NR 307A Week 4 Organizational Equity Assessment Example

Advancing Equity, Inclusion, and Diversity in Healthcare Chamberlain University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NR 307A Week 4 sample paper is an organizational assessment of five ordinary arrangements at a 180-bed community hospital and the patient each one assumes. Chamberlain NR 307A (NR-307A), Advancing Equity, Inclusion, and Diversity in Healthcare, asks RN-to-BSN students to assess an organization's practices for equity, not its mission statement. The paper describes the hospital by size and region only, uses the CLAS standards and Braveman as frameworks, sets an assessment matrix with where each rule is written, when it was revised and who enforces it, then examines visiting hours, portal enrollment with Sarkar and colleagues' evidence, wristband names, discharge pharmacy hours and a three-choice language field, and addresses each recommendation to its owner.

CourseNR 307A Advancing Equity, Inclusion, and Diversity in Healthcare
Week4
Paper typeOrganizational assessment
LengthAbout 1,290 words, 4 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolChamberlain University
ProgramRN-to-BSN
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NR 307A Week 4

1

Five Ordinary Arrangements at a 180-Bed Community Hospital and the Patient Each One Assumes

Student Name

College of Nursing, Chamberlain University

NR 307A: Advancing Equity, Inclusion, and Diversity in Healthcare

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title limits the assessment to five arrangements and names the question asked of each, which signals depth rather than a survey of everything the hospital does. The employer is described only by size, type and region. Student APA 7 format, no running head.
2

Five Ordinary Arrangements at a 180-Bed Community Hospital and the Patient Each One Assumes

The Organization and the Method

The organization is a 180-bed nonprofit community hospital in a small Midwestern city, with medical-surgical, telemetry, intensive care, labor and delivery and emergency services. I have worked there as a staff nurse for six years. I chose five arrangements that patients meet on almost every admission, and for each one I recorded where it is written, when it was last revised if I could find out, who enforces it, and the picture of the patient it takes for granted. I did not assess the mission statement, which promises compassionate care for every person, because it describes values rather than anything a patient experiences at the bedside. The matrix the course supplied is summarized in Table 1.

Two frameworks guided the questions. The federal standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services, known as CLAS, set out what health care organizations should do to provide effective, understandable and respectful care, including language assistance and governance that is accountable for it (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health, 2013). Braveman (2014) describes health equity as removing obstacles to health that fall on socially disadvantaged groups, which gives each arrangement a simple test: does it add an obstacle for some patients that it does not add for others?

Table 1

Assessment Matrix for Five Arrangements

ArrangementWhere it is writtenLast revisedWho enforces itPatient it assumes
Visiting hoursVisitor policy; signs at entrances2021Security; charge nursesA small family free in the daytime
Patient portal enrollmentDischarge checklist2023Discharging nurseHas an email address, a smartphone and signal
Name on the wristband and whiteboardRegistration system defaultUnknownRegistration staffUses the name on their insurance card
Discharge prescriptionsPharmacy hours on the discharge form2019Outpatient pharmacyLeaves before 6 p.m. on a weekday
Language fieldRegistration screenUnknownRegistration staffSpeaks English or Spanish, or is "Other"

Note. Revision dates come from the footer of each written policy where one exists; "Unknown" means no date was printed or available to staff.

Visiting Hours

The visitor policy, last revised in 2021 and posted at every entrance, reads: "Two visitors at a time, age 12 and older, 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. One support person may stay overnight in private rooms at the discretion of the charge nurse." Security staff at the front desk enforce the hours; charge nurses enforce the number. The policy fits a family of two adults, both free during the day, with no children to bring along. It works less well for a patient whose partner works a second shift and can visit only after 9:00 p.m., for large families who gather together, and for a parent who has no one to watch a 10-year-old. The overnight exception depends on the discretion of the charge nurse, which means it varies by shift and by who is asking.

No one designed the policy to exclude anyone. It was revised in 2021 to ease pandemic restrictions and has not been looked at since. That is the pattern I found repeatedly: arrangements that made sense for a particular moment and stayed in place.

Patient Portal Enrollment

The discharge checklist, revised in 2023, includes a line: "Enroll patient in the portal (email required) and confirm activation code." The activation code is sent by text and expires after 15 minutes. Laboratory and imaging results are released to the portal before anyone calls the patient. The arrangement assumes an email address, a smartphone with signal in the building, and comfort using both. Sarkar et al. (2011) studied portal use among more than 14,000 adults with diabetes and found that, after adjustment for other factors, Black and Latino patients and patients without an educational degree had higher odds of never logging on. When results go to the portal first, the patients least likely to log on are the last to learn their results.

Name on the Wristband and Whiteboard

The registration system prints the legal name from the insurance record on the wristband and pushes it to the whiteboard and the electronic record header. There is no field for a name the patient uses. The arrangement assumes that the name on a patient's insurance card is the name they answer to. It does not fit a transgender patient whose legal name has not been changed, an immigrant who uses an anglicized name at work, or an older patient known by a middle name all her life. Nurses write the preferred name on the whiteboard by hand when they know it, but it disappears when the board is wiped at shift change. No one I asked knew when the default was set.

Discharge Prescriptions

The discharge form states: "Prescriptions may be filled at the outpatient pharmacy in the main lobby, weekdays 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m." The hours were last revised in 2019. Patients discharged after 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, after 1:00 p.m. on Saturday, or at any time on Sunday leave with a paper or electronic prescription and must find a retail pharmacy that night or the next day. The arrangement assumes a patient who leaves during business hours, has transportation to a second stop, and can wait a day for a medication. It fails the patient going home at 7:00 p.m. with a new antibiotic and no car.

Language Field

The registration screen's language field offers three choices: English, Spanish and Other. There is no free-text field. Interpreter services are booked by language, so a nurse caring for a patient recorded as Other has to find out the language before booking, often by asking family members. Under the CLAS standards, language help should be free to the patient, and patients should be told about it in the language they prefer (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health, 2013). A field that cannot record the language makes the first step of that impossible to do from the record.

What this page is doingEach arrangement is quoted or described as it exists, with where it is written, when it was revised and who enforces it, before the assumed patient is named.
3

Nobody Meant It

None of these arrangements was written to exclude anyone. Each fits the patient the author had in mind, often a patient who resembles the staff who wrote it: someone with daytime hours, a smartphone, one name and English. This matters for the recommendations, because blaming the security guard, the registration clerk or the discharging nurse would miss the point. They are enforcing rules as written. The changes need to come from whoever owns each rule.

Recommendations, Addressed by Owner

To the patient experience committee (owner of the visitor policy): replace "at the discretion of the charge nurse" with "One support person chosen by the patient may stay overnight in any room" and review the policy every two years.

To the director of nursing informatics (owner of the discharge checklist): change the portal line to "Offer portal enrollment; if declined or not possible, document preferred contact for results" and route results for non-enrolled patients to a phone call.

To the registration manager (owner of the registration system): add a "name used" field that prints on the wristband beneath the legal name and appears on the whiteboard and record header.

To the director of pharmacy (owner of outpatient pharmacy hours): for patients discharged after hours, provide a first dose or a short supply of any new antibiotic or anticoagulant at the bedside.

To the registration manager: replace the three-item language field with the full language list used by the interpreter service.

What this page is doingEach recommendation is addressed to the role that owns the arrangement and is small enough for that role to approve, rather than to the organization in general.
4

References

Braveman, P. (2014). What are health disparities and health equity? We need to be clear. Public Health Reports, 129(Suppl. 2), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549141291S203

Sarkar, U., Karter, A. J., Liu, J. Y., Adler, N. E., Nguyen, R., Lopez, A., & Schillinger, D. (2011). Social disparities in internet patient portal use in diabetes: Evidence that the digital divide extends beyond access. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(3), 318-321. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2010.006015

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health. (2013). National standards for culturally and linguistically appropriate services in health and health care: A blueprint for advancing and sustaining CLAS policy and practice.

What the NR 307A Week 4 assignment asks for

For Week 4 you assess an organization, usually your workplace or one you know, for how its policies and practices affect equity and inclusion. Expect the instructions to name a framework, such as the CLAS standards, and to ask for an assessment tool or matrix, an analysis of selected practices and recommendations, in APA. Choose a small number of arrangements and go deep rather than covering everything briefly. Quote or describe each one as it exists, with where it is written, when it was last revised and who enforces it. Trace each assumption to the wording that carries it. Address each recommendation to the role that owns the arrangement. Do not identify the organization by name.

How the NR 307A Week 4 example is put together

The paper opens with the hospital described by beds, services and region, and the writer's six years there. The CLAS standards and Braveman (2014) frame the questions. Table 1 sets the five arrangements against where each is written, when revised, who enforces it and the patient it assumes. Sections then take each arrangement: visiting hours with overnight stays at the charge nurse's discretion; portal enrollment requiring an email, with Sarkar et al. (2011) on unequal portal use; legal names printed with no field for a used name; a lobby pharmacy closing at 6:00 p.m.; and a language field offering English, Spanish or Other. A section argues nobody meant it, and recommendations follow by owner.

NR 307A Week 4 rubric: what full points look like

Organizational assessment rubrics generally grade the framework and tool, depth of analysis of selected practices, evidence and sources, actionable recommendations, protection of the organization's identity and APA. Depth carries the most weight, which is why five arrangements are examined in detail instead of a dozen in a line each. The tool row is credited when the matrix records source, revision date and enforcer. Analysis scores when each assumption is traced to the wording that carries it. Recommendations earn points when addressed to the role that owns each rule and small enough to approve. Avoiding blame of individual staff and keeping the hospital unnamed protect professionalism points.

NR 307A Week 4 help from the desk

The largest loss is assessing the mission statement instead of what the organization actually does. Breadth without depth, a dozen items in a line each, comes next. Identifying the organization risks a professionalism penalty. Assumptions asserted rather than traced to wording, recommendations addressed to nobody, the required instrument buried or missing, blame placed on staff for rules they did not write and padded reference lists all cost points. An appendix that repeats the body instead of holding evidence loses marks. You can assess your employer without permission if you use public or everyday information and keep it anonymous. Name the arrangements you have in mind, and an assessment can be drafted with a matrix.

Get a NR 307A Week 4 example written to your instructions

Send the Week 4 instructions with the rubric and any assessment tool or matrix your classroom supplies, and a custom example is returned inside 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. The example runs on a described setting of the same type as yours, so no document belonging to your employer needs to leave the building.

More NR 307A papers and RN-to-BSN samples

NR 307A Week 4 questions, answered

Which organization should I assess?

The one you can see the inside of, which for most students in this program is their own employer. A department is a better unit than a hospital, because visiting rules, forms and clinic times are set locally and you can find out who set them. If you are not currently working, sections generally accept a placement site or a service you use as a patient.

Do I need permission from my employer?

Not for what this assignment actually looks at. Posted hours, signage, a blank form and a published policy are already public to anyone walking in. Permission becomes an issue the moment you want internal audit data or you quote a named manager, which is also the point at which the paper stops being an assessment of arrangements. Keep to what is on display.

Can I say the organization is doing well?

Yes, and a paper finding two arrangements that work is more convincing than one finding fault everywhere. What the rubric wants is the same treatment either way: name the arrangement, show who decided it, and show the evidence for the verdict. A compliment with no mechanism behind it earns as little as a complaint with no mechanism behind it.

Where can I find a free NR 307A Week 4 sample paper?

The full Week 4 assessment of five arrangements at a 180-bed community hospital, with the matrix and recommendations addressed by owner, is reproduced on this page.

Who receives the recommendations in the NR 307A Week 4 example?

Each goes to the role that owns the arrangement: the patient experience committee, the director of nursing informatics, the registration manager and the director of pharmacy.