NR 447 Week 2 Leadership Practices Self-Assessment Example

Collaborative Leadership in Healthcare Chamberlain University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Enabling others to act, the practice the Leadership Practices Inventory rated highest, and the short-staffed Friday evening when it stopped holding are weighed in this NR 447 Week 2 sample paper. Chamberlain NR 447 (NR-447), Collaborative Leadership in Healthcare, asks RN-to-BSN students to complete a leadership inventory and test it against real practice. The paper reports Kouzes and Posner's five practices and the writer's highest and lowest scores in one paragraph, then rebuilds the hour a 30-bed cardiac step-down unit went short: the writer stopped asking, built the night assignment alone in four minutes and read it out at the 1900 huddle. It says it believes the Friday over the inventory, adds second readings from a night nurse and an assistant, names the trait under load and sets a goal sized to one huddle, with Eggenberger on the charge nurse role.

CourseNR 447 Collaborative Leadership in Healthcare
Week2
Paper typeLeadership self-assessment
LengthAbout 1,090 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolChamberlain University
ProgramRN-to-BSN
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NR 447 Week 2

1

Enabling Others Until Seven in the Evening: A Leadership Self-Assessment Tested Against a Short-Staffed Shift

Student Name

College of Nursing, Chamberlain University

NR 447: Collaborative Leadership in Healthcare

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the practice the instrument rated highest and the hour of the shift at which it stopped holding, which tells the reader the paper tests the result rather than reports it. Student APA 7 format, no running head.
2

Enabling Others Until Seven in the Evening: A Leadership Self-Assessment Tested Against a Short-Staffed Shift

The Result

I completed the self version of the Leadership Practices Inventory, which rates how often a leader shows five behaviors that Kouzes and Posner (2017) derived from thousands of personal-best leadership stories: setting an example, building a common picture of the future, questioning how things are done, strengthening others by sharing power and trust, and recognizing contributions. My highest score was on strengthening others, the practice the authors call enabling others to act, and my lowest was on questioning how things are done. In the inventory's terms, I describe myself as a leader who builds trust, involves others in decisions and shares power, and who is less likely to push against established routines.

What this page is doingThe instrument result takes one short paragraph because it is the cheapest thing on the page. Naming the five practices and the two extreme scores gives the testing that follows a precise claim to test.
3

The Hour the Unit Went Short

The result describes me on an ordinary day, and on ordinary days I think it is accurate. As charge nurse on our 30-bed cardiac step-down unit, I usually build the assignment with the oncoming nurses rather than for them, and I ask before I move a patient. The shift that tests the result is a Friday in the third week of this course. At 1845, the night charge nurse called in sick, and I agreed to stay as charge until 2300. At 1900 we had two admissions pending from the emergency department, one nurse short for nights, and a nurse on my day team in the medication room in tears because a patient she had cared for all week had died that afternoon.

What I did for the next hour was not enabling others to act. I stopped asking. I built the night assignment alone in about four minutes and read it out at the 1900 huddle without inviting changes. When a night nurse said she had never taken an intra-aortic balloon pump patient, I said she would be fine and I would help. I told the day nurse in the medication room that I was sorry and that she could go home once she finished report, and I walked away to call the house supervisor. I did not consult the charge nurse from the neighboring unit, who had offered help, because explaining the problem would have taken longer than solving it myself. By 2000 the assignment was covered and both admissions were placed. By my own standard, the unit was safe. By the standard of the inventory, I was a different leader from 1845 to 2000.

What this page is doingThe hour is rebuilt closely enough that a reader can hear the tone: the time the unit went short, what was said, when asking stopped and who was not consulted. A style is visible when a unit goes short, and this is the stretch where the writer ran out of time to be collaborative.
4

Which One I Believe

When the inventory and my memory of that Friday disagree, I believe the Friday. The inventory asks how often I engage in a behavior, and I answered with my typical shift in mind. Typical shifts do not test leadership very much. The behavior I showed under load, deciding alone, reassuring instead of listening, choosing speed over involvement, is closer to the directive style that Hersey et al. (2013) describe as appropriate when followers are unable or unwilling and time is short. It may have been the right style for that hour. But it is not the style I reported, and I suspect it is the style my night colleagues remember most, because they meet me when the unit is short far more often than day staff do.

The low score on challenge the process also looks different after that Friday. I did not question anything that evening, including the house supervisor's decision not to hold the second admission until 2100, which would have given the night team an hour to settle. I accepted it because questioning it would have been one more conversation. That fits the inventory's finding, and it had a cost that night.

What this page is doingThe paper says plainly which account it believes and why the tool and the memory disagree. Refusing to reconcile the two quietly is the strongest move available, because the disagreement is the paper's only real finding.
5

A Second Reading

I asked the night nurse who took the balloon pump patient how she would describe me as charge that evening. She said I was calm and got everything covered, but that she felt she could not say no to the assignment, and that when I said she would be fine it did not feel like help, it felt like the end of the conversation. She added that I did come to her room twice before 2300, which she appreciated. Her account matches mine closely and adds the part I could not see from the desk: my speed read to her as a closed door.

I also asked the nursing assistant who worked nights that Friday. Her account was shorter and less comfortable. She said that when I am charge on a good day I ask her what she thinks of the assignment, and that on that night I did not look up from the computer when she asked whether she could take her break before the admissions arrived. I have no memory of her asking. That gap, between what I remember doing and what someone standing three feet away saw, is the most useful thing this assignment produced, because I could not have found it with any instrument I fill out about myself.

The Trait That Shows Under Load

The trait the inventory did not return is that under pressure I stop sharing decisions and start absorbing them. I would rather carry a problem alone for an hour than spend ten minutes involving someone else, and I call that efficiency. Eggenberger (2012) found that charge nurses describe themselves as holding the frontline for their teams, often by taking on problems themselves, and that this can leave them isolated and their staff less developed. That describes my Friday.

A Change Sized to a Shift

My goal is one behavior that I can practice on my next charge shift. When a short-staffed assignment has to be built quickly, I will still build it alone, because there is not time to do otherwise, but I will read it out at the huddle and then ask one question and wait for an answer: which of these assignments worries you most? And when a nurse tells me she has never cared for a type of patient, I will replace you'll be fine with a specific offer: I will be in the room for the first hour of the pump check at 2000. I will know whether I did it by asking the night charge nurse, after my next three short-staffed shifts, whether she heard me ask the question at the huddle.

What this page is doingThe goal is a behavior with a trigger and a script, sized to one huddle and one offer, and it is checked by a named colleague who watches the writer work. Nothing in it needs a promotion or a manager's permission, which is what the rubric asks for this week.
6

References

Eggenberger, T. (2012). Exploring the charge nurse role: Holding the frontline. Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(11), 502-506. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182714495

Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, D. E. (2013). Management of organizational behavior: Leading human resources (10th ed.). Pearson.

Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations (6th ed.). Wiley.

What the NR 447 Week 2 assignment asks for

In Week 2 you take a leadership inventory and then put its result to the test. Typical requirements are the instrument and results, interpretation, examples from practice, strengths and areas for growth, feedback from others, a development goal and APA. Report the result in one short paragraph. Test it against one demanding shift rebuilt in detail, including what you said and who was not consulted. If the tool and your memory disagree, say which you believe and why. Ask colleagues how they experienced you and report what they said, even if it is uncomfortable. Name the trait the tool did not capture. Set a goal with a trigger, a script and someone who will check it.

Inside the NR 447 Week 2 example

The result section names the five practices and the writer's highest score, enabling others to act, and lowest, challenging the process. The next section describes an ordinary charge shift, then the Friday when the unit went short: the writer stopped asking, built the night assignment alone and read it out without discussion, including giving a balloon pump patient to a nurse who had never cared for one. The belief section explains that the inventory asks how often and was answered with a typical shift in mind. Second readings come from the night nurse, who felt she could not ask questions, and the assistant. The trait section names absorbing decisions under pressure. The goal adds one question at the huddle and a specific offer of help.

NR 447 Week 2 rubric: what full points look like

Leadership self-assessment rubrics in NR 447 typically score correct handling of the inventory, how deeply its result is read, practice examples, feedback from others, honest identification of growth areas, a measurable goal and APA. Most of the grade rides on interpretation, so the paper tests the result against one shift and saying plainly which account it believes. The instrument row is credited for one short, accurate paragraph. Examples score because the hour is rebuilt with times and words. Feedback earns points through two colleagues' readings, including the less comfortable one. The growth area is credited because the trait under load is named. The goal scores for a trigger, a script and a named checker. Kouzes and Posner, Hersey and colleagues and Eggenberger support it.

NR 447 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost points

The most expensive version of this paper is the flattering one, where every subscale reads as a strength and the one weakness is repaired in the same sentence. Another loss is examples that confirm the result without testing it. Students also skip feedback from others, describe the instrument at length or set goals such as "be a more inclusive leader." The course commonly uses the Leadership Practices Inventory, so check which version you were given. You should admit a real weakness; graders reward it. Examples should come from your nursing practice. If you have your scores but need help testing them, send the result and an NR 447 self-assessment can be planned around one demanding shift.

Get a NR 447 Week 2 example written to your instructions

Send the inventory you were assigned, the template if your section published one, and the rubric, and we will write a custom NR 447 self assessment built around those headings and that instrument rather than a generic personality write-up. The first example is free and it is back with you inside 24-48h.

More NR 447 papers and RN-to-BSN samples

NR 447 Week 2 questions, answered

Which inventory does this course use?

It varies, and sections have used style inventories, emotional intelligence measures and conflict mode instruments at different times, sometimes with a specific link in the classroom. Write to whichever one your week names. The reasoning on the page does not change with the instrument, because the paper is graded on the comparison between a result and remembered conduct, not on the particular tool that produced the result.

Do I have to admit a real weakness?

You have to admit one that costs something, which is not the same as confessing anything serious. A trait that slows you down when the unit is short, a habit of taking a task back rather than waiting, or a tendency to stop explaining once you are behind all qualify. The test is whether a reader could imagine a colleague agreeing with the assessment.

Can I use examples from before I was a nurse?

Usually yes, if the section does not restrict it, and earlier work in retail, the military or a care setting often produces sharper material because the writer is less defensive about it. The stronger papers still bring at least one nursing example, since faculty are assessing conduct in the environment the course is about and the transfer is worth showing directly.

Where can I find a free NR 447 Week 2 sample paper?

Here is the full Week 2 paper: the inventory result, the short-staffed Friday, which account the writer believes, colleagues' readings, the trait under load, the goal and three references.

What will the NR 447 Week 2 writer do on the next short-staffed shift?

To read a rushed assignment out at the huddle and ask which assignment worries the nurses most, and to replace "you'll be fine" with a specific offer of help, checked by the night charge nurse after three shifts.