NR 721 Week 7 Continue or Stop Recommendation Example

Topics in Healthcare Systems Leadership II Chamberlain University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

A recommendation that commits in its first line to continuing a change in an altered form, and treats stopping its informal parts as real work, is this NR 721 Week 7 sample paper. Chamberlain NR 721 (NR-721), Topics in Healthcare Systems Leadership II, has MSN Nurse Executive students decide whether their change should continue, change or end. The sample keeps a telemetry discontinuation protocol from 1 December 2027 with four alterations: a 10:00 reminder, an expiring continuation order, a transmitter return step and a written technician call. It details removing the paper list and old cards, argues both rejected options fairly and sets a review date with thresholds and a default.

CourseNR 721 Topics in Healthcare Systems Leadership II
Week7
Paper typeContinue or stop recommendation
LengthAbout 1,110 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolChamberlain University
ProgramMSN, Nurse Executive
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NR 721 Week 7

1

Recommendation: Continue the Telemetry Discontinuation Protocol on 5 West in an Altered Form From 1 December 2027, With Four Named Changes and One Thing Removed

Student Name

College of Nursing, Chamberlain University

NR 721: Topics in Healthcare Systems Leadership II

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title takes a position in its first words and names the alterations and the removal, which tells the reader the recommendation commits rather than asks for more time.
2

Recommendation: Continue the Telemetry Discontinuation Protocol on 5 West in an Altered Form From 1 December 2027, With Four Named Changes and One Thing Removed

The Position

Continue the nurse-driven telemetry discontinuation protocol on 5 West, altered in four specific ways from 1 December 2027, and remove the informal "keep on tele" list on the same date. Do not stop the protocol, and do not continue it unchanged.

The Evidence, Compressed

Over its first year the protocol cut telemetry use from 41 to 31 days per 100 patient-days, about 1,235 telemetry days, and central station alarms from 1,190 to 940 a day, with no harm found in reviews of three rapid response calls after removals. It also cost about $30,550 in lost transmitters, a cost nobody had foreseen, and its gain fell short of the 25 per 100 promised. The review of current practice found the core assessment done in a little over half of reminders, a 07:00 reminder that fires during handoff, a paper list that bypasses assessment for listed patients and a nurse-added call to the monitor technician that improves the protocol. On days the telemetry champion works, the default answer is used far less often. The national monitoring standards the protocol was built on remain current (Sandau et al., 2017).

What this page is doingThe evidence is compressed into a single paragraph drawn from the term's earlier work, leaving the space for what the choice requires.
3

The Four Alterations

First, the reminder moves from 07:00 to 10:00, after handoff, the medication pass and the start of hospitalist rounds, so the nurse answering it has seen the patient and can ask a provider in person.

Second, a "continue telemetry" order replaces the paper list. A provider who wants a patient monitored beyond the criteria enters it, stating why, and it lapses after 24 hours, and the reminder displays it. The default answer "continue, provider preference" is removed from the reminder.

Third, transmitter return becomes part of removal: a return bin at the nurses' station, a required checkbox in the removal note and a line on the discharge checklist, all being installed this month.

Fourth, the nurses' own addition, phoning the technician before a box comes off, is written into the protocol.

Stopping Is a Piece of Work

Removing the paper list is not a matter of taking it down. On 1 December, the night charge nurse will take the list down as the shift opens, after the continuation order has been live in the record for a week, so no patient is left without a route. The original laminated criteria cards, which still describe the 07:00 time and the default answer, will be collected from all six charging stations and replaced by new cards placed in each bedside telemetry pouch. The reminder's old answer option will be switched off by the record team on the same date. The protocol document will be reissued with a version number and date. Each of these has a named person, listed in the communication that follows this recommendation, because a removal nobody performs leaves the old practice in place beside the new one (Norton & Chambers, 2020).

Something Fills the Gap

The paper list existed because hospitalists' wishes had no route at 07:00. The continuation order gives them one, with a reason and an expiry, and the 10:00 reminder places the decision when a conversation is possible. Removing the list without these would invite a new informal route within weeks.

What this page is doingNaming what fills the space left by the removed list is what keeps the stop from being undone by a new workaround.
4

The Option Rejected, Argued Fairly

The strongest alternative is to stop the protocol and return telemetry discontinuation to providers. The case for it is real. The unit has spent about $30,550 on lost transmitters. Hospitalists remain uneasy, and one episode of atrial fibrillation an hour after a removal still shapes how night nurses feel about the protocol. The gain is smaller than promised, and much of it depends on one champion's daily question. Returning the decision to providers would end the reminder, the list and the lost boxes in one move.

It is rejected because it would also give back most of the gain, more than a thousand telemetry days a year and a quarter of the central station's alarms, and return the unit to a practice in which monitoring outlasted its indication by days. The costs that make stopping attractive come from a missing step and a badly timed reminder, both of which can be fixed, not from the protocol's logic. A hospital that wrote the standards into the order itself achieved a larger fall than 5 West has (Dressler et al., 2014), which suggests the unit's problem is too little structure, not too much nurse authority.

The Other Option Rejected: Continue Unchanged

Continuing as the protocol now runs has its own case: it is working in part, the transmitter fix is already under way and changing the reminder time and the answer options asks the record team for work in its busiest quarter. But the review showed that unchanged practice is drifting further, not holding steady. The default answer rose from 14% of reminders in the protocol's second month to 40.7% a year later, and drift of that kind tends to continue in the direction it is already moving. Leaving the 07:00 time and the default option in place would let the protocol slowly turn back into the practice it replaced, with a reminder that everyone clicks through.

What this page is doingArguing against continuing unchanged, with the trend in the default answer, shows the recommendation weighed both alternatives rather than one.
5

Who Does What Before 1 December

The record team moves the reminder, removes the default option and builds the continuation order by 24 November. Clinical engineering installs the return bin by 1 November. The medical director for hospital medicine tells hospitalists about the continuation order at the November staff meeting. The unit educator prepares the new pouch cards. The nurse manager reissues the protocol document and owns the June review.

A Date, Not a Watch

The altered protocol takes effect on 1 December 2027. It will be reviewed on 1 June 2028 against three figures: telemetry days at or below 28 per 100 patient-days, transmitter losses at two or fewer a quarter and at least 80% of reminders answered with an assessment or an active continuation order. The champion's daily question becomes a duty of every day charge nurse, so the protocol no longer depends on one person's schedule.

The Default

If the June review does not take place or reaches no decision, the altered protocol continues, and the continuation order keeps its 24-hour expiry. The default protects the gain without letting any patient's monitoring continue indefinitely by inertia.

References

Dressler, R., Dryer, M. M., Coletti, C., Mahoney, D., & Doorey, A. J. (2014). Altering overuse of cardiac telemetry in non-intensive care unit settings by hardwiring the use of American Heart Association guidelines. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(11), 1852-1854. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4491

Norton, W. E., & Chambers, D. A. (2020). Unpacking the complexities of de-implementing inappropriate health interventions. Implementation Science, 15, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0960-9

Sandau, K. E., Funk, M., Auerbach, A., Barsness, G. W., Blum, K., Cvach, M., Lampert, R., May, J. L., McDaniel, G. M., Perez, M. V., Sendelbach, S., Sommargren, C. E., & Wang, P. J. (2017). Update to practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in hospital settings: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 136(19), e273-e344. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000527

NR 721 Week 7 instructions, in plain terms

Commit in the first paragraph to one of three endings: continue as it stands, continue in an altered form with the alterations named, or wind it down. Compress the evidence into a short section drawn from your earlier work rather than gathering it afresh. Spend most of the space on the consequences of the choice. If anything is to stop, treat stopping as work: say what is removed, by whom and when, including objects such as cards, lists and prompts. Say what fills the gap left by anything removed, so a new workaround does not appear. Argue the options you rejected at full strength before rejecting them. Set a date for review with stated thresholds, not an intention to monitor, and name the default that applies if the review never happens.

Inside the NR 721 Week 7 example

The sample opens by continuing the protocol in altered form and removing the paper list on the same date. One paragraph compresses the year's evidence. Four alterations are named: the reminder moves to 10:00, a continuation order with a reason and 24-hour expiry replaces the list, transmitter return becomes part of removal and the technician call is written in. A section describes taking down the list, collecting old cards, switching off the default answer and reissuing the protocol, each with a named person. The case for stopping is argued with the $30,550 loss and hospitalists' unease, then rejected. A second section rejects continuing unchanged, citing the default's rise. Responsibilities before 1 December, review thresholds for 1 June 2028 and a default close the paper.

NR 721 Week 7 rubric: what full points look like

The costliest paper closes by asking for more time, which is a position withheld and dressed as prudence, and it is the most common ending in this genre. Next in expense is a stop recommendation that describes no removal work, leaving cards on walls and a field still collecting entries. Marks go where alternatives are sketched thinly, since an option nobody could have chosen shows nothing was weighed. Graders also take points for a review described as continued monitoring rather than a date with thresholds, and for no stated default. Recommendations score well when the position appears in the first paragraph, removal is planned object by object, something fills each gap and rejected options are argued fairly.

Common NR 721 Week 7 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Committing to continue, change or stop, rather than asking for more time, is what this paper is graded on. Share your evidence from earlier weeks and the options you are weighing, and the recommendation can state a position first, plan any removal object by object with named people, say what fills each gap, argue the rejected options fairly and set a review date with thresholds and a default. Naming the default protects the decision if the review never happens. The position is yours to take.

Get a NR 721 Week 7 example written to your instructions

Send the assignment instructions, the rubric and the intervention you are ruling on. A custom Week 7 recommendation returns inside 24-48h with the position taken in the opening paragraph and the work it creates itemised, whichever of the three endings your case supports. The first one is free, and we will supply the case if you need one.

More NR 721 papers and MSN samples

NR 721 Week 7 questions, answered

Can I recommend keeping something that is not working?

You can where the case supports it, and the paper then has to carry an argument about timing or capacity rather than about results. What a rubric will not accept is keeping it by omission, where no position is stated at all and the change survives because the writer avoided the sentence.

How much evidence should this paper carry?

Less than writers expect, and drawn from the term's earlier work rather than gathered fresh. Three grounds, each tied to something observed since the change went in, will support a position adequately. Evidence assembled specially tends to read as though the position came first and the support was found afterward.

What if the intervention was mine?

Then say so in the first line and rule on it anyway. The awkward case, where the writer's own change is the one being wound down, is what this assignment is built to produce. Recusing yourself is not an option, because the person who put it in place is usually the only one who knows what it costs to run.

Where can I find a free NR 721 Week 7 sample paper?

The full continue-or-stop recommendation for a telemetry discontinuation protocol, with its four alterations, is available on this page.

What default does the NR 721 Week 7 sample set if the review never happens?

The altered protocol continues, and the continuation order keeps its 24-hour expiry so no patient stays monitored by inertia.