| Course | NR 719 Topics in Advanced Practice Leadership II |
|---|---|
| Week | 8 |
| Paper type | Project dissemination presentation with speaker notes |
| Length | About 960 words, 5 pages |
| Format | Slides with speaker notes, APA 7 references |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 719 Week 8
Results and Request to the System Nursing Quality Council, 12 August 2027: Kilogram-Only Weighing for Children Held at Nine in Ten, and Two Departments Are Waiting
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 719: Topics in Advanced Practice Leadership II
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Slide 1: For the System Nursing Quality Council: Nine in Ten Children Now Weighed in Kilograms
Original emergency department, February to June 2027
Request today: $12,276 to finish the change at two more departments
Speaker notes: Good morning. I am presenting to the council because you hold the decision on spreading this change. The headline is on the slide: since January, when scales and the weight field were fixed to kilograms, about nine in ten children in our department have been weighed in kilograms. The request comes on slide 7, before the end, so there is time to test it.
Slide 2: Before the Change, Only 57% Were Measured in Kilograms
Summer 2026 audit, 400 pediatric triage records
228 measured in kilograms; 61 converted from pounds by hand; 88 stated by a parent
Three safety reports in a year with pounds used as kilograms
Speaker notes: This was the starting point. Nearly a quarter of weights were a parent's estimate, and hand conversions were wrong often enough to produce three near misses, including a fluid bolus 2.2 times the intended volume that a nurse stopped at the pump. Weight errors of this kind are a known source of dosing errors in general emergency departments, not only in ours (Hirata et al., 2019).
Slide 3: The Measured Share Passed 90% in March and Stayed There
Measured-in-kilograms share by month
| Month, 2027 | Measured in kilograms, of 50 audited |
|---|---|
| February | 44, 88% |
| March | 47, 94% |
| April | 48, 96% |
| May | 47, 94% |
| June | 48, 96% |
Speaker notes: This is the core result. February fell just short of the 90% target, and every month since has been at 94% or above. Parent-stated weights fell from 22% to under 4%. These figures come from 50 records drawn at random each month and checked by a second nurse, and the full report follows the published reporting standard for improvement work (Ogrinc et al., 2016), including the limits of a before-and-after design in one department.
Slide 4: Where It Slipped, It Was Teaching, Not the Lock
Four travel nurses who started in April and May never received the orientation card
Two of those nurses account for five of the nine parent-stated weights
Orientation now sits in the coordinator's checklist
Speaker notes: The locks held without anyone's effort. The part that slipped was the part that depended on a person remembering. When I was away for two weeks in April, no one handed out the card, and the stated weights in May came largely from nurses who had not seen it.
Slide 5: One Measure Did Not Move
Whole-number weights: 31% before, 33% after
Nurses round to the nearest kilogram
Matters most for infants; next step measures them separately
Speaker notes: I want you to see the result that did not improve. About a third of weights end in zero, which means rounding. The project did not target it, so it is no surprise, but for an infant half a kilogram is a large part of a dose. The next small change targets infants specifically.
Slide 6: The Other Two Departments Are Converting by Hand Today
The shared record has refused pounds since January
Their scales still show pounds
Suburban audit, May: 31 of 50 converted by hand, 4 off by more than 10%
Speaker notes: This is why I am asking now. The record change applied to all three departments, but only ours locked its scales. The other two now convert every child's weight by hand into a field that accepts only kilograms, which builds the original error into their routine.
Slide 7: The Request: $12,276 in Year One
$7,120 one-time: five scales and set-up hours
$5,156 a year: rural coordinator two hours a week, printing
Urgent care: add the kilogram-only field to the record upgrade by 31 August
Speaker notes: Here is the decision. The one-time money buys the scales that cannot be locked and the set-up time. The recurring money is mainly coordinator time at the rural site, which has no pediatric emergency care coordinator today, although national readiness guidance recommends one for every emergency department that treats children (Remick et al., 2018). The suburban site will use its existing coordinator. I am not claiming savings, because three near misses a year cannot honestly be converted into dollars.
Slide 8: What Happens if the Council Says Yes
Scales ordered the same week
Readiness assessments at both sites by 31 August
Scales locked by 1 October; first audits reported in November
Speaker notes: If you approve today, both departments assess readiness in August and lock their scales by October. Either may ask for a later date after its assessment, and I would support that. You will see their first audit results in November.
Slide 9: What I Would Do Differently
Put orientation in someone's job description from day one
Measure infants separately from the start
Ask the other departments before the shared record changed
Speaker notes: Three things I would change. The lapse in teaching came from ownership that lived in my head. Rounding would have shown up earlier if infants had been measured on their own. And the shared field change should have been discussed with the other two departments before it went live, which would have avoided the half-spread we are now asking you to finish. Thank you. I will take questions on any of the nine slides, especially the budget and the rounding result, which I expect the council to probe hardest.
References
Hirata, K. M., Kang, A. H., Ramirez, G. V., Kimata, C., & Yamamoto, L. G. (2019). Pediatric weight errors and resultant medication dosing errors in the emergency department. Pediatric Emergency Care, 35(9), 637-642. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001277
Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Goodman, D., Batalden, P., Davidoff, F., & Stevens, D. (2016). SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Quality & Safety, 25(12), 986-992. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411
Remick, K., Gausche-Hill, M., Joseph, M. M., Brown, K., Snow, S. K., Wright, J. L., American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Section on Surgery, American College of Emergency Physicians Pediatric Emergency Medicine Committee, & Emergency Nurses Association Pediatric Committee. (2018). Pediatric readiness in the emergency department. Pediatrics, 142(5), Article e20182459. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-2459
Reading the NR 719 Week 8 instructions
Name the audience on the title slide, along with the claim and the request, so the deck reads correctly even without sound. Give each slide one claim, written as a headline rather than a topic label. Show data as a single chart or small table with labeled values and the point stated in the title, not left to inference. Write speaker notes in full sentences, since they carry the argument and are what a marker reads to judge whether the talk holds together. Include the result that did not improve. Place the slide naming the decision you want before the end, so there is time to test it, and say what happens if the audience agrees. Close with a reflection that has a point, such as what you would do differently, rather than a thank-you slide alone.
Inside the NR 719 Week 8 example
The title slide names the council, the date, the nine-in-ten result and the $12,276 request. Slide 2 gives the 2026 baseline and the near misses. Slide 3 is a small monthly table from February to June with the target passed in March, and its notes cite the reporting standard used. Slide 4 traces the lapse to orientation, not the lock. Slide 5 presents the rounding result that held still. Slide 6 explains that two departments convert by hand because the shared field refuses pounds. Slide 7 makes the request, with recurring and one-time parts, coordinator guidance and no claimed savings. Slide 8 lists what happens after a yes. Slide 9 reflects on ownership, infant measurement and consulting the other departments before the record changed.
NR 719 Week 8 rubric: what full points look like
Paragraph slides read aloud cost the most and are the easiest failure to avoid. Next is a deck with no ask, which turns a leadership presentation into a report and leaves the audience nothing to do. Empty or fragmentary speaker notes lose the marks for narration, and charts pasted without labels or a stated takeaway invite the questions you least want. Graders also take points for decks that hide unfavorable results and for a closing slide that only says thank you. Presentations score well when every slide carries one headline claim, when the request comes before the end with its cost, when notes are full sentences and when the reflection says something the writer would actually change.
Common NR 719 Week 8 mistakes, and how to avoid them
A dissemination deck has to work for an audience deciding something, and every slide should earn its place toward that decision. Share your results, your audience and the decision you need, and the deck can be built with headline claims, one small table or chart with its point in the title, the request placed before the end and notes written as full sentences. Including the result that did not move, and a reflection with a real lesson, tends to strengthen trust in the rest. The results, the request and the reflection are yours.
Get a NR 719 Week 8 example written to your instructions
Send the presentation requirements, the slide limit and whatever notes or narration your section expects, plus the audience you are building for. A writer produces a custom example deck in prose form with full speaker notes, returned inside 24 to 48 hours, and the first one is free.
More NR 719 papers and DNP samples
- NR 719 Week 1: Handover Status Post
- NR 719 Week 2: Spread Position Paper
- NR 719 Week 3: Sustainability Plan
- NR 719 Week 4: Budget Justification
- NR 719 Week 5: Outcomes Evaluation Write-Up
- NR 719 Week 6: Dissemination Plan
- NR 719 Week 7: Executive Summary
- NR 718 Week 8: Project Proposal Presentation
- NR 702A Week 8: Readiness Memo
- NR 717 Week 8: Policy Presentation
- NR 705A Week 8: Design Defense
NR 719 Week 8 questions, answered
How many slides should the deck run to?
Whatever your section states, and the limit is usually generous compared with the content that survives editing. The finished example fits inside its limit with room to spare, because slides carrying one claim each are short. Filling a limit with additional slides is how decks acquire the paragraph text that costs the most marks.
Do I need to record narration?
That varies by section and the posted requirement decides it. Either way the written notes matter, since a recorded talk still needs a script underneath and an unrecorded deck is judged on the notes alone. The finished example writes them as continuous sentences that could be read aloud without further preparation.
How is this different from the presentation in the project course?
That course presents a completed project to a scholarly audience, poster and manuscript included. This deck is a leadership artifact aimed at a room that controls resources, so it carries an ask, a sustainment plan and an owner. The evidence may overlap; the purpose does not, and the purpose is what the rubric here follows.
Where can I find a free NR 719 Week 8 sample paper?
All nine slides of the council presentation, each with full speaker notes, appear on this page.
Why does the NR 719 Week 8 deck show a result that did not improve?
Showing the unchanged rounding figure beside the gains lets the council trust the other numbers and explains the next small change.