| Course | NR 394 Transcultural Nursing |
|---|---|
| Week | 6 |
| Paper type | Cultural group analysis |
| Length | About 1,100 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | RN-to-BSN |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 394 Week 6
Somali Americans in the Minneapolis Area: A Cultural Group Analysis Written as Tendency, Not Rule
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 394: Transcultural Nursing
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Somali Americans in the Minneapolis Area: A Cultural Group Analysis Written as Tendency, Not Rule
Edges of the Group
This analysis concerns Somali Americans living in Hennepin County, Minnesota, which includes Minneapolis and holds one of the largest Somali communities in the United States. Most arrived as refugees after the collapse of the Somali government in 1991 and the civil war that followed, or are the children of those refugees born in Minnesota. The group is bounded by place, Hennepin County, and by origin, Somali heritage, and the analysis concentrates on families with young children because that is where the health issue discussed below is sharpest. Descriptions here apply to tendencies within that bounded group, not to every Somali American, and not to Somali communities elsewhere.
Variation Inside the Group
Before any general claims, the axes along which members of the group differ should be stated. Generation is the largest: parents who arrived as adults, often after years in refugee camps in Kenya or elsewhere, differ in language, education and experience of health care from their children raised and schooled in Minnesota. Time since arrival matters, since families who arrived in the 1990s have different networks and English fluency from those who arrived recently. Education and literacy vary widely; some parents are university-educated and others had little formal schooling because of war. Religious practice is widely shared, since the community is overwhelmingly Sunni Muslim, but observance varies. Gender shapes experience of the health system in specific ways, particularly for women seeking reproductive care. A nurse who meets a Somali American family should expect any of these to change what the family believes and needs.
Practices and Values Relevant to Care
Several tendencies are relevant to nursing care, each held with the variation above in mind. Faith is central for many families, and illness may be understood partly within a religious framework in which health and outcome are ultimately in God's hands, which does not prevent seeking medical care but can shape how risk is discussed. Modesty is important for many women, and a preference for female clinicians, especially for examinations and childbirth, is common. Families often make health decisions collectively, with husbands, elders or extended family involved. Oral communication and trusted community voices carry weight; information that comes through a respected person in the community may be more persuasive than a pamphlet. A qualitative study of Somali immigrant women's experiences with the health care system in Minnesota found discordant beliefs and expectations between women and clinicians, including different views of prevention, pregnancy care and the role of the doctor, and worries that women did not raise with their clinicians (Pavlish et al., 2010).
A Health Issue Where Culture and Information Met
The clearest recent example of culture, information and health interacting in this community is measles vaccination. According to the state's investigation, coverage with the first dose of measles, mumps and rubella vaccine among Somali children in Hennepin County had exceeded 90 percent in the mid-2000s but fell steeply after 2008, reaching 35.6 percent in 2014, in part because of fears that the vaccine caused autism, which were spread in the community through personal networks and visits by vaccine opponents (Hall et al., 2017). In the spring of 2017, a measles outbreak occurred in Minnesota; by the end of May there were 65 confirmed cases, 95 percent in unvaccinated people, and U.S.-born children of Somali descent accounted for 85 percent of cases (Hall et al., 2017).
The episode is often told as a story about misinformation, and it partly is. But it also shows the power of the community's own information networks, the concern for children's development in a community where autism was newly visible, and the loss of trust that can follow when clinicians do not engage those concerns directly. The public health response that followed relied heavily on Somali health workers, imams and community organizations, which suggests that the same networks that spread fear can also spread vaccination.
Other Health Concerns Families May Raise
Vaccination is not the only issue that matters in clinical encounters, and a nurse should be ready for others without assuming they apply to every family. Many adults in the first generation lived through war, displacement and years in refugee camps, and some carry the effects of trauma that may appear as sleep problems, physical pain or worry rather than as a request for mental health care; stigma around mental illness can make direct questions unwelcome, so gentle, specific questions about sleep and stress may open the subject more easily. Women's reproductive care raises questions of modesty and, for some, of prior genital cutting performed in childhood in Somalia, which a nurse in obstetrics should be prepared to discuss respectfully and without judgment if it affects care. Diet and fasting during Ramadan affect medication timing for people with diabetes or other chronic conditions. Each of these is a possibility to ask about, not a prediction.
What This Means for Nursing
For a nurse caring for Somali American families, three implications follow. First, asking rather than assuming is essential given the variation above: whether a mother wants a female clinician, who in the family should be part of decisions, and what she has heard about vaccines are all questions, not facts. Second, concerns about vaccines should be discussed openly and respectfully, with time given to the specific fear about autism, rather than dismissed; parents who feel heard are more likely to accept information. Third, partnering with trusted community members, such as Somali-speaking nurses, community health workers and religious leaders, extends the nurse's reach into networks where a clinic's message alone does not travel. Giger and Haddad (2021) describe communication and social organization as core domains of cultural assessment, and both are central here.
Limits of This Analysis
This analysis relies on published sources and a public health investigation rather than on the community's own voices, and it risks describing the group from outside. It also focuses on families with young children and on one health issue, which may overstate the place of vaccination controversy in the community's health as a whole. A fuller analysis would include interviews with community members, particularly younger adults raised in Minnesota, whose views on health may differ from those of their parents. Any nurse using this analysis should treat it as a starting point for questions, and should expect individual patients to depart from it.
References
Giger, J. N., & Haddad, L. (2021). Transcultural nursing: Assessment and intervention (8th ed.). Elsevier.
Hall, V., Banerjee, E., Kenyon, C., Strain, A., Griffith, J., Como-Sabetti, K., Heath, J., Bahta, L., Martin, K., McMahon, M., Johnson, D., Roddy, M., Dunn, D., & Ehresmann, K. (2017). Measles outbreak: Minnesota April-May 2017. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66(27), 713-717. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6627a1
Pavlish, C. L., Noor, S., & Brandt, J. (2010). Somali immigrant women and the American health care system: Discordant beliefs, divergent expectations, and silent worries. Social Science & Medicine, 71(2), 353-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.010
What the NR 394 Week 6 assignment asks for
Week 6 turns from one person to a cultural group and its health beliefs, practices and needs. Look for requirements covering a defined group, its history and demographics, health beliefs and practices, a health issue affecting the group, implications for nursing and scholarly sources in APA. Bound the group by place and origin so the description can be checked. State the variation inside it before any general claim. Write practices as tendencies, each tied to its relevance for care. Choose one health issue and support it with accurate figures from an official source. Interpret those figures in light of the community's values. Draw nursing implications that stress asking, and state the limits of your analysis.
How the NR 394 Week 6 example is put together
The first section places the group in Hennepin County, home to one of the largest Somali communities in the country, and notes refugee arrival. The variation section covers generation, from parents who arrived as adults after years in camps in Kenya to children raised in Minnesota, along with other axes. The practices section discusses faith, family decision-making and preferences for female clinicians as tendencies, citing Pavlish and colleagues. The health issue section uses Hall and colleagues' report on the measles outbreak and falling MMR coverage, and reads it as both misinformation and the strength of community networks. Other concerns are noted without assuming they apply to everyone. The last sections give three nursing implications and the analysis's limits.
NR 394 Week 6 rubric: what full points look like
Cultural group analysis rubrics generally award points for a well-defined group, accurate background, balanced description of beliefs and practices, analysis of a health issue, nursing implications, avoidance of stereotype, use of sources and APA. Avoiding stereotype counts most in this course, and the paper earns it by stating variation first and writing every practice as a tendency. Group definition is credited for bounding by place and origin. The health issue row scores through accurate figures from the state's investigation and an interpretation that respects community values. Implications earn points because they start from asking rather than assuming. Pavlish and colleagues, Hall and colleagues and Giger and Haddad support the analysis, and the limits section shows honesty.
NR 394 Week 6 help: mistakes that cost points
The costly error on this paper is the universal claim, a sentence that begins with the group's name and a verb, turning a tendency into a rule. Another loss is a group too large to define, which can only be described in generalities. Students also rely on dated sources, misquote public health figures or present a health issue only as ignorance. Implications that tell nurses what to expect from every member of the group repeat the stereotype the course warns about. Writing about your own cultural group is allowed if you keep the same care. If your assigned group is different, name it and the place, and an NR 394 group analysis can be bounded and written as tendencies.
Get a NR 394 Week 6 example written to your instructions
Send the assignment instructions, the rubric and the group you have chosen. We write a custom NR 394 Week 6 example to those requirements and return it inside 24-48h, with nothing charged for a first request. What comes back shows a population described without the description hardening into a verdict on anybody.
More NR 394 papers and RN-to-BSN samples
- NR 394 Week 1: Cultural Misreading Discussion Post
- NR 394 Week 2: Cultural Competence Self-Assessment
- NR 394 Week 3: Cultural Assessment Interview Write-Up
- NR 394 Week 4: Blood Refusal Transcultural Case
- NR 394 Week 5: Doing the Month Culture Care Plan
- NR 394 Week 7: Health Promotion Plan
- NR 394 Week 8: Reflection
- NR 395 Week 6: Trend Analysis
- NR 393 Week 6: Coronary Care Unit History Analysis
- NR 436 Week 6: Program Proposal
- NR 361 Week 6: Cycle Tracking Health App Review
NR 394 Week 6 questions, answered
How recent do the sources have to be?
Recent enough that the community described still resembles one you could meet. Many sections set a five year window on health literature and allow older work for foundational theory, which is a sensible default where nothing is specified. Population material ages quickly, because migration, generation and access all change what a group's care looks like inside a decade.
Can I write about my own cultural group?
Usually, and it produces a better paper than most, provided the sourcing standard does not slip. The risk is that insider knowledge arrives uncited and the analysis turns into memoir. Anything you know from living it still needs a citation beside it or a clear label saying it is your own observation, and the variation paragraph matters more here, not less.
Is a group analysis not the thing this course warns against?
The objection is to group description used as an assessment of a person, not to knowing anything about populations. Background reading tells you what to ask about and what to watch for. It never tells you what this patient thinks. Write the analysis as a set of questions worth asking, and the ending, where the description meets somebody real, does the rest.
Where can I find a free NR 394 Week 6 sample paper?
This page shows the full Week 6 analysis of Somali Americans in Hennepin County, with the group's edges, variation, practices as tendencies, the measles example, nursing implications, limits and three references.
How does the NR 394 Week 6 paper avoid stereotyping?
It states the variation inside the group first, by generation and other axes, and then writes each practice as a tendency tied to care, so nurses are directed to ask rather than assume.