| Course | NR 533 Financial Management in Healthcare Organizations |
|---|---|
| Week | 2 |
| Paper type | Budget variance analysis |
| Length | About 1,150 words, 3 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | MSN, Nurse Executive |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 533 Week 2
Budget Variance Analysis: One March on a 12-Bed Palliative Care Unit, $47,707 Over the Static Budget, Flexed to 341 Patient Days and Split Into Volume, Hours, Pay Rate, Supplies and Pharmacy
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 533: Financial Management in Healthcare Organizations
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Budget Variance Analysis: One March on a 12-Bed Palliative Care Unit, $47,707 Over the Static Budget, Flexed to 341 Patient Days and Split Into Volume, Hours, Pay Rate, Supplies and Pharmacy
Purpose
The March cost center statement for the 12-bed inpatient palliative care unit I manage shows total expenses of $281,447 against a budget of $233,740, an unfavorable variance of $47,707, or 20%. The finance office has asked for an explanation. This analysis rebuilds the month from the statement and the unit's own records. It first flexes the budget to the number of patient days that actually occurred, then divides what remains into its causes. The purpose is to separate the part of the overage that simply reflects more patients from the parts that reflect how the unit used staff, what it paid for them, and what it spent on supplies and drugs, so that each part can be managed by whoever controls it.
Step 1: Volume
The budget assumed 310 patient days in March, an average daily census of 10. The unit actually had 341 patient days, an average of 11.0. Two things drove the increase: the hospital's two contracted hospices referred more patients for general inpatient care after one of them closed its own inpatient facility in February, and the hospital's palliative consult service transferred four patients from the intensive care unit for comfort care.
A budget that does not change with volume will always show an overage when more patients arrive. Flexing the budget to 341 patient days, using the budget's own rates, is the standard first step in variance analysis for this reason (Finkler et al., 2013). The flexible budget for March is $257,114. The volume variance, the difference between the flexible and static budgets, is $23,374 unfavorable. That part of the overage reflects the unit caring for 31 more patient days than planned and is not a management failure. The remaining variance, actual spending against the flexible budget, is $24,333, and it is the part that needs explaining.
Step 2: The Remaining Variance by Line
Table 1 sets out the static budget, flexible budget and actual spending for the three lines that account for almost all of the variance.
Table 1
March Variance After Flexing for Volume
| Line | Static budget (310 days) | Flexible budget (341 days) | Actual | Actual minus flexible |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salaries, nursing | $192,510 | $211,761 | $225,347 | $13,586 unfavorable |
| Medical supplies | $11,780 | $12,958 | $14,120 | $1,162 unfavorable |
| Pharmaceuticals | $29,450 | $32,395 | $41,980 | $9,585 unfavorable |
| Total, three lines | $233,740 | $257,114 | $281,447 | $24,333 unfavorable |
Step 3: Salaries Split Into Hours and Rate
The budget assumed 11.5 worked nursing hours per patient day at an average hourly cost of $54.00. In March the unit worked 4,053 hours at an average of $55.60, or 11.89 hours per patient day.
Efficiency variance. The unit worked 131.5 more hours than the budget allows for 341 patient days (4,053 against 3,921.5). At the budgeted rate, that is $7,101 unfavorable. Almost all of the extra hours were in the last week of March, when three patients were actively dying at the same time and each family needed a nurse present for long periods. Two nurses were added on the evening shift for four nights. I approved those shifts and would do so again, but they should be recognized as a consequence of acuity that the per-day budget does not capture.
Rate variance. The average hourly cost was $1.60 higher than budgeted across all 4,053 hours, which is $6,485 unfavorable. Part of this is the extra shifts themselves, which were paid at overtime rates, and part is a shift differential increase negotiated in January after the budget was set. The differential change is permanent and should be built into next year's rate; the overtime portion is not.
Step 4: Supplies
Supplies ran $1,162 over the flexible budget, or $41.41 per patient day against a budgeted $38.00. The difference is specialty mattress rentals for four patients with pressure injuries on admission, which are charged to the unit's supply line. The rentals were clinically necessary. The more useful question is whether the hospital should own two low-air-loss mattresses rather than rent them, which I will raise in the capital request later this year.
Step 5: Pharmaceuticals
Pharmaceuticals ran $9,585 over the flexible budget, $123.11 per patient day against $95.00. Pharmacy's dispensing reports allow this to be divided into three causes. About $4,100 came from continuous octreotide infusions for three patients with malignant bowel obstruction. About $2,300 came from a morphine shortage that required switching patients on continuous opioid infusions to hydromorphone, which cost more per equivalent dose. About $3,200 came from waste: 38 partially used infusion bags discarded after death or discharge, and emergency medication kits restocked in full when a single drug was used.
Only the last cause is controlled on the unit. The first reflects the patients' conditions and the second a national supply problem. Palliative care has been shown to reduce hospital costs overall, mainly by avoiding intensive treatments that do not serve the patient's goals (May et al., 2018), and a matched study of eight hospitals' consultation programs found lower direct costs per admission for patients seen (Morrison et al., 2008), so pharmacy spending on comfort medications should not be read as waste in itself. The discarded bags are waste, and they are the unit's responsibility. Most were 24-hour bags hung for patients who died within a few hours, a practice the unit adopted years ago to reduce the number of bag changes for families at the bedside. That reason still matters, and the change proposed below keeps it by using shorter bags only when death is expected soon.
Summary and Actions
Of the $47,707 overage, $23,374 reflects higher volume. Of the remaining $24,333, about $15,200 reflects patient need and outside factors (acuity-driven hours, part of the rate variance, bowel obstruction treatment and the drug shortage), and about $9,100 reflects decisions the unit can change or the budget should have included: the permanent differential increase, the waste, the mattress rentals and part of the overtime.
I will take four actions. First, from April, patients whose prognosis is measured in hours to days will receive 12-hour rather than 24-hour infusion bags, which pharmacy agrees is safe and should cut discarded volume by about half. Second, emergency kits will be restocked only with what was used. Third, I will ask finance to build the new shift differential into the rate for the rest of the year. Fourth, I will ask finance to report pharmacy waste as a separate line, so that the part of the pharmaceutical line the unit controls is visible each month.
References
Finkler, S. A., Jones, C. B., & Kovner, C. T. (2013). Financial management for nurse managers and executives (4th ed.). Elsevier.
May, P., Normand, C., Cassel, J. B., Del Fabbro, E., Fine, R. L., Menz, R., Morrison, C. A., Penrod, J. D., Robinson, C., & Morrison, R. S. (2018). Economics of palliative care for hospitalized adults with serious illness: A meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine, 178(6), 820-829. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0750
Morrison, R. S., Penrod, J. D., Cassel, J. B., Caust-Ellenbogen, M., Litke, A., Spragens, L., & Meier, D. E. (2008). Cost savings associated with US hospital palliative care consultation programs. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168(16), 1783-1790. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.168.16.1783
Reading the NR 533 Week 2 instructions
For Week 2 you generally analyze a monthly budget variance for a cost center, real or supplied. Prompts ask you to calculate variances, distinguish volume from other causes, explain each significant variance and recommend actions. Flex the budget to the actual volume first, using the budget's own rates, so that more patients are not mistaken for overspending. Then break the remaining variance into parts: for salaries, hours and rate; for supplies and drugs, quantity and price where you can. Trace each part to events in the month. Say which causes the unit controls. Show the arithmetic so the reader can check it. A table of the lines, with nurse-manager finance sources in APA 7, keeps the analysis checkable.
How the NR 533 Week 2 example is put together
The paper opens with the statement's totals and the purpose of rebuilding the month. The volume step explains why census rose and calculates the flexible budget and volume variance. Table 1 shows static, flexible and actual spending for salaries, supplies and pharmaceuticals. The salary section splits 131.5 extra hours from a $1.60 higher hourly cost and ties each to acuity, overtime and a new differential. Supplies are traced to mattress rentals. Pharmaceuticals are split three ways using dispensing reports, with evidence that palliative care lowers hospital costs overall placed beside the waste figure. The summary divides the variance into need and controllable decisions and lists four actions.
Where the points sit in the NR 533 Week 2 rubric
Variance analysis rubrics usually reward correct calculation of variances, use of a flexible budget, accurate identification of causes, distinction between controllable and uncontrollable factors, and practical recommendations. Graders frequently recompute the numbers, so figures that reconcile from table to text earn credit. Splitting salary variance into efficiency and rate components shows command of the method. Explaining causes with evidence from the month, such as dispensing reports, strengthens the analysis. Recommendations should follow from the controllable causes only. Recognizing when a variance reflects patient need rather than poor management shows judgment. Clear tables and citations support the score. Where a section asks for a short memo to leadership with the analysis, a plain summary of what is volume and what is spending tends to score well.
Common NR 533 Week 2 mistakes, and how to avoid them
The most frequent mistake is explaining the static budget variance without flexing for volume, which blames the unit for caring for more patients. Flex first. Another is stopping at line totals without splitting them into hours and rate or quantity and price. Students also list causes without evidence from the month. Use schedules, dispensing data or logs. Avoid recommending cuts to lines driven by patient need. Check that your numbers reconcile; a variance that does not add up loses credibility quickly. Do not ignore permanent changes, such as a new differential, which should go into the budget rather than be explained again every month. Finally, say what reporting would help next time.
Get a NR 533 Week 2 example written to your instructions
Send the worksheet or template your section issued, plus whatever figures you were given for the month, and we write a custom variance analysis to it and return it inside 24-48h, the first one free. If no figures came with the assignment, we build a plausible month and label every input as illustrative in the line where it appears.
More NR 533 papers and MSN samples
- NR 533 Week 1: Discussion on Owning a Budget Line
- NR 533 Week 3: Cost Per Case Worksheet
- NR 533 Week 4: Operating Budget Draft
- NR 533 Week 5: Business Case
- NR 533 Week 6: Capital Request Write-up
- NR 533 Week 7: Reimbursement Brief
- NR 533 Week 8: Budget Defense Presentation
- NR 532 Week 2: Workload Forecast
- NR 531 Week 2: Org Chart Analysis With Hidden Lines
- NR 529 Week 2: Delegation Analysis of a Standing Job
NR 533 Week 2 questions, answered
How much arithmetic should be shown?
Enough that a reader can reproduce the split without asking you for anything. The flexed figure, the separate causes and the total should be visible and should reconcile. Long derivations are not wanted, but a result appearing without the inputs beneath it gets treated as unverified, and unverified is graded the same as wrong at this level.
What if the month has no obvious problem in it?
Then say so and analyze anyway, because a month landing close to plan is often two large differences canceling. Showing that an unfavorable rate effect was hidden by a favorable volume effect is a stronger finding than any single overspend, and instructors read it as the mark of somebody who flexed properly rather than eyeballing the bottom line.
Which cause gets the recommendation?
The largest one the manager can actually influence, which is rarely the largest one overall. Volume usually belongs to somebody else, price often sits inside a contract signed centrally, and use is where the schedule, the assignment and the approval of extra shifts all live. Say plainly which portion you are leaving alone, and why you are leaving it.
Where can I find a free NR 533 Week 2 sample paper?
The March variance analysis shown above, table and all, is the complete NR 533 Week 2 sample and nothing stands between you and reading it. If your course supplied its own statement, send us the figures and an analysis flexed and split the same way can be written.
What does flexing the budget mean in NR 533 Week 2?
It means recalculating the budget at the volume that actually occurred, using the budget's own rates. The sample flexes March to 341 patient days, which separates $23,374 of volume effect from the spending that needs explaining.