This page holds a finished NR 306 Week 4 respiratory assessment, showing how each sound is tied to an intercostal space and a line before it is described. Searches like "nr 306 week 4 assignment example", "nr306 week 4 sample" and "nr 306 week 4 example" land here.
What a finished NR 306 Week 4 respiratory assessment looks like
A finished respiratory record reads like a chart of positions with sounds attached. The opening is visual: rate, rhythm, effort, the shape of the chest, whether the person uses accessory muscles or leans forward to breathe. Palpation follows, with chest excursion measured for symmetry and tactile fremitus compared side to side at each level. Percussion gives resonance across the fields, and any change from it is placed at the space and the line where it appeared. Auscultation is the longest part: breath sounds named by type and by where they belong, with anything added to them described by timing in the breath and by location. Every entry has a right and a left, and the two are compared at the same height.
How a NR 306 Week 4 example is structured
The document opens with the person seated and the chest exposed to the extent the assignment allows, then runs the four techniques in their usual order across each field before changing surface. Anterior, posterior and lateral are separate blocks, and within each the entries step down in pairs so that right and left at one level sit next to each other on the page. Landmarks are stated in the terms the template uses, which is normally an intercostal space plus a vertical line such as midclavicular, midaxillary or scapular. Adventitious sounds get their own entries rather than a shared sentence, each with location, timing and whether it cleared. Where nothing was added, the field still records the sound that was heard there. A closing line reports the person's tolerance of the examination.
Across before down
Each level compared right to left before the record moves lower, since the whole value of the technique is the difference between two sides at the same height.
A position on every sound
An intercostal space and a vertical line attached to each entry, so a reader could return to the same spot and listen again.
Effort described, not scored
Rate, rhythm, use of accessory muscles and posture written as observations, which is what the inspection row is asking for before anything is touched.
Fremitus and excursion kept in
The two palpation findings recorded rather than quietly dropped, each with the levels at which the hands were placed and what the two sides did.
Quiet fields still reported
Where nothing extra was heard, the entry names the sound that was present and where, because silence in the document reads as a field never reached.
Where marks go in NR 306 Week 4
The reliable loss here is the unplaced sound. Crackles heard is half a finding; crackles at the right base, posterior, at the end of inspiration is the whole one, and the difference is where the marks live. Second is the record that walks down one side and then down the other, which loses the comparison the technique exists to make. After those: rate reported without rhythm or effort, fremitus and excursion skipped because they feel optional, percussion left out entirely, anterior fields done and posterior forgotten, a count that no reader can place because the position was never named, and the person's response to the examination never mentioned. Describing a sound you did not hear, to fill a template row, costs more than any of these.
Get a NR 306 Week 4 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 4 instructions and your respiratory template, and a custom example is written into it with the landmarks your section uses, returned inside 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free. The breathing you listened to belongs to a real person who agreed to it, and that part of the assignment is not ours to supply.
NR 306 Week 4 questions, answered
How many auscultation points does the template want?
As many as it prints, and each one filled. Forms vary between sections, and the count matters less than the pattern: paired points at each level, front and back, with the lateral fields included rather than assumed. If your form draws a diagram, mark it and describe it in words as well, since the written entry is what the rubric reads.
My volunteer is healthy and everything sounded the same. What do I write?
Write where you listened and what you heard, field by field. Vesicular sounds over the peripheral fields, bronchovesicular where they belong, nothing added, equal on both sides at each level. That is a complete finding and it earns full credit, because the record is being read for coverage of the fields rather than for the discovery of a problem.
Should I include oxygen saturation and smoking history?
Include the measurement if your template has a row for it, and keep the history brief. This week is about what the examination produced, so a long account of smoking years belongs to the interview course rather than here. One or two lines of relevant background is usually enough to set the findings up, and anything more starts competing with the fields for space.