| Course | NR 716 Analytic Methods |
|---|---|
| Week | 2 |
| Paper type | PICOT question write-up |
| Length | About 1,100 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 716 Week 2
A PICOT Question on Emergency Department Fascia Iliaca Blocks for Older Adults With Hip Fracture, Defended Element by Element
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 716: Analytic Methods
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
A PICOT Question on Emergency Department Fascia Iliaca Blocks for Older Adults With Hip Fracture, Defended Element by Element
The Problem Before the Question
Our emergency department sent 214 hip fracture patients aged 65 and over to the orthopedic floor in fiscal year 2026. The 4 A's Test, recorded by orthopedic unit nurses, was positive before surgery in 61 of them (28.5%). In the first twelve hours after arrival, patients received a median of 12 mg of intravenous morphine equivalents. No patient received a nerve block in the department; 37% received a fascia iliaca block from anesthesia immediately before surgery, a median of 26 hours after arrival. According to a Cochrane review, nerve blocks given for a broken hip lower pain on movement and the risk of acute confusional state (Guay & Kopp, 2020), and the department's practice council will decide in March 2027 whether to add an early block to the hip fracture pathway. The question below is written for that decision.
A Population a Query Could Find
P: adults aged 65 or older who arrive at our emergency department with a hip fracture confirmed on X-ray and are admitted for surgical repair. Each part of that definition can be found by a records query: age at arrival, a diagnosis code for fracture of the femoral neck, intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric region, an imaging result and an admission order to orthopedics. Patients transferred in from another hospital after a block, patients with a periprosthetic fracture and patients managed without surgery are excluded, because each would receive different care whatever the pathway says. Patients with dementia are included. Many trials excluded them, but they make up about a third of our population and are the group most likely to develop delirium, so leaving them out would answer a question nobody here is asking.
The Intervention, at Protocol Grain
I: an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block placed in the department within 60 minutes of radiographic confirmation, by a credentialed emergency physician or advanced practice nurse, using a single injection of a long-acting local anesthetic at the weight-based dose in the pharmacy-approved order set, together with scheduled acetaminophen and intravenous opioid only for breakthrough pain. Stated at this grain, two clinicians would deliver it the same way. It deliberately excludes continuous catheters, which our department cannot manage, and the newer pericapsular block, which has been compared with the fascia iliaca block in a single emergency department trial (Di Pietro et al., 2025) and is not yet in our credentialing program.
The Comparison That Runs
C: our current practice, written out so that it can continue unchanged in any comparison period: scheduled acetaminophen 1 g every eight hours, intravenous morphine or hydromorphone as needed under the department's pain protocol, reassessment of pain every hour and no nerve block until anesthesia sees the patient before surgery. Calling this standard care would hide the detail that matters most, that about a third of patients already receive a block, only much later. Any comparison has to keep that preoperative block in both arms, so the question is about timing and placement, not about block against no block.
An Outcome Already Counted
O: preoperative delirium, defined as a positive 4 A's Test score of 4 or more recorded on any shift between admission to the orthopedic unit and the start of surgery, and, as a secondary outcome, total intravenous morphine milligram equivalents given in the first 12 hours after arrival. Both are already recorded: the 4 A's Test is a required field on the orthopedic unit's shift assessment, and opioid doses are in the medication administration record. Choosing outcomes the hospital already counts means the project measures from the first day instead of building a measurement system. Pain on movement would be the most direct outcome, but our department records pain at rest only, and changing that would be its own project.
Time Matched to the Outcome
T: from arrival in the department until the start of surgery, or 72 hours if surgery is delayed. The window follows the outcome. Preoperative delirium can only occur before surgery, and our median time to surgery is 26 hours, so a 72-hour ceiling captures nearly every patient. The opioid outcome uses its own fixed 12-hour window, because a single block lasts roughly that long.
The Question Type Declared
The question belongs to the intervention, or therapy, type: it asks if acting produces a better result than the present course, which points the search toward randomized trials and systematic reviews of them and, for the parts trials do not answer, such as who can safely place the block, toward cohort studies and practice guidelines. Declaring the type also tells the reader what kind of answer is possible. The national orthopedic guideline for older adults with hip fracture already recommends regional nerve blocks as part of pain management (O'Connor & Switzer, 2022), so the open question for this department is narrower than whether blocks help. It is whether placing one early, in the emergency department, by our own clinicians, adds enough to the later block anesthesia already gives to justify the training, the order set and the time each placement takes.
The Question in Full
In adults 65 and over whom our emergency department admits with a hip fracture seen on X-ray (P), would a fascia iliaca block under ultrasound guidance, given within 60 minutes of radiographic confirmation by a credentialed emergency clinician (I), compared with scheduled acetaminophen and as-needed intravenous opioid with any block deferred to anesthesia before surgery (C), reduce preoperative delirium on the 4 A's Test and intravenous morphine equivalents in the first 12 hours (O) between arrival and surgery or 72 hours (T)?
What the Question Leaves Out
Three things were considered and left out. Mortality was dropped as an outcome, because a pathway change in one department cannot detect a difference in deaths and the Cochrane review found the evidence on mortality uncertain even across many trials. Length of stay was dropped because it depends on surgical scheduling more than on analgesia. And patient satisfaction was dropped because the department's survey is sent weeks after discharge and returns too few responses for this group. Each could become its own question later; none belongs in the one the council will use in March, which needs outcomes the department can read within months of a change.
References
Di Pietro, S., Maffeis, R., Jannelli, E., Mascia, B., Resta, F., De Silvestri, A., Musella, V., Centurioni, C. E., Regeni, E., Grassi, F. A., Locatelli, A., & Perlini, S. (2025). Comparing the pericapsular nerve group block and fascia iliaca block for acute pain management in patients with hip fracture: A randomised clinical trial. Anaesthesia, 80(12), 1484-1492. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16695
Guay, J., & Kopp, S. (2020). Peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2020(11), Article CD001159. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001159.pub3
O'Connor, M. I., & Switzer, J. A. (2022). AAOS clinical practice guideline summary: Management of hip fractures in older adults. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 30(20), e1291-e1296. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00125
The Chamberlain NR 716 Week 2 instructions
Begin with the local problem in a few sentences, with figures, before writing the question. Then give each element its own paragraph explaining what it contains and why it was drawn that way. Define the population so a records query could find it, and say who is excluded and why. State the intervention at the level a protocol would use, so two clinicians would deliver it the same way. Spell out the comparison as what your unit does today, in enough detail that it could keep running, rather than calling it standard care. Choose an outcome some existing system already counts, or explain the cost of measuring something new. Match the time frame to how long the outcome takes to move. Declare the question type and what kind of evidence it calls for. Close with the full question and note what you deliberately left out.
How the NR 716 Week 2 example is put together
The sample opens with 214 admissions, a 28.5% delirium rate, a median of 12 mg of intravenous morphine equivalents and a preoperative block given a median of 26 hours after arrival. The population paragraph names the diagnosis codes, imaging result and admission order a query would use and keeps patients with dementia. The intervention paragraph sets the block within 60 minutes, by a credentialed clinician, at the order set's weight-based dose, and excludes catheters and the pericapsular block. The comparison spells out current analgesia and notes that a third of patients already get a later block. Outcomes are the 4 A's Test and opioid doses from existing records, with pain on movement set aside. A 72-hour ceiling follows the median time to surgery, and the closing section explains why mortality, length of stay and satisfaction were left out.
Where the points sit in the NR 716 Week 2 rubric
The heaviest loss is a comparison nobody could run: the word none, or standard care with no account of what is standard on the unit, which deletes the second arm the project depends on. Next is an outcome no existing system counts, which commits the project to building a measure before it can measure anything. Marks are also lost for a population defined only by diagnosis, an intervention broad enough to cover several practices, a time frame taken from the term calendar instead of from the outcome and elements stated without reasons. Write-ups score well when feasibility is argued alongside meaning, when the population could be found by a query and when the paper says plainly which outcomes were left out and why.
NR 716 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost points
Most PICOT drafts fill in the letters without defending them. If you send us your problem, a description of what your unit does today and the data your system already records, we can help you define a population a records query could find, pitch the intervention at the grain a protocol would use, write the comparison as it actually runs and choose outcomes and a time frame that fit each other. The closing note on what you left out, and why, often needs a second pair of eyes too. The finished question reflects your own project and the decision your setting faces.
Get a NR 716 Week 2 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 2 instructions and the practice problem you are working from, and a custom example is written into your own template and returned inside 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free. The question you take to your site, and the data you pull there, stay yours.
More NR 716 papers and DNP samples
- NR 716 Week 1: Model Placement Post
- NR 716 Week 3: Search Strategy Write-up
- NR 716 Week 4: Evidence Appraisal Table
- NR 716 Week 5: Literature Matrix
- NR 716 Week 6: Critical Appraisal Write-up
- NR 716 Week 7: Evidence Synthesis Paper
- NR 716 Week 8: Practice Recommendation Presentation
- NR 715 Week 2: Practice Problem Statement
- NR 714 Week 2: Outcome Measure Write-Up
- NR 709A Week 2: Results and Limits Paper
- NR 702A Week 2: Practice Gap Write-Up
NR 716 Week 2 questions, answered
My site cannot run a real comparison. What then?
Say so in the write-up and take the honest comparison, which is usually the unit before the change set against the same unit after it. That is weaker, and the paragraph should admit it rather than dress it up as a control group. Naming the weakness in Week 2 is what a doctoral reader rewards; discovering it in the results is what costs.
Can I build the question on my own practice site?
Most sections expect exactly that, and it is also where the boundary sits. The question, the background and the argument can be drafted to your material. What the site itself produces, the chart pulls, the hours you log, and any evaluation a preceptor signs, belongs to you and is never written here. Send the problem in your own words and leave identifying detail out.
How does this differ from the PICOT worksheet in a bachelors course?
A worksheet asks whether the elements are present. A doctoral write-up asks whether they can be executed, so every letter arrives with the reason it was drawn that way and the place its data will come from. The same question can pass the first and fail the second, which is why completed boxes rarely transfer upward intact.
Where can I find a free NR 716 Week 2 sample paper?
A full PICOT write-up for an emergency department nerve block question, defended element by element, is on this page.
Why does the NR 716 Week 2 sample keep patients with dementia?
They are about a third of the department's hip fracture patients and the group most likely to become delirious, so excluding them would answer a question nobody there is asking.