| Course | NR 447 Collaborative Leadership in Healthcare |
|---|---|
| Week | 5 |
| Paper type | Staffing case analysis |
| Length | About 1,190 words, 7 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | RN-to-BSN |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 447 Week 5
One Night Nurse Short at 1500: Pricing Four Staffing Options for a Full Telemetry Unit
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 447: Collaborative Leadership in Healthcare
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
One Night Nurse Short at 1500: Pricing Four Staffing Options for a Full Telemetry Unit
The Case
The case places me as day charge nurse on a composite 24-bed telemetry unit at 1500 on a Saturday. Every bed is full. The night schedule has five registered nurses and one nursing assistant; at 1455, one of the five night nurses calls in sick. The house supervisor reports that no float nurses are available, the agency list has already been exhausted for the weekend, and no one on our unit's call list has answered. Two patients are high acuity: one on a diltiazem infusion for atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular rate and one with a new heart failure exacerbation on an intravenous diuretic, with a potassium of 3.1 being replaced. The emergency department has one patient waiting for a telemetry bed who will come to us when a discharge occurs, and one discharge is expected around 1900.
Two constraints remove the obvious answers. Calling someone in has already failed, and the case states that no one else is available. And the hospital will not close the unit to admissions on a weekend without the administrator on call, who has already said no. The decision is how to cover 24 patients overnight with four nurses and one assistant, or with some other arrangement I can create from the staff already in the building.
Four Options, Priced Alike
Each option is priced in the same four terms: the patient load per night nurse, the acuity each nurse carries, what the night team inherits at 0700, and what patients and families would notice.
Option A, split the patients among four nurses. Load: six patients each. Acuity: two nurses would each carry one of the high-acuity patients plus five others. Inheritance: the day team at 0700 inherits a night where 0400 laboratory draws and 0600 weights are likely to be late. Visible cost: slower call light response all night. Aiken et al. (2002) found that each additional patient per nurse was associated with higher odds of death within 30 days of admission in surgical patients, and a sixth patient on telemetry is exactly the kind of increment that finding describes.
Option B, the night charge nurse takes a full assignment. Load: five nurses with about five patients each, including charge. Acuity: manageable per nurse. Inheritance: no one is free to respond to a rapid response, help with the admission at 1900 or take a break relief; the charge nurse is managing the unit and five patients. Visible cost: a slow response to any emergency.
Option C, ask a day nurse to stay four extra hours, until 2300. Load: five nurses until 2300, then four. Acuity: the admission and the discharge can happen while five are present. Inheritance: the problem moves to 2300 to 0700, which is when the unit is quieter but when a sixth patient per nurse still returns. Cost to staff: a day nurse works sixteen hours with a four-hour tail, which some policies permit and some nurses will decline.
Option D, combine C with a staggered redistribution. A day nurse stays until 2300; at 2300 the night charge nurse takes the three most stable patients, and the remaining 21 patients are split among three nurses at seven each. This option is ruled out on inspection: seven telemetry patients per nurse is well beyond what any of our nurses or our unit's staffing guideline would accept, and the charge nurse would still be carrying patients.
The Choice
I choose Option C, with the night charge nurse taking the three most stable patients at 2300 and the other three nurses taking seven high- and moderate-acuity patients combined into six-patient assignments, arranged so that no nurse carries both high-acuity patients.
The strongest case against my choice is Option A without the extended shift, because it avoids asking anyone to work sixteen hours, and a tired nurse at hour fifteen is a real safety risk. That case is serious. My answer is that the first four hours of the night contain almost all of the unit's predictable workload: the 1900 discharge, the admission that follows, 2000 and 2100 medications, and the potassium replacement on the heart failure patient, which needs monitoring. With five nurses during those hours, the admission and the high-acuity patients can be covered without anyone carrying six. From 2300 to 0700, the unit's workload drops sharply, and six patients per nurse on a quiet unit is safer than six patients per nurse during the admission hour. I also judge that the fatigue risk is bounded: the nurse staying would leave at 2300 rather than working a full double, and only a volunteer would stay.
What I Do for the Nurse Who Pays
The day nurse who agrees to stay carries the heaviest personal cost. Before she agrees, I tell her what the four hours will involve and that she can say no without any consequence. The Code of Ethics for Nurses holds that nurses owe the same duties to themselves as to others, including attention to their own health and safety (American Nurses Association, 2015), so declining has to be a real option rather than a formality. If she agrees, I give her the discharge and the admission, the two tasks that end cleanly by 2300, so that she does not hand over a half-finished problem. I make sure she takes a thirty-minute break between 1830 and 1900, covered by me before I leave, and I ask the house supervisor to authorize a meal voucher. I also document the extension so that it counts toward the unit's record of mandatory overtime, which our manager reviews, and I tell the manager on Monday who stayed. The night nurses taking six patients after 2300 also pay a cost; for them, I ask the house supervisor to round on the unit at 0100 and 0400 and to be the unit's first call for any rapid response.
When I Reassess
The decision is made at 1500 on incomplete information and has to be revisited at 1830, before I leave. At that time I will check three things: whether the 1900 discharge is still happening, whether the diltiazem patient's heart rate has been controlled or is still requiring titration, and whether the sick call has been replaced by anyone answering the call list late. If the discharge is canceled and the admission cannot come, the extended shift may not be needed, and I will release the day nurse at 1900. If the diltiazem patient remains unstable, I will ask the house supervisor to consider transfer to the intensive care unit before the night starts, which would change every assignment. The American Nurses Association (2020) describes staffing as a continuous process that responds to changes in patient needs across a shift, and a plan with no reassessment point would treat a 1500 guess as a 1900 fact.
References
Aiken, L. H., Clarke, S. P., Sloane, D. M., Sochalski, J., & Silber, J. H. (2002). Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA, 288(16), 1987-1993. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.16.1987
American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements.
American Nurses Association. (2020). ANA's principles for nurse staffing (3rd ed.).
NR 447 Week 5 instructions, in plain terms
The Week 5 case analysis has you apply leadership and management principles to a staffing problem and recommend a course of action. The assignment sheet tends to list the facts of the case, the options available, an analysis of each, a decision with rationale, consideration of the people affected, follow-up and APA. Restate the case as facts and name the constraints that rule out easy answers. Cost each option with one shared yardstick. Make the choice in one clear sentence. Defend it against the strongest option you rejected, naming the real risk in your own choice. Protect the person who absorbs the decision. Set a time to reassess and the findings that would change your plan.
Inside the NR 447 Week 5 example
The case section describes the Saturday at 1500, every bed full, five night nurses scheduled and one calling out, an admission and a discharge pending. The constraints section rules out calling someone in and closing to admissions. Four options follow, each priced by load, acuity, inheritance and patient experience: splitting among four nurses, the night charge taking a full assignment, a day nurse staying until 2300, and a combination. The choice section selects the day nurse staying with the night charge taking three stable patients at 2300, arranged so no nurse carries both high-acuity patients. The defense addresses fatigue at hour fifteen. The protections for the day nurse follow. The reassessment at 1830 lists three checks.
NR 447 Week 5 rubric: what full points look like
Case analysis rubrics in NR 447 generally weigh accurate facts, identification of options, consistent analysis of each, a clear decision, defense against alternatives, attention to people affected, follow-up and APA. A clear, defended decision outweighs the other rows, and the paper earns it with one unambiguous sentence and a fair answer to the strongest alternative. Options are credited because each is priced in the same four terms. Facts score when the constraints are named early. Attention to people earns points through specific protections for the nurse who stays. Follow-up is credited for a 1830 reassessment with three named checks. Aiken and colleagues, the ANA staffing principles and the Code of Ethics support the analysis.
NR 447 Week 5 help from the desk
The most damaging failure here is refusing to decide, presenting three options with a balanced discussion and ending on how difficult the situation is. Another is pricing options in different terms, so they cannot be compared. Students also choose without naming the risk in their own choice, ignore the nurse who absorbs the cost or treat the decision as final at 1500. Citing state ratio laws is fine where they apply, but most states do not have them. One or two staffing studies are usually enough. Use the supplied case unless your instructor allows your own. A different staffing case can be priced the same way; our writers can help you lay out the options for NR 447.
Get a NR 447 Week 5 example written to your instructions
Send the case as your section published it, together with the rubric and any framework the week requires, and we will write a custom NR 447 case analysis that decides the case rather than surveying it. The first example costs nothing and is returned inside 24-48h, written from your own materials.
More NR 447 papers and RN-to-BSN samples
- NR 447 Week 1: Charge Nurse Leadership Discussion
- NR 447 Week 2: Leadership Practices Self-Assessment
- NR 447 Week 3: Charge Shift Conflict Analysis
- NR 447 Week 4: Oncology Unit Delegation Write-Up
- NR 447 Week 6: Team Improvement Proposal
- NR 447 Week 7: Interview Write-up
- NR 447 Week 8: Reflection
- NR 449 Week 5: Barrier Analysis
- NR 446 Week 5: Stroke Unit Team Analysis Paper
- NR 451 Week 1: Discussion Post
- NR 442 Week 5: Hepatitis A Outbreak Epidemiology
NR 447 Week 5 questions, answered
Do I use the supplied case or one from my own unit?
Follow the prompt, since sections differ and some supply a scenario while others invite your own. Where you have the choice, a case from your own experience gives you detail no vignette contains, provided you strip identifying material out. If the case is supplied, use its facts as written and resist the urge to add convenient ones that make the decision easier.
Can I cite staffing ratio requirements?
Only accurately. Requirements differ between states and many places have none at all, so a paper asserting a universal ratio invites a correction. If a rule genuinely applies where you practice, cite it and say where it applies. Otherwise argue from acuity, skill mix and what the unit can actually cover, which is the reasoning the week is testing anyway.
How much literature does a case analysis need?
Usually less than the paper's length suggests and always what the rubric states. Two or three sources placed where they change the decision beat a page of general references on nurse staffing. The most useful citation supports the mechanism behind your choice, such as why a particular assignment pattern affects surveillance, rather than restating that staffing matters.
Where can I find a free NR 447 Week 5 sample paper?
The complete Week 5 staffing analysis, with the facts, four priced options, the choice, its defense, protections for the nurse who stays, the 1830 reassessment and three references, appears on this page.
Which option does the NR 447 Week 5 analysis choose?
Asking a day nurse to stay until 2300, with the night charge nurse then taking the three most stable patients and assignments arranged so no nurse carries both high-acuity patients.