NR 557 Week 2 History and Symptom Analysis Example

Health Assessment for Professional Nursing Practice Chamberlain University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

A 78-year-old home health patient's breathlessness is analyzed from the patient's own words, "I just can't get my wind today," in this NR 557 Week 2 sample paper, a history and symptom analysis. For Chamberlain NR 557 (catalog code NR-557), Week 2 has students keep the opening sentence and build a structured history on it. The analysis records what limited the interview, including breathlessness and a daughter supplying the history, then covers onset, course, pattern, character, severity, associated symptoms, self-treatment and background, and ends with what the history suggests, what it cannot settle and four questions for the examination. Pertinent negatives are recorded as carefully as positives.

CourseNR 557 Health Assessment for Professional Nursing Practice
Week2
Paper typeHistory and symptom analysis
LengthAbout 1,100 words, 2 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolChamberlain University
ProgramMSN
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NR 557 Week 2

1

History and Symptom Analysis: "I Just Can't Get My Wind Today", a 78-Year-Old Home Health Patient's Breathlessness Taken From the Patient's Own Sentence Through Onset, Character and Associated Symptoms

Student Name

College of Nursing, Chamberlain University

NR 557: Health Assessment for Professional Nursing Practice

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title keeps the patient's opening words and signals a structured symptom analysis built on them, which lets a reader see how the history shaped everything that followed. Student APA 7 title page.
2

History and Symptom Analysis: "I Just Can't Get My Wind Today", a 78-Year-Old Home Health Patient's Breathlessness Taken From the Patient's Own Sentence Through Onset, Character and Associated Symptoms

The Opening Line, Unedited

When I arrived for a scheduled home health visit, the patient, a 78-year-old retired bus driver who has lived for years with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), along with heart failure, was sitting in a recliner rather than at the kitchen table where we usually talk. Asked how things were, the patient said: "I just can't get my wind today."

I have kept that sentence exactly because it carries two details a paraphrase would lose. "Today" says the change is recent, not the usual breathlessness of COPD. And "get my wind" is the patient's usual phrase; over six weeks of visits, the patient has used it to describe bad days, but never before at rest in the chair. A paraphrase such as "reports dyspnea" would lose both.

What Limited the Interview

Three things shaped what I could ask. The patient was breathless enough to stop mid-sentence twice, so questions had to be short and closed where possible. The patient's daughter, who lives nearby and had come over that morning because the patient "didn't sound right" on the phone, supplied much of the history, which is helpful but filtered through her worry. And the patient is slightly hard of hearing, so I sat close and faced them. I noted these limits in the record so that anyone reading the history would know which parts came from the daughter.

Time, Before Anything Else

Onset. The patient first noticed a cough with more sputum three days ago. Breathlessness at rest began yesterday evening. The daughter says the patient did not come to the phone yesterday afternoon, which is unusual.

Course. Worsening since yesterday evening, not improved by the patient's rescue inhaler, used four times since last night instead of the usual once or twice a day.

Pattern. Worse lying flat, so the patient slept in the recliner. The patient has slept on two pillows for months because of heart failure, but has not needed the chair before.

Character and Severity

The patient describes the breathlessness as "can't fill up," not as chest tightness. On a 0 to 10 scale, the patient rates it 7 at rest, compared with about 2 at rest on a usual day. The patient can speak in phrases of four or five words before pausing. The cough brings up thick yellow-green sputum, a change from the usual small amount of white sputum.

Associated Symptoms

Present: feeling hot and cold since yesterday; less appetite; tiredness; the daughter reports the patient seemed "muddled" this morning, asking twice what day it was, which is not usual. Absent, asked directly: chest pain, pain on breathing in, coughing up blood, leg swelling beyond the usual mild ankle swelling, calf pain, palpitations, vomiting or diarrhea. Not known: weight today; the patient has not weighed since the day before yesterday because of feeling unwell, which matters for heart failure.

What the Patient Has Tried

Rescue inhaler four times since last night with little relief; usual long-acting inhalers taken this morning; acetaminophen once last night for feeling hot. No home oxygen. No antibiotics or steroids at home.

Relevant Background

COPD for 12 years, with two admissions for exacerbations in the past three years; heart failure with reduced ejection fraction diagnosed four years ago; hypertension; former smoker of 40 pack-years, quit eight years ago. Medications include inhalers, a diuretic, a beta-blocker and an angiotensin receptor blocker. Influenza vaccine this season; pneumococcal vaccination status unclear. Lives alone with daily visits from the daughter.

Questions Still Open After the History

The history leaves four questions for the examination. First, how fast is the patient actually breathing? The patient's own sense of breathlessness and the pauses in speech suggest a raised rate, but only a count will say by how much. Second, is the problem on one side? Pneumonia usually affects one area of the lung, while a COPD flare or heart failure more often affects both sides, so the chest examination must compare right and left. Third, is there fluid overload? The worse orthopnea and the missing weight leave heart failure open. Fourth, how confused is the patient? The daughter's report is important but second-hand, and new muddled thinking during an infection in someone this age is a warning sign that needs to be tested directly.

The history also changes what I will not do at this visit. The planned medication review and education about inhaler technique can wait. A breathless patient cannot concentrate on teaching, and the priority is to decide whether today's visit ends at home or with a referral. Writing that decision down now, before the examination, makes it easier to see later whether the examination confirmed or changed it.

What the History Suggests

The history already points in a direction before any examination. Three days of cough with a change in sputum color, feeling hot and cold, new breathlessness at rest and new confusion in an older adult suggest an acute respiratory infection, possibly pneumonia, on top of COPD. Symptoms and history alone cannot reliably confirm or rule out pneumonia; a review of the clinical diagnosis of pneumonia found that no single finding from the history was sufficient, and that the examination and chest radiography were needed (Metlay et al., 1997). Two alternatives remain live: a COPD exacerbation without pneumonia, and worsening heart failure, since orthopnea has worsened and weight is unknown. The new confusion is important because in older adults it can be the first sign of serious infection.

The history also sets the priorities for the examination. I need a counted respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, a careful chest examination comparing both sides, a check for leg swelling and weight, and a brief mental status assessment. The next write-up records that targeted examination. Respiratory rate, often estimated rather than counted in routine charting (Badawy et al., 2017), will be counted for a full minute, since an abnormal rate is among the earliest signs of deterioration (Cretikos et al., 2008).

Marking the daughter's contributions separately also matters for later readers, who may want to confirm details directly with the patient once the acute illness has passed.

The history took about ten minutes.

References

Badawy, J., Nguyen, O. K., Clark, C., Halm, E. A., & Makam, A. N. (2017). Is everyone really breathing 20 times a minute? Assessing epidemiology and variation in recorded respiratory rate in hospitalised adults. BMJ Quality & Safety, 26(10), 832-836. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006671

Cretikos, M. A., Bellomo, R., Hillman, K., Chen, J., Finfer, S., & Flabouris, A. (2008). Respiratory rate: The neglected vital sign. Medical Journal of Australia, 188(11), 657-659. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01825.x

Metlay, J. P., Kapoor, W. N., & Fine, M. J. (1997). Does this patient have community-acquired pneumonia? Diagnosing pneumonia by history and physical examination. JAMA, 278(17), 1440-1445. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550170070035

What the NR 557 Week 2 assignment asks for

This week asks you to take and analyze a health history for a presenting symptom. The prompt typically wants the chief complaint, a symptom analysis, relevant history and your interpretation. Keep the patient's opening sentence exactly as spoken, since wording often carries details a paraphrase loses. Record what limited the interview, such as breathlessness, a language barrier or a relative supplying the account. Establish timing first: onset, course and pattern. Then describe character, severity on a scale compared with usual, associated symptoms both present and specifically denied, what the patient has tried and relevant background. Say what the history suggests and what it cannot establish without examination. List the questions the examination must answer. Cite evidence on history-taking and diagnosis in APA 7.

Inside the NR 557 Week 2 example

The analysis opens with the patient's sentence and explains that "today" and the familiar phrase in a new setting both matter. A section records three limits on the interview. Timing sections cover three days of changed cough, breathlessness at rest since the previous evening and a night in the recliner. Character and severity compare a rating of 7 at rest with the usual 2. Associated symptoms include fever, poor appetite and confusion reported by the daughter, with chest pain, calf pain and blood in sputum specifically denied. Sections cover self-treatment and background. The interpretation points to infection on top of COPD, cites a review showing history alone cannot confirm pneumonia and lists questions for the examination.

Reading the NR 557 Week 2 grading rubric

History and symptom analyses are generally judged on completeness, accuracy, organization, attention to the patient's own words and a sound interpretation that sets up the examination. Keeping the opening sentence unedited shows respect for the patient's account and often preserves diagnostic clues. Recording limits on the interview shows awareness of how information was gathered. Establishing timing first reflects how clinicians reason about symptoms. Including specifically denied symptoms, not only present ones, shows thoroughness. Comparing severity with the patient's usual state makes it meaningful. An interpretation that states what the history cannot settle, and what the examination must test, shows mature reasoning. Evidence on diagnosis cited in APA 7 supports the analysis.

Common NR 557 Week 2 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Histories often paraphrase the chief complaint into medical terms, losing details the patient's words carried. Quote it. Another weakness is recording only positive symptoms; pertinent negatives, asked directly, are as important. Some students leave out who gave the history, although a relative's account is filtered through their own concerns. Say who spoke. Avoid reaching a diagnosis from history alone when the evidence shows examination is needed. Record severity against the patient's usual level, not only as a number. End with what the examination must answer, since a history that does not guide the next step is incomplete. Note the time the history was taken.

Get a NR 557 Week 2 example written to your instructions

Send the Week 2 instructions, whatever template your section supplies and the complaint you were assigned, and a custom example is written to all of it and returned inside 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free. It arrives with the questioning laid out and the urgency argued, so you can see exactly where your own interview would slot in.

More NR 557 papers and MSN samples

NR 557 Week 2 questions, answered

How is this different from a full health history?

Scope and purpose both. A full history populates every heading on a form; this takes a single complaint and asks what would change how fast it gets seen. Whole regions of the standard history appear only where they bear on that one symptom, and a paper reproducing the complete form usually buries the analysis it was asked for underneath the coverage.

Am I supposed to explain why the symptom happens?

Not here. The paper is graded on what your questions returned and how you ranked it, so a short line of background is fine where it justifies a question you asked. Papers that spend three paragraphs on the process behind the symptom arrive thin on the questioning itself, which is the half actually carrying the marks in this week.

What if the patient's account contradicts itself?

Record both versions and say which one you acted on. Contradiction is information: a person who reports three days and then describes an event from last month has told you something about how they are experiencing this. Smoothing it into one clean timeline removes the thing a reader would use, and graders notice when a history is tidier than any real conversation.

Where can I find a free NR 557 Week 2 sample paper?

The breathlessness history and symptom analysis is the complete NR 557 Week 2 sample above, nothing omitted. If your patient's symptom is different, share the history with us and an analysis in this structure can be prepared.

Why keep the patient's exact words in NR 557 Week 2?

Because wording carries details a paraphrase loses. In the sample, "today" signals a recent change and a familiar phrase in a new setting signals something unusual.