| Course | NR 222 Health and Wellness |
|---|---|
| Week | 3 |
| Paper type | Family assessment |
| Length | About 1,120 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | BSN (pre-licensure) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 222 Week 3
Family Assessment: A Household With Two Teenagers, a Parent on Night Shifts and a Grandmother Ten Minutes Away, Read for Who Is Home at Six
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 222: Health and Wellness
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Family Assessment: A Household With Two Teenagers, a Parent on Night Shifts and a Grandmother Ten Minutes Away, Read for Who Is Home at Six
Who Lives There, and When
The Reed family agreed to be interviewed for this assessment; their names and some details have been changed. Four people live in the house, and a fifth is part of the household's daily running.
Dana, 41, is a respiratory therapist who works three 12-hour night shifts a week, usually Sunday, Monday and Wednesday, from 1900 to 0730. She sleeps from about 0830 to 1500 on the mornings after. Marcus, 43, is a heating and cooling technician who works 0700 to 1600 on weekdays and is on call one weekend a month. Jaylen, 15, is in tenth grade, plays basketball after school three days a week, and has asthma. Ava, 11, is in sixth grade and is picked up from school by her grandmother. Loretta, 68, Dana's mother, lives alone ten minutes away, is retired, and has type 2 diabetes. She picks Ava up at 1500 every weekday and keeps her until one of her parents is home.
The hour that matters most for this family's health is 1800. On Dana's work nights, she leaves at 1830, Marcus gets home at about 1630, Jaylen gets home from practice at 1745, and Ava comes home from her grandmother's at 1700. Dinner happens, or does not, in the hour between.
The Family Tree, Read Aloud
The three-generation family tree drawn for this assessment carries four health facts that matter to the current household. On Dana's side, a myocardial infarction killed her father at 58, and her mother, Loretta, was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes nine years ago and has told Dana her last A1C was "a little high." On Marcus's side, his father has high blood pressure and Marcus himself had asthma as a child. Jaylen's asthma therefore has a family history on his father's side, and both children have a grandparent with diabetes and a grandfather who died young of heart disease.
Read together, the tree says that this family's long-term risks are cardiovascular and metabolic, and that the habits being formed now, at the dinner table and in Jaylen's handling of his own asthma, are the ones that will matter most over the next twenty years.
Shared Machinery
The family has two vehicles: Dana's car and Marcus's work truck, which he cannot use for personal errands. On Dana's work nights, only Marcus's truck is at home after 1830, which is why Loretta, not Marcus, picks Ava up.
The kitchen can produce a full meal, but on weeknights it mostly produces what Marcus knows how to make: frozen lasagna, boxed macaroni, or takeout. Dana cooks on her nights off and on Sundays, when she also does the week's grocery shopping. Marcus said, "I can do the grill and that's about it."
Paid leave is uneven. Dana has paid sick time and vacation. Marcus has neither; a day off for a child's appointment is a day's lost wages. Loretta's time is free but not unlimited: she said she is "getting tired" of the daily pickups.
Developmental Stage, Put to Work
This is a family with adolescents, a stage in which a central task is shifting responsibility to the teenagers while staying connected to them. That task shows up directly in health. Jaylen is 15 and is expected to manage his own controller inhaler, but Dana said she does not know whether he takes it every day and that he used his rescue inhaler "a lot" during basketball last month. Ava, at 11, is old enough to help with simple cooking. The stage suggests that the right changes are ones the teenagers can own, not ones the parents do for them.
A Recommendation With an Owner
Hammons and Fiese (2011), reviewing studies of family meals, found that children and adolescents who shared family meals three or more times a week were more likely to be in a normal weight range and to have healthier eating patterns than those who shared fewer. The Reeds already eat together on Dana's nights off. The gap is her three work nights, when the meal is often takeout eaten at different times.
The first recommendation is specific and assigned. On Mondays and Wednesdays, Marcus and Jaylen will cook dinner together from one of four simple recipes Dana will choose and shop for on Sunday, and the family will eat at 1800 before Dana leaves. Jaylen agreed to this because, in his words, "I'm starving after practice anyway." Ava will set the table and help with one step. Sunday stays Dana's night to cook.
The second recommendation belongs to Jaylen. He will take his controller inhaler at breakfast, keep the inhaler next to his cereal bowl, and tell his mother on Sunday evenings how many times he used his rescue inhaler that week. If it was more than twice, Dana will book a visit with his pediatrician, on a day Marcus does not lose wages.
The third concerns Loretta. With her agreement, Ava will go to her grandmother's only three days a week, and Marcus will leave work at 1500 on Tuesdays and Thursdays, which his employer has allowed in exchange for on-call cover. Loretta has also agreed to take her glucose readings to her next appointment and to tell Dana what her A1C is, so the family is working from a number rather than "a little high."
What the Family Said It Would Not Change
Two things the family asked to keep, and the assessment respects both. Dana does not want to give up Sunday cooking, which she described as "the one thing that makes me feel like I'm running the house and not just visiting it." And Marcus does not want Jaylen's basketball practice cut back for homework or chores, because he sees it as the healthiest thing in his son's week, and he is probably right. The recommendations above were fitted around both.
The assessment also leaves out things it did not reach. It did not assess the family's finances beyond leave and transport, it did not include Loretta's own household, and it relies on each person's account of their habits rather than on records. A follow-up visit in six weeks would check whether the Monday and Wednesday dinners are happening, what Jaylen's Sunday inhaler reports show, and what Loretta's A1C turned out to be.
References
Hammons, A. J., & Fiese, B. H. (2011). Is frequency of shared family meals related to the nutritional health of children and adolescents? Pediatrics, 127(6), e1565-e1574. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1440
NR 222 Week 3 instructions, in plain terms
The Week 3 assignment asks you to assess a family, usually through an interview, using a framework your section names, such as a family assessment model with structural, developmental and functional parts. Expect to describe who is in the family, draw or describe a genogram, identify strengths and risks and make recommendations. Plan on a few APA pages supported by a scholarly article, with every family name changed. The instructions reward recommendations that fit the family's real resources. Developmental stage should be applied to the household, not copied from a textbook. Respect what the family says it will and will not do, and state what the assessment could not cover.
How this NR 222 Week 3 example is built
The opening introduces four household members and a grandmother nearby, each with age, job and hours, and fixes 1800 as the hour that matters. The family tree section reads a father's heart attack at 58 and a grandmother's diabetes as long-term risks. Shared resources are counted: a work truck that cannot run errands, weeknight meals Marcus can make, and leave only one parent has. The adolescent stage is applied to Jaylen managing his own controller inhaler. Recommendations follow Hammons and Fiese (2011): two cooked dinners a week by Marcus and Jaylen, an inhaler beside the cereal bowl, and fewer pickups for Loretta. The close lists what the family kept.
Reading the NR 222 Week 3 grading rubric
Family assessment rubrics usually reward a complete description of family structure, analysis of strengths and risks, application of a developmental stage, realistic recommendations, use of evidence and APA. Recommendations carry a large share, and this sample gives each one an owner, a day and a reason the family can sustain it. The genogram row is earned only when the tree is interpreted, so the paper says what the cardiac and diabetes history means now. Developmental analysis scores when it is tied to a real task, such as the inhaler. Evidence on shared meals supports the first recommendation directly. Stating what the assessment left out helps with critical thinking criteria. A paper that respects the family's refusals also shows the partnership these criteria look for.
NR 222 Week 3 help from the desk
The heaviest loss is a recommendation addressed to nobody, such as eat together more often, with no shopper and no evening named. Many papers draw a family tree and never say what it means. Others call the family supportive and communicative without evidence. Developmental stage pasted from a textbook earns little. Assessing one person and calling it a family misses the assignment, and leaving money out entirely ignores a major resource. If you use a composite family, say so and keep the details consistent. Pass along your interview notes and your section's framework, and a custom NR 222 family paper can be written from them. Keep every name changed, including the grandparent's.
Get a NR 222 Week 3 example written to your instructions
Send the instructions or rubric from your own classroom and a custom example is written to them and returned inside 24-48h, free the first time. Where the assignment requires a signed permission form from the household you write about, obtaining that form is your part of the work, and the sample is built to sit behind it rather than to replace it.
More NR 222 papers and pre-licensure samples
- NR 222 Week 1: What Is Health? Discussion Post
- NR 222 Week 2: Wellness Self-Assessment
- NR 222 Week 4: Cultural Assessment
- NR 222 Week 5: Teaching Plan
- NR 222 Week 6: Community Resource Brief
- NR 222 Week 7: Health Promotion Project
- NR 222 Week 8: Reflection
- NR 224 Week 3: Procedure Rationale
- NR 103 Week 3: RN Role and Delegation Paper
- NR 226 Week 3: Nursing Diagnosis Exercise
- NR 452 Week 3: Literature Matrix
NR 222 Week 3 questions, answered
Does it have to be a real family?
Many sections encourage a real one and the writing is better for it, because you already know who has the car and what the argument about salt sounds like. Strip out names and anything identifying, keep the specifics that shape health, and check what your classroom requires by way of permission before you begin collecting anything from them.
What counts as a family here?
Whoever shares the arrangements. Roommates who split a rent and a fridge, a grandparent raising two children, a couple with an adult son who moved back, an unrelated household of four all cover the same ground. What the assessment needs is shared constraints and shared decisions, not a particular legal shape, and saying which shape yours is takes one sentence.
How much money detail is appropriate?
Enough that a reader can tell whether your recommendation is affordable, and no bank statements. Whether anybody has paid leave, whether a co-pay is a real obstacle, whether transport costs a fare each way: these change what can be proposed. Leaving money out altogether is the more common error, and it produces plans that quietly assume a budget nobody in the house has.
Where can I find a free NR 222 Week 3 sample paper?
The complete Week 3 family assessment of the Reed household, with the family tree, shared resources and three assigned recommendations, is reproduced further down this page.
Which study supports the NR 222 Week 3 family meal plan?
It cites Hammons and Fiese's 2011 Pediatrics review, which found that children sharing family meals three or more times a week were more likely to have a normal weight and healthier eating.