| Course | NR 602 Primary Care of the Childbearing and Childrearing Family Practicum |
|---|---|
| Week | 4 |
| Paper type | Development write-up |
| Length | About 1,110 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | MSN, Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 602 Week 4
Development Write-Up: A.B., 18 Months Old, Born at 32 Weeks, Assessed at a Corrected Age of 16 Months Across Four Domains, With Lost Words Read Differently
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 602: Primary Care of the Childbearing and Childrearing Family Practicum
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Development Write-Up: A.B., 18 Months Old, Born at 32 Weeks, Assessed at a Corrected Age of 16 Months Across Four Domains, With Lost Words Read Differently
Corrected Age First
A.B. was born at 32 weeks, 8 weeks early. Chronological age today is 18 months. Corrected age, which subtracts the weeks of prematurity, is 16 months. Development is judged against the corrected age until 24 months chronological, because a child born 8 weeks early has had 8 fewer weeks of development since conception (Lipkin et al., 2020). Judging A.B. against 18-month milestones would label normal progress as delay.
Four Domains, Kept Apart
Gross motor. Walks independently across the room, observed. Squats to pick up a toy and stands again, observed. Climbs onto a low chair, reported by the parent.
Judgment for 16 months corrected: on track.
Fine motor. Stacks two blocks, observed. Picks up a raisin with thumb and finger, observed. Scribbles with a crayon, reported.
Judgment: on track.
Language. Says "mama," observed once during the visit. Understands "where is the ball?" and looks at it, observed. The parent reports that A.B. said "ball," "up" and "dog" at 13 to 14 months and no longer says them. No pointing to show the parent something of interest was seen during the visit; the parent says A.B. points to ask for things but "not really to show me stuff."
Judgment: behind for 16 months corrected, and with a loss of words.
Social and emotional. Smiles at the parent, observed. Plays peekaboo when the parent starts it, reported. Response to name: called by name three times during the visit, turned on the third, observed. Brings toys to show the parent: "not usually," reported.
Judgment: some concern, particularly response to name and showing.
Observed or Reported
Each skill above is labeled. Reported skills are not discounted, but they carry less weight than skills seen, and a skill the parent reports and that I could not observe is recorded as reported, not as present.
Lost Skills Read Differently
A child who is slow to gain words is a different concern from a child who had words and has lost them. Loss of language or social skills at any age is a red flag that calls for prompt evaluation, both for hearing loss and for autism spectrum disorder (Zwaigenbaum et al., 2015). The parent did not raise the lost words as a worry; I asked directly, "Are there any words A.B. used to say and doesn't say now?" and the parent listed three.
Screening
Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F), completed by the parent at the visit: score 5, in the medium-risk range. The follow-up interview, done in clinic, confirmed failures on pointing to show interest, response to name and bringing objects to show. The tool's validation study found that children screening positive after the follow-up interview frequently received a diagnosis of autism or another developmental condition (Robins et al., 2014).
Ages and Stages Questionnaire, at corrected age: gross motor and fine motor above the cutoff; communication and personal-social below.
Assessment
Language delay with regression of words, and social communication concerns, at a corrected age of 16 months, with a positive autism screen after follow-up. Motor development on track for corrected age.
Actions With Dates
Today: referral to the state early intervention program, which assesses children under 3 at no cost to the family. The early intervention coordinator was called during the visit; the intake call is scheduled for 3 days from now.
Within 2 weeks: formal audiology assessment, booked before the family left, because hearing loss can cause both language delay and poor response to name.
Within 4 weeks: referral to developmental pediatrics for diagnostic evaluation. The waiting list is about 4 months; early intervention services can begin before a diagnosis.
4 weeks from today: follow-up visit with the parent to review the audiology result and the early intervention assessment.
What Was Said to the Parent
I told the parent that A.B. is moving and using hands well for age, that the lost words and some social skills need a closer look and that the earlier help starts, the better. I said that a screen is not a diagnosis. The parent asked whether being born early explained it. I said that prematurity raises the chance of developmental differences, which is one reason to look closely, but that using corrected age had already accounted for being born early.
Why Corrected Age Did Not Explain the Findings
Using corrected age moves every milestone expectation 2 months earlier, which explains why A.B. walks later than an 18-month-old born at term might. It does not explain losing words, which is not a feature of prematurity. Nor does it explain the social findings: a 16-month-old usually points to show interest and turns to a familiar voice saying their name. Correction answers the motor question and leaves the language and social questions standing.
What the Screens Can and Cannot Say
The M-CHAT-R/F is a screen for autism risk, not a diagnosis, and a positive result after the follow-up interview means the child needs a diagnostic evaluation. The Ages and Stages Questionnaire shows where development sits against age norms in each domain. Together they confirm what was observed: a child developing in movement and hand skills and behind in language and social communication. Neither can say why.
Why Act Before a Diagnosis
A diagnosis may take months, given the waiting list for developmental pediatrics. Early intervention services in the United States do not require a diagnosis; a documented delay is enough. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends referral to early intervention as soon as a delay is identified, at the same time as any diagnostic referral (Lipkin et al., 2020). Waiting for a diagnosis before starting help would waste the months when therapy may matter most.
What the Parent Will Do Meanwhile
The parent was given three things to try at home before the early intervention visit: naming objects A.B. looks at, waiting a few seconds for A.B. to respond before helping, and reading picture books together for ten minutes a day. The parent was asked to write down any new words or any further words lost.
Limits
A single visit, with a tired child at the end of the morning. The parent's report of lost words is the most important finding and was not seen directly.
References
Lipkin, P. H., Macias, M. M., Council on Children with Disabilities, & Section on Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. (2020). Promoting optimal development: Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders through developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics, 145(1), e20193449. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-3449
Robins, D. L., Casagrande, K., Barton, M., Chen, C.-M. A., Dumont-Mathieu, T., & Fein, D. (2014). Validation of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-up (M-CHAT-R/F). Pediatrics, 133(1), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1813
Zwaigenbaum, L., Bauman, M. L., Fein, D., Pierce, K., Buie, T., Davis, P. A., Newschaffer, C., Robins, D. L., Wetherby, A., Choueiri, R., Kasari, C., Stone, W. L., Yirmiya, N., Estes, A., Hansen, R. L., McPartland, J. C., Natowicz, M. R., Carter, A., Granpeesheh, D., ... Wagner, S. (2015). Early identification of autism spectrum disorder: Recommendations for practice and research. Pediatrics, 136(Suppl. 1), S10-S40. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-3667C
What the NR 602 Week 4 assignment asks for
The Week 4 write-up sorts before it judges. Handle gross motor, fine motor, language and social skills as four separate accounts, because a child behind in one is different from a child behind in all four. Label each skill by where it came from: seen in the room or reported by the parent. Correct for prematurity before comparing with milestones. Read lost skills differently from slow ones. End with actions that carry dates. Most rubrics mark down a milestone checklist with no interpretation, a concern identified with no action, chronological age used for a preterm infant and four domains collapsed into one impression.
Inside the NR 602 Week 4 example
The sample explains why the child is judged at 16 months corrected. Gross and fine motor skills are on track, each labeled observed or reported. Language shows one word observed and three words reported lost. Social skills show a late response to name and little showing of toys. The lost words are read as a red flag. The autism screen, confirmed by follow-up interview, and a developmental questionnaire are reported. Actions are booked with dates: early intervention intake in three days, audiology within two weeks and developmental pediatrics. Sections explain why correction did not explain the findings, why help starts before diagnosis and what the parent will do meanwhile. Margin notes mark where the domains and dated actions meet the rubric.
NR 602 Week 4 rubric: what full points look like
The largest loss is a checklist with no interpretation, and every domain here ends with a judgment. A concern identified with no action costs the next share, while three referrals are booked with dates. Chronological age for a preterm infant loses a row, and the write-up corrects first and explains why. Collapsing four domains hides the pattern, so they are kept apart. Treating a parent's report as equal to observation loses marks, and each skill is labeled. Reading lost words as a separate signal earns the red-flag criterion. Explaining why corrected age did not account for the findings shows the correction was used, not just recorded. Giving the parent things to do while waiting keeps the family involved.
Common NR 602 Week 4 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Weak NR 602 Week 4 write-ups tick off milestones with no conclusion. Others identify a delay and stop. Many use chronological age for a baby born early. Domains are often merged into one impression. Lost skills are sometimes recorded as slow progress. Correct the age, assess each domain separately, label what you saw and what you were told and ask directly about lost skills. Then book the actions before the family leaves. If your child's history differs, share the birth week and the skills you observed, and we can work through a sample write-up with you. Ask the parent directly whether any words or skills have disappeared.
Get a NR 602 Week 4 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 4 case and the age you were assigned, and a custom example is written to it and returned inside 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free. If a particular screening instrument is named in your instructions, say so and the example carries its reasoning through to that tool.
More NR 602 papers and FNP samples
- NR 602 Week 1: Prenatal Surveillance Post
- NR 602 Week 2: Prenatal Visit Note
- NR 602 Week 3: Well Child Growth Write-Up
- NR 602 Week 5: Anticipatory Guidance Handout
- NR 602 Week 6: Pediatric SOAP Note
- NR 602 Week 7: Case Study Analysis
- NR 602 Week 8: Practice Reflection
- NR 601 Week 4: Falls Case Analysis
- NR 566 Week 4: Pediatric Amoxicillin Dosing Write-Up
- NR 511 Week 4: Case Analysis, Acute Knee Swelling
NR 602 Week 4 questions, answered
Do milestones need a source?
Yes, and one current national source used consistently is better than several mixed together, since different references place the same skill at slightly different ages and a write-up that borrows from all of them ends up contradicting itself. Name the reference once, then let every expected range in the document come from it.
What if the child in the case is fine?
Then the write-up says so and shows the comparison that supports it, which is more work than it sounds. Normal has to be demonstrated domain by domain against a stated range, and the guidance still has to look forward to skills that are not there yet. A case with nothing wrong is often marked harder, because there is nowhere to hide thin reasoning.
How firm should the conclusion be?
Firmer than hedging, softer than diagnosis. What is expected at this level is a clear statement of whether the pattern falls inside or outside the expected range, followed by a named next step. Refusing to commit reads as avoidance, while a confident developmental diagnosis from one office visit reads as overreach, and both lose points.
Where can I find a free NR 602 Week 4 sample paper?
The full development write-up for a preterm 18-month-old assessed at corrected age is published on this page.
Why are lost words treated differently in the NR 602 Week 4 write-up?
Losing language or social skills at any age is a red flag that calls for prompt hearing and autism evaluation, unlike slow progress.