| Course | MPH 599 Professional Writing |
|---|---|
| Week | 1 |
| Paper type | Discussion post with two replies |
| Length | About 620 words |
| Format | Discussion post with APA 7 citations |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | Master of Public Health (MPH) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MPH 599 Week 1
Week 1 Discussion: Initial Post
"It Was Observed That": Six Years of Restaurant Inspection Reports and the Sentence Habit I Am Bringing Into Graduate Writing
Initial Post
The habit, named as an object. For six years I inspected restaurants as an environmental health specialist in Larkin County, an invented county standing in for the real one. My writing habit is the sentence that hides its actor behind a passive verb and a stack of nouns: "It was observed that hand sink accessibility was obstructed by food storage containers." No one does anything in that sentence. The inspector observed, the cook stacked boxes, the sink was blocked, but the grammar says none of it. When I went through the two papers I wrote last term, I found the frame "it was observed that" or "it was noted that" 23 times in about 4,000 words, and many sentences with three or four nouns in a row, such as "employee illness reporting policy documentation."
The setting that trained it. Inspection reports are legal documents. They may be read by an owner's lawyer or quoted at a hearing, so we were trained to write in a way that sounds neutral and avoids saying who did what. Passive voice protected us: "was observed" put the inspector out of the sentence, and "was obstructed" put the cook out of it too. That style served the job. It does not serve a graduate paper, where the reader needs to know who acted and what happened.
What It Costs at Graduate Level
The cost is clarity and length. Williams and Bizup (2017) argue that readers understand a sentence most easily when its characters appear as subjects and their actions appear as verbs; my habit turns actions into nouns and removes the characters. In my last paper, a sentence about restaurant inspections read: "Inconsistency in inspector scoring practices was identified as a factor in reduced reliability of inspection outcomes." A clearer version would be: "Inspectors scored restaurants differently, so a score depended partly on who did the inspection." The second is shorter, and it says what the first only gestures at. The point matters in my subject area: a Tennessee study of more than 167,000 inspections found that individual inspectors' mean scores ranged from 69 to 92 (Jones et al., 2004), a finding I would want to state plainly, not bury.
The Change, Stated So It Can Be Checked
This term I will cut "it was observed that" and its relatives to zero in graded work, and I will keep noun stacks to two nouns in a row. Anyone can check both by searching my papers. I will report the counts in my week 8 revision memo.
A Question for the Group
Which habits did your last job train into your writing? I suspect nurses, case managers and lab staff all have their own report language, and I would like to know whether others found theirs as hard to see as I did.
Reply to Jasmine
Jasmine, you wrote that your writing is "too wordy." Could you find one construction that causes it? You mention that your nursing notes always began with "Patient states that." If your papers begin many sentences with "Research states that," that would be a pattern you could count and change, which "wordy" is not.
Reply to Omar
Omar, I like that you named a specific habit: starting paragraphs with a long background clause before the main point. You say it comes from writing grant reports. Did those reports reward the background-first order? If so, your change might be to move one sentence, the claim, to the start of each paragraph, which would be easy to check.
References
Jones, T. F., Pavlin, B. I., LaFleur, B. J., Ingram, L. A., & Schaffner, W. (2004). Restaurant inspection scores and foodborne disease. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 10(4), 688-692. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1004.030343
Williams, J. M., & Bizup, J. (2017). Style: Lessons in clarity and grace (12th ed.). Pearson.
What the MPH 599 Week 1 assignment asks for
The first post asks you to identify one writing habit you bring into graduate work and describe it precisely enough that a reader could find it in your writing. Name the construction itself, not a general quality such as wordiness. Explain the setting that trained it, since most habits made sense somewhere. Show what it costs at graduate level, ideally with a sentence of your own and a revision of it. State the change you will make in a form that can be checked, such as a count. Close by asking classmates which report language their own jobs trained into them. In replies, help classmates move from a general complaint about their writing to a specific construction they could find and count.
How this MPH 599 Week 1 example is built
The post names the hidden-observer sentence and the noun stack, quoting an inspection line about a blocked hand sink in which no one does anything. It counts the frame 23 times in about 4,000 words of earlier papers. It explains that inspection reports are legal documents written to sound neutral, which made passive voice useful there. A before-and-after sentence about inspector scoring shows the cost, linked to a Tennessee study in which inspectors' average scores ranged from 69 to 92. The change is a count of zero frames and a limit of two nouns in a row. Replies ask Jasmine to find the construction behind her wordiness and Omar whether grant reports rewarded his background-first paragraphs.
MPH 599 Week 1 rubric: what full points look like
The loss with the longest tail on this post is a habit described in the abstract, which leaves a reader nothing to check against actual paragraphs. The next is a post that starts formally and drifts into the voice of a message to a colleague by its third paragraph. Posts that name several habits at once, or that state a change no one could verify, such as writing more clearly, also lose points. Strong posts name one construction precisely, explain where it was learned, show its cost with a real example and a revision, set a checkable change and ask a question that helps classmates do the same. Replies earn credit when they turn a classmate's general complaint into a construction that could be found and counted.
MPH 599 Week 1 help from the desk
Seeing your own writing habits is difficult, because they feel like normal prose. Send a few pages of earlier writing and we will mark the recurring constructions with you, count them and choose the one most worth changing. We can also help you connect the habit to the setting that trained it and write a revision that shows the cost. A reply that turns a classmate's vague complaint into something countable is harder to write than it looks, and we can help you draft one. Your writing and your choices remain your own, and work samples can be anonymized before you share them.
Get a MPH-599 Week 1 example written to your instructions
Send the instructions your classroom shows for this week, with the rubric if your section publishes one, and a custom MPH-599 Week 1 post written to them comes back inside 24-48h, the first one free. Say what kind of writing you already do for work and the example is built from that starting point rather than from a generic one.
More MPH 599 papers and MPH samples
- MPH 599 Week 2: Baseline Writing Sample
- MPH 599 Week 3: Paragraph Architecture Exercise
- MPH 599 Week 4: Paraphrase and Citation Exercise
- MPH 599 Week 5: Tone and Register Edit
- MPH 599 Week 6: Reference List Reconciliation
- MPH 599 Week 7: Short Scholarly Paper
- MPH 599 Week 8: Revision Memo
- MPH 598 Week 1: One Trade Post
- MPH 500 Week 1: Upstream Walk Post
- MPH 515 Week 1: Population Question Post
- MPH 503 Week 1: Advocacy Ask Post
MPH 599 Week 1 questions, answered
Does admitting a weakness cost points?
Not on its own. The rows are marking the precision of the description and the control of the sentences delivering it, not the habit being described. A vague confession scores badly because it is vague. A habit named exactly, with one instance a reader can go and find, reads instead as the diagnostic skill this credit exists to install.
All my writing is for work. Is that usable here?
It is the better case. Workplace prose has a purpose, a reader and a history of being rewarded for something, which makes a habit traceable rather than mysterious. The finished example names the document type and what its reader wanted, then shows the construction that wanting produced, and the classroom reads that as evidence, never as a plea for allowance.
Are the replies marked as writing too?
In most sections yes, and that catches people out. A post drafted carefully beside replies dashed off at speed produces two samples of one writer, and the looser one is the more honest. A finished set keeps the replies in the register of the post, shorter without being looser, with the same attention paid to every sentence.
Where can I find a free MPH 599 Week 1 sample paper?
This page holds a complete MPH 599 Week 1 post about a restaurant inspector's hidden-observer habit, with two replies to classmates.
What change does the MPH 599 Week 1 sample commit to?
Cutting phrases like "it was observed that" to zero in graded work and keeping noun stacks to two nouns, both checked by searching the papers.