checked on. Student APA 7 title page.
2

APA Formatting Exercise: A Two-Page Paper on Missed Nursing Care, Built From the Reference List Outward and Checked Both Ways

The Title Page as a Checklist

The seventh edition of the APA manual sets out a student title page that differs from the professional one (American Psychological Association [APA], 2020). The title page of this exercise was built from the following checklist, item by item, rather than copied from a paper written under the sixth edition, which required a running head that student papers no longer carry.

Page number in the top right corner of every page, starting with 1 on the title page. Title in bold, centered, a few lines down from the top, in title case. A blank line, then the student's name. The affiliation: department and university. The course number and name, as the course lists it. The instructor's name. The due date, written out as month, day, year. No running head, no abstract and no author note, since the assignment did not ask for them.

Every item above was then checked against the title page itself, one tick at a time. Two errors were caught this way in my first draft: the course name had been shortened, and the date had been written as numbers only.

What this page is doingThe title page is treated as a checklist and verified item by item, including the fields the older edition required.
3

The Reference List, Built First

The reference list for the exercise was written before the body, because a list built first makes it harder for a citation and a reference to drift apart. Each entry was taken from the article itself and its DOI record, not from memory or a citation generator, and each DOI was opened to confirm it led to the right article. The entries were then alphabetized by the first author's surname, double-spaced, with a hanging indent of half an inch, and each DOI written as a full https://doi.org address. The finished list appears at the end of this paper.

The Sample Body, With Citations That Arrive With the Idea

The body of the exercise is a short passage on missed nursing care, written to practice citation and paraphrase. It reads as follows.

Missed nursing care is any part of the care a patient needs that is left undone or delayed, in whole or in part (Kalisch et al., 2009). In their concept analysis, Kalisch et al. (2009) describe several groups of factors that contribute to it: pressures that force a nurse to decide between competing priorities, elements of the nursing process itself, and the nurse's own perceptions and values. Delegation is one of the places where missed care begins. Bittner and Gravlin (2009) reported that registered nurses expected assistive personnel to report significant findings and to show assessment and prioritizing skills, and that nurses described frequent instances of routine care being omitted. The two studies suggest that when a nurse hands work to someone else under time pressure without clear instructions, the care is at greater risk of being missed.

Three choices in this passage are deliberate. First, every borrowed idea carries its citation in the same sentence as the idea, not at the end of the paragraph, so a reader can tell which claim comes from which source. Second, the sources are paraphrased rather than quoted, because the ideas matter more than the authors' exact wording and because a paraphrase shows that I understood them. Third, the citation for a work with three or more authors uses the first author's name and "et al." from the first mention, which is a change from the sixth edition.

What this page is doingCitations are placed with the idea they support, and the passage paraphrases rather than quotes.
4

Paraphrase Over Quotation, Shown Side by Side

To practice the difference, the exercise sets a quotation and a paraphrase of the same idea next to each other. The quotation, with the page number that APA requires for a direct quote, reads: Kalisch et al. (2009) wrote that missed care covers required care that is "omitted (either in part or in whole) or delayed" (p. 1509).

The paraphrase used in the body reads: Missed nursing care is any part of the care a patient needs that is left undone or delayed, in whole or in part (Kalisch et al., 2009).

The paraphrase keeps the meaning and the citation but changes the structure and most of the words, and it does not need a page number, although APA encourages one when it would help a reader find the passage. I chose the paraphrase for the body because the definition is short and familiar enough to restate, and because a paper built mostly of quotations shows that the writer found the sources but not that the writer understood them. A quotation is reserved for the rare case where the exact wording matters, such as a definition being contested or a phrase that cannot be restated without losing its meaning.

One error the side-by-side caught: in my first paraphrase I had written "care that is forgotten," which changed the meaning. The authors' definition includes care that is consciously delayed or left undone because of competing priorities, not only care that slips a nurse's mind. The corrected version kept their broader meaning.

Headings at the Levels the Assignment Specifies

The assignment asked for two heading levels. Level 1 headings are centered, bold and in title case; Level 2 headings are flush left, bold and in title case, with the text beginning on the next line as a new paragraph (APA, 2020). The paper's title is repeated at the top of the first page of text in bold and centered, and it does not take the label "Introduction," because the opening paragraphs are understood to be the introduction.

The Two-Way Check

The last step is the check that catches the errors graders find first. It runs in two directions.

From the body to the list: every in-text citation was highlighted in the draft, and for each one I found the matching reference and confirmed that the author names were spelled the same way and the year was the same. Kalisch et al. (2009) and Bittner and Gravlin (2009) each matched.

From the list to the body: for each reference, I searched the draft for the first author's surname to confirm the work was cited at least once. An earlier draft had a third reference, on nurse staffing, that I had cited in a paragraph I later cut. It was still in the reference list. The two-way check caught it, and it was removed.

The check took about ten minutes for a two-page paper, and it is the step I am most likely to skip when I am tired. It is also the step that would have cost me points for a reference I did not use.

What this page is doingThe two-way check is shown in both directions, including the orphan reference it caught, which is the point of the exercise.
5

References

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000

Bittner, N. P., & Gravlin, G. (2009). Critical thinking, delegation, and missed care in nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Administration, 39(3), 142-146. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e31819894b7

Kalisch, B. J., Landstrom, G. L., & Hinshaw, A. S. (2009). Missed nursing care: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(7), 1509-1517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05027.x

What the NR 103 Week 4 assignment asks for

The Week 4 assignment asks you to show you can apply APA 7 to a short paper: title page, headings, in-text citations, a reference list and paraphrasing. Expect the instructions to name the elements being checked and to supply or suggest a topic and sources. Some sections give a template, and points are often tied to each formatting element rather than to the ideas. Paraphrase is usually preferred over quotation, because the skill being assessed is carrying an idea accurately in your own words. The student title page differs from the professional one, so check which fields your section wants. Read the rubric first, since every listed item is likely worth points of its own.

How this NR 103 Week 4 example is built

The exercise opens by listing every title page item, from page number to date, and checking each against the draft; two errors turn up that way. The reference list comes next, built from each article and its DOI record. The body is a short passage defining missed nursing care with Kalisch et al. (2009) and Bittner and Gravlin (2009), each citation placed in the same sentence as its idea. A quotation and a paraphrase of the same definition sit side by side, and the writer explains a meaning error in the first paraphrase. Two heading levels are set out with their rules. The two-way check closes the paper and finds an unused staffing reference.

NR 103 Week 4 rubric: what full points look like

This assignment is graded almost element by element, so the rubric reads like a checklist: title page, headings, in-text citations, reference list, paraphrasing and overall mechanics. The reference list usually carries the most points, because errors there are quick to spot, and the sample protects it by building entries from DOI records. Citation points depend on every borrowed idea having a source in the same sentence and every source appearing in the list. Paraphrasing is judged on meaning, which is why the sample shows its own mistake with forgotten care. Heading levels and title page fields are worth smaller amounts that add up. Proofreading for italics, indents and alphabetical order finishes it.

Common NR 103 Week 4 mistakes, and how to avoid them

The biggest loss is a reference list that does not match the body, an uncited entry or a citation with nothing behind it. A second is formatting from memory or from a classmate's older paper written under the sixth edition, which leaves a running head on a student title page. Students also quote when the task asked for paraphrase, which skips the skill being graded. Missing title page fields, wrong italics and hanging indents add up quickly. Citation generators help with drafts, but their output needs checking against the manual. If your section supplied its own topic and articles, send them with the rubric, and the desk can build the exercise from your sources.

Get a NR 103 Week 4 example written to your instructions

Send the exercise prompt, the rubric and the edition your section requires, along with any sources you have been told to use, and a custom NR 103 example is written to those instructions and returned inside 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free, and it comes back matching the edition you name.

More NR 103 papers and pre-licensure samples

NR 103 Week 4 questions, answered

Which edition does my section use?

Sections name the edition they expect, and the seventh is what most current templates are built around, so check the classroom rather than a search result. The difference matters for a student paper: the running head and the publisher location both changed. When you ask for an example, name the edition, and the reference entries come back built to it.

Can I use a citation generator?

Most produce something close and almost none produce something correct, and the errors cluster in exactly the places assignments check: capitalization in titles, missing digital object identifiers, journal names abbreviated. Treat the output as a first draft and compare it against the template your section supplies. The points are attached to the finished entry, not to where it came from.

Why does this carry so many points so early?

Because it is the cheapest term in which to be wrong. The mechanics get built once, and the courses that follow assume a correct front page, a matching entry and an in-text pair without teaching any of it again. A week spent on indents now buys back time in every paper after it, which is a poor argument emotionally and an accurate one arithmetically.

Where can I find a free NR 103 Week 4 sample paper?

The full Week 4 APA exercise on missed nursing care, including the title page checklist, the quotation and paraphrase pair and the two-way reference check, appears on this page.

What error did the NR 103 Week 4 two-way check catch?

It found a third reference on nurse staffing that was listed but no longer cited, because the paragraph using it had been cut, so the entry was removed before submission.