| Course | PA 648 Transition to Practice II |
|---|---|
| Week | 2 |
| Paper type | Remediation agreement table |
| Length | About 640 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | Master of Physician Assistant Studies (MPAS) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PA 648 Week 2
Remediation Contract Carrying Six Items Forward From the PA 608 Deficit Classification: One Row Each in the Original Order, a Measure, Who Takes the Reading, a Date With Room in It and What a Miss Triggers
Student Name
Chamberlain University
PA 648: Transition to Practice II
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Remediation Contract Carrying Six Items Forward From the PA 608 Deficit Classification: One Row Each in the Original Order, a Measure, Who Takes the Reading, a Date With Room in It and What a Miss Triggers
Header
Student: the writer. Faculty advisor: Professor Hale. Course: PA 648, Transition to Practice II. Source document: the deficit classification submitted for PA 608, dated September 30, 2026. Contract dated October 2, 2026; signed by the student and the advisor. Any change to a row is initialed and dated by both.
One Row per Item, in the Original Order
Table 1
Contract Rows
| Item (as worded in PA 608) | Measure | Reading taken by | Date | What a miss triggers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Low clearance left out of drug and dose choices | At least 17 of 20 unseen questions with clearance below 60 correct; no miss below 30 | Classmate tester; scored independently | Week 5, by October 30 | Item stays open; new set of 20 in week 7 |
| 2. Gaps in renal knowledge | At least 12 of 15 correct on a renal question set drawn from the question bank | Faculty advisor | Week 4, by October 23 | Advisor assigns a focused review; retest in week 6 |
| 3. Stem's own normal limits overlooked | Zero misses on 10 questions where the stem prints a range that differs from common memory | Classmate tester | Week 5, by October 30 | Retest in week 7 |
| 4. First-choice drug mixed up with later-line options | At least 8 of 10 correct on first-line choice questions in five conditions | Faculty advisor | Week 6, by November 6 | Advisor meets student to review each miss |
| 5. Rushed misreadings of stems | No more than 2 misses answered in under 30 seconds on the retake | Testing software report, read by the advisor | Retake, November 21 | Item stays open for the summative evaluation |
| 6. Time ran short in the first and last blocks | Each block finished with at least 2 minutes left on the retake | Testing software report | Retake, November 21 | Item stays open; pacing plan reviewed |
Note. Note. Items appear in the order of the PA 608 deficit classification, each in a shortened form of its original finding.
Who Takes the Reading
I do not score my own items. Items 1 and 3 are scored by a classmate who chose questions I have not seen; items 2 and 4 by the faculty advisor; items 5 and 6 by the testing software's reports, read by the advisor. The point is that each reading would come out the same whoever took it.
Dates That Leave Room
Each date sits at least two weeks before the retake on November 21, so that any miss can trigger its consequence and still be retested before the retake. Only items 5 and 6 are read on the retake itself, because they can only be measured under exam conditions.
The dates also avoid the two weeks of my elective rotation's call schedule, when evening testing would be unreliable.
What a Miss Triggers
Every row has a consequence, written now. None of the consequences is a penalty; each is a further step with a date. The retake itself sits inside the program's summative evaluation period, which accreditation standards require programs to hold within the final four months of the program (Accreditation Review Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant, 2024), so the dates cannot slide past early December.
What Is Not in the Contract
Knowledge gaps spread thinly across the blueprint are not listed as items. They are addressed by general review and measured by the overall retake score, not by individual rows.
References
Accreditation Review Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant. (2024). Accreditation standards for physician assistant education (5th ed.). Accreditation Review Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant.
The Chamberlain PA 648 Week 2 instructions
The second week asks for a remediation contract, mostly a table with prose around it. Down the left run the items carried forward from your earlier assessment, one row each, worded exactly as they were worded there so nobody has to translate. Across from each item sit the measure, the person or system that takes the reading, the date and what happens if the item is missed. Put a short header at the top that identifies the source document, the parties and how changes are made. Choose readers other than yourself wherever possible. Leave room in the dates for a miss to trigger its consequence before any final deadline. Explain what is deliberately left out of the contract. Cite any program or accreditation requirement that sets the outer deadline.
How the PA 648 Week 2 example is put together
The header names the student, Professor Hale as advisor, the PA 608 classification of September 30 and the October 2 signing date, with a rule that changes are initialed by both. A table holds six rows in the original order: kidney function into drug decisions measured by 17 of 20 unseen questions with no miss below 30; renal facts by 12 of 15; printed ranges by zero misses on 10; first-line choices by 8 of 10; fast reading errors by no more than 2 on the retake; and block timing by two minutes left per block. Each row names the reader, the date and the consequence of a miss. A section explains independent readings. A dates section places every measure at least two weeks before November 21. The consequences section cites the accreditation standard for summative evaluation. A final section leaves thin knowledge gaps to the overall score.
Reading the PA 648 Week 2 grading rubric
The contract loses the most when items are reworded from the original assessment, which makes it impossible to trace whether the agreement covers what was found. Next comes a row without a measure or without a consequence, since an item with no defined miss cannot fail. Self-scored readings cost a significant share. Faculty reward one row per item in the original order, a named reader for each and dates that leave room for a miss to be acted on. A header that fixes the source and the signatures earns credit because it protects the contract from later rewriting. Stating what is left out shows judgment. Citation of any external deadline, in APA form, completes the rubric.
PA 648 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost points
Remediation contracts most often go wrong by turning findings into vague goals, such as "strengthen renal knowledge," with no measure attached. Another common problem is the student scoring every item. Some contracts also set every date on the final deadline, so a miss cannot be fixed. If your items come from a different assessment, such as a faculty evaluation or an OSCE, send the original wording; a contract drafted for you would keep each item's wording, add a measure, an independent reader, a date with room and a consequence, and fix the source and signatures in a header. If your program has a remediation template, the rows would be placed into it unchanged.
Get a PA-648 Week 2 example written to your instructions
Send the assignment instructions and any contract template your classroom supplies, and a PA-648 Week 2 example comes back filled to that template inside 24-48h, with the first one free. The rows arrive on an invented case. Your own items, your own dates and anyone's real initials belong in your copy, not in an example written by somebody who was not in the room.
More PA 648 papers and MPAS samples
- PA 648 Week 1: Testable Commitment Post
- PA 648 Week 3: Retake Schedule
- PA 648 Week 4: Faculty Checkpoint Summary
- PA 648 Week 5: Second Attempt Comparison
- PA 648 Week 6: Evidence of Closure Memo
- PA 648 Week 7: Attestation Packet
- PA 648 Week 8: Sign-off Narrative
- PA 501 Week 2: Origins of the Profession Essay
- PA 502 Week 2: Bedside Question Brief
- PA 503 Week 2: Illness Scripts
- PA 504 Week 2: Encounter Opening Script
PA 648 Week 2 questions, answered
Does every row need a number attached to it?
No, but every row needs something a second person can observe and report. A timed set of items produces a number; an observed encounter produces a checklist and a stated line for what counts. What will not do is a row whose outcome is the candidate's own sense of being better, because nobody else can read it and nothing can be compared later.
Can the reviewer named in a row be a classmate?
In some sections, for some rows, and the example shows how it is written when it happens. A classmate can observe and report; what a classmate cannot do is carry the weight of a row that a program will later lean on. Strong submissions use peers for practice readings and reserve the settling reading for faculty.
How many items belong in one agreement?
Few enough that every one gets a real date and a real reader. Submissions that carry ten items usually carry ten thin rows, and the thinness shows up in the reasoning paragraphs, where the writer runs out of anything specific to say. Three or four worked properly reads stronger than a full page of everything.
Where can I find a free PA 648 Week 2 sample paper?
The complete PA 648 Week 2 remediation contract, with six items in their original order and a measure, reader, date and consequence for each, is on this page.
Why does nobody self-score in the PA 648 Week 2 sample?
Each reading is taken by a classmate, the advisor or the testing software so the result would be the same whoever took it.