This page holds a finished NR 395 Week 4 position paper, built around a single arguable claim, with the strongest objection stated fairly and answered before the conclusion. Searches like "nr 395 week 4 assignment example", "nr395 week 4 sample" and "nr 395 week 4 example" land here.
What a finished NR 395 Week 4 position paper looks like
A finished position paper looks like an argument, not a review of the literature with a preference at the end. The claim is visible on the first page and is phrased so that a competent nurse could disagree with it: mandatory influenza vaccination for staff, unrestricted family presence during resuscitation, refusal on grounds of conscience, mandatory overtime during a shortage. Evidence appears underneath the claim it supports instead of being pooled in a block at the front, so each source is doing a job that can be traced. About a quarter of the paper belongs to the other side, written well enough that a reader who holds that view would accept the summary. The conclusion restates the position with the concession still standing.
How a NR 395 Week 4 example is structured
The opening paragraph does two jobs and no more: it establishes that the question is genuinely open among nurses, and it states the writer's answer. Background comes next, kept short, because a position paper that spends three pages on context is buying time. The body then runs as reasons in descending order of strength, each under its own heading with the evidence attached, the strongest first rather than saved for a finish. The opposition section sits after them and is written in good faith, taking the argument a thoughtful opponent would make instead of the version that is easiest to knock down. The response follows immediately and concedes whatever is true in it. The conclusion says what the writer's own position costs and why it is still worth paying. Headings carry the sequence so the argument can be followed at a glance.
A claim with an opponent
The thesis passes one test: a competent nurse could hold the opposite view without being careless or cruel. Topics failing that test have nothing left to argue.
Reasons ordered by strength
The best reason leads. Saving it for the end assumes a reader who is still generous on page five, and rubrics in this course reward the argument that opens with weight.
The other side, at full strength
Written as its own advocate would write it. A summary the opposition would sign is worth more marks than three paragraphs demolishing an argument nobody makes.
Evidence doing visible work
Each study or guideline sits under the claim it supports, close enough that a reader can see which sentence would collapse if the source were removed.
A conclusion that pays
The last page names who is worse off under the writer's position and argues that the trade is still right. Ending on a softened thesis undoes the paper.
Where marks go in NR 395 Week 4
First and most expensive, a position nobody could oppose. Papers arguing that nurses should be ethical, or that patients deserve dignity, have chosen a topic with no other side and there is no argument left to grade. Second is the balanced paper, where the writer surveys both views generously and declines to choose, which reads as caution rather than analysis. Third is the straw opposition, summarized in one dismissive sentence, which costs more than omitting it. Fourth is evidence stacked before the reasoning, a paragraph of study findings with no claim attached. Fifth is the conclusion that quietly softens the thesis, ending on further research is needed after seven pages of commitment. Sixth, and cheap to avoid, is APA drift in a paper long enough for it to accumulate.
Get a NR 395 Week 4 example written to your instructions
Send the prompt, the rubric your classroom posts, your page count and the position you want argued. A custom example is written to those instructions and returned inside 24-48h, first one free. If you have not settled on a side yet, say so and the example will argue the one that has better nursing evidence behind it.
NR 395 Week 4 questions, answered
How do I know a topic is arguable enough?
Try to write the opposing paper in your head. If the best you can produce for the other side is negligence or indifference, the topic is not a position, it is a truism. Mandatory vaccination, conscience-based refusal, staffing ratios and family presence all pass, because thoughtful nurses land on both sides of each for reasons that are not embarrassing.
Can a position paper use first person?
Sections differ, and many allow it for the thesis statement while expecting the body to argue from evidence rather than preference. The safer construction is to state the position plainly and let the reasons carry it, so the paper does not depend on whose opinion it is. Check what your classroom asks, since some prompts explicitly permit first person throughout.
Where does the nursing code belong in a position paper?
Inside the reasoning, usually once or twice, at the point where a provision actually supports the contested step. Opening with a block quotation from the code is common and rarely earns anything, because the provisions are broad enough to be read both ways. The stronger move is to show why the provision favors your side and not the other.