| Course | NR 705A DNP Project & Practicum II |
|---|---|
| Week | 6 |
| Paper type | Survey instrument draft |
| Length | About 1,110 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 705A Week 6
Survey Instrument Draft: A Short Staff Survey on the Same-Day Behavioral Health Introduction, Written Out in Full With Its Introduction and Response Options
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 705A: DNP Project & Practicum II
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Survey Instrument Draft: A Short Staff Survey on the Same-Day Behavioral Health Introduction, Written Out in Full With Its Introduction and Response Options
Purpose
To measure, at the end of the 12-week test, how acceptable and feasible the same-day introduction is to the staff who carry it out. Acceptability and feasibility are separate implementation outcomes from whether a change works (Proctor et al., 2011), and a change staff find unworkable is unlikely to last after the project. The item design follows the logic of brief validated measures of acceptability and feasibility (Weiner et al., 2017), adapted to this specific workflow.
The Form
Introduction, as respondents will read it:
"This survey is about the same-day introduction to the behavioral health counselor that started on 1 March. It takes about four minutes. Your answers are anonymous: the survey does not ask your name, and results will be shared only when at least five people in a group have answered. Taking part is voluntary and will not affect your job. Thank you."
1. What is your role at this site?
( ) Medical assistant ( ) Primary care clinician ( ) Behavioral health consultant or psychologist ( ) Behavioral health assistant ( ) Other
2. In the past two weeks, how many times were you involved in a same-day introduction?
( ) None ( ) 1 or 2 ( ) 3 to 5 ( ) 6 or more ( ) Not sure
If you answered "None," skip to question 7.
3. The same-day introduction fits into my usual work.
( ) Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Neither agree nor disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( ) Does not apply to my role
4. I have enough time to do my part of the same-day introduction.
( ) Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Neither agree nor disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( ) Does not apply to my role
5. The pocket card or one-page summary tells me what I need to do.
( ) Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Neither agree nor disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree ( ) I have not used them
6. In the past two weeks, how often did the same-day introduction delay your next patient?
( ) Never ( ) Once ( ) 2 or 3 times ( ) More than 3 times ( ) Not sure
7. I would like the same-day introduction to continue after the project ends.
( ) Strongly disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Neither agree nor disagree ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly agree
8. What one change would make the same-day introduction work better? (Optional, free text)
Why Each Item Is There
A short survey earns its brevity only if every item serves a decision. Item 1 allows results by role, which matters because each role carries a different part of the change. Item 2 identifies who has experience to answer items 3 to 6. Items 3 and 4 measure feasibility from two angles, fit and time. Item 5 tests the change package. Item 6 links to the visit length balancing measure from the staff side. Item 7 measures acceptability and intention to continue. Item 8 collects suggestions without forcing an answer.
Every item earns its place: an item about general job satisfaction was cut because it would not change any decision about the project, and an item about training quality was folded into item 5 to keep the form short enough to finish in four minutes.
Response Options and Recall
Every item includes an option for respondents to whom it does not apply or who are not sure, so nobody is forced to guess. The recall period is two weeks, short enough to remember how many introductions one took part in.
The Read-Aloud Pass
A survey that makes sense to its author can still confuse the people who answer it. On 2 February 2027, two medical assistants and one clinician read the draft aloud and said what they understood each item to mean. Two changes followed: "warm handoff," the project's term, was replaced with "same-day introduction," which staff actually say; and item 6 originally asked about "workflow disruption," which one medical assistant read as computer problems, so it now asks about delaying the next patient. The read-aloud took twenty minutes and changed two items, which is a good return for the time; a survey that staff misread would have produced results nobody could use.
How the Survey Fits the Other Measures
The weekly process measures show whether the change happened; the survey shows how staff experienced doing it. If handoff requests fall in later weeks and the survey shows that staff found the change hard to fit into their work, the two together suggest a feasibility problem rather than a lack of interest. Integrated care depends on staff sustaining routine processes (Archer et al., 2012), so feasibility matters for whether the change can outlast the project.
How Results Will Be Reported
How results are presented decides what readers take from them. Agreement items will be reported as counts at each response point, by role, not as averages, so that a split between groups is visible. Free-text answers will be grouped by theme and quoted only where no respondent could be identified. With only one behavioral health consultant and one assistant, their role will be combined with the psychologist's in reporting, so that no single person's answers can be picked out, and that rule will be stated at the top of the results.
Administration
The timing and method are chosen to reach staff when they can answer. Online, with a printed option at the front desk, in the last week of the test, May 2027. Expected respondents: about 24 staff, of whom about 14 are medical assistants and clinicians who will have used the workflow most. The survey will be translated into Spanish for any staff member who prefers it. A reminder will go out after three days, and the survey will close after one week. Responses will be stored in the health center's survey tool, not on the student's devices.
What the Survey Cannot Show
Whether patients found the introduction acceptable. A patient survey was considered and set aside for this term because the site agreement allows staff contact for the project but not patient contact.
References
Archer, J., Bower, P., Gilbody, S., Lovell, K., Richards, D., Gask, L., Dickens, C., & Coventry, P. (2012). Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012(10), CD006525. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006525.pub2
Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
Weiner, B. J., Lewis, C. C., Stanick, C., Powell, B. J., Dorsey, C. N., Clary, A. S., Boynton, M. H., & Halko, H. (2017). Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Science, 12, Article 108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3
What the NR 705A Week 6 assignment asks for
Submit the whole form, starting with the words a respondent actually reads: who is asking, how long it takes and what happens to the answers. Number the items. Make each item stem ask one thing, and give response options that cover every reasonable answer, including one for cases where the question does not apply. Keep the recall period short enough to answer without guessing. Mark skip patterns. Explain why each item earns its place and cut any that would not change a decision. Read the form aloud with a few intended respondents and report what changed. Say how it will be administered and how results will be reported.
Inside the NR 705A Week 6 example
The sample's introduction promises anonymity, four minutes and reporting only for groups of five or more. Items ask role, how many introductions the respondent joined in two weeks with a skip for none, whether the change fits usual work, whether there is enough time, whether the pocket card helps, how often it delayed the next patient, whether it should continue and one free-text suggestion. Each item is justified, and a job satisfaction item was cut. A read-aloud with two medical assistants and a clinician replaced the project's term with the staff's own and fixed an item misread as being about computers. The survey runs online in May, with results by role as counts. Results will be reported as counts by role, with small roles combined so no individual can be identified.
Where the points sit in the NR 705A Week 6 rubric
Survey drafts lose most when they list topics instead of writing the actual items and options respondents will see. Next are double-barreled items that ask two things at once. Response options often miss reasonable answers, especially does not apply, forcing guesses. Long recall periods produce unreliable answers. Many surveys include items that would not change any decision, lengthening the form without benefit. Few drafts are tested by reading aloud with real respondents, so misunderstood words survive. Reporting averages instead of counts by role can hide disagreement between groups, which graders often point out. Drafts that never say how results will be reported also invite averages that hide disagreement. Administration details are often missing.
Common NR 705A Week 6 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Writing a short survey that staff will actually complete and understand takes careful wording. Item by item, we can help you draft the introduction, single-question stems and complete response options, and decide which items earn their place. We can also help you plan a read-aloud test and decide how results will be reported. Reading the form aloud with two or three intended respondents usually changes at least one item. The survey is yours. Settling in advance how you will present results helps as well, since it decides what readers take away.
Get a NR 705A Week 6 example written to your instructions
Forward the instrument requirements from your classroom, plus the rubric and the measures the form has to serve, and a custom NR 705A Week 6 draft comes back inside 24-48h, the first one free. Say whether your project needs a survey, an audit form or both, since the two are built differently.
More NR 705A papers and DNP samples
- NR 705A Week 1: Change Proposal Post
- NR 705A Week 2: Intervention Design
- NR 705A Week 3: Change Package Outline
- NR 705A Week 4: Baseline Description
- NR 705A Week 5: Measure Definitions
- NR 705A Week 7: Approval Determination Memo
- NR 705A Week 8: Design Defense Summary
- NR 702A Week 6: Project Charter
NR 705A Week 6 questions, answered
What does a pre-test look like when the project has not started?
It runs on colleagues rather than on patients, and it is about the form rather than about the answers. Three or four people fill it in while somebody watches, then explain in their own words what each item was asking. Hesitations and rewordings are the findings. A short cognitive interview of that kind usually changes two or three stems and costs an afternoon.
My project needs an audit form, not a survey. Does the week still apply?
Yes, and the genre in the classroom often covers both. An audit form is the easier of the two to build badly, because the writer is also the person filling it and every ambiguity feels resolved. Each line needs an observable definition and a written rule, exactly as a measure row does, or two auditors will produce two different forms.
How many items is too many?
The limit is the time the person answering actually has, not a number on a page. A form handed to staff between tasks rarely survives past about ten items, and one given to patients at discharge less than that. Anything beyond the measures the table calls for is usually cut, since unused answers still have to be stored and explained.
Where can I find a free NR 705A Week 6 sample paper?
Here you will find the complete staff survey draft for a same-day behavioral health introduction.
What did the NR 705A Week 6 read-aloud change?
It replaced the project's term warm handoff with the staff's own phrase and reworded an item that a medical assistant read as being about computer problems.