| Course | NR 222 Health and Wellness |
|---|---|
| Week | 7 |
| Paper type | Health promotion project |
| Length | About 1,150 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Chamberlain University |
| Program | BSN (pre-licensure) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NR 222 Week 7
Health Promotion Project: Healthy People 2030 Objective SH-03 Narrowed to Nine Overnight Grocery Stockers and Their Daytime Sleep
Student Name
College of Nursing, Chamberlain University
NR 222: Health and Wellness
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Health Promotion Project: Healthy People 2030 Objective SH-03 Narrowed to Nine Overnight Grocery Stockers and Their Daytime Sleep
The Objective, Cited Straight
The project is built on Healthy People 2030 objective SH-03: "Increase the proportion of adults who get enough sleep." The objective's baseline was 72.3% of adults aged 18 and over getting sufficient sleep in 2020, the national target is 73.3%, the data come from the National Health Interview Survey, and the objective is currently listed as getting worse, with the most recent figure, from 2024, at 69.5% (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion [ODPHP], n.d.). I use only those figures from the objective. The project does not claim to move a national number; it asks what the objective means for one small group.
The Visible Narrowing Step
The narrowing goes in three steps. From all adults, to adults who work nights, because shift work makes sufficient sleep much harder to achieve: The review by Wickwire et al. (2017) links shift work to a long list of health effects, from cognitive complaints to cancer, and describes a circadian sleep disorder that a sizable share of shift workers develop. From night workers in general, to the nine people on the overnight stocking crew at one grocery store, whom I met in Week 5, whose shifts start at ten at night and end at half past six, and who told me most of them get only five or six hours after a shift. And from their sleep in general, to their daytime sleep on work days, since that is the part of their week they can change and the part the Week 5 session began to address.
The crew's hours, money and beliefs come with them from the earlier work. None of them controls their shift times. Two are parents who sleep in two blocks around school runs. Most use energy drinks in the last hours of the shift. Money is tight, so nothing in the project can cost more than a few dollars. And the crew's shared belief is that tiredness is "just the job," which the project has to work with rather than argue against.
Level of Prevention, Declared
This is a primary prevention project. It aims to reduce sleep loss, and the fatigue that follows it, before it causes harm, such as a drowsy drive home or a workplace injury. It does not diagnose or treat shift work disorder, which would be secondary or tertiary prevention and belongs with a clinician. The one place the project touches secondary prevention is a single line on every card telling anyone who has nodded off while driving to see a doctor; that line is a referral, not a treatment.
Interventions With Days and Objects
Week 1, Tuesday 0300, break room: the 15-minute session from Week 5, with foil, a sleep mask, sunglasses and an energy drink can as the four objects, and a choice card for each person.
Week 1, Wednesday: a "dark kit" left in the break room for anyone to take: a roll of aluminum foil and masking tape, paid for by the store manager at about $20 for the crew.
Weeks 1 to 4, every night: a sign above the energy drink shelf in the break room refrigerator: "Last caffeine by 0200 means deeper sleep by 0800," in English and Spanish.
Week 2, Tuesday 0300: a five-minute check-in at break, in which I ask who kept their card's change and what got in the way.
Week 4, Tuesday 0300: a second five-minute check-in and a repeat of the cards for anyone who wants to choose a new change.
Barriers Matched One to One
Each barrier the crew named has a matching part of the plan. Cost is met by the dark kit and by choosing changes that cost nothing, such as caffeine timing. Lack of control over hours is met by focusing on what happens after the shift, not on the shift itself. The parents' split sleep is met by offering the dark room and sunglasses, which help both blocks of sleep, rather than advice about sleeping in one long stretch. Language is met by bilingual cards and sign, and by Luis repeating each point in Spanish. The belief that tiredness is just the job is met by never describing their sleep as a problem they caused, and by letting them choose the change rather than prescribing it.
Who Carries It After Week 4
A project that ends when the student leaves has promoted nothing, so each part has an owner who stays. The store manager owns the dark kit and has agreed to restock it when it runs out, at a cost small enough to come out of the break room budget. Luis owns the sign, which he will replace if it is torn down, and the energy drink count, which he agreed to repeat once a month for three months so the crew can see whether the change holds. The night lead owns the choice cards and will offer them to new hires in their first week, since new overnight workers are the ones who have not yet built habits around daytime sleep.
My own part ends at Week 4. I will leave the crew with a one-page summary of what they chose and what the counts showed, written in plain English and Spanish, and I will tell them honestly that the project could not measure whether they sleep more, only whether they did the things that usually help. If the counts show nothing changed, that is useful too, and the summary will say so.
Evaluation by Observation
The evaluation measures what can be observed, not what the crew says they intend. First, the number of dark kit rolls taken from the break room over four weeks, counted by the night lead. Second, the number of energy drinks in the break room trash after 0200 on four sample nights in Week 1 and Week 4, counted by Luis, who agreed to do it and to tell the crew he was doing it. Third, at the Week 4 check-in, a show of hands for who has kept a change for at least two weeks, which is self-report but in front of coworkers who would notice an obvious untruth.
The project will be judged a success if at least five of the nine crew members report keeping one change at Week 4 and the count of late energy drinks falls. It does not claim to measure sleep hours, which would need diaries or trackers the crew did not want to use. That is the most important limit of the evaluation: it measures behaviors that should improve sleep, not sleep itself.
References
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.). Increase the proportion of adults who get enough sleep: SH-03. Healthy People 2030. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/sleep/increase-proportion-adults-who-get-enough-sleep-sh-03
Wickwire, E. M., Geiger-Brown, J., Scharf, S. M., & Drake, C. L. (2017). Shift work and shift work sleep disorder: Clinical and organizational perspectives. Chest, 151(5), 1156-1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.12.007
NR 222 Week 7 instructions, in plain terms
The Week 7 project asks you to select a Healthy People 2030 objective, apply it to a specific population and design a health promotion plan. Expect the instructions to ask for the objective with its data, the population, the level of prevention, interventions, barriers, resources and an evaluation plan. A longer APA paper with several sources is typical. Strong projects narrow the objective clearly to one group and carry forward what earlier assessments found. Interventions should have content, timing and materials, not just the word education. The level of prevention you declare must match what the activities actually do. Evaluation should measure something observable within the project's time frame.
How this NR 222 Week 7 example is built
The project opens by quoting SH-03 with its 72.3 percent baseline and 73.3 percent target. The narrowing section moves from all adults to night workers, citing Wickwire et al. (2017), and then to one crew with their hours, money and beliefs carried forward. The prevention level is declared primary and kept separate from treating shift work disorder. Interventions are listed by week and day: the 0300 session, a $20 dark kit, a bilingual sign on the refrigerator and two check-ins. Barriers are matched to plan parts. Owners are named for after Week 4. Evaluation counts foil rolls and late energy drink cans, and states what it cannot measure.
NR 222 Week 7 rubric: what full points look like
Health promotion project rubrics usually grade the objective and data, the population analysis, the fit of the prevention level, the interventions, sustainability, evaluation and APA. The largest marks go to interventions and evaluation, so each activity has a day and an object, and each measure can be counted by someone on site. The objective row requires accurate figures, cited from the Healthy People page. Population analysis earns credit when the narrowing is shown step by step. Declaring primary prevention and keeping every activity preventive protects the consistency criterion. Naming who carries the work after the student leaves meets the sustainability row that many sections include. Accurate APA entries for government pages finish the grade.
Common NR 222 Week 7 mistakes, and how to avoid them
The worst projects stay national, describing the objective for pages without ever reaching a person. Another frequent loss is declaring primary prevention and then planning treatment. Education promised with nothing said about content earns little. Evaluation written as increased awareness cannot be measured. Invented percentages attached to a real objective are easy to catch. Budgets that assume money the group does not have look careless. If you are unsure which objective to use, choose the one your earlier assessments pointed toward. Send your chosen objective and group with your earlier papers, and a project can be drafted that carries their findings forward. Keep the counts honest even when they are small.
Get a NR 222 Week 7 example written to your instructions
Send your project instructions or rubric and a custom example is written to them and returned inside 24-48h, the first one free. If your section assigns the objective, requires a particular number of interventions, or expects a presentation file alongside the paper, tell us and the example is built to fit rather than trimmed to fit later.
More NR 222 papers and pre-licensure samples
- NR 222 Week 1: What Is Health? Discussion Post
- NR 222 Week 2: Wellness Self-Assessment
- NR 222 Week 3: Family Assessment Paper
- NR 222 Week 4: Cultural Assessment Paper
- NR 222 Week 5: Shift Worker Sleep Teaching Plan
- NR 222 Week 6: Community Resource Brief
- NR 222 Week 8: Reflection
- NR 224 Week 7: Charting Exercise
- NR 103 Week 7: Academic Integrity Case Response
- NR 226 Week 7: Discharge Teaching Plan
- NR 452 Week 7: Evaluation Plan
NR 222 Week 7 questions, answered
Can the project be for one person?
In most sections yes, and it usually produces the stronger paper, because a plan for one person can be specific about hours, money and transport in a way a plan for a general audience cannot. Check what your prompt says about scope. If a small group is required, keep the group small enough that you could still name what each member would have to do.
How do I pick which objective to use?
Work upward from your assessment rather than downward from the published list. Something in the earlier weeks pointed at a gap, whether a screening never done, a safety item absent from a home, or a habit with a real risk attached. Find the objective covering that gap and the narrowing paragraph writes itself, because the connection was there before you went looking.
What makes evaluation acceptable here?
Somebody has to be able to look at something and answer yes or no. An appointment made or not made, a device installed or not installed, a count over a fortnight, a demonstration performed correctly. Increased knowledge and improved attitude are not observations. If the only way to evaluate is to ask whether the person feels better informed, the intervention was probably too vague.
Where can I find a free NR 222 Week 7 sample paper?
The complete Week 7 health promotion project on objective SH-03 and nine overnight stockers, with dated interventions and the count-based evaluation, is shown in full here.
How does the NR 222 Week 7 project evaluate success?
It counts dark kit rolls taken and late-night energy drink cans in the break room trash, and asks whether at least five of nine workers kept one change by Week 4.