NR 535 Week 2 Learning Objectives Set Example

Theoretical Foundations and Instructional Strategies for the Nurse Educator Chamberlain University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NR 535 Week 2 sample paper presents eight learning objectives for a 90-minute chest drainage session for new graduate nurses, each with its audience fixed before its verb. In Chamberlain NR 535 (catalog code NR-535), Week 2 asks MSN Nurse Educator students to write objectives someone could watch being met. The set follows three rules: the learner is the subject, the verb is observable and matched to the cognitive level needed, and every objective can be checked within the session. It excludes topics that belong later, explains why no objective reaches the evaluate level, lists the in-session check for each, and shows how preceptor feedback reshaped two objectives.

CourseNR 535 Theoretical Foundations and Instructional Strategies for the Nurse Educator
Week2
Paper typeLearning objectives set
LengthAbout 1,120 words, 3 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolChamberlain University
ProgramMSN, Nurse Educator
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NR 535 Week 2

1

Learning Objectives Set: Eight Objectives for Teaching Chest Drainage to First-Year Nurses, Each With an Audience Fixed Before the Verb, an Action Someone Can Watch and a Limit Set by the Ninety Minutes Available

Student Name

College of Nursing, Chamberlain University

NR 535: Theoretical Foundations and Instructional Strategies for the Nurse Educator

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the three rules the objectives follow, which is how the set can be checked line by line rather than judged as a whole. Student APA 7 title page.
2

Learning Objectives Set: Eight Objectives for Teaching Chest Drainage to First-Year Nurses, Each With an Audience Fixed Before the Verb, an Action Someone Can Watch and a Limit Set by the Ninety Minutes Available

Purpose and Audience

These objectives are for a 90-minute session on chest drainage systems for new graduate nurses in the first three months of our nurse residency program, who work on the unit's twenty-eight thoracic and pulmonary beds. The audience is fixed first, because the right verb depends on who is learning. These nurses have passed a licensing examination and cared for patients with chest tubes as students, usually as observers. They know the vocabulary but have rarely been responsible for the system. They are at the stage Benner (1982) called advanced beginner, able to recognize recurring features of situations with guidance but not yet to see the whole picture unaided.

The session is one of twelve in the residency's first quarter and cannot hold everything about chest drainage. The objectives below are limited to what a new nurse must do safely in the first weeks of caring for these patients alone, and what can be taught and checked in 90 minutes with one drainage system, one task trainer and eight learners.

Rules for Writing the Objectives

Each objective follows three rules. First, the audience is the new graduate nurse, and the objective states what that nurse will do, not what the educator will cover. Second, the verb names an action someone can watch or hear. Verbs such as understand, know, appreciate and be aware of are excluded, because they promise nothing observable. The revised taxonomy of educational objectives distinguishes levels of cognitive process, from remembering and understanding through applying, analyzing, evaluating and creating (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001), and the verbs below were chosen to match the level the nurse needs to reach, not the highest level that sounds impressive. Third, each objective must be achievable and checkable within the session.

Eight Objectives

When the session closes, each new graduate nurse will be able to:

1. Identify, on a three-chamber drainage system at the bedside, the collection chamber, the water seal chamber and the suction control mechanism, pointing to each and stating its purpose in one sentence. (Remember)

2. Demonstrate, on a task trainer, how to check the water seal for tidaling and for bubbling, and state what each finding means for a patient on water seal and for a patient on suction. (Apply)

3. Distinguish, given three drainage system photographs and brief patient histories, between expected intermittent bubbling, a continuous air leak and a leak in the tubing or connections. (Analyze)

4. Demonstrate the sequence for locating the source of a continuous air leak by briefly clamping along the tubing, stating when clamping is and is not appropriate. (Apply)

5. Record drainage volume and character correctly from the collection chamber, including marking the level and time, for a system with 140 mL of serosanguineous drainage over four hours. (Apply)

6. State the drainage volume and character that require immediate notification of the surgical team under unit policy, and give one example of each. (Remember and understand)

7. Demonstrate the immediate response to accidental disconnection of the tubing from the drainage system and to accidental dislodgement of the chest tube from the patient, on the task trainer. (Apply)

8. Explain, in their own words to a partner, why the drainage system must be kept below the level of the chest and why routine clamping during transport is avoided. (Understand)

What Was Left Out, and Why

Several topics were excluded because they do not fit a first-quarter session or cannot be checked in 90 minutes. Assisting with chest tube insertion and removal is taught later, when residents have spent time with thoracic patients. Digital drainage systems, used only in the operating suite at our hospital, are omitted. Physiology of the pleural space is reviewed briefly in a pre-reading rather than taught, because the objectives concern what nurses do at the bedside and a review of chest drain management for nurses focuses on the practical checks and troubleshooting that prevent harm (Durai et al., 2010).

The set also avoids objectives at the evaluate and create levels. It would be easy to add one, such as design a plan of care for a patient with a persistent air leak, but new graduates at this stage cannot yet do this reliably, and an objective that cannot be met in the session only gives a false sense of rigor.

How Each Objective Will Be Checked

Every objective has a check within the session. Objectives 1, 2, 4 and 7 are checked at the task trainer, with the educator watching each nurse perform the action. Objective 3 is checked with a short photograph exercise, with each nurse writing an answer before discussion. Objective 5 is checked with a documentation exercise on a paper flow sheet. Objective 6 is checked by asking each nurse to state the thresholds without notes. Objective 8 is checked by listening to explanations between partners and asking one follow-up question of each pair.

Objectives that cannot be checked in the session are not objectives for the session. Writing the checks alongside the objectives, rather than after the session is designed, is the test that the verbs are observable: if the educator cannot describe what would be watched or heard, the verb needs to change.

Alignment With Later Sessions

The objectives build toward the residency's later outcomes. In the second quarter, residents will care independently for postoperative thoracic patients, and their preceptors will use a checklist based on these objectives to confirm competence during the first two weeks. In the fourth quarter, residents will attend a session on complex drainage problems, including persistent air leaks and subcutaneous emphysema, which will use analysis and evaluation objectives built on this foundation. Preceptors were asked to review the draft objectives before the session, and two changes came from them: objective 7 was added after a preceptor described a new nurse who froze when a tube separated during a bed change, and objective 5 was made specific because documentation errors on drainage volume were the most common finding in the unit's chart audits. The set is therefore the first step in a sequence, and it is limited on purpose so that each later step has something solid to stand on.

What this page is doingEach objective fixes the audience, uses an observable verb matched to the needed cognitive level and has a stated check within the session, and the set explains what it excluded.
3

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Benner, P. (1982). From novice to expert. American Journal of Nursing, 82(3), 402-407. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000446-198282030-00004

Durai, R., Hoque, H., & Davies, T. W. (2010). Managing a chest tube and drainage system. AORN Journal, 91(2), 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2009.09.026

Reading the NR 535 Week 2 instructions

For Week 2 you generally write a set of learning objectives for a teaching session or unit. Prompts ask you to identify the learners, write measurable objectives across domains or levels, align them with a taxonomy and explain your choices. Fix the audience before choosing verbs, because the right level depends on who is learning. Replace verbs such as understand and know with actions someone could observe. Match each verb to the level the learners actually need, not the highest level available. Keep objectives within what the session's time and materials allow. Say how each will be checked. Explain what you left out. Cite the taxonomy you use in APA 7, and format the set as your section directs.

How the NR 535 Week 2 example is put together

The set begins by describing its learners, new graduates in their first three months who are advanced beginners in Benner's terms, and the limits of a single session. A section states three rules for writing the objectives, with the revised taxonomy of educational objectives supporting the choice of levels. Eight numbered objectives follow, each labeled with its level, from identifying chambers to explaining why a drainage system stays below the chest. A section explains exclusions, such as insertion and digital systems, with a practical review of chest drain management guiding the focus. Another lists the in-session check for each objective. The last section places the set in the residency's sequence and describes preceptor input.

Reading the NR 535 Week 2 grading rubric

Objectives rubrics usually reward clearly identified learners, measurable action verbs, alignment with a taxonomy, appropriate levels, feasibility and a clear rationale. Graders look closely at verbs, so observable actions matched to the learners' stage earn more than ambitious but vague ones. Stating how each objective will be checked shows understanding of alignment between objectives and assessment. Explaining exclusions and the absence of higher levels demonstrates judgment rather than omission. A taxonomy cited and applied correctly supports the scholarly criterion. Connecting the set to later sessions shows curriculum thinking. Clean formatting, with each objective numbered and labeled, supports readability.

NR 535 Week 2 help from the desk

The most common error is objectives built on verbs such as understand, appreciate or be aware of, which promise nothing observable. Replace them. Another is writing what the educator will cover instead of what the learner will do. Students also reach for evaluate and create levels to look rigorous when the learners are novices who cannot meet them yet. Match the level to the learner. Avoid objectives that cannot be checked in the time available. Do not write more objectives than the session can hold. Explain what you left out, since a set that seems to include everything invites the question of how it fits in ninety minutes. Finally, check each verb by asking what you would see.

Get a NR 535 Week 2 example written to your instructions

Send us your week's instructions, the rubric and the topic you were assigned, along with the audience if your section names one. A custom objectives set is written to those exact requirements, rationale column included, and comes back inside 24 to 48 hours. The first example is free, and it is built for your session rather than adapted from someone else's.

More NR 535 papers and MSN samples

NR 535 Week 2 questions, answered

Do the objectives have to use a taxonomy?

In practice most sections expect one, and the example names its taxonomy openly so the rationale has something to argue against. The point is not the label but the climb. When every line sits at the same low level, the session has no shape, and when the top line jumps three levels above the audience, the hour cannot deliver it. The taxonomy simply makes both problems visible.

Can an objective set include an affective objective?

It can, and the example shows one written so it still passes the observation test. Attitude objectives fail when they promise a feeling and succeed when they promise a behavior that would follow the feeling: raising a concern aloud, asking for a second check, choosing to pause. Write the behavior, keep the attitude in the rationale, and the line survives a rubric.

Does this set have to match the lesson plan I write later?

It should, and that is the practical value of writing it carefully now. Later weeks in this course ask for a plan with minutes attached, and each block in that plan is supposed to serve a named objective from this set. Vague verbs here become unassignable minutes there. The example is written so every line could be pointed at from a timing column without rewording.

Where can I find a free NR 535 Week 2 sample paper?

The eight chest drainage objectives shown above are the complete NR 535 Week 2 sample, and they are posted openly. For a set written to your own learners and topic, tell us who they are and what the session covers, and objectives with checks can be prepared.

How many objectives should the NR 535 Week 2 set have?

Enough to cover what the session can teach and check, often five to eight. The sample writes eight for a 90-minute session and gives an in-session check for each one.