| Course | NR 705A DNP Project & Practicum II |
|---|---|
| Week | 2 |
| Paper type | Intervention design paper |
| Length | About 1,140 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 705A Week 2
Intervention Design Paper: The Same-Day Behavioral Health Introduction Written as a Recipe, With Its Trigger, Actors, Dose, What It Displaces and Edge Conditions
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 705A: DNP Project & Practicum II
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Intervention Design Paper: The Same-Day Behavioral Health Introduction Written as a Recipe, With Its Trigger, Actors, Dose, What It Displaces and Edge Conditions
The Trigger
A PHQ-9 total of 10 or more entered on the rooming tablet during an adult primary care visit at the site. The tablet already calculates the total and files it in a structured field in the record. The trigger is the score appearing, not anyone's memory: the medical assistant sees it on the tablet before leaving the room.
The Actors, in Order
Medical assistant. On seeing a score of 10 or more, sends a one-line secure message to the behavioral health consultant's group: room number, patient's preferred language, and "PHQ 10+, warm handoff request." Then tells the patient, in the patient's language: "Our behavioral health counselor may stop by today. Is that all right with you?" Records the patient's answer in the visit note template.
Primary care clinician. Reviews the score and the patient's answer before or at the start of the visit, asks about safety as usual, and, if the patient agrees, says before the end of the visit: "I'd like you to meet our counselor today, before you go." If the consultant has not arrived by the end of the visit, walks the patient to the consultant's office or the waiting area outside it.
Behavioral health consultant. On receiving the message, replies within five minutes with one of three answers: "coming now," "in 20 minutes" or "booked, use open slot at 10:00 or 14:00." Joins the visit or meets the patient after it, for 10 to 20 minutes: introduction, brief assessment, a plan for the next contact, booked before the patient leaves.
Behavioral health assistant. Checks the daily list at 16:30 for any positive screen that did not get a same-day contact, and at 08:30 the next business day calls those patients, using a script in the patient's language.
The Dose
Every qualifying adult visit, Monday to Friday, 08:30 to 16:00: about 20 a week, or 4 a day. One same-day contact per eligible patient, 10 to 20 minutes. One next-business-day call for any eligible patient not seen the same day, with up to three attempts over three days. The change runs for 12 weeks in the test term, from 1 March to 24 May 2027.
What It Displaces
Two 30-minute booked follow-up slots a day on the consultant's template, at 10:00 and 14:00, become open-access slots for same-day contacts. That removes about ten booked follow-up visits a week. The behavioral health director will shift those follow-ups to the psychologist's Tuesday and Thursday sessions and to telehealth slots in the late afternoon. The behavioral health assistant's afternoon callback work shifts to 08:30 the next morning, displacing the time currently used for appointment reminders, which move to an automated text system already licensed.
This is the element a unit notices first, and it is written down so that the team can see exactly what it gives up.
Edge Conditions
Consultant with another patient and no open slot left: the medical assistant books the patient into the next day's open slot, and the behavioral health assistant calls that afternoon to confirm.
Positive screen after 16:00 or on Saturday: no same-day attempt; next-business-day call by 12:00.
Patient declines a same-day introduction: recorded with the reason in the patient's words; next-business-day call still offered.
Patient reports active suicidal thoughts: the existing safety protocol takes over, and the clinician and consultant manage the patient together; the warm handoff design does not change safety procedures.
Patient's preferred language not spoken by the consultant: telephone or video interpreter, as for any visit.
Patient already in behavioral health care at the health center: the consultant is still messaged and decides whether to see them or notify their current clinician.
Why This Design
In the IMPACT trial, collaborative care helped older adults with depression partly because a care manager made early, structured contact (Unützer et al., 2002). A warm handoff applies the same principle at the moment of the visit. The design keeps the next-business-day call because one study found that warm handoffs did not work equally well for all groups (Horevitz et al., 2015), and patients who decline a same-day meeting should still be reached quickly.
How the Design Was Built
The design came from the workflow map made in the first term, which showed patients leaving the building before anyone from behavioral health knew about them, and from the behavioral health team's meeting, where the consultant said, "If I could just meet them, they'd come back." The medical assistants suggested messaging before the clinician enters, since the clinician's visit is when the patient is most likely to agree. The scheduling office suggested the two fixed open slots rather than a floating block, because fixed slots are easier to protect from overbooking. Integrated care research describes the same need for routine, low-friction contact between primary care and behavioral health (Archer et al., 2012).
What Would Make Staff Abandon It
Every change has a point at which the people carrying it give up, and it is better to name it in advance. A day when four positive screens arrive at once and the consultant is booked: the edge conditions handle it, but if it happens often, staff will stop messaging. The design counts handoff requests weekly so that falling use is seen early. If requests fall below two thirds of eligible visits for two weeks running, the student and the director of behavioral health will meet the medical assistants to find out why before anything else changes. Asking the people who carry a change why they stopped is cheaper than guessing.
A Day in the Test, Described
A Tuesday in March: at 09:40 a medical assistant rooms a 46-year-old patient for a diabetes visit, the PHQ-9 total is 14, and the assistant messages the group and asks the patient about meeting the counselor. The consultant replies "in 20 minutes." The clinician sees the patient, discusses the score and, at 10:05, walks the patient to the consultant's office for the 10:00 open slot, which the consultant has held. The consultant spends fifteen minutes with the patient and books a follow-up for the next week. At 16:30 the assistant's list shows one positive screen from a 17:15 visit the previous day; the call is made at 08:35.
What the Design Does Not Change
The PHQ-9 screening process, the safety protocol, behavioral health treatment after the first contact and the electronic record. Each is outside the project's scope and stays as it is.
References
Archer, J., Bower, P., Gilbody, S., Lovell, K., Richards, D., Gask, L., Dickens, C., & Coventry, P. (2012). Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012(10), CD006525. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006525.pub2
Horevitz, E., Organista, K. C., & Arean, P. A. (2015). Depression treatment uptake in integrated primary care: How a "warm handoff" and other factors affect decision making by Latinos. Psychiatric Services, 66(8), 824-830. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201400085
Unützer, J., Katon, W., Callahan, C. M., Williams, J. W., Jr., Hunkeler, E., Harpole, L., Hoffing, M., Della Penna, R. D., Noël, P. H., Lin, E. H. B., Areán, P. A., Hegel, M. T., Tang, L., Belin, T. R., Oishi, S., & Langston, C. (2002). Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 288(22), 2836-2845. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.22.2836
The Chamberlain NR 705A Week 2 instructions
Write the design as a recipe. Name the trigger, the event that starts the change, so nothing depends on anyone remembering. Name each actor by role and say what that person does, in order, with whatever object is in their hand. Give the dose as numbers: how often, to how many and for how long. Say what each actor stops doing to make room, which is the element most designs skip and the one a unit notices first. Write out the edge conditions, especially what happens when the main actor is unavailable, when the patient declines and when safety takes over. Explain where the design came from and say what it does not change.
How this NR 705A Week 2 example is built
The sample's trigger is a PHQ-9 total of 10 or more on the tablet. The medical assistant sends a one-line message and asks the patient's permission; the clinician introduces the consultant; the consultant replies within five minutes and meets the patient for 10 to 20 minutes; the assistant checks a daily list and calls after-hours patients by 08:30 the next working day. The dose is about 20 patients a week for 12 weeks. Two follow-up slots a day become open slots, with follow-ups moved to the psychologist and telehealth. Edge conditions cover a busy consultant, evening and Saturday screens, refusals, suicidal thoughts, interpreters and patients already in care, and a Tuesday is described step by step. The design's origins in the workflow map and team meeting are explained, and a rule triggers a staff meeting if handoff requests fall.
Where the points sit in the NR 705A Week 2 rubric
Design papers lose most when they explain why the change should work and never say who does what. Next is a trigger that depends on someone remembering, which fails on busy days. Many designs give no dose, so nobody knows how often or for how long the change runs. The displaced work is almost always missing, though it is what staff notice first and resist most. Edge conditions are often skipped, leaving staff to improvise when the main actor is unavailable. Designs that do not say what stays unchanged can alarm teams who fear the whole service is being redesigned. Designs that never describe a typical day also make the recipe harder to picture. Graders look for where the design came from.
Common NR 705A Week 2 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Writing a design as a recipe, with actors, dose and edge conditions, shows quickly where the plan is vague. Working from your design notes, we can fix the trigger, set out each actor's steps and give the dose as numbers. We can also help you name what the change displaces and write out the edge conditions. Walking through one ordinary day with the people involved usually reveals an edge condition you had missed. The design is yours. Describing one ordinary day step by step is worth doing too.
Get a NR 705A Week 2 example written to your instructions
Paste the Week 2 assignment page and any template your section supplies into the request, and a custom NR 705A intervention design paper written to it lands inside 24-48h, the first one free. Tell the desk which change you have chosen and how much of it is settled, and the example is built around that.
More NR 705A papers and DNP samples
- NR 705A Week 1: Change Proposal Post
- NR 705A Week 3: Change Package Outline
- NR 705A Week 4: Baseline Description Write-up
- NR 705A Week 5: Measure Definition Table
- NR 705A Week 6: Survey Instrument Draft
- NR 705A Week 7: Approval Determination Memo
- NR 705A Week 8: Design Defense Summary
- NR 702A Week 2: Practice Gap Write-Up
NR 705A Week 2 questions, answered
Does every element need a citation?
Not every one, and pretending otherwise produces a paper where the citations stop meaning anything. Each element is marked as settled by evidence or settled by a limit at your site, and both are legitimate. What draws a comment is an element with neither: a number chosen because it sounded reasonable, sitting in a document that will be held to it later.
Is this the implementation plan?
No. This term settles what the change is; the plan for putting it into a unit, with its schedule, its coverage and its contingencies, belongs to the term after. Keeping them apart matters at the marking stage, because a design paper carrying a rollout calendar usually has a thin trigger section underneath it and loses points there.
The change I want needs a system build. Is that a problem?
Scope is what faculty will actually comment on here. A design resting on something a technical team has not agreed to build carries a dependency nobody owns, and the usual answer is a version that works on paper first. Saying which parts would need a build, and what the change looks like without them, reads as judgment rather than retreat.
Where can I find a free NR 705A Week 2 sample paper?
This page holds the full intervention design paper for a same-day behavioral health introduction, written as a recipe.
What does the NR 705A Week 2 design displace?
Two booked follow-up slots a day on the consultant's schedule, moved to the psychologist's days and telehealth, and the assistant's reminder calls, moved to automated texts.