NR 394 Week 8 Transcultural Nursing Reflection Example

Transcultural Nursing Chamberlain University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

The question a medical unit nurse now asks before the meal tray arrives is the change at the center of this NR 394 Week 8 sample paper, a reflection on transcultural nursing. Chamberlain NR 394 (NR-394), Transcultural Nursing, ends with RN-to-BSN students giving evidence that their bedside care is different now. The reflection opens on a recent admission of a man from Bangladesh with a foot infection and diabetes who, asked three new questions, said Ramadan began in four days and he would fast, while his insulin was scheduled with meals. It sets that reading beside the Week 1 misreading of a Somali woman's trays, traces the questions to Kleinman and colleagues, admits a recent wrong assumption about a Hmong family, credits the other assignments, describes the patient's own account line in every admission note and ends on how to ask without singling anyone out.

CourseNR 394 Transcultural Nursing
Week8
Paper typeCourse reflection paper
LengthAbout 1,140 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolChamberlain University
ProgramRN-to-BSN
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NR 394 Week 8

1

The Question I Now Ask Before the Tray Arrives: A Reflection on Transcultural Nursing

Student Name

College of Nursing, Chamberlain University

NR 394: Transcultural Nursing

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title points to one behavior that changed, a question asked at admission, and signals a reflection built from encounters rather than a summary of the term. Student APA 7 format, no running head.
2

The Question I Now Ask Before the Tray Arrives: A Reflection on Transcultural Nursing

A Tuesday Admission

Two weeks ago I admitted a man in his sixties who had emigrated from Bangladesh and was being treated for a foot infection and poorly controlled diabetes. At the end of the admission questions, before I left the room, I asked him three things I had never asked a patient before this course: what he thought had caused the problem, what worried him most, and whether there was anything about his religion, food or family that the team should know. He answered the first two briefly. To the third, he said that Ramadan would begin in four days and that he intended to fast from dawn to sunset, as he had every year. His insulin was scheduled with meals at 0800, 1200 and 1700. None of that had come up in the emergency department, and none of it was in his record.

What this page is doingThe reflection opens inside a specific encounter from after the term began, which carries more of a reader's attention than any summary. The detail of the insulin schedule shows why the question mattered.
3

Two Readings Side by Side

My opening post for this course described a Somali woman whose untouched meal trays I had written off as poor appetite until, on the third day, her daughter raised the question of halal meat. My reading then was clinical and immediate: an untouched tray means illness. I did not ask because the admission screen did not ask, and because I did not think of food as a place where belief and care meet.

With the Bangladeshi patient, my reading started differently because I asked before anything went wrong. Had I not asked, the likely sequence is easy to imagine: on the first morning of Ramadan he would have declined breakfast, I would have held his insulin or given it anyway, and either choice could have produced dangerous blood sugar. Instead, I told the diabetes educator and the physician on the first day, and they adjusted his insulin to fit a pre-dawn meal and an evening meal, following published guidance on diabetes management during Ramadan, and discussed with him the conditions under which his faith would excuse him from fasting if his health required it (Al-Arouj et al., 2010). He chose to fast with the adjusted plan, and his blood sugars stayed within his target range.

What this page is doingAn early reading is placed next to a later one, and the difference is written as changed behavior with a consequence, not as a claim about personal growth.
4

What Changed It

The question I asked grew out of the questions Kleinman et al. (1978) proposed for eliciting a patient's own account of illness, which I first read in the opening week and adapted in the second week's self-assessment into a commitment to ask three questions at every admission. My inventory score in that assessment placed me in the culturally aware range, with high desire and low skill, and I argued in that paper that desire meant nothing without a habit. The three questions are that habit. What I did not expect was how often the third question would produce something important. In eight weeks of asking it at every admission, I have learned about a fasting plan, a family member who needed to be present for any decision, a patient who wanted a female nurse for bathing, and a patient whose home remedy interacted with her anticoagulant. None of those appeared in the admission screen.

What Has Not Changed

I still make quick readings, and some of them are still wrong. Last week I assumed that a Hmong family's reluctance to consent to a surgical procedure meant they did not understand it, and I asked the physician to explain it again. The family understood perfectly well; they wanted to consult an older relative who was traveling. My reading was faster than my question, and I asked only after the physician had already repeated the explanation. In the account by Tervalon and Murray-García (1998), humility of this kind is a process kept up for a whole career, never a finished achievement, and this is what that means for me in practice: the habit of asking has changed some encounters, but it has not replaced the reflex of assuming, which still moves faster.

What this page is doingOne honest admission of a habit that has not changed makes the claimed change believable. The reflection names a specific recent misreading rather than claiming to be finished.
5

What the Other Weeks Added

The admission questions are the most visible change, but other assignments shaped how I use the answers. Writing the culture care plan for a mother doing the month taught me to sort what I learn into what to keep, what to adjust and what to change, rather than treating every cultural practice as either harmless or a problem. When the Bangladeshi patient told me about Ramadan, I did not think of the fast as an obstacle to his insulin; I thought of it as a practice to accommodate, which is why the conversation with the diabetes educator started from how to make fasting safe rather than from whether he should fast. The group analysis of Somali families in Minneapolis taught me to hold what I know about a group loosely and to expect individual patients to differ from it, which is exactly the mistake I made with the Hmong family, who did not fit the explanation I had formed. Each assignment added a step between noticing a difference and acting on it, and those steps are where my practice changed.

What I Will Keep Doing

The change I will keep is visible to anyone who reads my admission notes. Every admission note I write includes a line headed patient's own account, with the answers to the three questions, and the unit educator has asked whether the questions could be added to the admission template for the whole unit, which I will propose at the next practice council meeting. The second change is harder to see: when I notice myself forming a quick explanation for a patient's behavior, especially one that involves culture, I will ask the patient or family before acting on it. I cannot show that one on paper, but my charge nurse, who knows about the Hmong family, has agreed to ask me at the end of shifts whether I asked before assuming.

What Remains Hard

The question that remains hard for me is how to ask about belief without making patients feel singled out. I ask every patient the same three questions, partly so that no one feels targeted because of how they look or speak, but a white patient born in my town sometimes looks puzzled when I ask about religion, and a patient who has experienced discrimination may wonder why I am asking. Campinha-Bacote (2002) places cultural encounters at the center of developing competence, and each encounter teaches me something about how to ask. I have not yet found wording that feels natural to everyone, and I suspect that finding it is part of the lifelong process the course has described.

What this page is doingThe reflection closes on a genuine, unresolved problem connected to the new habit, which reads as ongoing learning rather than a finished transformation.
6

References

Al-Arouj, M., Assaad-Khalil, S., Buse, J., Fahdil, I., Fahmy, M., Hafez, S., Hassanein, M., Ibrahim, M. A., Kendall, D., Kishawi, S., Al-Madani, A., Nakhi, A. B., Tayeb, K., & Thomas, A. (2010). Recommendations for management of diabetes during Ramadan: Update 2010. Diabetes Care, 33(8), 1895-1902. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-0896

Campinha-Bacote, J. (2002). The process of cultural competence in the delivery of healthcare services: A model of care. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13(3), 181-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/10459602013003003

Kleinman, A., Eisenberg, L., & Good, B. (1978). Culture, illness, and care: Clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research. Annals of Internal Medicine, 88(2), 251-258. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-88-2-251

Tervalon, M., & Murray-García, J. (1998). Cultural humility versus cultural competence: A critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 9(2), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2010.0233

Reading the NR 394 Week 8 instructions

The final NR 394 reflection asks you to reflect on your growth in transcultural nursing and how the course will affect your practice. Most sections require specific examples of change, connection to course concepts, honest discussion of continuing challenges, plans for future practice and APA. Open inside one recent encounter rather than a summary. Place an early reading beside a later one and show the difference as behavior with a consequence. Name the reading or assignment that produced the change. Admit a habit that has not changed, with a recent example. Describe a practice anyone could see in your notes. End on a problem the new habit has not solved.

How this NR 394 Week 8 example is built

The first section describes the admission two weeks ago: three questions at the end, the answer about Ramadan in four days and insulin scheduled at 0800, 1200 and 1700, none of it in the record. The second places this beside the Week 1 trays and imagines what would have happened without asking, citing Al-Arouj and colleagues on fasting and diabetes. The third traces the questions to Kleinman and colleagues and the Week 2 commitment. The fourth admits assuming a Hmong family's hesitation meant misunderstanding. The fifth credits the culture care plan for sorting decisions into modes. The sixth describes the patient's own account line in every admission note. The last section asks how to raise belief without making patients feel targeted.

NR 394 Week 8 rubric: what full points look like

Final reflection rubrics in NR 394 usually score specific evidence of change, connection to course concepts, honesty about challenges, application to practice, a plan going forward, writing quality and APA. Proof of change outweighs every other row, which is why the paper sets two readings side by side with a consequence avoided. Course concepts are credited through Kleinman and colleagues, Campinha-Bacote and Tervalon and Murray-García used accurately. Honesty scores because a recent misreading is admitted. The practice row is met by a visible line in every admission note. The forward plan earns points for being checkable. Ending on the problem of asking without singling anyone out shows the cultural humility the course teaches.

NR 394 Week 8 help from the desk

The reflection losing most is a course review, an appreciative summary of readings and instructors with nothing about the writer's practice. Second is growth claimed without evidence, such as feeling more culturally sensitive. Students also present themselves as transformed, with no remaining mistakes, which reads as performance. Plans such as "continue learning about cultures" cannot be checked. Brief citations to the readings that caused the change strengthen the paper. You may say the course did not change your practice if you explain why honestly. If you have an encounter from this term that showed you something new, describe it and an NR 394 Week 8 reflection can open inside it.

Get a NR 394 Week 8 example written to your instructions

Send the reflection prompt, the rubric, and a line about what your earlier assignments in the course covered. We write a custom NR 394 Week 8 example to those instructions and return it inside 24-48h, free on a first request, so you can see what evidenced change reads like before writing your own.

More NR 394 papers and RN-to-BSN samples

NR 394 Week 8 questions, answered

How personal is a reflection allowed to be?

Personal about practice, not about privacy. Rubrics here reward a writer who names a specific misreading and what it cost, and reward nothing for emotional intensity by itself. Keep patients unidentifiable, keep colleagues unnamed, and let whatever feeling the piece carries come from the detail of what happened rather than from adjectives describing how strongly the writer felt.

Do citations belong in a reflection?

Almost always, and their absence is a routine deduction. The model you are reflecting on is somebody's published work, and naming it accurately is part of showing that you used it. Two or three references generally cover it: the framework itself, something from the reading that shifted your view, and occasionally a source behind the practice change you are committing to.

Can I say the course did not change my practice?

You can say a part of it did not, with a reason, and that often reads as more credible than uniform enthusiasm. What does not survive is a claim that nothing changed at all, since it means either that the assessments were done without engagement or that the reflection is not looking hard enough. Find the smallest real change and write that precisely.

Where can I find a free NR 394 Week 8 sample paper?

This page has the complete Week 8 reflection on asking three questions at admission, the Ramadan and insulin example, the comparison with Week 1, the admitted misreading, the admission note practice and four references.

What three questions does the writer ask at admission in the NR 394 Week 8 reflection?

What the patient thinks caused the problem, what worries the patient most, and whether anything about the patient's religion, food or family should be known by the team.