NR 224 Week 2 C. diff Contact Precautions Write-Up Example

Fundamentals: Skills Chamberlain University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NR 224 Week 2 sample paper is an asepsis write-up that follows one entry into a contact precautions room for C. difficile, surface by surface, from the door handle in to the door handle out. Chamberlain NR 224 (NR-224), Fundamentals: Skills, asks pre-licensure BSN students to show infection control as a sequence of things touched and why. The paper explains why spores call for soap and water instead of alcohol rub under the IDSA and SHEA guideline, starts the room at the doorway, tracks the hands as they change state more than once, shows gloves protecting the next patient, separates clean from sterile technique and describes taking the gown and gloves off in the order that keeps contamination off the skin.

CourseNR 224 Fundamentals: Skills
Week2
Paper typeAsepsis write-up
LengthAbout 1,110 words, 4 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolChamberlain University
ProgramBSN (pre-licensure)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NR 224 Week 2

1

Asepsis Write-Up: One Entry Into a Contact Precautions Room for C. difficile, Surface by Surface, From the Door Handle In to the Door Handle Out

Student Name

College of Nursing, Chamberlain University

NR 224: Fundamentals: Skills

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the room, the organism and the surfaces, because this write-up is about physical things touched in order. Student APA 7 title page.
2

Asepsis Write-Up: One Entry Into a Contact Precautions Room for C. difficile, Surface by Surface, From the Door Handle In to the Door Handle Out

The Room and the Task

The write-up follows one entry into the room of Mrs. N., 79, who has diarrhea from Clostridioides difficile and is on contact precautions; details are composite. The task was to take her vital signs, empty and measure the contents of her bedside commode, help her back to bed and replace her water. The entry lasted about 12 minutes. It is written surface by surface, because asepsis in a room like this is less about knowing the rules than about what my hands touched, in what order, and what they carried out.

C. difficile matters for asepsis because it forms spores. Alcohol-based hand rub, which works well against most bacteria and viruses on the unit, does not reliably kill C. difficile spores. The joint IDSA and SHEA practice guideline for C. difficile recommends contact precautions, gowns and gloves, dedicated equipment and hand washing with soap and water in settings where spread is a concern (McDonald et al., 2018). Soap and water removes spores from the hands by friction and rinsing; it does not kill them.

Before going in, I also checked two things that change the plan. The first was whether anyone else needed to go in with me, since helping Mrs. N. off the commode alone would have meant a second nurse gowning up mid-task, which costs supplies and time. She was able to stand with one person, so I went in alone. The second was whether the room had its own supplies of gloves and a clean pitcher, so I would not have to leave and come back in the middle of the visit. Each extra entry is another chance to carry something out.

Where the Room Begins

The room begins at the doorway, not at the bed. The isolation cart outside the door holds gowns and gloves, and the sign on the door says contact precautions and soap and water. Before touching the door handle, I cleaned my hands with alcohol rub, because at that moment they carried the unit, not the room, and the next patient I would touch after this one needed protection from what I brought in. I put on a gown, tied at the neck and waist so it covered my scrubs from neck to knees, and then gloves, pulled over the gown's cuffs so no skin showed at the wrist.

I left my phone and pen in my pocket outside the gown, and I did not bring my own stethoscope. The room has a dedicated stethoscope and blood pressure cuff that stay in the room, because equipment carried between rooms carries spores with it.

What this page is doingThe room is defined as starting at the door, and each item brought or left behind has a reason.
3

Hands Change State More Than Once

Inside, my gloved hands moved from clean to contaminated and back more than once, and each change needed its own step. I took Mrs. N.'s blood pressure and temperature first, with the room's own equipment, while my gloves were still clean, because vital signs involve touching her skin and I wanted that done before touching anything soiled. Then I helped her from the commode to the bed, which meant touching her clothing, the commode arms and the bed rail. I emptied the commode into the toilet, measured the volume, noted its appearance and cleaned the commode pan.

At that point my gloves were grossly contaminated, and the next task, replacing her water pitcher and putting the call light in her hand, involved things she would touch and put in her mouth. So I removed the gloves, washed my hands with soap and water at the sink in the room, and put on a new pair before touching the pitcher. Sax et al. (2007) set out five moments when hands should be cleaned, grouped around contact with the patient, clean procedures, possible exposure to body fluids, and the patient's surroundings. In a 12-minute visit, I met four of the five, and each one was a different reason, not the same reason repeated.

Gloves Protect the Next Patient Too

Gloves in this room have two jobs. They protect my hands from the stool and the surfaces contaminated by it. And they protect the next patient, because the spores I would otherwise carry on my skin would go with me to the next room, where a patient on antibiotics might be vulnerable to infection. That second job is why gloves come off before touching clean things in the room, and why they come off before leaving it. A glove that touched the commode and then the water pitcher has failed at its second job without anyone seeing it.

Clean, Sterile and the Gap Between

Nothing in this visit was sterile. Contact precautions are about clean technique: keeping clean things clean and keeping contaminated things from spreading. The difference matters because sterile technique, which I will use for catheter insertion or dressing changes, has a field with edges and nothing unsterile may cross it. In this room there is no field. There is only an order of tasks and a set of barriers. Confusing the two would lead to one of two errors: treating the room as sterile and using far more supplies than needed, or treating a sterile procedure later in the week with the looser habits of this room.

Taking It All Off Again

Removal was done in the order that keeps the contaminated outside away from my skin. At the doorway, still inside the room, I removed my gloves first, peeling the second off inside the first, and then the gown, pulling it forward from the shoulders and rolling it inside out, touching only the inside. Both went into the bin inside the door. I washed my hands with soap and water at the room's sink for at least 20 seconds, rinsed and dried with a paper towel, and used the towel to open the door handle, because the handle is part of the room.

Outside, I did not touch the isolation cart or my face until I had cleaned my hands once more with alcohol rub, which is appropriate here because my hands were no longer soiled and had already been washed. The door handle I used on the way in was the last surface of the room, and the paper towel is how I left it behind.

What this page is doingRemoval is described in order with its reason, which is where most contamination of the nurse happens.
4

References

McDonald, L. C., Gerding, D. N., Johnson, S., Bakken, J. S., Carroll, K. C., Coffin, S. E., Dubberke, E. R., Garey, K. W., Gould, C. V., Kelly, C., Loo, V., Shaklee Sammons, J., Sandora, T. J., & Wilcox, M. H. (2018). Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clinical Infectious Diseases, 66(7), e1-e48. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix1085

Sax, H., Allegranzi, B., Uçkay, I., Larson, E., Boyce, J., & Pittet, D. (2007). 'My five moments for hand hygiene': A user-centred design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene. Journal of Hospital Infection, 67(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2007.06.004

Reading the NR 224 Week 2 instructions

This write-up has you describe an infection control procedure, such as entering an isolation room or performing hand hygiene and glove use, with a rationale for each step. Expect the instructions to name the type of precautions, the task to be done and the points where hand hygiene is required. A brief APA paper supported by a guideline or scholarly article is usual. The strongest write-ups are concrete, naming surfaces, equipment and the order of actions. They explain why each step blocks a route of transmission rather than calling it good practice. Removal of personal protective equipment deserves as much detail as putting it on, because that is where contamination of the nurse often happens.

How this NR 224 Week 2 example is built

The write-up opens in Mrs. N.'s room, a composite 79-year-old with C. difficile, and lists the tasks: vital signs, emptying the commode and helping her back to bed. It cites McDonald et al. (2018) on spores and soap and water. A section on where the room begins starts at the door handle and the isolation cart and keeps the writer's phone and stethoscope out. The hands section shows gloves changing from clean to contaminated and back, with a wash before touching her water pitcher. Gloves are shown protecting the next patient, Sax and colleagues' five moments frame hand hygiene, and the final section takes off gloves first, then the gown.

Reading the NR 224 Week 2 grading rubric

Asepsis write-ups are typically graded on accuracy of the technique, rationale for each step, correct use of hand hygiene and protective equipment, use of sources and APA writing. Rationale carries the most weight, which is why each step names the route a spore could travel. Accuracy here includes the detail that alcohol rub does not reliably kill C. difficile spores, taken from the national guideline. Hand hygiene is graded throughout, not once at the start, so the paper mentions it at every change of state. Removal order is checked against standard practice. Citations to the IDSA and SHEA guideline and the WHO five moments paper meet the source row with authority.

NR 224 Week 2 help from the desk

The costliest error is mentioning hand hygiene once at the top and never again, which leaves the hands untracked for the rest of the visit. Treating gloves as protection for the wearer only reverses the main point of the week. Skipping or compressing equipment removal wastes everything done before it. Using clean and sterile as synonyms is a frequent slip. Reasons such as good practice, with no organism or route named, earn little. Surfaces described in general terms lose detail points. Some sections allow alcohol rub in parts of the example; follow your guideline. If your scenario differs, send the organism and the tasks, and a write-up can be traced for that room.

Get a NR 224 Week 2 example written to your instructions

Send the assignment file, the rubric and any lab checklist your section uses, and a custom NR 224 asepsis write-up comes back inside 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. Equipment and wording differ between labs, so if your instructor teaches a particular order for removal, include it and the example follows that rather than a generic one.

More NR 224 papers and pre-licensure samples

NR 224 Week 2 questions, answered

Does hand hygiene really need to appear that often?

Yes, because the marking follows the hands. Each time a hand touches something outside the procedure it changes state, and the write-up has to show it being brought back. Written once at the top it reads as a preface rather than as an account of what actually happened, and graders tend to treat it exactly that way.

Is alcohol rub acceptable everywhere in the example?

Follow what your classroom teaches, since the exceptions are the point. There are situations where soap, water and friction are required and a rub is not enough, and knowing which situations those are is what this week is testing. State the choice and the reason for it rather than defaulting to whichever one is nearer.

How specific do the surfaces have to be?

Very. Naming the over-bed table, the rail, the pump keypad and the phone in your pocket turns a general commitment into an account somebody could check. Abstract surfaces let a writer avoid the awkward ones, and the awkward ones are where the marks live. Pick the surfaces your own lab actually has in it.

Where can I find a free NR 224 Week 2 sample paper?

The complete Week 2 asepsis write-up for a C. difficile contact precautions room, from the door handle in to the door handle out, is reproduced below.

Why does the NR 224 Week 2 example use soap instead of hand rub?

C. difficile forms spores that alcohol-based hand rub does not reliably kill, so the IDSA and SHEA guideline cited in the paper calls for soap and water after contact.