| Course | NR 394 Transcultural Nursing |
|---|---|
| Week | 2 |
| Paper type | Cultural self-assessment paper |
| Length | About 1,120 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | RN-to-BSN |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 394 Week 2
Culturally Aware, Not Yet Competent: What a Self-Assessment Inventory Showed About My Practice
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 394: Transcultural Nursing
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Culturally Aware, Not Yet Competent: What a Self-Assessment Inventory Showed About My Practice
The Instrument and the Result
I completed the Inventory for Assessing the Process of Cultural Competence Among Healthcare Professionals, Revised, a 25-item self-report instrument developed by Campinha-Bacote to measure the five constructs of her model of cultural competence: cultural awareness, cultural knowledge, cultural skill, cultural encounters and cultural desire (Campinha-Bacote, 2002, 2007). I chose it over the other inventories offered in the course because it is built on a nursing model and because its items ask about behaviors as well as attitudes. Scores range from 25 to 100 and are grouped into four levels: culturally incompetent, culturally aware, culturally competent and culturally proficient. I answered each item as I actually practice rather than as I think a nurse should.
My total score was 68, which places me in the culturally aware range, below the threshold for culturally competent. My highest-scoring items concerned cultural desire and awareness: I want to care well for patients from backgrounds different from mine and I recognize that my own background shapes how I see patients. My lowest-scoring items concerned cultural skill, especially conducting a cultural assessment, and cultural knowledge of specific groups in my community.
What the Result Asserts and What I Accept
The result asserts that I am aware of cultural difference and motivated to respond to it but do not yet have the skills to act on that awareness consistently. I accept most of that. The low skill scores fit my practice closely: I do not use a structured cultural assessment on admission, and I rarely ask patients about beliefs or practices that might affect their care unless a problem forces the question. I also accept that my knowledge of specific groups is thin. My hospital serves large Somali, Hmong and Mexican American communities, and I could not describe basic health practices or concerns in any of them with confidence.
Where I disagree with the instrument is on cultural desire. My high score there reflects what I said I want, and the inventory has no way of checking whether that desire shows up in behavior. Tervalon and Murray-García (1998) argue that cultural competence framed as mastery can mislead clinicians into thinking they have finished learning, and they propose cultural humility, an ongoing practice of examining one's own assumptions and correcting the imbalance of power between clinician and patient, as a better goal. By that standard, a high desire score means little unless it produces a habit of asking patients about their own values, which I have not yet built.
Evidence From My Practice
Three recent encounters support this reading. First, last spring I charted an older Somali woman's untouched meal trays as poor appetite for two days before her daughter asked whether the food was halal. My desire to care well for her did not produce the one question that mattered, because my admission assessment did not include it. That encounter is the clearest evidence for the skill gap the inventory reported. Second, I cared for a Hmong man after surgery whose family wanted to place a string around his wrist, and I told them it had to be removed because of the identification band on the same arm. I later learned that the string is a common practice associated with protecting the patient's spirit, and that it could have been placed on the other wrist. I acted on a hospital rule without asking what the practice meant. Third, and in the other direction, I have learned from a Spanish-speaking colleague to ask Mexican American patients whether they are using any home remedies or teas, and patients have usually answered openly. That habit came from a colleague, not from an assessment tool, and it is the kind of skill the inventory asks about.
What the Result Means for Care
The practical meaning of a culturally aware but not competent score is that I will recognize cultural difference when it announces itself, as when a family member raises a question, but I will miss it when it does not. Patients who do not volunteer their beliefs, often those with the least power in the encounter, are the ones my current practice fails. Campinha-Bacote (2002) places cultural encounters at the center of her model because direct interaction with patients from other backgrounds is how knowledge and skill develop, and she describes cultural competence as a process rather than an endpoint. My result suggests that the encounters are happening every shift but that I am not using them to learn, because I rarely ask the questions that would make them informative.
Where My Blind Spots Come From
The inventory does not ask why a nurse scores as she does, but the question matters for change. My own background explains some of my blind spots. I grew up in a small town where nearly everyone shared my language, religion and food habits, and my nursing education presented culture mostly as a list of facts about groups, which I memorized for an examination and did not use. My unit's routines reinforce the pattern. The admission assessment asks detailed questions about medications, falls and skin but only one question about religion, a yes or no about wanting a chaplain visit. When the tools I use every shift ask nothing about beliefs, it is easy to believe that beliefs rarely matter to care.
Knowing where the blind spots come from also suggests where to push. The unit's admission assessment is revised every year by a committee, and I can propose adding the explanatory questions I plan to use myself, so that the habit does not depend on my memory alone.
One Change I Could Fail At
The change I am committing to is narrow on purpose. At every admission for the next two months, after the standard admission questions, I will ask three open questions adapted from the explanatory model approach: what the patient thinks caused the problem, what the patient is most worried about, and whether there is anything about the patient's beliefs, religion, food or family that the care team should know. I will record the answers in the admission note. To check myself, I will review my own admission notes for one week each month; if fewer than four in five of my admissions include the answers, I have not met the goal. I will retake the inventory at the end of the course, but I will treat my admission notes, not the score, as the evidence of change.
References
Campinha-Bacote, J. (2002). The process of cultural competence in the delivery of healthcare services: A model of care. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13(3), 181-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/10459602013003003
Campinha-Bacote, J. (2007). The process of cultural competence in the delivery of healthcare services: The journey continues (5th ed.). Transcultural C.A.R.E. Associates.
Tervalon, M., & Murray-García, J. (1998). Cultural humility versus cultural competence: A critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 9(2), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2010.0233
What the NR 394 Week 2 assignment asks for
The Week 2 paper asks you to complete a cultural self-assessment and reflect on the results. Required parts tend to be the tool used, your results, an interpretation of strengths and areas for growth, examples from practice, the influence of your background and a plan for development, in APA. Name the instrument and cite it. Report the score briefly, since interpretation is where the grade sits. Argue with the result where it does not fit, and say what the tool cannot measure. Support your interpretation with specific encounters, each attached to one claim. Explain the origin of your blind spots without turning the paper into family history. Commit to one behavior with a trigger and a check.
Inside the NR 394 Week 2 example
The first section describes the revised inventory, its five constructs and the reason for choosing it, then reports a total of 68 with high desire and awareness items and low skill items. The second accepts the skill result and disputes the desire score, citing Tervalon and Murray-García. The evidence section gives three encounters, including the Somali woman's trays charted as poor appetite. The section on meaning explains that the writer notices difference when it announces itself and misses it otherwise. The section on origins traces blind spots to a small-town upbringing and a unit where the screen does not ask, and proposes changes to the admission assessment. The commitment is three open questions at every admission for two months, checked monthly.
Where the points sit in the NR 394 Week 2 rubric
Self-assessment rubrics for NR 394 generally award points for accurate use of the instrument, depth of interpretation, specific practice examples, insight into personal background, a measurable plan, use of sources and APA. Interpretation drives this rubric, so the paper disputes part of its own score and naming what the instrument cannot see. Examples are credited because each encounter supports one claim. Background insight scores when the origin of blind spots is explained briefly and tied to change. The plan row is met by a single behavior with a trigger and a monthly check, four in five admissions, that could clearly fail. Campinha-Bacote's model and Tervalon and Murray-García's distinction support the analysis.
Common NR 394 Week 2 mistakes, and how to avoid them
The most costly version of this paper is a heritage essay, pages about grandparents and family meals that answer a different assignment. Another is a score reported and accepted without interpretation, so the paper has nothing to argue. Students also claim competence everywhere, use examples that do not connect to the result, or set goals such as "be more open-minded." Long descriptions of the instrument use space without earning points. A published tool is usually required, so check your course materials. First person is expected. If you have your score but are unsure what it says about your practice, share the result and an NR 394 self-assessment can be planned around it.
Get a NR 394 Week 2 example written to your instructions
Send the assignment page from your classroom, plus the rubric and the name of the instrument your section allows. We write a custom NR 394 Week 2 example against those instructions rather than from a template, and it comes back inside 24-48h. The first one costs nothing, and you can read it beside your own attempt.
More NR 394 papers and RN-to-BSN samples
- NR 394 Week 1: Cultural Misreading Discussion Post
- NR 394 Week 3: Cultural Assessment Write-up
- NR 394 Week 4: Transcultural Case Analysis
- NR 394 Week 5: Culture Care Plan
- NR 394 Week 6: Cultural Group Analysis
- NR 394 Week 7: Health Promotion Plan
- NR 394 Week 8: Reflection
- NR 395 Week 2: Ethics Case Analysis
- NR 393 Week 2: Notes on Nursing Source Analysis
- NR 436 Week 2: Windshield Survey Write-up
- NR 361 Week 2: Penicillin Allergy EHR Workflow
NR 394 Week 2 questions, answered
Does it have to be a published instrument?
Usually yes, and your section names the acceptable ones. The point of a published tool is that it asks questions you would not have asked yourself and returns a result you cannot fully control. Where a free written self-assessment is permitted instead, the paper still needs an external structure of some kind, or it drifts into an essay about how open minded the writer feels.
How much of my own background belongs in it?
Enough to explain a bias, no more. Background earns its place as evidence for a habit you carry into patient care, so a line about growing up where illness was handled privately belongs if it accounts for something you do at the bedside. Family history with no link to your practice is the easiest available way to fill four pages and answer nothing.
Is first person acceptable here?
Yes, and most rubrics require it. This is one of the few nursing papers whose subject is the writer, so I is correct and the passive constructions drilled in elsewhere make the assessment vaguer than it needs to be. Formal register and full citation practice still apply. A personal voice is not permission to drop sources or to hand in a diary entry with a reference list.
Where can I find a free NR 394 Week 2 sample paper?
This page has the full Week 2 self-assessment, the inventory result, the argument with its desire score, three practice examples, the origins of blind spots, the admission commitment and three references.
What change does the NR 394 Week 2 paper commit to?
Asking three open questions at every admission for two months, about cause, worry and beliefs, food or family, recording the answers and checking monthly that at least four in five admissions include them.