| Course | NR 449 Evidence Based Practice |
|---|---|
| Week | 2 |
| Paper type | Practice problem statement |
| Length | About 1,130 words, 7 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | RN-to-BSN |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 449 Week 2
Starting a Unit of Red Cells at Night: A Practice Problem Statement Written From the Work, Not the Policy
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 449: Evidence Based Practice
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Starting a Unit of Red Cells at Night: A Practice Problem Statement Written From the Work, Not the Policy
The Routine and Why It Was Chosen
This statement describes how a unit of packed red blood cells is started on a 32-bed composite medical-surgical floor, as it is actually done rather than as the policy says it is done. The policy is clear and consistent with national standards: two licensed staff verify the patient's identity with two identifiers and match the blood product to the order and to the patient at the bedside, baseline vital signs are taken before the transfusion begins, vital signs are repeated within 15 minutes of the start and at the end, and the nurse stays close to the patient for the first 15 minutes, when severe reactions are most likely (Gorski et al., 2021; The Joint Commission, 2024). The unit transfuses about 60 units a month, a third of them between 1900 and 0700. A review of 40 transfusion records from the past quarter found that 15-minute vital signs were documented within 20 minutes of the start for 29 of 40 units, and for 7 of the 14 units started at night.
The Trigger
The routine begins when the blood bank pages the unit that a unit is ready. In practice, the page often arrives at an inconvenient time because the order was placed hours earlier with a request to transfuse when ready, and the crossmatch finished during medication pass. The nurse caring for the patient does not choose the start time; the laboratory's timing does.
The Sequence, One Action and One Role at a Time
Step 1, the transporter or the nurse collects the unit (5 to 15 minutes): On days, a hospital transporter brings the unit; at night there is no transporter after 2300, so the nurse or a nursing assistant walks to the blood bank on the ground floor, which takes 10 to 15 minutes round trip.
Step 2, the nurse finds a second verifier (1 to 20 minutes): Policy requires a second licensed nurse. On days, this takes a minute. At night, with four nurses on the unit, it can take 20 minutes, because the second nurse is often in the middle of a task and the first nurse waits rather than interrupts.
Step 3, bedside verification (3 minutes): Both nurses check the patient's wristband against the blood bank tag and the order, read the unit number aloud, and sign the electronic record.
Step 4, baseline vital signs (2 minutes): Taken by the nurse or the nursing assistant before the infusion is started.
Step 5, start and the first 15 minutes: The nurse starts the infusion at a slow rate and is expected to stay nearby.
Step 6, the 15-minute vital signs: On days, the nurse sets a timer. At night, this is the step most often late.
The Parts Nobody Wrote Down
Three parts of the routine appear nowhere in the policy. First, at night, some nurses write the start time on a strip of tape on the infusion pump because the record does not prompt a 15-minute reassessment; the tape is the unit's timer. Second, because finding a second verifier at night takes so long, nurses sometimes ask the charge nurse to hold the blood bank page until a colleague is free, which delays the start by up to an hour and means the unit may sit at room temperature on the counter while the nurse waits, which the policy prohibits beyond 30 minutes without starting. Third, when the 15-minute vital signs are missed, some nurses take them at 30 minutes and document the actual time; others document them as taken at 15 minutes. The second practice is a documentation error, and it means that the 29 of 40 figure above may overstate compliance.
What the Nurses Say
Five nurses who work nights were asked, informally, what makes the 15-minute check hard. Their answers were consistent and practical. Three said that the timing of the blood bank page was the main problem, because a unit that arrives during the 2100 medication pass forces a choice between starting the blood and finishing medications for five other patients. Two said that nothing reminds them at 15 minutes; on days, the charge nurse often walks by and asks, but at night the charge nurse has a full assignment. All five said they believed the 15-minute check mattered, and none described skipping it as acceptable. Their accounts match the record review: the problem is not a belief that the check is unimportant, but a night routine that gives the check nowhere to happen.
These accounts also explain the held page. Nurses who hold the page are not ignoring the policy; they are trying to make sure a second nurse and fifteen uninterrupted minutes exist before the blood arrives. The workaround protects one safeguard at the cost of another, since the delay risks the blood sitting out too long.
Where Shifts Differ
The day and night versions of the routine differ in three measurable ways. At night the unit has no transporter, so a nurse leaves the floor to collect blood. At night fewer licensed staff are available to verify, so the wait for a second nurse is longer. At night the nurse starting the transfusion usually has five or six other patients and may be the only nurse available for a call light in that hallway, so staying near the patient for 15 minutes competes with everything else. None of these differences is written into the policy, which describes a single version of the routine.
Why the Distance Matters
The 15-minute check exists because acute hemolytic and anaphylactic reactions tend to appear early, often within the first minutes of a transfusion, and are the reactions most likely to cause death if the infusion is not stopped quickly (Gorski et al., 2021). Identification errors at collection or at the bedside are a leading cause of the most serious transfusion reactions; Bolton-Maggs et al. (2015) describe how wrong blood in tube and bedside checks that are rushed or skipped lead to incompatible transfusions. On this unit, the night version of the routine stretches both safeguards: the second check is delayed, and the early vital signs are late. The problem, stated as a gap, is that half of night transfusions do not have documented vital signs within 20 minutes of the start, compared with nearly nine in ten of day transfusions, and the documentation may overstate the real figure.
References
Bolton-Maggs, P. H. B., Wood, E. M., & Wiersum-Osselton, J. C. (2015). Wrong blood in tube: Potential for serious outcomes: Can it be prevented? British Journal of Haematology, 168(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.13137
Gorski, L. A., Hadaway, L., Hagle, M. E., Broadhurst, D., Clare, S., Kleidon, T., Meyer, B. M., Nickel, B., Rowley, S., Sharpe, E., & Alexander, M. (2021). Infusion therapy standards of practice, 8th edition. Journal of Infusion Nursing, 44(1S), S1-S224. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000396
The Joint Commission. (2024). National patient safety goals effective January 2024: Hospital program. https://www.jointcommission.org/standards/national-patient-safety-goals/
Reading the NR 449 Week 2 instructions
The Week 2 statement has you describe a clinical practice problem on your unit in detail. You will likely need the routine and why it was chosen, how it is supposed to be done, how it is actually done, data showing the gap, contributing factors, why it matters and APA. Put the policy in two sentences so the reader can hold it beside the work. Give local numbers that show the distance between the two. Describe the trigger and each step with the role that performs it and the minutes it takes. Record the parts nobody wrote down. Treat nurses' accounts as evidence about the routine, not excuses. Show where shifts differ. Explain what harm the step guards against.
How the NR 449 Week 2 example is put together
The first section states the policy on two-person verification, baseline vital signs, a 15-minute recheck and staying close, and gives the transfusion volume and record review. The trigger section explains that the blood bank's page often arrives at a bad time because orders were placed hours earlier. The sequence lists collecting the unit, finding a second verifier, which can take 20 minutes at night, bedside verification, baseline vital signs, the start and the 15-minute check. The unwritten section names tape on the pump with the start time, a held page and backdated vital signs. Five night nurses explain what makes the 15-minute check hard. The shift section names three differences. The closing ties early reactions to the 15-minute window.
Reading the NR 449 Week 2 grading rubric
Practice problem rubrics in NR 449 typically score a clearly defined problem, the expected standard, a description of current practice, supporting data, contributing factors, significance and APA. Current practice is the row most statements miss, and this one earns it by describing each step with a role and minutes and recording the unwritten parts. The standard is credited because the policy is stated briefly with sources. Data score through the transfusion count and record review. Contributing factors earn points through nurses' own accounts and the night staffing differences. Significance is credited when the 15-minute check is tied to early hemolytic and anaphylactic reactions, with Bolton-Maggs and colleagues. The structure gives later weeks something specific to work on.
Common NR 449 Week 2 mistakes, and how to avoid them
The most expensive version describes the policy instead of the practice, a tidy page no one on the unit would recognize. Another loss is a problem with no local numbers, so the gap cannot be measured. Students also describe workarounds as misconduct, leave out the night version or jump to recommending a solution. Real unit figures are best, and estimates labeled as such are acceptable. This statement is narrower than a capstone problem statement and should stay on one routine. Recommendations belong in later weeks. If a routine on your unit is done differently from its policy, describe both and an NR 449 problem statement can be written from the work.
Get a NR 449 Week 2 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 2 instructions or the form your section supplies, along with a few lines about the routine you want described, and a custom example is written into that format and returned inside 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free. Real timings and counts from your workplace are yours to add or to leave out.
More NR 449 papers and RN-to-BSN samples
- NR 449 Week 1: Settled Evidence Routine Discussion
- NR 449 Week 3: Evidence Summary
- NR 449 Week 4: Stakeholder Analysis
- NR 449 Week 5: Barrier Analysis
- NR 449 Week 6: Practice Change Proposal
- NR 449 Week 7: Evaluation Plan
- NR 449 Week 8: Dissemination Brief
- NR 451 Week 2: Practice Problem Proposal
- NR 447 Week 2: Leadership Practices Self-Assessment
- NR 446 Week 2: Communication Style Self-Assessment
- NR 300A Week 2: Sensory Aids Annotated Bibliography
NR 449 Week 2 questions, answered
Do I need real numbers from my unit?
No, and it is safer without them. A statement works on described quantities that read as ordinary for the setting and are clearly marked as approximate, which you can replace later with anything you are entitled to use. Audit results, incident counts and quality reports belong to whoever employs you, and a page that never leaned on them is easier to submit.
How is this different from the problem statement in the capstone?
That one is scoped for approval and has to promise a project somebody could finish inside a term. This one carries no project yet. It is a description whose only job is accuracy, which is why it records variation and unwritten parts instead of editing them out to make a scope look clean.
Should the statement say what the evidence recommends?
In one line at the end, and no further. The comparison has to appear somewhere or the description is only a process record, but the reading itself belongs to the week that follows. Sections differ here, so check whether yours wants the evidence named at this point or held back until the summary.
Where can I find a free NR 449 Week 2 sample paper?
This page has the complete Week 2 problem statement on starting blood at night, with the policy, the local numbers, the six steps with roles and minutes, the unwritten parts, nurses' accounts and three references.
Which step is most often late at night in the NR 449 Week 2 statement?
The 15-minute vital signs after the transfusion starts, the check meant to catch early severe reactions, which slips because night staffing, collection and verification all take longer.