This page holds a finished NR 351 Week 2 APA formatting exercise in submission form, with the correction behind each element marked. Searches like "nr 351 week 2 assignment example", "nr351 week 2 sample" and "nr 351 week 2 example" land here.
What a finished NR 351 Week 2 APA formatting exercise looks like
A finished exercise looks unremarkable, which is the whole point of formatting. The title page carries exactly the elements the current edition requires, in the required order and spacing, with nothing added out of habit from an older edition. Body text is double spaced throughout with no extra space between paragraphs. In-text citations match the reference list entry for entry, in both directions, which is the check instructors run first. Reference entries hang correctly, capitalise titles in sentence case, and carry the digital object identifier where one exists. Where the exercise asks for a corrected version of a supplied document, every planted error is caught, and the ones planted in the reference list are usually the ones that get missed.
How a NR 351 Week 2 example is structured
Work to whichever edition and template your section names, since the requirements changed between editions and old habits produce confident errors. The order of attack that works is mechanical. Title page first, element by element against the requirement. Then the global settings: font, spacing, margins, running head where required. Then headings, which have levels and formats rather than being a matter of taste. Then every in-text citation checked against the reference list and back again. Then each reference entry checked for order of elements, capitalisation, italics and identifier. Quotations and paraphrases come last, since a correctly formatted citation attached to the wrong kind of borrowing is still wrong. Where a self-check sheet is supplied, complete it honestly rather than ticking through.
The title page, element by element
Each required item present, in the required order and spacing, with nothing carried over from an older edition out of habit.
Global settings before anything else
Font, spacing, margins and any running head fixed once at the document level, which removes a whole class of error in a single pass.
Headings as levels, not taste
Each heading formatted for its level rather than styled by preference, which is where documents that look tidy still lose points.
Citations checked both ways
Every in-text citation matched to a reference entry and every entry matched back to a citation, which is the first check most instructors run.
Reference entries in detail
Order of elements, sentence case titles, italics and the digital object identifier where one exists, each checked separately.
Quotation against paraphrase
The kind of borrowing matched to the citation used, since correct formatting attached to the wrong treatment of a source is still an error.
Where marks go in NR 351 Week 2
The heaviest single loss is the mismatch between citations and references, in either direction, because it suggests the sources were never handled properly rather than merely formatted loosely. The second is the title page built from an older edition, which is common and is treated as carelessness rather than as an honest mistake. Beyond those: extra spacing between paragraphs, headings styled rather than leveled, sentence case ignored in reference titles, hanging indents produced with the space bar so they collapse on the marker's screen, identifiers missing where they exist, and quotations run in without page numbers where the edition requires them. Every one of those is mechanical, which is exactly why an instructor expects them caught.
Get a NR 351 Week 2 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 2 exercise and the edition your section requires, along with any template it supplies, and a custom example is corrected into that format and returned inside 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free. Learning to catch these yourself is what the week is for.
NR 351 Week 2 questions, answered
Which APA edition does the course use?
Whatever your section names, and the difference matters more than it sounds. Title page requirements, running heads and reference elements all changed between recent editions, so guidance found online may be confidently wrong for your assignment. Send the edition when you request an example, since a correctly formatted document in the wrong edition scores no better than an incorrect one.
Do I lose points for small formatting slips?
Usually yes, and that is the design of the assignment rather than harshness. This exercise exists so the errors get expensive once, early, instead of in every paper afterwards. The ones that recur across a term, such as spacing and hanging indents, are worth fixing at the document level rather than line by line.
Can a citation generator do this for me?
It can produce a draft and it will produce errors, particularly in capitalisation, identifiers and unusual source types. The exercise is testing whether you can find those, so a generated list pasted in unchecked tends to be the version that loses most. Use one if you like, then check every entry against the manual your section names.