NR 452 Week 5 Bedside Heel Stick Change Proposal Example

Capstone Course Chamberlain University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Doing the newborn screening heel stick at the mother's bedside while the baby breastfeeds or is held skin-to-skin is the change proposed in this NR 452 Week 5 sample paper, written to outlast its author. Chamberlain NR 452 (NR-452), Capstone Course, asks pre-licensure BSN students to propose a change based on their appraised evidence. The proposal states the change in one sentence, then carries the evidence at moderate strength from Johnston, Shah and Gray and their colleagues and explains why sucrose, the strongest evidence, was not chosen. It explains why the nursery routine made sense, keeps a fallback and assigns every part of the change to someone who is staying, since a student cannot volunteer. It counts the cost in minutes, describes what mothers are told, names three predictable failure points and measures with the time and location the unit already records.

CourseNR 452 Capstone Course
Week5
Paper typeCapstone change proposal
LengthAbout 1,110 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolChamberlain University
ProgramBSN (pre-licensure)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NR 452 Week 5

1

Heel Sticks at the Mother's Bedside: A Change Proposal Built to Outlast Its Author

Student Name

College of Nursing, Chamberlain University

NR 452: Capstone Course

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the change in a few words and names the condition it is written under: its author will not be there to carry it out. Student APA 7 format, no running head.
2

Heel Sticks at the Mother's Bedside: A Change Proposal Built to Outlast Its Author

The Change in One Sentence

On the mother-baby unit, the newborn screening heel stick will be done at the mother's bedside while the baby is breastfeeding or held skin-to-skin, at a time agreed with the mother during the morning assessment, instead of in the nursery bassinet on the nursery's schedule.

What this page is doingThe change comes first, as something a person on shift does differently at a particular moment, before any sentence that justifies it.
3

The Evidence, at the Strength It Was Found

The appraisal completed in the previous weeks supports this change at moderate strength. Skin-to-skin contact during a painful procedure reduced newborn pain indicators across 25 trials, though the review authors rated the certainty as moderate to low (Johnston et al., 2017). Breastfeeding during a heel stick lowered measured pain and matched oral sucrose closely in a review of 20 studies (Shah et al., 2012). A small trial in healthy term newborns found that babies held skin-to-skin cried and grimaced far less during the lance than babies left in a crib (Gray et al., 2000). Oral sucrose has the strongest evidence of the three (Stevens et al., 2016), but it requires a product, a protocol and an order, which is a larger change than this project can support. The proposal therefore uses the measures that need nothing but the mother and a change in timing. None of these sources shows harm, and none claims the effect is large in every infant; the proposal claims no more than they do.

What this page is doingThe evidence is compressed and carried forward at the strength the appraisal allowed, with the review's own certainty rating repeated. Explaining why sucrose, the strongest option, is left for later shows the proposal is sized to what a unit can take up.
4

Why the Nursery Routine Persists

The current routine exists for reasons that are sensible from the unit's side. Collecting every heel stick in the nursery lets the collector work through a list in one place, with good light, a warm surface and supplies within reach, and it keeps the procedure away from mothers who might find it distressing. The routine also predates the unit's move to rooming-in; when babies spent most of the night in the nursery, collection there was simply where the babies were. Now most babies stay with their mothers, so collecting in the nursery means taking the baby away from the mother to do something painful and then bringing the baby back crying. The proposal respects the reasons behind the old routine by keeping nursery collection as a fallback and by giving the collector a set time in each room, rather than asking for collection whenever a mother happens to be feeding.

What this page is doingThe proposal explains why the current routine made sense when it began, which is how a proposal earns a hearing from the people who run it. The fallback it keeps is a direct answer to those reasons.
5

Who Holds Each Part

The writer will not be on the unit after this session, so every part of the change is assigned to someone who is staying. The day-shift nurse assigned to the mother and baby asks the mother during the 0800 assessment whether she would like to hold or feed her baby during the heel stick and agrees on a time between 24 and 48 hours of age, as the screening program requires. The nurse writes the agreed time on the whiteboard in the room. The unit's newborn screening collector, a role held by a nursing assistant trained in capillary sampling, performs the heel stick at the bedside at that time, with the nurse present if the mother is breastfeeding for the first time. The unit educator adds a five-minute segment on positioning for bedside heel sticks to the annual newborn skills day, which already exists. The nurse manager owns the change, approves it at the unit practice council and reviews it at the monthly staff meeting for the first three months.

What this page is doingEvery piece of the change sits with a role that is staying, and the proposal says so because a pre-licensure author cannot volunteer for anything. This is the section graders on a student capstone check first.
6

What It Costs, in Minutes

The change costs time in two places and saves it in one. The morning question adds about thirty seconds to the nurse's assessment. The bedside heel stick takes the collector longer than a nursery heel stick, perhaps five extra minutes, because the collector must walk to the room, position the baby with the mother and wait for a feed to settle before starting. On a unit with about 12 births a day, that is roughly an hour of collector time a day. The saving is in the time spent comforting a crying newborn after a nursery heel stick and in the nurse's time returning a distressed baby to a mother who was not present, which staff estimated at five to ten minutes per baby. The change may therefore cost little net time, but it moves time from nurses to the collector, which is why the collector's schedule, not the nurse's, will decide whether the change survives.

What Mothers Are Told

Mothers are told in plain language what the heel stick is for, that it can hurt briefly, and that holding or feeding the baby during it has been shown to help babies cope. They are told that they may choose not to be present, and that the nursery remains available if they prefer. For mothers who are breastfeeding for the first time, the nurse helps with latch before the collector begins, so that the baby is feeding steadily when the lance happens. The unit's existing newborn screening pamphlet, given at admission, will gain one sentence explaining that the test is usually done in the room, so mothers are not surprised when it is offered.

Where It Could Fail

Three failure points are predictable. First, mothers who are asleep, in pain after a cesarean or away from the room at the agreed time; the proposal allows the heel stick to move to the next feed within the screening window, and to the nursery only if the window is about to close. Second, the collector's workload on high-census days, when bedside collection for twelve babies could compete with other duties; the proposal lets the charge nurse return to nursery collection for the day when census is above a threshold the unit sets, and asks that the number of such days be recorded. Third, the change could fade as new staff join; the educator's segment on newborn skills day and the whiteboard prompt are the two supports that do not depend on anyone remembering the project.

What the Unit Will Count

The unit already records the time and location of each newborn screening collection on the specimen card and in the electronic record. The measure is the percentage of heel sticks performed in the mother's room during feeding or skin-to-skin, which requires one new checkbox on the existing collection documentation. The target at three months is 70 percent of heel sticks, allowing for mothers who decline or are unavailable. Maternal satisfaction with the change will be asked in one question on the unit's existing discharge survey.

References

Gray, L., Watt, L., & Blass, E. M. (2000). Skin-to-skin contact is analgesic in healthy newborns. Pediatrics, 105(1), Article e14. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.105.1.e14

Johnston, C., Campbell-Yeo, M., Disher, T., Benoit, B., Fernandes, A., Streiner, D., Inglis, D., & Zee, R. (2017). Skin-to-skin care for procedural pain in neonates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(2), Article CD008435. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008435.pub3

Shah, P. S., Herbozo, C., Aliwalas, L. L., & Shah, V. S. (2012). Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012(12), Article CD004950. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004950.pub3

Stevens, B., Yamada, J., Ohlsson, A., Haliburton, S., & Shorkey, A. (2016). Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(7), Article CD001069. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001069.pub5

What the NR 452 Week 5 assignment asks for

In Week 5 you put forward a change for the unit where you first saw the problem. Students usually need the change, the evidence, why current practice exists, who will carry out the change, its costs, how patients are informed, risks and how it will be measured, in APA. State the change first as something a person on shift does differently. Carry the evidence forward at the strength your appraisal allowed. Explain why the current routine made sense. Assign every part to a role that is staying, since you will not be there. Count the cost in minutes. Plan what patients are told. Name where it could fail and what the unit already records.

Inside the NR 452 Week 5 example

The change section moves the heel stick from the nursery bassinet to the mother's bedside at a time agreed during the morning assessment. The evidence section carries forward the moderate-strength findings and explains why sucrose, despite stronger evidence, needs supplies and orders the unit does not routinely have. The persistence section explains that collecting in the nursery lets the collector work through a list and keeps a fallback for mothers who are unavailable. The roles section assigns the morning question to the day nurse and the collection to the collector. The cost section adds thirty seconds and some walking time. The teaching section explains what mothers hear. Three failure points include mothers asleep or in pain. The measure uses recorded collection location.

Reading the NR 452 Week 5 grading rubric

Change proposal rubrics in the pre-licensure capstone typically weigh a clear change, carried-forward evidence, understanding of current practice, assignment of roles, feasibility and cost, patient communication, risks and measurement, and APA. Assignment of roles is the section graders check most, because a student author cannot carry the change, and this proposal earns it by giving every part to someone staying. The change is credited for a one-sentence action. Evidence scores at the strength the appraisal allowed. Current practice earns points for explaining why the nursery routine made sense. Feasibility is credited in minutes. Patient communication and risks score for being specific. The measure uses data the unit already keeps.

Common NR 452 Week 5 mistakes, and how to avoid them

The proposal that costs most only works while its author is standing there, relying on the student to check, remind or collect. Another loss is overstating the evidence or ignoring why current practice exists. Students also skip the cost, leave patients' information out or invent a measure that requires new counting. The proposal does not have to be something you can carry out yourself; it must be something the unit could. Being unlicensed means assigning roles to licensed staff. Evidence goes in a compressed section, not the whole review again. Send your appraised evidence and an NR 452 change proposal can be written for the people who will stay.

Get a NR 452 Week 5 example written to your instructions

Send the Week 5 instructions and any required elements your section lists, along with your problem statement and appraisal work, and a custom example is written to that scope and returned inside 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free. Whether any of it is ever put to the people you worked beside is a decision nobody else can take.

More NR 452 papers and pre-licensure samples

NR 452 Week 5 questions, answered

Does the proposal have to be something I could carry out myself?

No, and assuming you will be present to do it is the commonest way these documents come apart. Write it for the people who will still be on that unit next year, and describe their part in enough detail that somebody who never spoke to you could follow the sentence. Your own availability is the one resource this project does not actually have.

Does it matter that I am not licensed yet?

Not to the marking, though it does shape the document. The proposal is judged on whether the reasoning holds and whether anybody could act on it, never on the writer's title. Where it does matter is in what you claim to know: draw the setting from what you observed on placement, and let published evidence carry everything you were not there long enough to see.

Where does the evidence go in this document?

Directly under the recommendation and compressed hard. A reader deciding whether to act needs to know what supports the change and how confidently, not to read your appraisal a second time. Two or three sentences carrying the strongest findings, at the certainty the appraisal genuinely reached, do more work here than a page restating the previous assignment.

Where can I find a free NR 452 Week 5 sample paper?

The complete Week 5 proposal for bedside heel sticks during breastfeeding or skin-to-skin contact, with the evidence, roles, costs, what mothers are told, failure points, the measure and four references, can be read here.

Why does the NR 452 Week 5 proposal not choose sucrose?

Although sucrose has the strongest evidence, it requires a supply and an order or protocol the unit does not routinely have, while skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding need nothing new.