| Course | NR 702A DNP Project & Practicum I |
|---|---|
| Week | 7 |
| Paper type | Practicum objective set |
| Length | About 1,110 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 702A Week 7
Practicum Objective Set: Six Objectives for the First DNP Practicum Term, Each With a Checkable Verb, the Product It Leaves and the Competency It Answers
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 702A: DNP Project & Practicum I
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Practicum Objective Set: Six Objectives for the First DNP Practicum Term, Each With a Checkable Verb, the Product It Leaves and the Competency It Answers
The Objectives
| No. | Objective | Product afterward | Competency domain answered | Hours |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Obtain and verify the matched baseline of positive screens and completed behavioral health contacts for two quarters | A one-page baseline table with definitions, checked by the quality analyst | Domain 5: Quality and Safety | 16 |
| 2 | Map the current referral workflow from positive screen to first contact by observing ten referrals | A workflow map with the step where each lost patient dropped out | Domain 7: Systems-Based Practice | 24 |
| 3 | Convene a 30-minute meeting of the behavioral health team to review the baseline and workflow map | Meeting notes with each team member's view of the main barrier | Domain 6: Interprofessional Partnerships | 12 |
| 4 | Review the literature on interventions that increase first behavioral health contact after a positive screen in primary care | An evidence table of at least ten sources, with the setting and effect of each | Domain 4: Scholarship for the Nursing Discipline | 32 |
| 5 | Draft the aim statement and project charter and obtain sponsor and executive approval | Signed charter, version 1.0 | Domain 10: Personal, Professional, and Leadership Development | 20 |
| 6 | Present the project to the site operations meeting | A five-minute presentation and the meeting's recorded response | Domain 6: Interprofessional Partnerships | 8 |
| Total | 112 |
The domains are quoted from the national competency framework my program uses (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2021).
Why These Verbs
Obtain, map, convene, review, draft, present. Each can be checked from outside: a table exists, a map exists, notes exist, an evidence table exists, a signed charter exists, a meeting minute records the presentation. None of the verbs describes something only I could confirm, such as understand or appreciate.
Hours That Add Up
The hours are estimates made before the term started and will be compared with the log at the end. 112 hours against the 112 my practicum plan allots to this term. The largest share, 32 hours, goes to the evidence review, because the next term's choice of change depends on it. The workflow map takes 24 hours because observing ten referrals means being present when they happen, which cannot be scheduled exactly. Some of that time will be spent waiting, which is itself information about how the handoff works.
Spread, Not Back-Loaded
Weeks 1 and 2: objective 1. Weeks 2 to 4: objective 2. Week 4: objective 3. Weeks 3 to 7: objective 4. Weeks 5 and 6: objective 5. Week 7: objective 6. No week holds more than 20 hours, and the evidence review runs alongside the other work rather than being left to the end.
How the Objectives Connect to the Project
Objectives 1 and 2 establish what the gap is and where it happens. Objective 3 brings in the people who control the handoff. Objective 4 gathers the evidence the next term needs. Objectives 5 and 6 secure the approvals that let the project continue. Together they leave the project ready for the second term, when a change will be chosen.
What Each Objective Depends On
Objective 1 depends on the quality analyst's time, already agreed. Objective 2 depends on patients screening positive while I am present, which happens several times a week. Objective 3 depends on the director of behavioral health granting agenda time. Objective 6 depends on the site medical director's agenda.
How Progress Will Be Checked
At the midpoint of the term, week 4, the mentor and I will go through the set together, and each objective will be marked as running, slipping or revised, with the reason for any revision written beside it. At the end of the term, each objective's product will be filed in a shared folder the mentor can see, so that the readiness memo can point to each one.
How the Products Feed the Next Term
The baseline table becomes the project's baseline. The workflow map identifies where patients are lost, which the next term's root cause analysis will build on. The team's views from the meeting become hypotheses to test. The evidence table supplies the candidate changes. The charter and presentation secure the permissions the next term needs to test a change.
Why the Evidence Review Gets the Most Hours
The next term's choice of change depends on knowing what has been tried elsewhere, in what settings and with what results. Many integrated care studies describe whole models rather than the first-contact step (Archer et al., 2012), so finding the narrower evidence takes time. Thirty-two hours allows for searching, reading and building a table that sets out each source's setting and effect, which the second term's proposal will cite.
What the Mentor Will Check
The baseline table's definitions; the workflow map's accuracy against what the behavioral health team sees; the meeting notes' fairness to each team member's view; the evidence table's coverage; the charter's scope. The mentor will not check hours, which the program verifies from my log.
How Each Objective Prepares a Later Term
Objective 1's baseline will be reused unchanged in the fourth term's evaluation. Objective 2's map will be redrawn in the third term after the change, so that before and after can be set side by side. Objective 3's meeting begins a monthly relationship with the behavioral health team that the third term's testing depends on. Objective 4's table becomes the evidence section of the proposal. Objectives 5 and 6 secure permissions that last for the whole project. Nothing produced this term is a one-off exercise.
What Would Change the Set
If the quality improvement determination finds the project needs further review, objective 4 would expand to prepare the review documents and objective 6 would wait. If the behavioral health team meeting is canceled, objective 3 would become individual conversations with each team member, recorded in the same format.
What the Set Leaves Out
Any intervention. Choosing and testing a change belongs to the next two terms, and an objective that tested a change now would get ahead of the evidence and the site's agreement.
Fit With the Evidence
The workflow map and evidence review prepare for a change of the kind collaborative care literature describes (Archer et al., 2012). Measuring a validated score and acting on it, the basis of measurement-based care (Fortney et al., 2017), is what the baseline in objective 1 makes possible.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2021). The essentials: Core competencies for professional nursing education. American Association of Colleges of Nursing.
Archer, J., Bower, P., Gilbody, S., Lovell, K., Richards, D., Gask, L., Dickens, C., & Coventry, P. (2012). Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012(10), CD006525. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006525.pub2
Fortney, J. C., Unützer, J., Wrenn, G., Pyne, J. M., Smith, G. R., Schoenbaum, M., & Harbin, H. T. (2017). A tipping point for measurement-based care. Psychiatric Services, 68(2), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201500439
NR 702A Week 7 instructions, in plain terms
Present the set as a table or numbered list. Open each objective with a verb that someone outside could check, such as draft, convene, review or present. Under it, name the product the work will leave, since that is what makes an objective verifiable and what most sets omit. Quote the competency each objective answers from your program's own list rather than describing it. Give an hours estimate for each and make sure they add up to the term's total. Spread the work across the term rather than leaving it to the end. Say what each objective depends on, how progress will be checked and how each product feeds later terms.
Inside the NR 702A Week 7 example
The sample's six objectives obtain a two-quarter baseline, map ten observed referrals, convene a behavioral health team meeting, review at least ten sources into an evidence table, draft and approve the aim and charter, and present at the site operations meeting. Products include a checked baseline table, a map of where patients drop out, notes with each team member's view, an evidence table, a signed charter and minutes. Domains quoted include Quality and Safety, Systems-Based Practice and Interprofessional Partnerships. Hours total 112, with no week above 20. Dependencies, a midpoint check with the mentor and links to later terms are set out. What would change the set, such as a canceled team meeting, is planned for in advance, and the product of each objective is linked to the term that will reuse it.
Where the points sit in the NR 702A Week 7 rubric
Objective sets lose most when verbs describe inner states, such as understand or appreciate, that nobody outside could check. Next is a set with no products, so there is nothing to show at the end of the term. Competencies are often paraphrased rather than quoted, which makes the mapping vague. Hours that do not add up to the term's requirement, or that cluster in the last weeks, suggest the plan was not worked through. Many sets include testing an intervention in the first term, which gets ahead of the evidence and the site's agreement. Sets that never name dependencies leave the student surprised when an objective stalls. Sets that never say how each product feeds later terms also look like a list of tasks rather than a plan. Graders check that hours match the practicum plan.
NR 702A Week 7 help from the desk
Turning a term's work into objectives with checkable products takes several drafts. A guided draft can help you choose verbs others can verify, name each objective's product and quote the competency it answers. We can also help you estimate hours that add up and spread the work across the term. Asking your mentor what they would want to see at the end of the term often clarifies the products. The objectives and their products are yours. Linking each product to the term that will use it is worth doing too.
Get a NR 702A Week 7 example written to your instructions
Send the competency list your program uses and the number of hours your term carries, and the objectives come back written against both, with products attached and the arithmetic done. The hours themselves, and the record you keep of them, stay entirely with you and your site. First sample free, inside 24 to 48 hours.
More NR 702A papers and DNP samples
- NR 702A Week 1: DNP Trouble Post
- NR 702A Week 2: Practice Gap Write-Up
- NR 702A Week 3: Setting Description
- NR 702A Week 4: Site Agreement Summary
- NR 702A Week 5: Aim Statement Draft
- NR 702A Week 6: Project Charter
- NR 702A Week 8: Proposal Readiness Memo
NR 702A Week 7 questions, answered
How many objectives is the right number?
Three to five in most sections, and the number matters less than the fit with the hours. Two objectives that each swallow a hundred hours are harder to defend than four that divide the term sensibly. What faculty read for is whether the set covers the competencies the program lists for this term without inventing work to fill a gap in the coverage.
Can an objective be about the project itself?
Usually yes, and in this term most of them are. Drafting the charter, summarizing the agreement and presenting the problem to a unit meeting are all practicum work as well as coursework, and faculty prefer objectives that produce something the project needs. What they resist is a set where every objective is a document and none involves being in the service.
What happens if an objective turns out to be impossible?
It gets replaced and the substitution is dated, which is why the closing paragraph carries a fallback for each entry. Committees cancel, managers move and access takes longer than anyone predicts. Faculty treat a documented replacement as competence; what they treat harshly is a set that still lists an objective everybody knew was dead six weeks earlier.
Where can I find a free NR 702A Week 7 sample paper?
The finished set of six practicum objectives for the first DNP term is available here in full.
Why does each NR 702A Week 7 objective name a product?
A table, map, set of notes or signed charter is something someone else can check, which is what makes the objective verifiable.