| Course | PA 510 Comprehensive Clinical Module Dermatology |
|---|---|
| Week | 3 |
| Paper type | Distribution pattern analysis |
| Length | About 830 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | Master of Physician Assistant Studies (MPAS) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PA 510 Week 3
Distribution Pattern Analysis: Wrists, Shins, a Line Along a Forearm Scratch and the Inside of Both Cheeks, With Every Clear Region Named
Student Name
Chamberlain University
PA 510: Comprehensive Clinical Module Dermatology
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Distribution Pattern Analysis: Wrists, Shins, a Line Along a Forearm Scratch and the Inside of Both Cheeks, With Every Clear Region Named
Two Claims Kept Apart
This analysis makes two separate claims about D.O.'s eruption, one at close range and one across the body. The full skin examination was done in a gown with the patient's permission, in good light, front and back, including the scalp, mouth, nails, palms and soles. The genital examination was offered and declined, and that region is recorded as not examined.
Close Range: How the Lesions Sit Together
On the wrists and forearms, papules are grouped in clusters of five to fifteen, with normal skin between most of them. On both shins, papules have merged into larger plaques, the largest 6 by 4 centimeters on the left, with thick gray-white scale. On the left forearm, about twelve papules run in a straight line 7 centimeters long along a scratch the patient remembers making on a pallet strap about four weeks ago. Lesions appearing along a line of injury are known as the Koebner phenomenon, which is characteristic of lichen planus among other conditions (Le Cleach & Chosidow, 2012). I have recorded the line as a close-range finding and noted its history, but I have not made it the basis of a diagnosis.
Across the Body: Regions Involved
Flexor surfaces of both wrists and the lower third of both forearms. Front of both shins, from just below the knee to the ankle. Lower back, a scattered group of about ten papules. Inside of both cheeks in the mouth: a lacy white network on the buccal mucosa, about 2 by 1 centimeters on each side, not wiped off with gauze, painless.
The Regions Recorded Clear
Face, including the lips and eyelids: clear. Scalp: clear, with no hair loss or scarring. Neck, chest and abdomen: clear. Upper arms and the extensor forearms: clear. Palms and soles: clear of the eruption; a separate pigmented spot on the left sole is noted and will be examined on its own. Thighs and buttocks: clear. Fingernails and toenails: no ridging, thinning or splitting. Genital area: not examined, declined. Naming these is what makes the pattern claim checkable; a reader who sees "wrists and shins" without them cannot tell whether the face was looked at.
Symmetry as a Comparison
The eruption is symmetric in the sense that both wrists and both shins are involved to a similar degree: 30 to 40 papules on each wrist and forearm, and plaques on each shin, the left larger. Symmetry is a comparison between sides, and both sides were examined; the claim would not be possible from photographs of one side only. The single linear group on the left forearm is asymmetric and has a separate explanation.
Where the Pattern Stops
On the shins, the plaques stop at the ankle and do not involve the top of the foot. On the forearms, the lesions stop below the elbows. Edges where the eruption stops are part of the pattern, because a process confined to flexural wrists, shins and mouth points a reader differently from one involving the trunk widely or the sun-exposed face and backs of the hands.
What the Pattern Suggests, and Does Not
Flexor wrists, shins, the lower back, linear lesions along a scratch and a lacy network inside the cheeks together form the pattern most often described in lichen planus (Le Cleach & Chosidow, 2012). A lichenoid reaction to a medicine can look similar but is more often widespread and may favor sun-exposed areas; the clear face and backs of the hands are recorded for that reason. The pattern narrows the question but does not answer it.
Mucosa and Nails, Looked At on Purpose
The mouth and nails were examined deliberately rather than as an afterthought, because they change what the pattern means. A lacy white network inside both cheeks is found in a large share of people with lichen planus of the skin and is often painless, so patients rarely mention it (Le Cleach & Chosidow, 2012). Its presence here strengthens the skin pattern; its absence would not have ruled it out. Nails were examined because lichen planus can thin, ridge or split them and sometimes scar the nail fold; all twenty nails looked normal, which is recorded as a finding and not left blank. The scalp was parted in several places to look for scarring hair loss, which was absent.
Diagram and Prose Agreeing
The body diagram attached to the note shades the wrists, forearms, shins and lower back, marks the forearm line with a single stroke and marks both cheeks on the mouth inset. Every shaded area is named in the prose above, and no area named in the prose is left unshaded.
References
Le Cleach, L., & Chosidow, O. (2012). Lichen planus. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(8), 723-732. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1103641
The Chamberlain PA 510 Week 3 instructions
Week three asks you to analyze the distribution of an eruption in two separate claims. At close range, over a few centimeters, describe how lesions sit together: grouped, linear, ring-shaped or merged into plaques. Across the body, name the regions involved in standard terms, such as flexor or extensor surfaces, folds, scalp, palms and soles, mucosa and sun-exposed areas. Then name the regions examined and found clear, one by one, and any not examined. Treat symmetry as a comparison you can only make if both sides were seen. Say where the pattern stops. If you include a shaded body diagram, make sure every shaded region appears in the prose and the reverse. You may say what the pattern suggests, but stop short of a diagnosis.
How the PA 510 Week 3 example is put together
The analysis records the examination conditions, including a declined genital examination recorded as not examined. Close range comes first: clusters of five to fifteen papules on the wrists and forearms, merged plaques on both shins with the largest 6 by 4 centimeters, and a straight 7-centimeter line of papules along a pallet-strap scratch, noted as the Koebner phenomenon. Across the body, it lists flexor wrists and lower forearms, both shins, the lower back and a lacy white network inside both cheeks. Clear regions follow one by one, from face and scalp to thighs and nails, with a pigmented spot on the left sole set aside for separate examination. Symmetry is shown with counts on both sides. The pattern stops at the ankles and below the elbows. A section on the mouth and nails explains why they were examined on purpose, and the diagram is checked against the prose.
PA 510 Week 3 rubric: what full points look like
A pattern asserted with no clear regions listed beside it fails hardest, because nothing in it can be checked. Symmetry claimed from material showing one side is the next common deduction, and markers name it directly. A shaded diagram that includes regions the prose never mentions costs points in both places, since the mismatch is visible at a glance. Further losses come from vague regional words where the section expects flexural, extensor or acral terms; from close-range and body-wide claims mixed in one sentence; from mucosa, scalp and nails left unexamined without comment; and from a diagnosis presented as the pattern's conclusion. Strong analyses keep the two claims separate, name involved and clear regions with equal care, support symmetry with both sides, mark where the eruption ends and make the diagram and prose agree. Saying what the pattern suggests without settling it earns the closing points.
PA 510 Week 3 help from the desk
Distribution analyses often stop at a list of involved areas, which is the part that earns the least. If you share the case or images your section assigned, we can help you split close-range observations from the body-wide pattern, list the clear regions explicitly and word symmetry so it rests on both sides. We can also help you decide which regional terms your section expects and check a body diagram against your prose line by line. When your images cover one area only, we can help you write a pattern claim that stays within what was shown. The analysis and its conclusions are yours. If your course supplies a body map or a fixed region list, the custom sample uses those regions in that order, so every one is accounted for.
Get a PA-510 Week 3 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 3 instructions from your classroom, the images or written case, and the body diagram if your section issues one. A custom analysis matched to those regions and that diagram lands inside 24-48h at no charge for a first request, written in the regional terms your own rubric names.
More PA 510 papers and MPAS samples
- PA 510 Week 1: Scale Versus Crust Post
- PA 510 Week 2: Lesion Morphology Description
- PA 510 Week 4: Clinical Photograph Critique
- PA 510 Week 5: Skin Tone Description Audit
- PA 510 Week 6: Pigmented Lesion Evaluation
- PA 510 Week 7: Biopsy Site Justification
- PA 510 Week 8: Teledermatology Referral Brief
- PA 505 Week 3: PHQ-9 Score Interpretation
- PA 504 Week 3: HPI Draft
- PA 503 Week 3: Problem Representation
- PA 502 Week 3: NNT Calculation
PA 510 Week 3 questions, answered
Our images cover one area only. Can we still claim a pattern?
Not a body-wide one, and the version scoring well says so in a line. Write the pattern the material supports at close range, name the regions that would have to be examined before any wider claim could stand, and state what each would settle. Sections mark that limit explicitly on image-based work rather than treating it as a shortfall.
Is the shaded diagram enough by itself?
Rarely. Most sections mark the diagram and the prose separately, and the prose carries the reasoning rows. A diagram fixes the regions; the paragraph says why those regions matter together and what their boundaries suggest. Handing in one without the other usually forfeits the whole analysis half of the rubric, however carefully the shading was done.
How precise do the regional terms have to be?
Precise enough that a reader could reproduce the shading from the words alone. On the arms is not a region a marker can use; the crease of the elbow against the point of the elbow is. Where your section publishes a list of accepted regional terms, that list is the standard being applied to your wording.
Where can I find a free PA 510 Week 3 sample paper?
This page carries the full PA 510 Week 3 distribution analysis of a lichenoid eruption, with every clear region named.
Why does the PA 510 Week 3 sample list the clear regions?
Because naming each region examined and found clear is what lets a reader trust the list of involved regions instead of wondering what was skipped.