| Course | NR 324 Adult Health I |
|---|---|
| Week | 5 |
| Paper type | Patient teaching plan |
| Length | About 1,120 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | BSN (pre-licensure) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 324 Week 5
Teaching Plan: Six Weeks of Home IV Antibiotics Through a PICC Line for a 52-Year-Old Hotel Night Auditor
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 324: Adult Health I
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Teaching Plan: Six Weeks of Home IV Antibiotics Through a PICC Line for a 52-Year-Old Hotel Night Auditor
The Learner Before the Disease
Mr. V. is 52 and works nights as a hotel night auditor, 11 p.m. to 7 a.m., five nights a week. He was admitted with an infection in his right knee joint that needed surgical washout, and he goes home in two days with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in his left upper arm and six weeks of intravenous cefazolin, given every 8 hours from a small pre-filled pump that empties by itself over 30 minutes. A home infusion nurse will visit once a week to change the dressing and draw blood; everything else he does himself, three times a day, for 42 days.
What he brings: he reads well and likes written steps, but needs reading glasses, which he left at home. He has never handled any medical equipment. His hands are steady. He lives with his 16-year-old son, who is home in the evenings. His work hours mean one of his three daily doses falls during his shift, at about 3 a.m., in the hotel's back office. He says he is "a bit squeamish" about the line and has not looked at it yet. English is his first language. The Infectious Diseases Society of America guideline on outpatient intravenous antibiotic therapy emphasizes that patients or caregivers who give their own doses need structured teaching and an assessment of whether they can do it safely (Norris et al., 2019).
Ordered by What Is Dangerous
The first thing taught is what would do the most harm if it went wrong. A central line is a direct path from the outside world to the bloodstream, so infection of the line is the most dangerous failure, and hand hygiene and cleaning the connection come first. Next is flushing, because a blocked line means missed doses and a trip to the emergency department. Connecting the pump comes third, because it is the easiest step and the least dangerous if done slowly. Keeping the dressing dry and recognizing warning signs come last, but still before discharge. Guidelines for preventing catheter-related infections name hand hygiene and scrubbing the access hub with an antiseptic before each use among the core measures (O'Grady et al., 2011).
Objectives, Written as Performances
1. Before touching the line, Mr. V. washes his hands with soap for 20 seconds or uses the alcohol gel, and lays out his supplies on a clean paper towel on a cleared table.
2. He scrubs the needleless connector at the end of the line with an alcohol pad for 15 seconds, twisting, and lets it dry for 5 seconds without touching it, before every connection.
3. He flushes the line with a 10-milliliter prefilled saline syringe, using a push-pause motion, before and after each dose, and stops and calls if he feels resistance.
4. He connects the pump, opens the clamp on the pump tubing, checks that the pump is going down after 10 minutes, and disconnects and flushes when it is empty.
5. He covers the arm with a plastic sleeve before showering and keeps the dressing dry.
6. He names the signs that mean calling the infusion nurse the same day, fever of 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit or higher, redness, pain or drainage at the insertion site, swelling of the left arm or hand, and the one that means calling 911: sudden shortness of breath or chest pain.
Methods and Sessions
Session 1, today at 2 p.m., covers Objectives 1 to 3 on a practice arm with an identical connector, then on his own line with the nurse beside him, because he has not yet looked at it and handling a model first lowers the squeamishness. He is given the steps printed at 18-point size, each step beside a photo of hands doing it, because his glasses are at home; his son is asked to bring them tonight. Session 2, tonight at 7 p.m., with his son present, covers Objective 4 during a real dose, and Mr. V. does every step while the nurse watches and talks only if a step is about to go wrong. His son learns to recognize the warning signs in Objective 6, because he will be in the house during the evening dose.
Session 3, tomorrow at 6 a.m., is the dose he will usually give at home before sleeping, done entirely by him. Session 4, tomorrow at 2 p.m., covers Objectives 5 and 6 and plans the 3 a.m. work dose: a clean area in the hotel office, a small zipped bag with the supplies, a phone alarm, and the infusion pharmacy's 24-hour number saved in his phone. If the work dose cannot be managed safely, the plan is to ask the infectious disease team whether the dose times can shift to 6 a.m., 2 p.m. and 10 p.m., so that all three happen at home.
Evaluation
Each objective is evaluated by watching him do it, not by asking whether he understood. A 12-item checklist based on the large-print steps is used at Sessions 2 and 3; any missed item is taught again and watched again. He is ready for discharge when he completes two consecutive doses with no missed items and no prompting. Objective 6 is evaluated by teach-back: he tells the nurse, as he would tell his son, what each warning sign is and whom he calls. Bastable (2019) describes return demonstration as the method best suited to evaluating psychomotor skills, and here it is the only evidence that he can do this alone at 3 a.m. in a hotel office.
The home infusion nurse receives a copy of the completed checklist, so the first home visit starts from what Mr. V. can already do and where he needed repeated teaching, rather than from the beginning.
One risk is left open on purpose. Mr. V. may manage perfectly in hospital and still skip the hub scrub at 3 a.m. when he is tired and a guest is waiting at the front desk. The plan cannot remove that risk, but it can make the scrub the one step he never skips by teaching it first, practicing it most, and asking him to say out loud, at each session, why it matters. The home infusion nurse will ask him to show the scrub at every weekly visit, because a skill done 126 times alone drifts, and the weekly visit is the only point at which anyone will see it.
References
Bastable, S. B. (2019). Nurse as educator: Principles of teaching and learning for nursing practice (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Norris, A. H., Shrestha, N. K., Allison, G. M., Keller, S. C., Bhavan, K. P., Zurlo, J. J., Hersh, A. L., Gorski, L. A., Bosso, J. A., Rathore, M. H., Arrieta, A., Petrak, R. M., Shah, A., Brown, R. B., Knight, S. L., & Umscheid, C. A. (2019). 2018 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the management of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 68(1), e1-e35. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy745
O'Grady, N. P., Alexander, M., Burns, L. A., Dellinger, E. P., Garland, J., Heard, S. O., Lipsett, P. A., Masur, H., Mermel, L. A., Pearson, M. L., Raad, I. I., Randolph, A. G., Rupp, M. E., & Saint, S. (2011). Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 52(9), e162-e193. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir257
The Chamberlain NR 324 Week 5 instructions
The Week 5 assignment asks for a teaching plan for a patient going home with a new skill or treatment. Expect the instructions to want a learner assessment, objectives, content, teaching methods, a schedule and evaluation, with sources. Assess the person before the disease: eyesight, hands, literacy, working hours and who else is at home. Order content by what would do the most harm if done wrong. Write each objective as something the person does. Spread sessions over time and include practice on a model and on the real equipment. Evaluate by watching performance with a checklist. Say what happens to anything that could not be taught before discharge.
Inside the NR 324 Week 5 example
The plan opens with Mr. V.'s job, his knee infection and six weeks of antibiotics through a PICC line, with Norris et al. (2018) for home therapy. The learner section lists his preferences, missing glasses, steady hands and a teenage son at home in the evenings. Content is ordered by danger, starting with hand hygiene and scrubbing the hub, per O'Grady et al. (2011). Six objectives are performances, from a 15-second hub scrub to naming when to call 911. Four sessions follow, including a 6 a.m. dose he gives entirely and a plan for a 3 a.m. work dose. Evaluation uses a checklist shared with the home infusion nurse, with Bastable (2019) for methods.
NR 324 Week 5 rubric: what full points look like
Teaching plan rubrics commonly grade learner assessment, measurable objectives, prioritized content, appropriate methods, evaluation and continuity, and APA. Objectives carry the most weight, so each begins with an action that can be watched. Learner assessment scores when eyesight, hours and household shape the methods. Prioritization is credited when content follows danger rather than convenience. Methods earn points for practice on a model before the real line and large-print steps. Evaluation by watching, with a checklist, meets the criterion graders look for. Sharing results with the home nurse shows continuity. Naming the 3 a.m. risk that cannot be removed shows honest judgment.
NR 324 Week 5 help: mistakes that cost points
The plan that costs most turns objectives into topics, teaching about a medicine instead of teaching a person to give it. Next is a plan with no order, everything delivered on discharge morning. Evaluation by conversation, a note that material was discussed, loses marks when watching was possible. Ignoring what the adult is working with, such as print he cannot see or a night schedule, costs points. A plan that never says what happens to parts nobody had time to teach also loses marks. Five to seven objectives is common. If the person cannot perform the task, evaluate a caregiver. Hospital leaflets can be used if adapted. Send your patient's details for an NR 324 plan built around his day.
Get a NR 324 Week 5 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 5 prompt as your classroom posted it, the teaching plan template or rubric attached, and whatever patient details you were given, including anything the case says about the household. A custom example is written to those instructions, with objectives somebody could be watched performing, and comes back inside 24 to 48 hours. The first is free.
More NR 324 papers and pre-licensure samples
- NR 324 Week 1: Chronic Condition Management Post
- NR 324 Week 2: Heart Failure Daily Jobs Concept Map
- NR 324 Week 3: Diabetes and Ankle Fracture Case
- NR 324 Week 4: COPD Home Discharge Care Plan
- NR 324 Week 6: Perioperative Write-up
- NR 324 Week 7: Medication Management Case
- NR 324 Week 8: Discharge Summary Paper
- NR 325 Week 5: Concept Map
- NR 304 Week 5: Older Adult Findings Ranking Case
- NR 326 Week 5: Risk Assessment Write-up
- NR 302 Week 5: Respiratory Assessment Write-Up
NR 324 Week 5 questions, answered
How many objectives should a teaching plan carry?
Few enough to be taught in the time the person is still here. Sections differ on the number and the template usually decides it, but the example keeps the list short and ranks it, because the value of the exercise is showing which piece could not be left for somebody else. Extra objectives dilute rather than add.
What counts as evaluation if the person cannot perform the task?
Say so plainly and write what you would accept instead: a relative doing it, a return visit arranged for it, or part of it done now with the remainder scheduled. What loses marks is an evaluation that quietly drops to asking whether the person feels confident, since that measures mood rather than capability.
Can the plan use a leaflet the hospital already provides?
Yes, as a support rather than as the teaching. Printed material is listed as a method alongside showing and rehearsal, and the example says why it suits this learner, which is a claim about eyesight, reading and language rather than about the leaflet. A plan whose whole method is handing something over has taught nobody anything.
Where can I find a free NR 324 Week 5 sample paper?
The full Week 5 teaching plan for Mr. V.'s home PICC antibiotics, with six performance objectives, four sessions and the checklist, is reproduced on this page.
What does the NR 324 Week 5 plan teach first?
Hand hygiene and scrubbing the needleless connector for 15 seconds, because infection of a central line is the most dangerous failure and a direct path to the bloodstream.