NR 305 Week 2 Health History Write-Up Example

Health Assessment for the Practicing RN Chamberlain University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NR 305 Week 2 sample paper is a health history write-up for a 47-year-old line cook reporting six weeks of hoarseness. Chamberlain NR 305 (NR-305), Health Assessment for the Practicing RN, asks RN-to-BSN students to take and record a complete, purely subjective history from a volunteer. The paper states the source and reliability first, gives the reason for seeking care in her words, follows the present illness through onset, character, timing and associated symptoms without naming a cause, records past health, medications with doses, allergies with reactions, family history with ages, a full review of systems and functional patterns, and closes with a summary that points the examination where to look, citing Bickley, Ball and Jarvis.

CourseNR 305 Health Assessment for the Practicing RN
Week2
Paper typeHealth history write-up
LengthAbout 1,120 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolChamberlain University
ProgramRN-to-BSN
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NR 305 Week 2

1

Health History of a 47-Year-Old Line Cook Reporting Six Weeks of Hoarseness

Student Name

College of Nursing, Chamberlain University

NR 305: Health Assessment for the Practicing RN

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the person by age and occupation and the reason for seeking care, the details a history is organized around. The person is a composite volunteer; no identifying information is used. Student APA 7 format, no running head.
2

Health History of a 47-Year-Old Line Cook Reporting Six Weeks of Hoarseness

Biographical Data and Source

Person: Ms. R., a 47-year-old woman, cooks on the hot line of a busy restaurant, mostly evenings and weekends.

Source and reliability: Ms. R. herself, who agreed to the interview for this assignment. She answered readily, gave consistent dates and consulted her phone calendar for two of them. Everything below is her report; no examination or records were reviewed.

Setting: A private room at the writer's workplace, on a weekday afternoon, lasting about 50 minutes.

What this page is doingThe source and reliability of the history are stated first, and the record makes clear that everything in it is reported rather than observed. A health history is entirely subjective and must read that way.
3

Reason for Seeking Care

In Ms. R.'s words: My voice has been rough for six weeks and it is not coming back. By the end of a shift I can hardly call orders.

History of Present Illness

Ms. R. reports that her voice became hoarse about six weeks ago, after a cold that otherwise cleared within a week. She describes her voice as rough and breathy, better in the morning and worse by the end of an evening shift, when she has to shout orders over the kitchen noise and the hood fans. She rates the effort of speaking as 3 out of 10 in the morning and 7 out of 10 by midnight. She reports a constant urge to clear her throat and a feeling of a lump in her throat that does not interfere with swallowing. She reports heartburn two or three nights a week after eating her one main meal late, around midnight, and that she sometimes wakes with a sour taste. She reports no difficulty or pain with swallowing, no coughing up blood, no weight loss she has noticed and no lump in her neck that she can feel. Resting her voice on her two days off helps somewhat. She has tried throat lozenges and hot tea with honey, which soothe but do not change the hoarseness. She was a smoker between 18 and 35, about twenty cigarettes daily, and stopped 12 years ago. She is worried because a coworker's father had throat cancer. The account above follows the standard attributes of a symptom, from when and how it began through what makes it better or worse and how severe it is, as health assessment texts recommend for a presenting concern (Jarvis & Eckhardt, 2024).

What this page is doingThe present illness follows the symptom through onset, character, severity, timing, aggravating and relieving factors and associated symptoms, all attributed to the patient. The interviewer's conclusions are kept out; the record does not say anemia or hypothyroidism.
4

Past Health History

Childhood illnesses: Chickenpox as a child; she does not recall others.

Adult illnesses: High blood pressure diagnosed about five years ago, which she says is controlled. No asthma, diabetes or thyroid disease that she knows of.

Surgeries and hospitalizations: Appendectomy at about age 20; two vaginal births, at ages 24 and 28; no other hospital stays.

Injuries: A burn on her left forearm from a fryer about ten years ago, treated in an urgent care clinic.

Immunizations: She believes she had a tetanus shot after the burn and a flu shot two years ago; she does not know her other vaccinations.

Last screenings: She reports her last Pap test and mammogram were about four years ago and that she has not had a colonoscopy.

Medications and Allergies

Medications: Lisinopril 10 milligrams by mouth once daily; an over-the-counter antacid, chewable, two or three nights a week; no inhalers, supplements or herbal products.

Allergies: Sulfa antibiotics, which she says gave her a rash with hives in her twenties. She knows of no food or latex allergies.

Family History

Mother: Age 71, living, with high blood pressure and type 2 diabetes.

Father: Died in his late sixties after a heart attack, according to Ms. R.

Sister: Age 51, living, with acid reflux treated with a daily pill.

Brother: Age 44, living and well as far as she knows.

Children: Two sons, 23 and 19, both well.

She reports no known family history of head, neck or lung cancers.

Review of Systems

General: Tired after long shifts, which she attributes to her hours; no weight change that she has noticed; no fevers or night sweats.

Skin, hair and nails: No rashes or sores; small healed burn scars on both forearms from work.

Head, eyes, ears, nose, throat: Hoarseness, throat clearing and lump sensation as above; a stuffy nose most mornings; no ear pain, no sore throat, no mouth sores.

Respiratory: Occasional dry cough, worse in the kitchen; no shortness of breath, no wheezing, no blood in sputum.

Cardiovascular: No chest pain, no palpitations, no leg swelling.

Gastrointestinal: Heartburn and sour taste as above; no difficulty swallowing; regular bowel movements with no blood.

Genitourinary and reproductive: Regular menstrual periods; no urinary symptoms.

Musculoskeletal: Low back pain after long shifts, relieved by ibuprofen and rest.

Neurologic: No numbness, weakness, dizziness or changes in vision.

Psychiatric: She describes herself as stressed by work hours but denies feeling sad most days or losing interest in things she enjoys.

Endocrine: No heat or cold intolerance; no excessive thirst.

Hematologic: No easy bruising or swollen glands that she has noticed.

Functional Health and Lifestyle

Ms. R. reports sleeping about six hours on work nights, going to bed around 0100 after late shifts. She eats one main meal a day, usually around midnight after her shift, and lies down within an hour of eating. Her usual drinks are coffee, three or four cups daily, and a beer or two on her days off; her smoking history is described above. Her exercise is her work, which involves standing for eight to ten hours. She lives with her younger son and supports him financially. She has health insurance through her employer but says she avoids appointments because taking time off costs her wages. She identifies her main strength as her family and her main worry as being too tired to keep working the extra shift she needs.

Summary of the Reported History

The history records six weeks of persistent hoarseness following an upper respiratory infection in a 47-year-old woman whose work requires shouting over noise in a smoky kitchen, with reported throat clearing, a lump sensation without difficulty swallowing, frequent late-night heartburn, a former smoking history of about 17 pack-years and a worry about cancer. She reports no difficulty swallowing, no blood in sputum, no weight loss and no neck lump. The history points to where the physical examination should focus, including the head and neck, the lymph nodes of the neck, the mouth and throat and the lungs. Consistent with the approach to history taking described by Bickley et al. (2021) and Ball et al. (2023), no conclusions are drawn here: the history is the person's account, and interpretation belongs after the examination and any referral.

What this page is doingThe summary gathers what was reported and points to where the examination should look without drawing diagnostic conclusions. Keeping the interviewer's interpretation out of a subjective record is what the week grades.
5

References

Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2023). Seidel's guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (10th ed.). Elsevier.

Bickley, L. S., Szilagyi, P. G., Hoffman, R. M., & Soriano, R. P. (2021). Bates' guide to physical examination and history taking (13th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

Jarvis, C., & Eckhardt, A. (2024). Physical examination and health assessment (9th ed.). Elsevier.

The Chamberlain NR 305 Week 2 instructions

In Week 2 an RN-to-BSN student interviews a volunteer and turns the conversation into a complete written history. Expect the template to include biographical data and source, reason for seeking care, history of present illness, past health, medications and allergies, family history, review of systems and functional patterns. Everything in a history is reported, not observed, so it should read that way. State the source and how reliable it is. Record medications with doses and allergies with reactions. Give family members' ages and outcomes. Cover every functional area, including the uncomfortable ones like substances and safety. Keep your own interpretation out, and leave identifying details out of the document.

How this NR 305 Week 2 example is built

The write-up opens with Ms. R.'s age, job and the source and reliability of her report, noting that she checked dates on her phone. Her reason for seeking care appears in her own words. The present illness follows the hoarseness from a cold six weeks ago through its pattern, worse after evening shifts, with throat clearing and a lump sensation, without naming any cause. Past health is listed by category with dates. Medications include lisinopril 10 milligrams and an antacid. Family history gives ages and conditions for each relative. A full review of systems and functional patterns follow. The summary gathers what was reported and notes where examination should focus.

Reading the NR 305 Week 2 grading rubric

Health history rubrics usually reward completeness, accuracy and attribution, a well-developed present illness, organization, professional language and APA. Completeness carries a large share, and evenness matters: substances, safety and support get the same attention as surgeries. The present illness scores when it covers onset, character, severity, timing, modifying factors and associated symptoms. Attribution earns credit when the record clearly reports what she said rather than what the interviewer concluded. Medications and allergies are graded on doses and reactions. Organization follows the template order. A summary that points to the examination without diagnosing shows the scope expected of a subjective record. A history in which every line can be traced to the volunteer reads as complete and honest.

NR 305 Week 2 help from the desk

The heaviest loss is unevenness, with surgeries described at length and substance use cleared in a sentence. Interpretation smuggled into a subjective record, such as calling someone anxious instead of reporting what they said, costs points. Medications without doses, past health with no dates, blank fields where an estimate was available, family entries with no ages and identifying details all lose marks. Too many quotations turn a record into a transcript. Interview a friend or family member if your section allows, and explain the purpose first. When dates are uncertain, record an estimate and say so. Bring your interview notes and template, and an NR 305 history can be organized from them.

Get a NR 305 Week 2 example written to your instructions

Send the Week 2 instructions and the history template your section issues, along with the context you are working from, and a custom example is written into your own template and returned inside 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free. The interview itself stays yours to conduct.

More NR 305 papers and RN-to-BSN samples

NR 305 Week 2 questions, answered

Who am I supposed to interview?

Check the instructions, since many sections specify a consenting adult who is not a patient and some rule out immediate family. Whoever it is, obtaining consent is yours to do and nothing identifying goes into the submission. Send the parameters your section sets when you request an example, because a volunteer history and a patient history differ in what may be asked.

It feels strange asking a friend these questions.

It is, and the write-up shows exactly where the strangeness won. Interviewers who know the person tend to answer for them, skip what they assume they already know, and hurry the sections about substances or safety. Naming that difficulty where your section invites it reads as insight; letting it thin out the record costs marks.

What if they cannot remember a date?

Write the approximation and say it is one. An age at the time, or a phrase such as roughly ten years ago as reported, is accurate and usable. Blank fields and invented years are marked differently from each other and both worse than a hedge, and an approximation reads like the work of somebody who was actually in the room.

Where can I find a free NR 305 Week 2 sample paper?

The complete Week 2 health history for Ms. R., with her six weeks of hoarseness traced in her words and a full review of systems, is reproduced on this page.

Why does the NR 305 Week 2 history avoid naming a cause?

A health history is entirely subjective, so the record reports what Ms. R. said about her hoarseness and heartburn and leaves conclusions for after the examination.