This page holds a finished PA-602 Week 6 apology wording review that marks a supplied draft line by line and gives a reason for each replacement. Searches like "pa 602 week 6 assignment example", "pa602 week 6 sample" and "pa-602 week 6 example" land here.
What a finished PA-602 Week 6 apology wording review looks like
Three columns, or something that behaves like three. The left holds the original line exactly as supplied, including whatever is clumsy about it. The middle holds the replacement, written out in full rather than described. The right holds one sentence on what the change does to the person reading, and that is the column marks are awarded in. Every row is numbered against the draft above it, so a reader finds the line without counting down the paragraph. A finished version does not rewrite every line: several are marked as sound and left alone, and saying so is part of the judgment being tested. Under the table sits a short passage naming the habit the draft keeps repeating, since most weak apologies have one rather than twelve separate faults.
How a PA-602 Week 6 example is structured
Where your section supplies its own review form, use it and put the reasoning in whatever field it leaves open. Otherwise a version that reads finished opens with the draft reproduced whole, so a reader sees it before it gets taken apart. A note on the addressee follows: who this is going to, what they already know, and what they will be looking for in the first line. The line-by-line pass then runs in document order rather than in order of severity, because anybody marking against the draft needs to follow it down the page. Lines that work are marked as such and passed over. After the pass comes the section naming the one habit running through it. A closing paragraph says what the revised version now commits its writer to that the original did not.
Original, replacement, reason
Three things on every line, and the reason is what earns points. A replacement offered with no account of what it changes for a reader is a preference rather than a review.
Find the missing subject
Sentences where the event has no author are the commonest fault in a supplied draft. Marking one is easy; saying what the absent subject does to a reader is the graded half.
Watch the pronoun drift
A draft beginning at I and sliding to we and then to the practice has moved a person out of the sentence. Track the drift and say where it starts.
Name the euphemism
A process word standing in for the thing that happened is the change most reviewers accept without noticing, because it reads as professional. Put the plain version beside it.
Leave the good lines alone
Mark the sentences that work and pass over them. A review touching every line reads as an exercise, and the judgment under examination here is partly about restraint.
Where marks go in PA-602 Week 6
A review that only tidies the sentences gives back the most, arriving with a cleaner draft and no account of what any single change accomplishes. Beside it sits the wholesale rewrite, where the original disappears and a marker cannot see what was wrong, which converts a review into a different assignment altogether. Then the reviewer who finds twelve unrelated faults and no habit, so nothing generalizes past this one paragraph. The cheaper losses: grammar terms used as verdicts, with the passive voice noted and its effect on a reader never stated; replacements longer than the originals; a euphemism accepted because it sounds professional; and no note on who the letter goes to, which decides half the choices above it.
Get a PA-602 Week 6 example written to your instructions
Send the assignment, the rubric and the draft your section supplied, and an example review comes back marked against that exact paragraph rather than a substitute one. It takes 24-48h and the first costs nothing. Write PA-602 and the week at the top of the message so it reaches a writer on this seminar.
PA-602 Week 6 questions, answered
What if the supplied draft is genuinely good?
Then the review argues that, line by line, rather than in a paragraph of approval. Say what each sentence achieves and for whom, then find the one place a reader could still take it the wrong way. A review concluding that a draft works, with the evidence attached to particular lines, marks above one that invents faults to look thorough.
Am I allowed to change the facts in the draft?
No, and doing it is a quick way to lose the week. The review works on wording, so the events, dates and people in the supplied paragraph stay exactly where they are. Where a fact looks wrong or missing, flag it in the reason column as something the writer would need to confirm, and leave the line itself untouched.
Does the review need sources?
Usually light ones, and check what your section asks for. Where citations are wanted they tend to sit in the closing section rather than against individual lines, supporting a claim about how people read an account of harm. A pass carrying a citation on every row reads as padding and pushes out the reasons, which is where the points are.